[GSL] 2012 Jan Code S RO32 D3 - Page 57
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Let's have a nice clean LR thread folks! Beware that moderation will probably be stricter than usual, balance whine, player bashing and trolling will not be tolerated! | ||
spree
United States86 Posts
| ||
MR KING
Sweden145 Posts
| ||
AgentComet
United States39 Posts
| ||
nokz88
Brazil1253 Posts
| ||
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
| ||
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
that flying shark needs to go. too powerful. | ||
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
Cool. | ||
Polygamy
Austria1114 Posts
| ||
blacklist_member
Australia318 Posts
| ||
Proko
United States1022 Posts
| ||
Blaec
Australia4289 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:48 Jehct wrote: Seems like Lucky played that wrong and the concept could work. Instead of trying to get 3 bases and then repeatedly attack, it seems like you could play super greedy behind that composition and attack as soon as the terran tries to move out, being really cost-effective. Attacking into a sick position like that doesn't seem good though =/ I suppose if you are able to keep trading efficiently, but I can't see you being able to counter attack very well once you wipe their army because all your banes will be gone and the roaches are too easily defended against. | ||
hysterial
United States2044 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:49 Focuspants wrote: he should have split his overlords and come in with half from the front and half from the back to sandwich MVP in. That woulda been cool. Yes, people saying this strat is bad are crazy. The difference in skill seemed to play a big part in the efficacy of this particular strat. | ||
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
| ||
MH_Gunner
200 Posts
| ||
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:50 nunez wrote: that flying shark needs to go. too powerful. Flying Shark imba, nerf now. | ||
TheBanana
Norway2183 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:48 chipmonklord17 wrote: I want the normal version of life is beautiful dammit >:O I said the exact same thing out loud, only in Norwegian | ||
Yang Wenli
United States2283 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:48 Jehct wrote: Seems like Lucky played that wrong and the concept could work. Instead of trying to get 3 bases and then repeatedly attack, it seems like you could play super greedy behind that composition and attack as soon as the terran tries to move out, being really cost-effective. Attacking into a sick position like that doesn't seem good though =/ Would have helped if Lucky realized that stim marines can kite faster than overlord drops. All those banelings that were dropped had more distance to cover to try to kill the marines. Splitting overlords to flank both sides would have crushed the army. | ||
Weemoed
Netherlands741 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:50 Polygamy wrote: This music is really bad, the explanation of why they chose it some how makes it worse. At least it isn't k-pop. | ||
hypnossc2
144 Posts
On January 11 2012 18:50 Polygamy wrote: This music is really bad, the explanation of why they chose it some how makes it worse. what? very good music | ||
RaiKageRyu
Canada4773 Posts
| ||
| ||