|
On April 03 2011 06:12 riboflavin wrote:
where is the mighty ban hammer?!
i want to hear more LR type commentary and less TT
are games being played still?
Nobody knows but the organizers and they're being tight lipped. There's a difference between crying/bitching/whining and being genuinely confused and seeking information. I'd like to know at least something of what's going on, but no one from MLG has posted anything here, on their website, or even in the live blog since the stream went down.
As I post this, from Tak on the MLG forums:
As stated on the Starcraft stream, they are having internet issues at the venue and players have chosen not to play until they are resolved to allow for the best matches. Grubby and DDE played one game, started the second game and then paused the game due to a massive lag spike, no games have been played since or are currently being played for Starcraft on the mainstage.
|
ROLF!
Get the Halo stream on guys 
|
On April 03 2011 06:11 branflakes14 wrote:
I'm honestly surprised that people are blaming MLG in the poll. MLG wouldn't be having these bandwidth issues in the first place if Blizzard implemented LAN support.
are you serious? that's like saying you shouldn't blame the drunk driver for causing the accident but instead blame the car company for making the car.
|
On April 03 2011 06:10 SpiZe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:10 zYwi3c wrote:On April 03 2011 06:08 keeblur wrote:Poll: Who do you blame for this mess?MLG (217) 69% Blizzard (69) 22% Dallas (29) 9% 315 total votes Your vote: Who do you blame for this mess? (Vote): Blizzard
(Vote): MLG
(Vote): Dallas
Why would u blame blizzard ? MLG connection is a big failure, bnet is working fine. No LAN support.
Sure, we all want LAN support.
The service that Blizzard provides (battle.net) is actually working fine though. You can't blame them for MLG's internet.
|
On April 03 2011 06:13 Vanimar wrote:
I am merely posting here to prove that, given the speed in which this thread grows, no one will even read it because there is no picture or vote in it. So I could write basically anything here. Like for example cheese is delicious, down with bacon. No one will ever find out, and yet I made a statement on the internet. I think Im a freaking genius. Ans since no one will disagree I quite frankly am. What a great day!
I disagree.
|
|
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 Jiddra wrote:
It's MLGs fault, Sundance said on state of the game that they can't afford real internet for this events. They buy cheap and hopes it works. MLG is kind of broke and a bit unstable.
He said they don't have enough money to roll in a satelitte truck, the point is they use the convention center internet, you can't blame MLG entirely.
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 Marzocchi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:07 Jameser wrote:well at least they aren't setting the bar very high for NASL to become the best american SC event ^ Agreed. Six Reasons Why NASL Will Trump MLG Dallas1) It's pre-recorded. (Nothing wrong with live events but live should mean "live" ala GSL. This also means VOD's should be uploaded sooner.) 2) It's on Justin.tv (NASL isn't claiming to have all technical issues worked out, but damn it, they're smart enough to run on servers that can handle massive viewership.) 3) It won't use Octoshape. 4) The format is painfully easy to follow. 5) We'll actually know what time what player is playing and can tune in accordingly. 6) Artosis Fighting!
AKA 6 reasons to get banned.
|
You cant compare a fuckin 2 + 2 hour downtime to 1 GSL game out of 80 gettin replayed cuz of lag after 1 min....god im drunk
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 Marzocchi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:07 Jameser wrote:well at least they aren't setting the bar very high for NASL to become the best american SC event ^ Agreed. Six Reasons Why NASL Will Trump MLG Dallas1) It's pre-recorded. (Nothing wrong with live events but live should mean "live" ala GSL. This also means VOD's should be uploaded sooner.) 2) It's on Justin.tv (NASL isn't claiming to have all technical issues worked out, but damn it, they're smart enough to run on servers that can handle massive viewership.) 3) It won't use Octoshape. 4) The format is painfully easy to follow. 5) We'll actually know what time what player is playing and can tune in accordingly. 6) Artosis Fighting!
I love this post so much
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 Frankon wrote:
The hell... SC2 on HALO stream
Excuse me but WHAT THE FUCK WHY AM I NOT INFORMED BY MLG?
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 zYwi3c wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:10 SpiZe wrote:On April 03 2011 06:10 zYwi3c wrote:On April 03 2011 06:08 keeblur wrote:Poll: Who do you blame for this mess?MLG (217) 69% Blizzard (69) 22% Dallas (29) 9% 315 total votes Your vote: Who do you blame for this mess? (Vote): Blizzard
(Vote): MLG
(Vote): Dallas
Why would u blame blizzard ? MLG connection is a big failure, bnet is working fine. No LAN support. Well, Dreamhack, GSL, Blizzcon. Only on MLG they have problems.
GSL at least has had connectivity issues on several occasions, most recently with MVP v Dimaga. Blizzcon and Dreamhack i'm not as sure about, i'd have to check but suffice it to say that this is not just an MLG thing.
|
wow i watch a full 2 hour movie and nothing happen since then?
hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahaha fire sundance
|
did dde and grubby played the 2nd game?
|
On April 03 2011 06:11 branflakes14 wrote:
I'm honestly surprised that people are blaming MLG in the poll. MLG wouldn't be having these bandwidth issues in the first place if Blizzard implemented LAN support.
GSL and TSL don't have these problems
If they were playing starcraft 1 on LAN at MLG right now, we still wouldn't be able to see it - its a streaming/organisational problem
|
On April 03 2011 06:10 SpiZe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:10 zYwi3c wrote:On April 03 2011 06:08 keeblur wrote:Poll: Who do you blame for this mess?MLG (217) 69% Blizzard (69) 22% Dallas (29) 9% 315 total votes Your vote: Who do you blame for this mess? (Vote): Blizzard
(Vote): MLG
(Vote): Dallas
Why would u blame blizzard ? MLG connection is a big failure, bnet is working fine. No LAN support.
I seriously doubt at this point that the MLG organisation could set up a decent LAN to play on.
|
Cool I am watching call of duty ;D
|
On April 03 2011 06:12 Jiddra wrote:
It's MLGs fault, Sundance said on state of the game that they can't afford real internet for this events. They buy cheap and hopes it works. MLG is kind of broke and a bit unstable.
Wow, even if this were true.. why would Sundance even mention this? -_-
Sad day for MLG.. ~~
|
On April 03 2011 06:11 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2011 06:10 zYwi3c wrote:On April 03 2011 06:08 keeblur wrote:Poll: Who do you blame for this mess?MLG (217) 69% Blizzard (69) 22% Dallas (29) 9% 315 total votes Your vote: Who do you blame for this mess? (Vote): Blizzard
(Vote): MLG
(Vote): Dallas
Why would u blame blizzard ? MLG connection is a big failure, bnet is working fine. Because Blizzard should have LAN so there aren't these kind of problems. Sucks their having internet problems :/.
No. It's Blizzard's fault when at GSL one player drops and they have to regame (see Dimaga vs MVP). It's MLG's fault when nothing is going on stream because they can't "handle" the viewers.
|
On April 03 2011 06:13 Vanimar wrote:
I am merely posting here to prove that, given the speed in which this thread grows, no one will even read it because there is no picture or vote in it. So I could write basically anything here. Like for example cheese is delicious, down with bacon. No one will ever find out, and yet I made a statement on the internet. I think Im a freaking genius. Ans since no one will disagree I quite frankly am. What a great day!
Mmmmm. . . cheese and bacon. . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/KKuTu.jpg)
