EPTOn August 05 2011 01:55 Titorelli wrote:
So the games continue at 8pm CET?
So the games continue at 8pm CET?
CEST.
ASUS ROG Tournament - ASSEMBLY Summer 2011 - Page 77
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Stay positive, be happy and enjoy the event. Caster bashing and player bashing? Too much whining? Uh-oh! | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
CEST. | ||
|
coko
United Kingdom570 Posts
Seriously, if you guys think the way to win is play the best people in an elimination tournament you are just totally wrong. Sure on the ladder, in practise play them. On the main stage, give me the weaker player every time. | ||
|
Pirat6662001
Russian Federation949 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:57 ZiRn1tRa wrote: Obviously, SEn should be disqualified for losing to SarenS and causing this mess.... First great suggestion from TL forums! make it so | ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:54 coko wrote: Well the usual answer to this is to play all final games at the same time so people don't know to "win/lose". But that is just not possible scheduling/streaming wise. No that's a very unusual answer. The obvious answer is either to randomize playoffs or to do MSL-style group play where you are never through by losing your last game. | ||
|
DizzyDrone
Netherlands629 Posts
| ||
|
coko
United Kingdom570 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:58 rasnj wrote: No that's a very unusual answer. The obvious answer is either to randomize playoffs or to do MSL-style group play where you are never through by losing your last game. By usual I meant sports like Football do this for the World Cup. | ||
|
Exarl25
1887 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:58 coko wrote: If you know you can't beat one person, but by avoiding them early enough you'll either meet them in the final or they will be knocked out. You should do it. It increases your chances of winning and it is winning mentality. You are looking for the best edge. Seriously, if you guys think the way to win is play the best people in an elimination tournament you are just totally wrong. Sure on the ladder, in practise play them. On the main stage, give me the weaker player every time. I think that's because you have absolutely no competitive spirit or sense of sportsmanship. Throwing games for money is always morally reprehensible, they should face DQ. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:56 Fujer wrote: Only thing that u can do to prevent this kind of things is to random draw the playoffs after groupstage play is finished. Just put all winners in one bowl and then put the 2nd place finishers in another and problem should be solved.. It can happen in any sort of group play. Say you have 2 teammates in group play, if one is winning the group they can throw a game to their teammate to secure their #2 spot, or at least force a tiebreaker. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
It's actually pretty usual in certain sports. | ||
|
Tweleve
United States644 Posts
| ||
|
loazis
Netherlands381 Posts
| ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8324 Posts
I actually play on an Asus myself, they're great computers. Dimaga Fighting! | ||
|
coko
United Kingdom570 Posts
Seriously enough QQ. Can't be bothered to defend players from those arguing WIN WIN WIN. FUN FUN FUN IMO. FUN WIN FUN. or WIN FUN WIN. Seems fine to me. At least they didn't just instantly leave. And for the rules against it. You can't. I mean by that rule Idra should of be DQ'd for leaving against MMA because he was winning and left. Was he trying to avoid the next player he'd meet? No. Clearly not. Yes you could argue that you know why they are doing what they are doing. But you cannot say for certain they are playing to lose. They are playing to be crazy imo. | ||
|
bennedik
Germany127 Posts
| ||
|
AIOL!
France962 Posts
 | ||
|
coko
United Kingdom570 Posts
On August 05 2011 02:00 Jibba wrote: It can happen in any sort of group play. Say you have 2 teammates in group play, if one is winning the group they can throw a game to their teammate to secure their #2 spot, or at least force a tiebreaker. That's true! | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:57 bennyaus wrote: If I gave you some money to break the rules and spirit of competition, would you be interested? I don't think either should be disqualified, but I think that competitions should not allow this to happen, and I'm disappointed by both of the players. Yes, I would. I don't know how ESPORTS followers obtained this white knight mentality that they believe all players have to abide to. If we as a community truly want SC2 to become mainstream and held up to the same regard as other sports shit like this will happen a lot more often. Is it wrong? Maybe, but players have to make these decisions for themselves, they shouldn't be held to the ridiculous standards of forum users who only look our for their self interest, in this case entertainment value. | ||
|
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
On August 05 2011 02:00 Exarl25 wrote: I think that's because you have absolutely no competitive spirit or sense of sportsmanship. Throwing games for money is always morally reprehensible, they should face DQ. Lemme know whare your "competitive spirit" is when you are given a chance to win 8000 euros. Until then get off your high horse. blame the tourney. | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:54 Therg wrote: I'm surprised so many people want Stephano and Brat_OK to be DQ-ed. This phenomena happens in big sports events as well. Rather blame the tournament structure than the players imo. Why is everyone saying this? Just because someone gets an opportunity to cheat does not mean it is OK to do so!! So are all of you the kind of person that would find a wallet on a street with money in it but also the owner identity, take the money and throw away the wallet?! | ||
|
Seronei
Sweden991 Posts
On August 05 2011 02:03 -Archangel- wrote: Why is everyone saying this? Just because someone gets an opportunity to cheat does not mean it is OK to do so!! So are all of you the kind of person that would find a wallet on a street with money in it but also the owner identity, take the money and throw away the wallet?! Nope, that would be against the law. | ||
| ||
