|
Players such as Jinro, HuK, and Adelscott did not apply for this tour, so don't ask why they aren't on this list. DIMAGA, Kas, and LaLush turned applications in late so they will not appear either. Please take some time to learn who exactly applied. Please inform yourself about who applied and who didn't. |
|
On March 23 2011 09:01 DazZle. wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 08:58 GenoZStriker wrote:On March 23 2011 08:56 DazZle. wrote:On March 05 2011 05:10 Xeris wrote: Guys, nobody is being chosen based on their video... ~_~!
We're choosing based on: 1) Results 2) Results 3) Results 4) Popularity
There ya go!
Cruncher must really be popular No but he's definitely shown much better results than most of players in North America. On March 23 2011 08:57 ultramafia wrote: Honestly the best decision the NASL could make is stop interacting with the community. They've done everything they can to give people a say and people whine like crazy...so they appease and than people cry that they appeased!
I just want to say thanks to NASL for dropping everything they are doing in there lives to attempt to give me something i LOVE...Competitive starcraft. If you fail i'll be sad but for fucks sake THANK YOU. And if you succeed and make a buck, congratulations. Either way i get more starcraft for doing absolutely nothing...
I hate to say this, but I think this was their mistake. Interacting with the community and also the voting gave people false hope regardless if they said that they were not going to pick players based off it. 4 gate your way into nasl
This is exactly how I felt about Cruncher's TLOpen win; he didn't really seem very creative or skilled, just able to use easy-win strategies. HOWEVER, his play in the recent showmatches everyone is talking about really has been much higher quality; he won with a variety of strategies, including big macro games as well as rushes.
|
On March 23 2011 09:07 Gatsbi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 09:00 FliedLice wrote:On March 23 2011 08:53 Gatsbi wrote:On March 23 2011 08:51 nihlon wrote:On March 23 2011 08:45 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:42 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:34 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:28 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:25 RogueStatus wrote:On March 23 2011 08:16 hmunkey wrote: [quote] No, he wants a tournament of highly skilled players. You know, the best players in the world? Right.. He named all Koreans that can be found nightly watching a GSL. This isn't the GSL. That's my point, and it was never advertised to be the GSL. "BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD" I think we all remember that. None of us are asking for a Korean dominated tournament, but almost completely excluding them turns the NASL into the North American Average Player Starleague. If players like Darkforce, Catz, Cruncher and KawaiiRice get in, I also expect Nestea, July, MC, MVP, Boxer and Nada. This "Best Players in the World" talk is like crying because someone lied to you. Yeah they HYPED their new league, yeah they said the best players in the world would be there. So what? All leagues in the world say that! There are great players there, some of them probably ARE amongst the best in the world. Just accept it won't be all filled with Koreans and a few foreigners (cause any other combination would still be accused of not being the best in the world) and recognize the quality of players that are being invited. I don't want it to be filled with Koreans, but only ONE was announced among 15, some of whom are arguably not among the top players, even in their respective region. Like others, it is a little bit worrying that players like Darkforce (not even a top5 EU zerg in my book) can be invited where as some very good Koreans are cut. Well I have read many posts saying Darforce is top5, top3 zerg in Europe, so it is clear that each person has a different book. The NASL has reasons for choosing as it does, reasons that they need not even explain (if they do, good for them). I don't think you can name 5 better zergs than darkforce in Europe atm. Also I think it had been very clear from the beginning that NASL take more into account than just player skill so I don't understand how this comes as a chock to some people. Did they honestly think we would have like 40 Koreans or something? Why shouldn't it have 40 Koreans? Are they not 'The Best Players the World Has Seen'? I don't get it, it seems like you guys don't even want the best players, you just want a bunch of average (when being compared to Koreans) NA/Euros We already have the tournament you're speaking of, check out www.gomtv.net. That's where most of the people go when they want to see 99% Koreans play. I like how people are all going on about "Owww foreign e-sports is getting huge" and then go "awww, why aren't there 90% koreans in that north american star league?!" I'd have way more fun watching a NASL full of foreign players with like 5-10 koreans than watching GSL... I never was as excited as last weekend watching TSL3 when it comes to sc2. Why should there only be 1 tournament like the GSL? In BW we had OSL MSL, and sometimes WCG and GOM tourneys. Why do foreigners deserve the biggest prize pool in SC2? They are getting rewarded for not being the best? wtf? that is ridiculous. The "hurp derp we already have that tourney its called gsl" argument is absolutely retarded, the more competitions there are with top koreans, the harder the foreigners will want to compete to become a part of that. they will practice and train harder and eventually be able to compete with Koreans. Do you just want it to turn into BW again, completely segregated between foreigners and Koreans, or do you want to see your favorite players battling it out on the world's top stage?
Right, I want my favourite players in the league, thing is, most of them aren't koreans, I don't need another GSL (herp derp and stuff).
I never said invite no Koreans, hell that would be stupid by NASL, but stacking the brackets with 3 2 koreans per division would kill the whole NA in NASL (that's 50%!)... invite people like MC, MarineKing, July, etc, and you already raised the level to world class with about 5-10 players, no need for 40
and i'm pretty sure outside of TL that opinion is even more spread, NASL would be stupid not to try to appeal to new audiences in the US (and EU) and that probably works better with having a truly international event rather than one full with "those nerdy asians"
|
On March 23 2011 09:10 jlake02 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 08:05 AnotherEon wrote:Seriously.... who the hell is being cut for Cruncher? he has barely any results, barely any fans, and most of his tl open run was abusive 1-2 base all ins hes probably friends with one of the higher ups :p interesting considering how adamant NASL were on preventing collusion data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" I feel the need to stand up for my player here. Alot of commentors are jumping on the 'why Cruncher' bandwagon and I don't think that's fair. The guy beat Fenix in a bo3 for the TL Open. He recently beat PainUser, SjoW and LzGaMeR in bo7 series. He hasn't had many opportunities to prove himself yet but has done well in almost every shot he has been given. Keep your eyes on him in 2011. He's going to be a solid player, regardless whether or not he has the "big name" forum fans like to see.
His run through the TSL tournament was a collection of 4 gate and 2 base all ins.
Does anyone remember the game on shakuras where he placed warpgates where his natural nexus should have been?
/facepalm
Secondly, beating PainUser, SjoW and LzGamer isnt very impressive when it was at a time when Terrans do not understand the matchup as well as Protoss do.
The SjoW and LzGamer series which I watched, was again a series of 1-2 base all ins. proxy stargates etc...
You can't be rational if you think this guy is LEGIT top 50 material.
|
On March 23 2011 08:59 Bagi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 08:53 Gatsbi wrote:
Why shouldn't it have 40 Koreans? Are they not 'The Best Players the World Has Seen'? I don't get it, it seems like you guys don't even want the best players, you just want a bunch of average (when being compared to Koreans) NA/Euros
Thorzain was just an "average" euro, as was Hasuobs in the eyes of many people. They proved everyone wrong on the first round of TSL already. Of course we also had Ciara...
What this demonstrates to me is that qualifiers and ladders for big tournaments are a good idea. I don't think I'll ever be able to get behind invitational tournaments as a primary format for competition.
|
I`m quite happy with the list. Of course there are some players with question marks for me, but no one who really doesn't deserve it at all. If they would just invite the 50 best, that would mean all koreans (who applied), few NA players and few zergs. So you can bet that`s not gonna happen.
|
i dunno why catz got invited. they only got 50 spots and so many applications. iam already a bit disappointed. but yeah its just me.
Hopefully the next invites will be a bit better.
|
Considering the invites: If that player list proves to be right then I have absolutely no problem with the invites. I think nearly everyone on that list deserves to be invited for individual reasons. There are a lot of underrated players in here who finally get the opportunity to prove themselves.
It's not supposed to be another online-GSL with 90% koreans in it. Right now I'm way more psyched about the NASL then I am about any gomtv event.
|
I like how GSL provides extra spots for foreigners, and a special foreigner house, while NASL denies the opportunity for Koreans to participate, save for ~3 (predicted). laff laff laff. I don't see how anyone who isn't a hypocrite can support this.
It's apparent that the "investor buddies / fountain pennies" are attempting to capture an audience that is as much interested in rivalries and drama, than good Starcraft play.
|
On March 23 2011 09:07 Gatsbi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 09:00 FliedLice wrote:On March 23 2011 08:53 Gatsbi wrote:On March 23 2011 08:51 nihlon wrote:On March 23 2011 08:45 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:42 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:34 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:28 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:25 RogueStatus wrote:On March 23 2011 08:16 hmunkey wrote: [quote] No, he wants a tournament of highly skilled players. You know, the best players in the world? Right.. He named all Koreans that can be found nightly watching a GSL. This isn't the GSL. That's my point, and it was never advertised to be the GSL. "BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD" I think we all remember that. None of us are asking for a Korean dominated tournament, but almost completely excluding them turns the NASL into the North American Average Player Starleague. If players like Darkforce, Catz, Cruncher and KawaiiRice get in, I also expect Nestea, July, MC, MVP, Boxer and Nada. This "Best Players in the World" talk is like crying because someone lied to you. Yeah they HYPED their new league, yeah they said the best players in the world would be there. So what? All leagues in the world say that! There are great players there, some of them probably ARE amongst the best in the world. Just accept it won't be all filled with Koreans and a few foreigners (cause any other combination would still be accused of not being the best in the world) and recognize the quality of players that are being invited. I don't want it to be filled with Koreans, but only ONE was announced among 15, some of whom are arguably not among the top players, even in their respective region. Like others, it is a little bit worrying that players like Darkforce (not even a top5 EU zerg in my book) can be invited where as some very good Koreans are cut. Well I have read many posts saying Darforce is top5, top3 zerg in Europe, so it is clear that each person has a different book. The NASL has reasons for choosing as it does, reasons that they need not even explain (if they do, good for them). I don't think you can name 5 better zergs than darkforce in Europe atm. Also I think it had been very clear from the beginning that NASL take more into account than just player skill so I don't understand how this comes as a chock to some people. Did they honestly think we would have like 40 Koreans or something? Why shouldn't it have 40 Koreans? Are they not 'The Best Players the World Has Seen'? I don't get it, it seems like you guys don't even want the best players, you just want a bunch of average (when being compared to Koreans) NA/Euros We already have the tournament you're speaking of, check out www.gomtv.net. That's where most of the people go when they want to see 99% Koreans play. I like how people are all going on about "Owww foreign e-sports is getting huge" and then go "awww, why aren't there 90% koreans in that north american star league?!" I'd have way more fun watching a NASL full of foreign players with like 5-10 koreans than watching GSL... I never was as excited as last weekend watching TSL3 when it comes to sc2. Why should there only be 1 tournament like the GSL? In BW we had OSL MSL, and sometimes WCG and GOM tourneys. Why do foreigners deserve the biggest prize pool in SC2? They are getting rewarded for not being the best? wtf? that is ridiculous. The "hurp derp we already have that tourney its called gsl" argument is absolutely retarded, the more competitions there are with top koreans, the harder the foreigners will want to compete to become a part of that. they will practice and train harder and eventually be able to compete with Koreans. Do you just want it to turn into BW again, completely segregated between foreigners and Koreans, or do you want to see your favorite players battling it out on the world's top stage?
First, the GSL has a bigger prize pool for the year than the MLG, the NASL, and IGN's new SC 2 league COMBINED. The foreigners certainly do not have the biggest prize pool in SC 2 by a large margin.
Second, there's a middle ground between inviting 40 Koreans and segregating the Koreans. You do not need to fill the scene with Koreans to involve them in the tournament. You can just invite a handful of their best.
Third, what you're asking for is to have Koreans monopolize the most high-paying foreigner tournaments which will definitely NOT make foreigners more likely to train harder, but will rather nip the foreigner scene in the bud because you cannot go from zero to hero in one fell swoop. It's not possible to simply "try harder" - trying harder is not enough to compete with people who play the game professionally and are paid a living salary to do it.
Every scene that's been at all successful was nurtured from the ground up. The reason Koreans were better in BW was because they had the ability to compete as salaried professionals in pro-houses as opposed to amateur online players which is what most foreign players are.
NASL won't suddenly make foreigners salaried professionals, but it's a step in the right direction in terms of attracting interest in the foreigner scene and the foreigner players, who otherwise would have to move to Korea to compete in high-paying tournaments. NASL's favoring of domestic players is no different than GSL's favoring of domestic players - both are ultimately favored towards players in their own countries. It's just that NASL chooses to do this by invitation selection whereas GSL chooses to do it by virtue of residency.
|
On March 05 2011 05:10 Xeris wrote: Guys, nobody is being chosen based on their video... ~_~!
We're choosing based on: 1) Results 2) Results 3) Results 4) Popularity
There ya go!
I think we can consider Cloud (represents Italy) and Cruncher (represents Arab nations) are invited due to them being the most prominent programers from their respective countries. Can also include Fenix (represents Peru) to an extent. Don't know about the others who have not shown much results in terms of tournament wins.
Makes sense as they are trying to reach out to every fanbase.
|
Some people are really pointing out things the wrong way (whining and crying), but I seriously dont understand how people can really justify as good the way the NASL is currently handling the logistics behind the thing.
This project as been presented as a professionnally ran league of the top players in SC2, and im not even going to discuss the actual players that were selected, but as far as what I have currently seen, not much has been handled professionnally. Lets just take what happened tonight with the slip-up of releasing 15 players instead of 5 by mistakes, or not making any real announcement except saying theyll do so sometimes today and put it on the site.
I really wish the quality is going to improve for what comes next because I really wish for this league to worth but im really not impressed with what was shown so far.
|
anywhere easy to find the "results results results" of these players? some people on the list don't seem to have lots of results especially considering only 50 spots but i might be wrong.
|
I'm happy with the invites, because there are no bad players.
I don't know much about Cruncher apart from his good but all-inish PvT and I don't know how good Catz is, but he definitely has style.
I don't want to see too many Koreans in the league because I hate the latency discussion after each game.
|
At the end of the day the bottom 16 will drop out and have to fight for their way back when the first season ends
|
edit: argh sorry delete pls if possible
|
On March 23 2011 08:53 Gatsbi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 08:51 nihlon wrote:On March 23 2011 08:45 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:42 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:34 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:28 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:25 RogueStatus wrote:On March 23 2011 08:16 hmunkey wrote:On March 23 2011 08:11 RogueStatus wrote:On March 23 2011 07:41 dsousa wrote: [quote]
No, of those 15 the players that are MUST watch IMO are Moon, Idra, and maybe Kiwi.
Justin.TV invitational on SC2CASTS.com has about an equal lineup, so far.
July, Boxer, Nada, MC, (even Ace) all have better credentials that those chosen so far. (so do Top, Ensnare, Squirtle, Rainbow)...
Oh so you want the GSL? No, he wants a tournament of highly skilled players. You know, the best players in the world? Right.. He named all Koreans that can be found nightly watching a GSL. This isn't the GSL. That's my point, and it was never advertised to be the GSL. "BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD" I think we all remember that. None of us are asking for a Korean dominated tournament, but almost completely excluding them turns the NASL into the North American Average Player Starleague. If players like Darkforce, Catz, Cruncher and KawaiiRice get in, I also expect Nestea, July, MC, MVP, Boxer and Nada. This "Best Players in the World" talk is like crying because someone lied to you. Yeah they HYPED their new league, yeah they said the best players in the world would be there. So what? All leagues in the world say that! There are great players there, some of them probably ARE amongst the best in the world. Just accept it won't be all filled with Koreans and a few foreigners (cause any other combination would still be accused of not being the best in the world) and recognize the quality of players that are being invited. I don't want it to be filled with Koreans, but only ONE was announced among 15, some of whom are arguably not among the top players, even in their respective region. Like others, it is a little bit worrying that players like Darkforce (not even a top5 EU zerg in my book) can be invited where as some very good Koreans are cut. Well I have read many posts saying Darforce is top5, top3 zerg in Europe, so it is clear that each person has a different book. The NASL has reasons for choosing as it does, reasons that they need not even explain (if they do, good for them). I don't think you can name 5 better zergs than darkforce in Europe atm. Also I think it had been very clear from the beginning that NASL take more into account than just player skill so I don't understand how this comes as a chock to some people. Did they honestly think we would have like 40 Koreans or something? Why shouldn't it have 40 Koreans? Are they not 'The Best Players the World Has Seen'? I don't get it, it seems like you guys don't even want the best players, you just want a bunch of average (when being compared to Koreans) NA/Euros
dont know why you even asking. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" that would be the same like why dont we just take the number one team in the baseball league, split the players into 2 teams and watch them play all day. obviously people want to cheer for the team from their hometown or they have some other history with. they want to cheer for people that they have something in common and can identify themselves with.
especially when you want to get new people into esports they need something that they can attach to and from that point get enthusiastic for the game. even when I was watching IEM and they showed other games I was ofc cheering for a countryman..
|
On March 23 2011 09:25 Bart wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2011 05:10 Xeris wrote: Guys, nobody is being chosen based on their video... ~_~!
We're choosing based on: 1) Results 2) Results 3) Results 4) Popularity
There ya go!
I think we can consider Cloud (represents Italy) and Cruncher (represents Arab nations) are invited due to them being the most prominent programers from their respective countries. Can also include Fenix (represents Peru) to an extent. Don't know about the others who have not shown much results in terms of tournament wins. ClouDMakes sense as they are trying to reach out to every fanbase.
Why are people acting as if ClouD was a total scrub?
He's in the top 25 on the ladder looking at all 3 ladders according to sc2ranks and in the top 30 of the TLPD
On March 23 2011 09:28 Diglett wrote: anywhere easy to find the "results results results" of these players? some people on the list don't seem to have lots of results especially considering only 50 spots but i might be wrong.
TeamLiquid. http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-international/players
|
On March 23 2011 09:00 FliedLice wrote:Show nested quote +On March 23 2011 08:53 Gatsbi wrote:On March 23 2011 08:51 nihlon wrote:On March 23 2011 08:45 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:42 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:34 Momildo wrote:On March 23 2011 08:28 setzer wrote:On March 23 2011 08:25 RogueStatus wrote:On March 23 2011 08:16 hmunkey wrote:On March 23 2011 08:11 RogueStatus wrote: [quote]
Oh so you want the GSL? No, he wants a tournament of highly skilled players. You know, the best players in the world? Right.. He named all Koreans that can be found nightly watching a GSL. This isn't the GSL. That's my point, and it was never advertised to be the GSL. "BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD" I think we all remember that. None of us are asking for a Korean dominated tournament, but almost completely excluding them turns the NASL into the North American Average Player Starleague. If players like Darkforce, Catz, Cruncher and KawaiiRice get in, I also expect Nestea, July, MC, MVP, Boxer and Nada. This "Best Players in the World" talk is like crying because someone lied to you. Yeah they HYPED their new league, yeah they said the best players in the world would be there. So what? All leagues in the world say that! There are great players there, some of them probably ARE amongst the best in the world. Just accept it won't be all filled with Koreans and a few foreigners (cause any other combination would still be accused of not being the best in the world) and recognize the quality of players that are being invited. I don't want it to be filled with Koreans, but only ONE was announced among 15, some of whom are arguably not among the top players, even in their respective region. Like others, it is a little bit worrying that players like Darkforce (not even a top5 EU zerg in my book) can be invited where as some very good Koreans are cut. Well I have read many posts saying Darforce is top5, top3 zerg in Europe, so it is clear that each person has a different book. The NASL has reasons for choosing as it does, reasons that they need not even explain (if they do, good for them). I don't think you can name 5 better zergs than darkforce in Europe atm. Also I think it had been very clear from the beginning that NASL take more into account than just player skill so I don't understand how this comes as a chock to some people. Did they honestly think we would have like 40 Koreans or something? Why shouldn't it have 40 Koreans? Are they not 'The Best Players the World Has Seen'? I don't get it, it seems like you guys don't even want the best players, you just want a bunch of average (when being compared to Koreans) NA/Euros We already have the tournament you're speaking of, check out www.gomtv.net. That's where most of the people go when they want to see 99% Koreans play. I like how people are all going on about "Owww foreign e-sports is getting huge" and then go "awww, why aren't there 90% koreans in that north american star league?!" I'd have way more fun watching a NASL full of foreign players with like 5-10 koreans than watching GSL... I never was as excited as last weekend watching TSL3 when it comes to sc2.
two tournaments with the best players in the world is better than one.
if i had a choice between watching one tournament with the best players and one tournament with average pros OR two tournaments with the best players I would choose the tournaments with the best players.
|
On March 23 2011 09:24 applejuice wrote: I like how GSL provides extra spots for foreigners, and a special foreigner house, while NASL denies the opportunity for Koreans to participate, save for ~3 (predicted). laff laff laff. I don't see how anyone who isn't a hypocrite can support this.
It's apparent that the "investor buddies / fountain pennies" are attempting to capture an audience that is as much interested in rivalries and drama, than good Starcraft play. 3? I think we need to wait for all 50 names to be made public before you can make such claims.
|
|
|
|