EPTOn August 28 2011 11:44 Xxavi wrote:
Is Huk out now?
Is Huk out now?
Not at all
MLG Raleigh Day 2 RED Live Report Thread - Page 495
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
The following is a list of behaviors that will get immediate bans: 1. Whining about stream 2. Bashing other games 3. Flaming other users 4. Bashing players 5. Complaining about imbalance Basically just be respectful. Aside from that, enjoy the games, make sure you bring an umbrella and have some delicious waffles! (#) | ||
|
Yaki
France4234 Posts
Not at all | ||
|
soulist
United States932 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:43 Condor Hero wrote: that cant be, it took tyler two bad MLGs to get out of pools and geoff is poised to have another bad one. youd have to calculate the points after this MLG. That's cause tyler did terrible in all of his mlgs while incontrol got 4th in one. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2011_MLG_Pro_Circuit/Rankings I'm right. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote: No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh | ||
|
Torpedo.Vegas
United States1890 Posts
2nd place in pool D, 3rd place in Pool C, tied for 2nd place in pool A are all Canadeese 3rd place in pool B and tied for 2nd place in pool A are Sweded individuals. I think Sweden should partner with Canada and make a new team called.....*drum-rollll*..... | ||
|
thewax
Austria365 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 ZaxbyCof wrote: Has Incontrol won a game this tourney? anyone know? nope, 0-10. Anaheim was the same as i recall | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 tdt wrote: Hopefully we have power? Husky is getting tired. they got a hurricane there hey | ||
|
Coolhwip
Sweden1381 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote: I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. | ||
|
Stress
United States980 Posts
| ||
|
HinagikUx
United States178 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 rave[wcr] wrote: i dont get it. howcome dongraegu is above select right now? both are 4-1 with select having 8-2 to drg's 8-3. select was placed on the winners bracket earlier too. why did they change this??? i think its b/c drg beat select. not sure though. | ||
|
Yaki
France4234 Posts
| ||
|
wats0n
United States509 Posts
| ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 ZaxbyCof wrote: Has Incontrol won a game this tourney? anyone know? Nope, 0-10 in games. | ||
|
Bagljash
Serbia10 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 garlicface wrote: I think his 4th place inflated his points, so he really can't fall too far down the ladder. I need to look at a proper spreadsheet though. Also look who is earning all the points in the last few MLGs. MMA, MVP, Losira, etc... They dont come back to take their seeds. Players arent earning as many points as before the GSL exchange program. It is harder for players to gain ground when the top ranked players from previous MLGs dont return | ||
|
ffadicted
United States3545 Posts
| ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 Xxavi wrote: Is Huk out now? no, he's in the loser's bracket, and he might have a teamkill match vs IdrA tomorrow. | ||
|
0ne
Spain2464 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:44 ZaxbyCof wrote: Has Incontrol won a game this tourney? anyone know? Not yet tt. He has to play drewbie now. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote: 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh no just no, allins have existed for the longest time and that's not true at all -_- GSL wasn't even around when it was first used and standardized for SC2 | ||
|
Mordiford
4448 Posts
Banter is awesome. | ||
|
Toads
Canada1795 Posts
 | ||
| ||
