|
The following is a list of behaviors that will get immediate bans:
1. Whining about stream 2. Bashing other games 3. Flaming other users 4. Bashing players 5. Complaining about imbalance
Basically just be respectful. Aside from that, enjoy the games, make sure you bring an umbrella and have some delicious waffles! (#) |
On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote: I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro...
Quite an assumption, luckily it doesn't matter since demuslim is still playing a series to secure his spot versus TLO at all.
|
lol tyler is right, it's supposed to be dual site.
|
On August 28 2011 11:38 FairForever wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:37 GrungyMunchy wrote:On August 28 2011 11:21 Serpico wrote:On August 28 2011 11:20 Ghostfoot wrote:On August 28 2011 11:14 Serpico wrote:On August 28 2011 11:14 Ghostfoot wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote: If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? No, he just doesn't want to lose his fanbase. He has a moronic fanbase if they DONT want him to use the best builds possible. How do you make more fans when you use the same debate-ably OP every TvP? I know that hasn't been his best match-up but hell, that's like saying do you want to just all-in your way to the top? If Mvp abused that build, I would honestly stop watching him so much. You'd be a fan of watching someone not trying as hard to win I guess. Yes, because being a fan of the winning players just because they win isn't totally what little kids do. In fact you're right, I think being a fan means to stop being a fan when your favourite players loses. *facepalm* What he's saying is you'd prefer that your most favourite players aren't doing their best to win. In the case of TvP that often means using the 1/1/1. So you'd prefer that your favourite player reduces his chances of winning by playing another build? Of course I do, I'm not a loser who feels the need to attach myself to the victories of other people just because I am their fan, as if their victories have anything to do with me. i'm fine with my favourite players losing sometimes, even if it means they don't use exploits begging to be patched.
|
On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote: I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite.
im a pretty big fan of tyler due to his community showings and how active he is in the community despite being married and such.
also he was one of the first avid users of double forge, and i think if he practiced on equal level of some of the other players, he'd be a pretty good contender.
he was also known from BW!
|
On August 28 2011 11:44 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:43 Condor Hero wrote:On August 28 2011 11:41 soulist wrote:On August 28 2011 11:37 Weasel- wrote:On August 28 2011 11:35 ZaxbyCof wrote: If Incontrol is in pool play next MLG... im gonna lose it. The only way he makes it into pool play for next MLG is if he makes some serious noise in the bracket here and makes a good finish in this tournament, which seems pretty justified to me. You're wrong. He is ranked 10th in points. He will definitely be in the next pool play no matter what that cant be, it took tyler two bad MLGs to get out of pools and geoff is poised to have another bad one. youd have to calculate the points after this MLG. Didn't iNcontroL get around 5th place in a recent MLG? I'm pretty sure he did relatively well at one time. well Tyler placed really high last year and those matter a lot too. either way its really fucking skewed if incontrol is still in. i love the guy but his performance just shows hes still got a lot of work to do.
On August 28 2011 11:44 0ne wrote: I like Haypro but Tyler has to win this. Go Nony show your true sick skills. yeah if he beats hayder, i like his chances vs trimaster. THEN WE GET IDRA VS NONY.
|
United States97276 Posts
On August 28 2011 11:45 thewax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:44 ZaxbyCof wrote: Has Incontrol won a game this tourney? anyone know? nope, 0-10. Anaheim was the same as i recall give him some credit. he was 1-10 at anaheim in pool play but he did manage to finish 4-13 overall after beating choya 2-1 and losing to tlo 2-1
|
Clash of the Titans on the stream right now. C'mon Haybro! Im rooting for ya ♥
|
Tyler vs HayprO : teamkill tomorrow there might be 2 others TL team kills with HerO vs Sheth and TLO vs Ret
|
silly husky, it's"you and me" not "you and I" when you and me is the object =/
|
Don't know who to support in this Tyler vs Haypro match. I'd root for Toss usually, but I like Haypro as well.
|
On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote: If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh It's because it died out as a non-allin opener. Other than that MVP game virtually no one opens 1/1/1 unless they're intending to do the infamous allin.
It's certainly an allin - just an incredibly strong one so it has no chance of not doing severe damage.
|
On August 28 2011 11:44 rave[wcr] wrote: i dont get it. howcome dongraegu is above select right now? both are 4-1 with select having 8-2 to drg's 8-3. select was placed on the winners bracket earlier too. why did they change this???
DongRaeGu beat select 2-0 in the head to head
|
On August 28 2011 11:44 ZaxbyCof wrote: Has Incontrol won a game this tourney? anyone know?
No, it says the game record next to the set record on the pool page of tl. iNcontroL 0-5 0-10
|
On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote: I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually.
|
On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote: If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh
Yes, everyone refers to 1-1-1 as the marine tank banshee allin, that's what I'm saying. What MVP did to MC is NOT the same thing.
|
On August 28 2011 11:45 FallDownMarigold wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:40 snafoo wrote:On August 28 2011 11:39 iDoMiNaTe2.0 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:On August 28 2011 11:09 CEPEHDREI wrote:On August 28 2011 11:08 Inflicted_ wrote:On August 28 2011 11:07 Scisyhp wrote: If Puma thought the 1-1-1 would win him the game, then don't blame him for using it. Only an idiot would avoid doing something because it was (allegedly) OP. I definitely will not blame someone for trying to win, I'd much rather a player try to win than try to lose. IMMVP doesn't condone the usage of 1-1-1 all-in because he sees it as OP too. Is he an idiot? he did it against MC in Code S. That was bomber. MVP had an expansion I think he was talking about the game where MVP fe into 1-1-1 with bunkers contain which was pretty sick No, having tanks and banshees off two bases is not the same thing as 1-1-1. 1-1-1 refers to the 1base allin that puma did. Not the same thing at all. 1-1-1 actually refers to a build that opens with 1 rax, 1 fact, 1 port. It's since been bastardized into meaning "all in" (which is still not even correct). Maybe I'm just a nitpicker but "all in" is a poker term that means you are ALL in. Everything. In SC2 this translates to bringing everything - ALL scvs - everything (which was where the term was born in SC2 - GSL scv all ins). Now people just call 90% of 1 base builds "all ins" tbh You need to study etymology. Words have meaning because people use them more and more.
1/1/1 used to only mean 1 Barracks, 1 Factory, 1 Starport but has been given a new meaning as well to the marine, tank, banshee optional raven all in by many people.
It's to the point now if you were to look in the dictionary for 1/1/1 you'd see two entries.
If humans couldn't create new words and new meanings we'd be still grunting at one another - so don't sweat it.
|
C'mon Tyler! Get revenge for MLG Anaheim.
|
Damn, he is having a rough tourney. At least he can bench press 400+ if thats worth anything.
|
On August 28 2011 11:48 Condor Hero wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2011 11:45 Coolhwip wrote:On August 28 2011 11:42 deadjawa wrote: I think most people would rather see demuslim TLO over tyler haypro... There seems to some unexplainable unjustified hype around Tyler which i've never really understood. I hardly ever see soneone cheering for him on the forums but the caster always claim him as a fan favorite. Tyler is just a fucking boss, youll be converted eventually.
Or if you like horses. 
|
Tyler going Stargate, haven't seen this from him in a while
|
|
|
|