[GSL] Grand Finals - Code S May - Page 198
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
| ||
PeZuY
935 Posts
| ||
nvs.
Canada3609 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:27 echO [W] wrote: Worst. GSL. Finals. Ever. I don't know why I'm surprised that it was so bad but I am. What a waste of time. -.- | ||
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
1. DT expands are nice, but if you throw down a forge MAKE CANNONS 2. Variations of the same build against Nestea who you saw make spores in time in each of the games is not a good idea... | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
MH_Gunner
200 Posts
| ||
Lamppost
Canada317 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:24 reapsen wrote: did Nestea just die? looks like credits of a funeral O god, Go watch the Idra good bye from gsl on youtube I got trolled so hard for about 25second | ||
d3m0n0id
United States3 Posts
| ||
Traven
United States160 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:20 cheesemaster wrote: LOL inca does not deserve that 20k, they should take the 20k away from the runner up if he loses 0-4 and give it to the champion, because lets face it you played terrible and dont deserve any money ![]() Thats the first 4-0 finals im pretty sure lol. just goes to show how bad inca is. You forgot the MKP and MVP finals. The first one not the second one. | ||
ZergZingZing
Korea (South)119 Posts
who the fuck came up with that bull shit | ||
scrapy
14 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:22 FinestHour wrote: o.o i want this slow version of neon trees i think this is the version they used..i maybe wrong though | ||
Steamboatlol
United States161 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:26 Whisps wrote: Shit I'd take 20 G's to get 4-0'd. Next season! It only takes 8 g's to get 4-0'd ...unless you're idra | ||
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:26 Whisps wrote: Shit I'd take 20 G's to get 4-0'd. Next season! This is so true. If I was InCa, i'd have a hard time dealing with that embarrassing series, but I'd have some solace knowing that I'm still bringing home 20K. | ||
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:25 ReasonSC2 wrote: Inca didn't analyze Nestea's games? wtf was he thinking doing 3 dt expands in a row Nestea always gets a evo and spore by 5 ~ 6 mins if the nexus is a bit late srsly even diamond zerg players will do this... freaking inca terribad I really don't get it either. But maybe we need to blame OGs Protoss and Thewind for this, they analyzed Nestea and still let Inca goes for DT, very weird decision. If Inca just play a 6 gate all-in with some tips from MC he may actually can take a game from Nestea. | ||
TheLantern
United States11 Posts
At least the better player won. | ||
cryL
Australia77 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:21 Barca wrote: -_________________________________________- MC wins with all-ins using force fields and TL explodes with "imba!" Nestea wins with all-ins using roach/ling and TL explodes with "omg i <3 Nestea" Don't get me wrong, Nestea > InCa for sure. Just too much bias going around. cause holding off loldt's, having more workers and expanding behind an attack is cheese. derp. | ||
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:29 Steamboatlol wrote: It only takes 8 g's to get 4-0'd ...unless you're idra hilarious btw | ||
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10344 Posts
Except you have less defensive units than a 3gate expand. He did 0 fucking damage every game and NesTea just killed him, it didn't even require all-ins. DT expand is only good if you can kill some stuff before the DT die. What happened doesn't matter. The idea is to pressure, not to have more units. Should he have done better? yes. But that doesn't make DT opening an all-in. | ||
EnderCraft
United States1746 Posts
| ||
Fenrisulf
United States325 Posts
On May 14 2011 17:26 cENTRYZ wrote: I really hope for a big finals in the Super Tournament. Two huge names. MC, MVP, NesTea, LosirA, MKP, July. Please. the problem is, 2 of those combos already happened MVP 4-0'd MKP and MC 4-1'd July. TBH, right now, the only possible super close finals at the top level i could see right now would involve MC/MVP/Nestea/Bomber, no one else on that level yet i think, although there is always room for improvement. | ||
| ||