so why exactly is who's in the groups in spoilers in the op, and then the list of matches is right below it? as an aside, have any matches happened yet?
On August 17 2011 19:00 sOda~ wrote: i always lose to that kind of play from zerg, wanted to see how to deal with it easily ;____;
the mid game army push by MC should have killed off killers, but the fungals.... 3 infestors was lifted and kill and yet the remaining infestors could hold off that army so easily without any support units. disgusting
Yeah it had nothing at all to do with MC blinking into ultras.
On August 17 2011 19:05 sixfour wrote: so why exactly is who's in the groups in spoilers in the op, and then the list of matches is right below it? as an aside, have any matches happened yet?
On August 17 2011 19:00 boaecho wrote: Wow he didnt deserve that win. Mc donated zealots for no reason
And you dont deserve to post. Your donating rubbish
Yet my post has reasoning whiles yours just spew subjective bullshit? Nice try.
What you on about? He won the game = he deserved it. With your reasoning no one deserves to win since someone always make a mistake.
I'm saying MC's mistake was on a huge level. He donated like ~15 zealots? That could have drastically changed the final battle. More fungals would have to be used, more meat sheilds, wider distribution of damage on MC's army, etc..
On August 17 2011 19:05 Crying wrote: i haven't really seen alot of corruptors to be made vs P ,zergs tend to skip them for infestors which is disgusting
Why? It is the same for T agaist Brood Lords. Instead of going viking they are going mass ghost.
On August 17 2011 19:06 tking wrote: dont understand why people are saying he should have gone zealot/archon, zealots are completely worthless vs fungal/ultra
HT would have been the answer, but hard to transition when you went stargate first no?.