|
The following is a list of behaviors that will get immediate bans:
1. Whining about stream
2. Bashing other games
3. Flaming other users
4. Bashing players
5. Complaining about imbalance
Basically just be respectful. Aside from that, enjoy the games, make sure you bring an umbrella and have some delicious waffles! (#) |
On August 28 2011 11:48 Condor Hero wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote:
I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually.
so is JF, everybody just forgot about him though 
|
United States97276 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:48 Condor Hero wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote:
I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually.
fucking boss + sc1 love. works for a lot of players
|
On August 28 2011 11:47 Yaotzin wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote:
If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh It's because it died out as a non-allin opener. Other than that MVP game virtually no one opens 1/1/1 unless they're intending to do the infamous allin. It's certainly an allin - just an incredibly strong one so it has no chance of not doing severe damage.
MVP did not open 1/1/1.................
|
On August 28 2011 11:49 snafoo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:47 Yaotzin wrote:On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote:
If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh It's because it died out as a non-allin opener. Other than that MVP game virtually no one opens 1/1/1 unless they're intending to do the infamous allin. It's certainly an allin - just an incredibly strong one so it has no chance of not doing severe damage. MVP did not open 1/1/1.................
Yes he did
|
On August 28 2011 11:39 Serpico wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:37 GrungyMunchy wrote:On August 28 2011 11:21 Serpico wrote:On August 28 2011 11:20 Ghostfoot wrote:On August 28 2011 11:14 Serpico wrote:On August 28 2011 11:14 Ghostfoot wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote:
If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? No, he just doesn't want to lose his fanbase. He has a moronic fanbase if they DONT want him to use the best builds possible. How do you make more fans when you use the same debate-ably OP every TvP? I know that hasn't been his best match-up but hell, that's like saying do you want to just all-in your way to the top? If Mvp abused that build, I would honestly stop watching him so much. You'd be a fan of watching someone not trying as hard to win I guess. Yes, because being a fan of the winning players just because they win isn't totally what little kids do. In fact you're right, I think being a fan means to stop being a fan when your favourite players loses. *facepalm* You're completely missing the point, congrats. If you're already a MVP fan before the 1/1/1 started the balance crying recently you still should be even if he abused it /facepalm.
No. Unlike you, EG bitch, I don't follow players blindly, I follow players that play in a way I like. If a player I like starts playing in a way I don't like, I'm not his fan anymore.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Haypro bonjovi will win his next 10 bo3's, I'm sure. Haypro fighting.
|
On August 28 2011 11:49 ReignFayth wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:48 Condor Hero wrote:On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote:
I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually. so is JF, everybody just forgot about him though
JF stopped being a pro-gamer. Tyler didn't.
Plus, Tyler is a boss IRL
|
On August 28 2011 11:49 ReignFayth wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:48 Condor Hero wrote:On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote:
I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually. so is JF, everybody just forgot about him though
eh I've been a fan since TSL1 then after his heroic run through TSL2, I'm fanatic for life.
|
On August 28 2011 11:50 ffadicted wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:49 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:47 Yaotzin wrote:On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote:
If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh It's because it died out as a non-allin opener. Other than that MVP game virtually no one opens 1/1/1 unless they're intending to do the infamous allin. It's certainly an allin - just an incredibly strong one so it has no chance of not doing severe damage. MVP did not open 1/1/1................. Yes he did
i didn't know FE's were 1/1/1's now.
|
|
|
Nony mass phoenix style is back!
|
|
|
On August 28 2011 11:49 snafoo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:47 Yaotzin wrote:On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote:
If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh It's because it died out as a non-allin opener. Other than that MVP game virtually no one opens 1/1/1 unless they're intending to do the infamous allin. It's certainly an allin - just an incredibly strong one so it has no chance of not doing severe damage. MVP did not open 1/1/1.................
Well he put an expo in it but IIRC 1/1/1 were his first 3 production buildings. Anywho, rest applies. No one really opens like that anymore unless they're intending to allin so the name stuck.
|
Tyler needs to transition. Just too many Phoenix.
|
|
|
Hahahah Day9 'whether good or bad, it definitely makes him sweet'
|
I think we're gonna see some Phoenix/Charge Zealot into some HT, this should be cool
|
On August 28 2011 11:51 holy_war wrote:
So many phoenixes.
"old" nony style. 
|
|
|
Infestation pit, TY HAYPRO
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
