Lucifron vs Spades - YOU WIN! - Page 4
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
ROOTCatZ
Peru1226 Posts
| ||
cybertopo
Spain525 Posts
On May 27 2012 07:47 Catatonic wrote: Bad (Spades) vs Overrated (Lucifron) guess I've no one to root for here How do you define overrated? Lucifron hasn't played that much but 4-0ing Thorzain is no small feat. | ||
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
Benj0
United Kingdom3 Posts
spades 4-0 | ||
Toxi78
966 Posts
On May 25 2012 08:36 Martijn wrote: I'm not calling it either way, but if Spades wins this I'm going to have a field day with some of the quotes here. You can say a lot of things about Luci, but even in beta, he was and still is never consistent. I have masses of respect for the guy, but I would never bet on the shape of the day he's in. it's like the worst insight ever. yea never consistent cause sometimes HE JUST DOESN'T play. very smart!!!! but when he is back being active, lucifron is for sure one of the most consistent EU players. he never "sucks", he always delivers. and right now, he is in that shape. and there is no such thing as "shape of the day" with luci lol, where did you get this idea? | ||
SeriouR
Spain622 Posts
| ||
Xoronius
Germany6362 Posts
Btw.: 4 guys with 1 post posting one-liners about Spades winning? | ||
Siika
United Kingdom17 Posts
| ||
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
On May 28 2012 20:49 Benj0 wrote: Should be a good game to watch spades 4-0 spades 4-0? are you serious? i mean spades is not bad but i doubt that he is going to take more than one map vs lucifron actually. | ||
Martijn
Netherlands1219 Posts
On May 28 2012 21:19 Toxi78 wrote: it's like the worst insight ever. yea never consistent cause sometimes HE JUST DOESN'T play. very smart!!!! but when he is back being active, lucifron is for sure one of the most consistent EU players. he never "sucks", he always delivers. and right now, he is in that shape. and there is no such thing as "shape of the day" with luci lol, where did you get this idea? First off, because periods of inactivity don't hurt your game? Think about what you're saying. Second, that has nothing to do with performing amazingly 1 day and struggling the next. No one said he "sucks", there's no need to overreact. He's a great player, and he's most certainly not the only one that has off days. Relax, adding 4 exclamation marks is not going to do anything to make your argument more convincing. I'm fully capable and willing to have a discussion here. 1 match and 1 tournament is what most people are basing their statements on. This isn't something you're going to see in a tournament because if you have a good day, you thrash through and look great. If you have a bad day on the other hand, you're out in 2 matches and no one sees a trend. Go watch his stream regularly. Honestly, he's lucky because a lot of great players have far bigger problems and he can still put on the hurt on a lot of players even on an off day. | ||
ROOTCatZ
Peru1226 Posts
On May 28 2012 21:55 Xoronius wrote: Anything other than Lucifronn winning convincingly would be a huge upset. Should be a 4-0/4-1. Btw.: 4 guys with 1 post posting one-liners about Spades winning? I got a feeling all 5 of those guys have the same ip, must be some diehard spades fan | ||
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
| ||
WesternWolves
Belgium89 Posts
http://www.twitch.tv/kingspades | ||
SaGGi
Slovenia1 Post
| ||
Lyter
United Kingdom2145 Posts
| ||
WesternWolves
Belgium89 Posts
On May 28 2012 11:47 LuckyFool wrote: I want that hard drive. Make sure to share the giveaway to your friends! The more interest we get, the better are the chances of organizing similar things in the future. | ||
Toxi78
966 Posts
On May 29 2012 00:25 Martijn wrote: First off, because periods of inactivity don't hurt your game? Think about what you're saying. Second, that has nothing to do with performing amazingly 1 day and struggling the next. No one said he "sucks", there's no need to overreact. He's a great player, and he's most certainly not the only one that has off days. Relax, adding 4 exclamation marks is not going to do anything to make your argument more convincing. I'm fully capable and willing to have a discussion here. 1 match and 1 tournament is what most people are basing their statements on. This isn't something you're going to see in a tournament because if you have a good day, you thrash through and look great. If you have a bad day on the other hand, you're out in 2 matches and no one sees a trend. Go watch his stream regularly. Honestly, he's lucky because a lot of great players have far bigger problems and he can still put on the hurt on a lot of players even on an off day. yea 4 exclamation marks, you clearly understand irony. awesome discussion we're about to have. it would be relevant to talk about his inconsistency because of being inactive if he had actually been inactive lately? it's not the case, why do you even bring that up? yea lucifron also was a nooby when he had never touched sc2, because you know, he had never played. what is your point? he is not inactive, you just can't talk about that to his discredit. the very idea of "sucking" means performing under your level, that's what i was refering to.you wanna play the annoying game, let's go for that, where did i say someone said he sucks? still, lucifron is not one of these players to have off days, it makes no sense to keep saying that. he is not like, say, mana, whose shape is highly unpredictable from tournament to tournament. luci has the experience at the highest level (wc3, sc2 top since BETA) that does justify the fact that he is actually a very consistent player lol. it's like you add a characteristic to a player that really doesnt have any grounds. and im not even a fanboy (i'm a friend of alastor so clearly i root against the brothers, no hard feelings at all though), it's just that it's from threads like these that people get wrong ideas and start spreading stupid ideas in the next livereport thread where luci is going to play. | ||
imCookies
United States82 Posts
Hopefully these TvTs show some interesting/new playstyles. | ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
On May 29 2012 10:06 Toxi78 wrote: yea 4 exclamation marks, you clearly understand irony. awesome discussion we're about to have. it would be relevant to talk about his inconsistency because of being inactive if he had actually been inactive lately? it's not the case, why do you even bring that up? yea lucifron also was a nooby when he had never touched sc2, because you know, he had never played. what is your point? he is not inactive, you just can't talk about that to his discredit. the very idea of "sucking" means performing under your level, that's what i was refering to.you wanna play the annoying game, let's go for that, where did i say someone said he sucks? still, lucifron is not one of these players to have off days, it makes no sense to keep saying that. he is not like, say, mana, whose shape is highly unpredictable from tournament to tournament. luci has the experience at the highest level (wc3, sc2 top since BETA) that does justify the fact that he is actually a very consistent player lol. it's like you add a characteristic to a player that really doesnt have any grounds. and im not even a fanboy (i'm a friend of alastor so clearly i root against the brothers, no hard feelings at all though), it's just that it's from threads like these that people get wrong ideas and start spreading stupid ideas in the next livereport thread where luci is going to play. I wouldn't bother :p lucifron has been in superb form ever since he's become active again. As you said, it's hard to be consistent when you're not actually playing! Was watching his stream last night and he was crushing Dimaga and white ra multiple times, great player! | ||
Martijn
Netherlands1219 Posts
On May 29 2012 10:06 Toxi78 wrote: yea 4 exclamation marks, you clearly understand irony. awesome discussion we're about to have. it would be relevant to talk about his inconsistency because of being inactive if he had actually been inactive lately? it's not the case, why do you even bring that up? yea lucifron also was a nooby when he had never touched sc2, because you know, he had never played. what is your point? he is not inactive, you just can't talk about thaot to his discredit. the very idea of "sucking" means performing under your level, that's what i was refering to.you wanna play the annoying game, let's go for that, where did i say someone said he sucks? still, lucifron is not one of these players to have off days, it makes no sense to keep saying that. he is not like, say, mana, whose shape is highly unpredictable from tournament to tournament. luci has the experience at the highest level (wc3, sc2 top since BETA) that does justify the fact that he is actually a very consistent player lol. it's like you add a characteristic to a player that really doesnt have any grounds. and im not even a fanboy (i'm a friend of alastor so clearly i root against the brothers, no hard feelings at all though), it's just that it's from threads like these that people get wrong ideas and start spreading stupid ideas in the next livereport thread where luci is going to play. Uh, you're the one that brought up inactivity, not me. You're completely off about mana too ironically, mana's problem is that he is way too matchup dependent. Show me any tournaments luci has won back. First time I met luci was DH where he disappointed ( most of all disappointed himself). Luci is in the best shape he has been, I'm completely with you that he is in peak condition. He has simply had this trait even as far back as release and his mentality at least doesn't come off as very different. We're talking about an rts legend here, but even they have some faults. | ||
| ||