EPTOn April 18 2011 06:04 Gigaudas wrote:
Feedback!
Roachs+corruptor+broodlord woud've perhaps been the best choice?
Feedback!
Roachs+corruptor+broodlord woud've perhaps been the best choice?
Are you trolling? All of those are bad against blink stalker
[TSL] Ro16 Day 4 - Page 266
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Its time to enjoy the matches, keep the whining out of this thread. GL HF! Also, don't reply to the whining and ignore it: have faith in the mods, we read every post and act swiftly. You're making it worse. Enjoy! | ||
|
Clog
United States950 Posts
Are you trolling? All of those are bad against blink stalker | ||
|
3nickma
Denmark1510 Posts
| ||
|
werynais
Germany1780 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:02 littlejunior wrote: Indeed my fellow zerg brother. Dark times for us zerg players. Sad but true.  Even the ex Terran god MorroW can't help us Zerglings, sadly. | ||
|
najreteip
Belgium4158 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:04 taintmachine wrote: i really dislike mondragon's playstyle. i have the feeling that his games only last this long, because he needs to make huge amounts of spine crawlers at every base. 1 game he did that lol | ||
|
Denzil
United Kingdom4193 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:04 Heavenly wrote: No, he didn't outthink Cruncher at all. If he out thought Cruncher he would not have lost 3-1. believe it or not, zergs do sometimes win against protoss. In this case, Mondragon did not. Just because he attacks from different angles, then loses them, does not make his play superior. Just because he kills some probes then proceeds to lose 20 mutalisks does not make him a superior player. Being unable to hold off a basic cannon rush does not make him a superior player. This is ridiculous. someone PLEASE explain how Mondragon outplayed Cruncher here? Watch the VODs again and actually look at what Cruncher is doing. Moving his Deathball from base to base on Shakuras to "defend" drops while his Nexuses get repeatedly taken out? | ||
|
Velocity`
United Kingdom343 Posts
On April 17 2011 23:39 Callous wrote: 3 - 1 to Naniwa 3 - 1 To Cruncher Protoss! Called it! | ||
|
Kevan
Sweden2303 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:03 SayTT wrote: ok this will make ppl happy again, white ra streaming and commentating in english http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/White-Ra Special tactics yeah! (he also just said it on the stream) | ||
|
delayed reflex
Canada358 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:00 Sabu113 wrote: He never quite responded to Cruncher's composition. When he went for the big muta base snipe he should have killed the tech off. He could have killed the archives and possibly the cyber core and that would have bought a lot more time for him. Also fungal seems like it should be super effective against these stalker clumps. Sure there's templar there,but each feedback is a storm lost. Probably needed Hydras or the infestors to just be cost effective against those big clumps. Maybe baneling drops would have been a nice edge to add in in the mid late game. Idk tbf Cruncher's air opening is superstrong. It really prevents that 3rd from going up. I think in theory ultralisks would be the way to go vs stalker+HT, and I think he might have been able to get them out in time after that massive hold at the 4th if he started it after his hive instead of the greater spire (which never saw any use). I gotta say I was impressed at how nicely Cruncher responded in unit comp to Mondi's muta play - mass mutas would do great against void+colossus but Cruncher showed he is more than just a 1-trick pony. I still feel bad for zergs | ||
|
Tegin
United States840 Posts
| ||
|
Fission
Canada1184 Posts
| ||
|
Kyouya
Mexico318 Posts
| ||
|
DonaldLee
586 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:05 branflakes14 wrote: I love how people are saying Infestors would've been useless because of Feedback. Is everyone really stuck in this "X hard counters Y" mentality? Yes. That and "You can't do X because of Y". | ||
|
thoradycus
Malaysia3262 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:06 Kevan wrote: Special tactics yeah! (he also just said it on the stream) i doubt zergs would be happy seeing a protoss play for quite a long time LMAO | ||
|
GP
United States1056 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:04 dani` wrote: HTs insta-kill Infestors using Feedback. There is no way you can say HTs do NOT counter Infestors unless you are joking. Stop using the word "counters" You're making Day9 lose sleep at night. | ||
Vundox
United States182 Posts
mondi might not have come up with the right answer but t3 is definitely not the answer | ||
|
Ko1tz
France493 Posts
| ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:04 taintmachine wrote: i really dislike mondragon's playstyle. i have the feeling that his games only last this long, because he needs to make huge amounts of spine crawlers at every base. It's called defending. And it's effective when your opponent cuts collossi for more stalkers. | ||
|
DaRKMaTT3r
Brazil553 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:02 Tracedragon wrote: Ulras/Infestors could have helped Mondi. :3 Great manner from him! Yeah i was wondering the same thing. Why didnt he get hive tech and some Ultra, would leave the high phoenix count useless and the storm are not that good against them, he also only had 1 immortal out and 1 robo. And some fungal could have solved the blinking problem while ultra smashed the stalker ball. Probably he had a low gas amount considering he was pumping so many mutas. Good games today, too bad i was cheering for Mondragon. =( Grats to cruncher! | ||
|
Slakter
Sweden1947 Posts
| ||
| ||
