EPTNestea didn't scout the proxy pylon and over-droned. That's why he lost.
StarsWar Round of 32, Day 1 - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Do not spoil unbroadcasted results. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
Nestea didn't scout the proxy pylon and over-droned. That's why he lost. | ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:11 emesen wrote: greedy how? it's the response to a forge FE... 2 base toss vs 2 base zerg = dead zerg unless he all ins... his third just got picked off by the proxy pylon pressure from lonecd which was a good response to the 3rd from nestea... so uh yeah.... dunno what you're smoking... ....what? I think you quoted the wrong person >_> | ||
|
bluestuff
Canada893 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:09 Nerdslayer wrote: Nastea was gready took a quick 3rd base. thats why he lost and lovecd had nice blink macro so stop with the balance crap. If nestea had played safe this woulnt had happend Funny you say that, when the protoss can forge fast expand and therefore is expected not be punished at all right, but a zerg player trying to capitalize on this "defensive' protoss build is being "greedy". | ||
|
PartyBiscuit
Canada4525 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:12 JJH777 wrote: This game is so horrible for zergs right now. And seriously what tourney actually still has close spawns? MLG/TSL/IPL/GSL/NASL all have them removed. Not NASL yet I'm pretty sure (unless it was the past day or so). | ||
|
RajaF
Canada530 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:11 emesen wrote: greedy how? it's the response to a forge FE... 2 base toss vs 2 base zerg = dead zerg unless he all ins... his third just got picked off by the proxy pylon pressure from lonecd which was a good response to the 3rd from nestea... so uh yeah.... dunno what you're smoking... Well I say greedy because the toss was not going for colossus or anything high tech. He could of fought off the stalker aggression off two base. | ||
|
Klamity
United States994 Posts
His recent interview said he was withholding some strategies. I really don't feel like I saw the best games from him. | ||
|
minru
United States78 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:11 emesen wrote: greedy how? it's the response to a forge FE... 2 base toss vs 2 base zerg = dead zerg unless he all ins... his third just got picked off by the proxy pylon pressure from lonecd which was a good response to the 3rd from nestea... so uh yeah.... dunno what you're smoking... lol wut? He didn't mention Nestea being greedy anywhere. And he's right.. Blink stalkers > Muta.. Pretty sure you're the one smoking here. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:15 Klamity wrote: Nestea would have won the second game very easily if he committed to the all-in. I'm not sure what stopped him. Last game, his lair tech was unreasonably slow and his mid-game scouting was poor. He was up 30 supply after losing his third but decided against poking at least? His recent interview said he was withholding some strategies. I really don't feel like I saw the best games from him. That wasn't a strategic loss though. It was just him playing sloppy. Don't think Nestea thought he could lose against some random scrub from China. Well, that proved to be his undoing. At least he'll have more time to focus on GSL. | ||
|
ComusLoM
Norway3547 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:16 Azarkon wrote: That wasn't a strategic loss though. It was just him playing sloppy. Don't think Nestea thought he could lose against some random scrub from China. Well, that proved to be his undoing. At least he'll have more time to focus on GSL. You don't get to play for WE and just be a random scrub. | ||
|
Nerdslayer
Denmark1130 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:13 bluestuff wrote: Funny you say that, when the protoss can forge fast expand and therefore is expected not be punished at all right, but a zerg player trying to capitalize on this "defensive' protoss build is being "greedy". Wrong but most zergs are greedy and onedimensional look at game 3 today copenhagen game morrow vs MC. MC did the usual build 3 gate into forge expand. standard. Morrow decide to go for fast baneling drops on his main and it worked perfectly. why? becuase it was unexpected. Like i sayd so many times as soon zergs learn to play creative and stop being so goddam greedy and onedimensional they will have trouble.. | ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:14 RajaF wrote: Well I say greedy because the toss was not going for colossus or anything high tech. He could of fought off the stalker aggression off two base. .... you can't be serious.... if the protoss saw that he was on 2 base he would never have attacked with just blink stalkers and just ended up teching and macroing until he would end up way too far ahead for nestea to come back that was not a greedy build when it's a very standard reaction to a forge FE | ||
|
Klamity
United States994 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:16 Azarkon wrote: That wasn't a strategic loss though. It was just him playing sloppy. Don't think Nestea thought he could lose against some random scrub from China. Well, that proved to be his undoing. At least he'll have more time to focus on GSL. I don't think he lost on purpose. I just don't think he cared enough to prepare for these games or to reveal his best/standard builds. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:20 Klamity wrote: I don't think he lost on purpose. I just don't think he cared enough to prepare for these games or to reveal his best/standard builds. I don't mean he lost on purpose. I mean that he played sloppy. His builds were fairly standard and could've worked. He just didn't execute them as well as he should have. For example, not scouting for proxies, over-droning, etc. | ||
|
zyglrox
United States1168 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:22 Azarkon wrote: I don't mean he lost on purpose. I mean that he played sloppy. His builds were fairly standard and could've worked. He just didn't execute them as well as he should have. For example, not scouting for proxies, over-droning, etc. exatcly, he was so passive, almost like he didnt care , prolly focusing on gsl | ||
|
Dragar
United Kingdom971 Posts
On April 24 2011 09:11 udgnim wrote: Stalkers without blink are meh Stalkers with blink are really good Yup! | ||
|
TheBanana
Norway2183 Posts
I can't get over the similarity. | ||
|
ptbl
United States6074 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
| ||
