• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:43
CEST 10:43
KST 17:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202563RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension5
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 733 users

[!] Pro Terran Strategy Q/A - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 22 Next All
Sp4cem4nSpiff
Profile Joined September 2011
United States46 Posts
September 01 2012 13:59 GMT
#141
What builds do you recommend in the current metagame for each Match Up?
Professionals are predictable, but the world is full of Amateurs.
Sp4cem4nSpiff
Profile Joined September 2011
United States46 Posts
September 01 2012 14:11 GMT
#142
Having a lot of trouble vs Ling/ Infestor....Any suggestions? Thanks again
Professionals are predictable, but the world is full of Amateurs.
NiNjAPlation
Profile Joined April 2011
United States85 Posts
September 01 2012 14:12 GMT
#143
Hi I'm a mid platinum Protoss, having trouble with the PvT matchup, I'm not necessarily having trouble with any specific comp or build. I'm having trouble dealing with the harrass Terran can do wether it's an early game banshee, blue flame hellions, or just your standard medivac drop. So my question to you is, what's the best way to help deal with this harrass?
League-Platinum Race-Protoss Server- AM Character Code- 794
ShnAndrei
Profile Joined March 2011
Romania164 Posts
September 01 2012 17:16 GMT
#144
@Ver

Thanks a lot for the replay tips! I think I will go with MVP's TvZ builds@IEM in which he opened straight into bio, and when I will get to the necessary level of multitasking, I will move on to the hellion-banshee opening.


You wrote earlier, regarding TvT:
"A much safer opening against almost any 1 base play is Rax cc double gas depot fact port, getting reactor on rax, tech lab on fact, and making marine/tank/viking."

This seems like an awesome TvT build to try. I always wanted to do a FE but I was afraid of my opponent getting fast tanks with vikings and just stepping over me. But this seems rather safe to try. Could you please point me to a replay in which this was carried out?

P.S.
Thanks a lot for this fantastic thread! If every top player shared his tips and secrets with the rest of the community the way you do, we would have faced a whole other level of gameplay and skill on ladder. I think this is the most interresting thread I've ever read on teamliquid.net.
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5356 Posts
September 01 2012 20:36 GMT
#145
Is marauder hellion actually a viable unit composition in the early game TvP? I know in theory the hellions can kill the zealots so the marauders can kill the stalkers/sentries. If it is, are there any specific scenarios where its better than regular bio?
¯\_(シ)_/¯
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
September 01 2012 21:27 GMT
#146
On September 02 2012 05:36 Whatson wrote:
Is marauder hellion actually a viable unit composition in the early game TvP? I know in theory the hellions can kill the zealots so the marauders can kill the stalkers/sentries. If it is, are there any specific scenarios where its better than regular bio?

Hellion/Marauder is a pressure opening (there are all-ins variations though, especially against Nexus first), you can find a guide here. Usually this kind of pressure build is used in a BoX series because Protoss cannot know for sure what you're up to upon scouting you went 13 gas.
dOraWa
Profile Joined August 2012
Korea (South)53 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-01 21:41:55
September 01 2012 21:41 GMT
#147
I've been trying to expand my repertoire of cheese (mid masters terran here) and I'd really like to learn how to use the 1-1-1 effectively vs toss (with or without SCV pull and cloak). I'm aware that it was quite an effective strategy vs toss for a long time, but every time I try to execute it I get stopped very easily.

Which build order(s) with cloak and without cloak would you recommend? Any replays you can direct me to?
Thanks
Jermman
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada174 Posts
September 01 2012 23:11 GMT
#148
The 1-1-1 is mostly figured out by protoss these days (as far as I know). Correct me if im wrong ver.
Terran/Random Player
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
September 02 2012 05:22 GMT
#149
What is the best stutter step method? Is it to use the stop command and right click, hold position and right click, or a-move and right click, or stop-command and a-move? Also, what is the best way to learn to perfect it, especially with stimmed marines?
Sianos
Profile Joined April 2011
580 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-02 11:47:19
September 02 2012 11:44 GMT
#150
Would you recommand the 10 minute timing attack with marines,hellions,medivacs,combat shield,stim and +1/+1 and followed up by a 3rd base and the transition inot marine,tank as a standard tvz opener for ladder? Or would you recommend to use the hellion and cloak banshee build followed up with a 3rd cc, double upgrades and the transition into marine,tank? Or both as good as the other or would you say that one of those is the better way to go?
Natespank
Profile Joined November 2011
Canada449 Posts
September 03 2012 15:46 GMT
#151
Ver could use a few other pros to back him up in this thread, from the look of it so far. Lot of questions.
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
September 03 2012 21:50 GMT
#152
On August 27 2012 14:06 GhandiEAGLE wrote:
Which way is currently the definitive TvT style? I have not seen very many TvT's lately so I do not really know which styles are popular now. I still play a very outdated marine-tank style.

Also, as a side note, when is God of the Battlefield Part Two coming out?


Foreigners primarily go rax cc 2 rax double gas into medivacs, start tanks, then 3rd cc. Koreans have many different one base gimmick builds but in general almost everyone will transition into marine/tank on 3 base.




On August 28 2012 09:14 NewbieOne wrote:
Easier question, I hope: What's with all those CC first TvZ openings at IEM (this), how come the Zergs don't kill them off for that?


On August 28 2012 17:37 Teoita wrote:
Because unless zergs started 6pooling every game (which means committing to a cheese before scouting the cc), cc first cannot be punished reactively with a standard 15 hatch.


On August 29 2012 02:36 NewbieOne wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 28 2012 17:37 Teoita wrote:
Because unless zergs started 6pooling every game (which means committing to a cheese before scouting the cc), cc first cannot be punished reactively with a standard 15 hatch.


So a tournament Zerg can be taken for granted to go 15 hatch but what about ladder Zergs? Or is the advantage from going CC first over a one-basing Zerg so high at a certain level of play that a one-base Zerg push will generally not break a CC first Terran?

Show nested quote +
On August 28 2012 19:55 blublub wrote:
On August 28 2012 17:37 Teoita wrote:
Because unless zergs started 6pooling every game (which means committing to a cheese before scouting the cc), cc first cannot be punished reactively with a standard 15 hatch.


Not even unless. Here is how TaeJa is dealing with 6pool when going cc before rax. It requires great multitasking and knowing some nice spots to hide rax that can block marines.
HERE !

Not sure what would happen if zerg would not bring his drones. I guess it is impossible to win. Even wining scv vs lings (not sure if possible also ;D) you would be really behind (scv loss and zerg mining the whole time, next wave of roaches or banes would clear everything out)


Yeah, I know that game, it was lovely! Thanks for bringing it up, it's so uplifting to think about it, lol.


On August 29 2012 02:42 Teoita wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2012 02:36 NewbieOne wrote:
On August 28 2012 17:37 Teoita wrote:
Because unless zergs started 6pooling every game (which means committing to a cheese before scouting the cc), cc first cannot be punished reactively with a standard 15 hatch.


So a tournament Zerg can be taken for granted to go 15 hatch but what about ladder Zergs? Or is the advantage from going CC first over a one-basing Zerg so high at a certain level of play that a one-base Zerg push will generally not break a CC first Terran?

On August 28 2012 19:55 blublub wrote:
On August 28 2012 17:37 Teoita wrote:
Because unless zergs started 6pooling every game (which means committing to a cheese before scouting the cc), cc first cannot be punished reactively with a standard 15 hatch.


Not even unless. Here is how TaeJa is dealing with 6pool when going cc before rax. It requires great multitasking and knowing some nice spots to hide rax that can block marines.
HERE !

Not sure what would happen if zerg would not bring his drones. I guess it is impossible to win. Even wining scv vs lings (not sure if possible also ;D) you would be really behind (scv loss and zerg mining the whole time, next wave of roaches or banes would clear everything out)


Yeah, I know that game, it was lovely! Thanks for bringing it up, it's so uplifting to think about it, lol.


I don't play terran so i might be wrong on this, but opening 6pool is suicide against anything that is not a cc first afaik. A cheesy ladder zerg will more likely roach/bane bust you or something like along those lines. Ver or any other high level terran would have to confirm that.

I am pretty sure that any 1base allin that can punish cc first would have to be done blindly, and i'm pretty sure it would also be bad against anything but cc first and crazy stuff like proxy 11/11. Don't quote me on that though.


6 pool is a really awful opener and should never be used, as in general anything will beat it. I'm pretty sure if you pull scvs early enough and you rax cc you can hold the 6 pool anyway.. 10 pool auto beats cc first and can kill rax cc too if they hide the rax to make the Zerg think it's 2 rax. If they 6 pool and don't bring drones you should be able to just win with scvs while hiding a rax if they kill the ramp rax. If they bring drones you just do that Taeja does.


On August 29 2012 03:07 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2012 02:42 Teoita wrote:
I don't play terran so i might be wrong on this, but opening 6pool is suicide against anything that is not a cc first afaik.

No, 6 pool + drone pull can also win 1 rax FE before second Depot, especially if the Terran built his first two buildings as part of the wall. The Zerg surrounds and attacks your Barracks, preventing your first Marine from escaping, and then all you have left is 15 SCVs and a flying Barracks. I guess you can then react like CC first, i. e. running away with your SCVs and splitting them in order to try to sneak a Barracks/Bunker somewhere to land your CC/OC (don't know if it's better to cancel the OC or not), but now we enter into unexplored areas; the two times I saw this, the Korean Terrans facing this 6-pool all-in tried to fight with 15 SCVs against Zerglings/Drones and of course lost.


From my experience, which might be flawed, as I usually face 6 pool with 14cc more than rax cc, you should be able to pull your scvs when the marine spawns and force the ling/drone off and then be able to surround your marine like you did in bw while making a bunker back in the min line as soon as rax completes, but this might not be reliable.



On August 29 2012 02:58 Gyro_SC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
Any combat shield timing is a gimmick and automatically bad against someone good. Those kind of attacks just don't work anymore because they get scouted and queens + units stomp on them. Unless you go hellion/banshee you essentially have to be defensive into the midgame. Hellion/banshee builds are better than marine openings, but if you really don't like them, then I recommend Taeja's bio openings.


In tvz are you force to do a hellion-banshee pressure?

There is not a lot of possibility like:

1-hellion + marauder
2-hellion + marine?
3-marine (combat shield or stim)
4-marine + fast-medivac (maybe too late)
5-marine + marauder
6-hellion + banshee
7-2rax
8-2 hidden starport banshee (look allin for me)


1. Doesn't work anymore.
2. Doesn't work if they're good.
3. No
4. No.
5. Definitely not.
6. Yes.
7. Yes
8. ....no

Basically after talking about this with Sheth and Suppy, on non cloud kingdom maps your options come down to:

one of the 3 hellion/banshee openings + Forward/proxy 11/11 (3 scvs not super allin). Forward 12/14 is not totally impractical either, though it's questionable if it's as good as the other two.

On Cloud Kingdom where Zerg can't scout you have more options, namely 2 base bio/blue flame timing attacks like what Binski used vs Leenock at MLG on that map, and it makes some of the above a little possible but still not very good if the Zerg plays it a bit safe. The other 2 base timings are also a little more possible because Zerg can't auto beat them by scouting and perfect drone timing but it's still too easy to hold with proper flanks.




On August 29 2012 05:16 Gyro_SC2 wrote:
What is the best thing to do (timing, composition) vs a zerg who go 2 base fast infestor when I want to go biotank (I just want to say that I don't mech)?

Macro, more base?
Drop ?
ghost?
big tankrine push?


2 base infestor is a bad build in general. You'll want to make sure to turret the natural though to stop burrowed infestors from walking in because some gimmicky Zergs will try that. You aren't really thinking about this correctly though, as you should already be doing some kind of 2 rax or hellion/banshee opening and jumping up to triple cc.

You can be much more aggressive against 2 base infestor and limit their creep a lot easier, as their army will be weak and they have limited offensive potential. You also want to mix in some marauders into your army composition to sit in the front, tank, and target infestors that walk too far. Ghosts are really only reliable if they go ultras and that's only much later on.




On August 29 2012 17:27 netherDrake wrote:
I've just faced a few colossus phoenix builds on the korean ladder (mid-high masters) and I'd like to know what approach you'd use against it.

Here are two questions I have:

1) Would you recommend a 2 prong attack (3-4 medivac drop and another attack with bio+vikings) against phoenix colossus if I manage to deny vision? (since the phoenixes and colossus have to be together or toss risks being overrun by a strong head on attack)

2) Gas spending - would it be better to get my 2/2 faster or focus my gas towards mass vikings? (would the addition of 3 ghosts instead of 4 vikings fare better against such a composition)

I haven't actually played against this style before and it doesn't really see the light in competitive play (if you have any please link me) so any advice would be appreciated.


The way to beat colo/phoenix 100% reliably is turtling until maxed on 3 base with double port viking and getting ghosts. You can get 2/2 and double port viking, those are not mutually exclusive. Don't bother dropping: it's far too risky and little reward, unless he tries some early 2 base allin and you know where his phoenix are.

In that 200 battle you just emp their phoenix and focus fire colo with vikings and they just wasted tons of money for nothing, meaning you win very easily.




On August 30 2012 10:28 SHODAN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2012 09:23 Ver wrote:Tank openings are not even worth worrying about.


Are you kidding? Tank openings in TvZ are excellent. Gumiho opens with tanks all the time. The build begins with 1 rax double FE, then he adds a 2nd rax, double gas, factory, double engineering bay, then a third rax. @100% factory, techlab, double gas at your natural ---> seige mode and a single hellion into tank #1. If you sense a 2 base roach/bane allin, you can skip the single hellion scout and prepare tank #1, seiged up before roach/banes are ready. Personally I like to wall off my natural with the 3rd orbital and 2 rax. This is one wall banelings will think twice about busting. Tank openings set you up for a strong midgame, either to defend early mining at your third, or to be very aggressive during 1-1.

I'm 1300+ EU master and could post some of my TvZ replays if anyone's interested.

GSTL Season 2, Gumiho vs. Seal
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Soulkey
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Effort


Excellent as in...puts Gumiho far behind every single game the Zerg doesn't blindly allin him? I'm glad you were taking this from a top Terran's games but if you actually look Soulkey played it reasonably well and Gumiho got way behind just from the opening and had to come back from a big deficit.

Hellion/banshee already makes you impervious against the same allins anyway, and actually lets you apply pressure, kill drones, and limit their creep. Any remotely decent Zerg is going to have creep to your ramp on a normal map if you do this because you simply can't attack early enough. If they have creep to your natural that means you have to blind coinflip whether they are hive rushing and what timing and risk losing the game if you push too fast and they maxed on a lair army (marineking vs hyun, entombed, ipl 5 kor regional). Getting behind in TvZ is almost a sure loss against a really solid Zerg (which is why Taeja wins: he never gets behind), and this build will put you behind against every non-allin Zerg build, even 2 hatch muta.




On August 30 2012 17:44 kollin wrote:
Ver if I do bombers build in tvp is it better to go 2 reactors 1 tech lab or 2 tech labs 1 reactor. I know most pros go 2 reactors 1 tech lab, but I don't know if my micro is good enough against collosus. So which one should a low level player go?


Most pros, including bomber, go 2 tech labs. 2 reactor is only really good against upgrade based builds and has a definite weakness vs Colossus.




On August 30 2012 19:02 Targe wrote:
Hey there Ver, at the moment versus protoss I tend to 1 Rax FE into 2 naked rax and one tech lab however I've seen a variation where you go 2 reactor 1 tech lab and then go for some agression earlier on.

From what I can see the reactors will delay all your tech by 100 gas, so stim becomes later and in turn factories and eventually medivacs (I usually go for a 10 minute push with MMM) however you gain an extra 2 marines per cycle.

Is there anything I've left out that you would be able to point out, and do you think the 2 reactor is worth switching to? (Baring in mind that it's purpose is to put on some aggression before the 10 minute mark)

Thanks if you can help! This is my most feared matchup atm!


I don't think I've ever seen that actually. That doesn't make much sense tbh. Delaying your sitm is never wise and the only value of this would be to coinflip Protosses who are being excessively greedy, which you can do anyway with Demuslims 4 rax combat shield or 5 rax no gas. The normal variation is much stronger, as stim and medivacs are more important. You can't put on aggression before medivacs if the Protoss is not playing greedy.




On August 30 2012 22:50 Vronti wrote:
Thanks for this thread Ver, excellent info. I have more generic question about build order in general, specifically in regards to how the different ladders (KR vs EU vs NA etc) function and the players they produce.

I've read quite a bit recently on how the Korean players (and Terrans specifically) are simply on a higher level than the EU and NA Terrans, whereas Protoss and Zerg are a bit more on equal footing (no doubt you saw the thread). Assuming this is true, part of the reason people accounted for the difference was because they were not afraid to do agressive all-in/cheese builds. Now I'm pretty sure that at lower levels trying to macro will get you farther than all-ins or cheese, but at higher levels of the game (I'm gold league, talking about diamond+ here), would mixing in a lot more reactionary styles or all-ins etc help you improve more than just 1 rax FEing or the equivalent every game? When and why do you add in a non-macro game on ladder or in competition?


Korean ladder is better in every way than NA (which has improved a lot) and EU. You actually get garbage TvT practice outside of Korean ladder, as foreigner Terrans don't know how to scv cut. So yes, this is true. The gap between Kor T/Foreigner T and the equivalent from other races is much larger. This is mostly due to Korean Terrans being more willing to coinflip/rely on luck based allins to win, and Terran being so utterly unforgiving. Terran can compete but only if they can go through the game without ever getting behind (which is why Taeja wins). Foreigner Terrans don't have that extreme solidity in their play. In addition, Terran really has only survived until this point by creativity, and Korean Terrans are much more creative than foreigners. Other races don't need to innovate as much, so this effect is less pronounced.

The allins question is difficult q to answer. 1 year ago Terran allins and gimmick builds were incredibly strong and a lot of Terran players were really successful because of it. Now you almost can never win with this kind of play against Zerg and it's much weaker against Protosses too in general. So no, practicing macro builds is the way to go now. It's worth it to practice a couple allins but they also require a lot less practice too, which means most of your time should be on macor builds.




On September 04 2012 00:46 Natespank wrote:
Ver could use a few other pros to back him up in this thread, from the look of it so far. Lot of questions.


Sorry this weekend was very busy. Will catch up within the next 2 days!
Liquipedia
OrangeNinja21
Profile Joined November 2010
United States84 Posts
September 04 2012 05:04 GMT
#153
Ver, just wanted to let you know that you are awesome.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
reikai
Profile Joined January 2011
United States359 Posts
September 04 2012 05:40 GMT
#154


Korean ladder is better in every way than NA (which has improved a lot) and EU. You actually get garbage TvT practice outside of Korean ladder, as foreigner Terrans don't know how to scv cut. So yes, this is true. The gap between Kor T/Foreigner T and the equivalent from other races is much larger. This is mostly due to Korean Terrans being more willing to coinflip/rely on luck based allins to win, and Terran being so utterly unforgiving. Terran can compete but only if they can go through the game without ever getting behind (which is why Taeja wins). Foreigner Terrans don't have that extreme solidity in their play. In addition, Terran really has only survived until this point by creativity, and Korean Terrans are much more creative than foreigners. Other races don't need to innovate as much, so this effect is less pronounced.




What did you mean by this?

1) Can you give some examples of a proper SCV cut? Is it only a current meta thing, where 1 base openings are prevalent?

2) KOR Terrans are using coinflip builds..... only because Terran it self is unforgiving? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you're talking about TvT here.

3) Is there a "science" behind Korean coinflip builds? Why would they take such huge risks like that? Is it because the coin is "weighted," so to speak, in their favor?

NA 1200 master Terran TT

PS I love this thread btw :D
Et Ducit Mundum Per Luce. :T:
ThaSlayer
Profile Joined March 2011
707 Posts
September 04 2012 05:58 GMT
#155
Im a Masters Terran struggling with T v T. I often lose games when I mech or face mech.
1) As the meching player, when is a good time to switch to sky terran? - I tend to play too passively and sit around my 4th, only to realise all my tanks are dead weight when BCs and Vikings appear
2) When moving out around 16min (the mid game push), what is a good siege tank count to leave at my 3rd to defend?
3) I've been doing a rather awkward cloak banshee (standard 13 gas timing) into expansion, and I as I get my production started around 8-10 min, I am rather vulunerable to drops - What is a good FE build into mech?

Thanks!
SHODAN
Profile Joined November 2011
United Kingdom1106 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-04 07:48:24
September 04 2012 07:29 GMT
#156
On August 30 2012 10:28 SHODAN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2012 09:23 Ver wrote:Tank openings are not even worth worrying about.


Are you kidding? Tank openings in TvZ are excellent. Gumiho opens with tanks all the time. The build begins with 1 rax double FE, then he adds a 2nd rax, double gas, factory, double engineering bay, then a third rax. @100% factory, techlab, double gas at your natural ---> seige mode and a single hellion into tank #1. If you sense a 2 base roach/bane allin, you can skip the single hellion scout and prepare tank #1, seiged up before roach/banes are ready. Personally I like to wall off my natural with the 3rd orbital and 2 rax. This is one wall banelings will think twice about busting. Tank openings set you up for a strong midgame, either to defend early mining at your third, or to be very aggressive during 1-1.

I'm 1300+ EU master and could post some of my TvZ replays if anyone's interested.

GSTL Season 2, Gumiho vs. Seal
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Soulkey
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Effort


Excellent as in...puts Gumiho far behind every single game the Zerg doesn't blindly allin him? I'm glad you were taking this from a top Terran's games but if you actually look Soulkey played it reasonably well and Gumiho got way behind just from the opening and had to come back from a big deficit.

Hellion/banshee already makes you impervious against the same allins anyway, and actually lets you apply pressure, kill drones, and limit their creep. Any remotely decent Zerg is going to have creep to your ramp on a normal map if you do this because you simply can't attack early enough. If they have creep to your natural that means you have to blind coinflip whether they are hive rushing and what timing and risk losing the game if you push too fast and they maxed on a lair army (marineking vs hyun, entombed, ipl 5 kor regional). Getting behind in TvZ is almost a sure loss against a really solid Zerg (which is why Taeja wins: he never gets behind), and this build will put you behind against every non-allin Zerg build, even 2 hatch muta.


Impervious, really? I think you've been watching too many day9 vods.

Zerg can open with 7 roach pressure in a given style to DRG. It hits just as your starport finishes (a full minute before your 1st banshee). 7 roach rush shuts down hellion pressure and can kill a lot of SCVs. Zerg can open roach/bane allin and with sheer numbers do unrecoverable damage to your economy. It doesn't matter how well you control (this is how MKP has lost a number of games). The theory that "hellions kill the lings, banshees deal with everything else" is not enough. Terrans can only be "impervious" to Z allins if they a) make a tank, or b) make marauders & bunkers, and c) wall off natural choke with raxx (depot walls don't cut it).

As for Gumiho and his excellent tank build, well... clearly you are convinced that Taeja's way is the only way (again, too many day9 vods?) . They might not have an 80% winrate at the moment, but terrans like Gumiho, MVP, Bomber and MMA show us that passive TvZ openings can work too. Look at how MMA opens with an economy-heavy build, then crushes Violet with beautifully executed drop play and a 2-2 push. http://www.gomtv.net/2012gsls3/vod/67631/?set=3&lang=
Thezzy
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands2117 Posts
September 04 2012 07:59 GMT
#157
Do you think a Reaper opening (more than 1 Reaper) is viable in TvZ?
They could perform mostly the same role as Hellions but have the advantage of jumping cliffs and getting a full scout on what Zerg is doing.
Reapers aren't as fast as Speedlings until Nitro Packs but cliff jumping may alleviate this a bit.
Since Reapers don't require as many minerals you could still expand early.

Since the first Reaper should show up around 4 minutes (and 4:30 in Zerg's base) you should be able to scout any sort of Roach/Baneling pressure coming.

They do delay tech due to their gas cost so tanks/thors will probably be a bit late.
Could Reapers work or would I be better off doing 12/14 rax?
Playing Terran is like flying down a MULE drop in a marine suit, firing a Gauss Rifle
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
September 04 2012 11:53 GMT
#158
On September 04 2012 16:29 SHODAN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 10:28 SHODAN wrote:
On August 19 2012 09:23 Ver wrote:Tank openings are not even worth worrying about.


Are you kidding? Tank openings in TvZ are excellent. Gumiho opens with tanks all the time. The build begins with 1 rax double FE, then he adds a 2nd rax, double gas, factory, double engineering bay, then a third rax. @100% factory, techlab, double gas at your natural ---> seige mode and a single hellion into tank #1. If you sense a 2 base roach/bane allin, you can skip the single hellion scout and prepare tank #1, seiged up before roach/banes are ready. Personally I like to wall off my natural with the 3rd orbital and 2 rax. This is one wall banelings will think twice about busting. Tank openings set you up for a strong midgame, either to defend early mining at your third, or to be very aggressive during 1-1.

I'm 1300+ EU master and could post some of my TvZ replays if anyone's interested.

GSTL Season 2, Gumiho vs. Seal
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Soulkey
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Effort


Show nested quote +
Excellent as in...puts Gumiho far behind every single game the Zerg doesn't blindly allin him? I'm glad you were taking this from a top Terran's games but if you actually look Soulkey played it reasonably well and Gumiho got way behind just from the opening and had to come back from a big deficit.

Hellion/banshee already makes you impervious against the same allins anyway, and actually lets you apply pressure, kill drones, and limit their creep. Any remotely decent Zerg is going to have creep to your ramp on a normal map if you do this because you simply can't attack early enough. If they have creep to your natural that means you have to blind coinflip whether they are hive rushing and what timing and risk losing the game if you push too fast and they maxed on a lair army (marineking vs hyun, entombed, ipl 5 kor regional). Getting behind in TvZ is almost a sure loss against a really solid Zerg (which is why Taeja wins: he never gets behind), and this build will put you behind against every non-allin Zerg build, even 2 hatch muta.


Impervious, really? I think you've been watching too many day9 vods.

Zerg can open with 7 roach pressure in a given style to DRG. It hits just as your starport finishes (a full minute before your 1st banshee). 7 roach rush shuts down hellion pressure and can kill a lot of SCVs. Zerg can open roach/bane allin and with sheer numbers do unrecoverable damage to your economy. It doesn't matter how well you control (this is how MKP has lost a number of games). The theory that "hellions kill the lings, banshees deal with everything else" is not enough. Terrans can only be "impervious" to Z allins if they a) make a tank, or b) make marauders & bunkers, and c) wall off natural choke with raxx (depot walls don't cut it).

As for Gumiho and his excellent tank build, well... clearly you are convinced that Taeja's way is the only way (again, too many day9 vods?) . They might not have an 80% winrate at the moment, but terrans like Gumiho, MVP, Bomber and MMA show us that passive TvZ openings can work too. Look at how MMA opens with an economy-heavy build, then crushes Violet with beautifully executed drop play and a 2-2 push. http://www.gomtv.net/2012gsls3/vod/67631/?set=3&lang=

Yes, handling Zerg agression with Hellions and Banshees can be very difficult, but playing triple OC Tanks is basically praying for this agression to come, which is neither good play nor a good way to think. As already stated, there is zero threat associated with fast Tanks, so Zerg is free to do whatever he wants. As a result, you will face 75 drones at the 10' mark, 11 minuts Hive and creep poking your third at the 12' or 13' mark (late Medivacs = no map presence) while you can only max by the 14' mark (any push with 3-4 Tanks before is a huge committment which can easily be crushed reactively by the Zerg if he doesn't already have enough to deal with it—remember how 3 Tanks pushes after Reactor Hellion expands faded away?) and have zero way to know how much army he made yet. By the time you reach his fourth his tier3 will be ready to crush your push and you will be stuck with a CC hopelessly flying above your fourth while waiting the few years it takes for creep to recede.

Why would you make Zerg play so comfortable (I mean, for him it's like playing against a computer for 14 minuts, or at least 10...) while having zero advantage compared to standard openings which do carry threats? Unless you face more agressive openings from Zerg than standard play there is no real reason to use triple OC tanks openings.

On September 04 2012 16:59 Thezzy wrote:
Do you think a Reaper opening (more than 1 Reaper) is viable in TvZ?
They could perform mostly the same role as Hellions but have the advantage of jumping cliffs and getting a full scout on what Zerg is doing.

No, Reapers are nowhere close to Hellions when it comes to map control. Reapers are terrible against Speedlings and they're way less threatening for the Zerg. And even if you scout some kind of agression coming, you're not even guaranteed to have the tools ready to deal with it since playing without Hellions, Banshees or Tanks makes you vulnerable to various busts.
SHODAN
Profile Joined November 2011
United Kingdom1106 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-04 16:53:09
September 04 2012 16:29 GMT
#159
On September 04 2012 20:53 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 04 2012 16:29 SHODAN wrote:
On August 30 2012 10:28 SHODAN wrote:
On August 19 2012 09:23 Ver wrote:Tank openings are not even worth worrying about.


Are you kidding? Tank openings in TvZ are excellent. Gumiho opens with tanks all the time. The build begins with 1 rax double FE, then he adds a 2nd rax, double gas, factory, double engineering bay, then a third rax. @100% factory, techlab, double gas at your natural ---> seige mode and a single hellion into tank #1. If you sense a 2 base roach/bane allin, you can skip the single hellion scout and prepare tank #1, seiged up before roach/banes are ready. Personally I like to wall off my natural with the 3rd orbital and 2 rax. This is one wall banelings will think twice about busting. Tank openings set you up for a strong midgame, either to defend early mining at your third, or to be very aggressive during 1-1.

I'm 1300+ EU master and could post some of my TvZ replays if anyone's interested.

GSTL Season 2, Gumiho vs. Seal
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Soulkey
WCS Korea, Gumiho vs. Effort


Excellent as in...puts Gumiho far behind every single game the Zerg doesn't blindly allin him? I'm glad you were taking this from a top Terran's games but if you actually look Soulkey played it reasonably well and Gumiho got way behind just from the opening and had to come back from a big deficit.

Hellion/banshee already makes you impervious against the same allins anyway, and actually lets you apply pressure, kill drones, and limit their creep. Any remotely decent Zerg is going to have creep to your ramp on a normal map if you do this because you simply can't attack early enough. If they have creep to your natural that means you have to blind coinflip whether they are hive rushing and what timing and risk losing the game if you push too fast and they maxed on a lair army (marineking vs hyun, entombed, ipl 5 kor regional). Getting behind in TvZ is almost a sure loss against a really solid Zerg (which is why Taeja wins: he never gets behind), and this build will put you behind against every non-allin Zerg build, even 2 hatch muta.


Impervious, really? I think you've been watching too many day9 vods.

Zerg can open with 7 roach pressure in a given style to DRG. It hits just as your starport finishes (a full minute before your 1st banshee). 7 roach rush shuts down hellion pressure and can kill a lot of SCVs. Zerg can open roach/bane allin and with sheer numbers do unrecoverable damage to your economy. It doesn't matter how well you control (this is how MKP has lost a number of games). The theory that "hellions kill the lings, banshees deal with everything else" is not enough. Terrans can only be "impervious" to Z allins if they a) make a tank, or b) make marauders & bunkers, and c) wall off natural choke with raxx (depot walls don't cut it).

As for Gumiho and his excellent tank build, well... clearly you are convinced that Taeja's way is the only way (again, too many day9 vods?) . They might not have an 80% winrate at the moment, but terrans like Gumiho, MVP, Bomber and MMA show us that passive TvZ openings can work too. Look at how MMA opens with an economy-heavy build, then crushes Violet with beautifully executed drop play and a 2-2 push. http://www.gomtv.net/2012gsls3/vod/67631/?set=3&lang=

Yes, handling Zerg agression with Hellions and Banshees can be very difficult, but playing triple OC Tanks is basically praying for this agression to come, which is neither good play nor a good way to think. As already stated, there is zero threat associated with fast Tanks, so Zerg is free to do whatever he wants. As a result, you will face 75 drones at the 10' mark, 11 minuts Hive and creep poking your third at the 12' or 13' mark (late Medivacs = no map presence) while you can only max by the 14' mark (any push with 3-4 Tanks before is a huge committment which can easily be crushed reactively by the Zerg if he doesn't already have enough to deal with it—remember how 3 Tanks pushes after Reactor Hellion expands faded away?) and have zero way to know how much army he made yet. By the time you reach his fourth his tier3 will be ready to crush your push and you will be stuck with a CC hopelessly flying above your fourth while waiting the few years it takes for creep to recede.

Why would you make Zerg play so comfortable (I mean, for him it's like playing against a computer for 14 minuts, or at least 10...) while having zero advantage compared to standard openings which do carry threats? Unless you face more agressive openings from Zerg than standard play there is no real reason to use triple OC tanks openings.

No, Reapers are nowhere close to Hellions when it comes to map control. Reapers are terrible against Speedlings and they're way less threatening for the Zerg. And even if you scout some kind of agression coming, you're not even guaranteed to have the tools ready to deal with it since playing without Hellions, Banshees or Tanks makes you vulnerable to various busts.


I'll try to explain the strategy behind triple OC tanks, and economy-heavy builds in general. Early tanks allow you to play as economy-heavy as possible. It lets you take a faster 3rd OC, faster 3rd and 4th gas, and faster upgrades (double engi bay at 6:50). Your early tank count then allows you to land your third much faster (9:30 mark), take the 5th and 6th gas faster, start 2-2 much faster. By 11:00 you will have 1 viking and 2 medivacs. After the viking has finished clearing nearby overlords, you use it as a spotter to track the location of his army. 2 medivacs and 16 supply of bio can freely clear up creep, then lift-off when you're in danger. This also opens up the threat of drops, whether you choose to commit to them or not. At the 13:30 mark, you will be at 180 supply, 6-7 tanks, 4 medivacs, 2-2 finished, 10 naked raxx, 1 with a techlab (only add reactors after you start 3-3). You attack at 2-2, shut down Z's fourth if it exists, trade well with his army and keep trading... I don't rely on gimmicky shit to get an early advantage over zerg. I try to outplay Z in the midgame with core units, drops, and tank lines. Z can safely make 75 drones no matter what opening you do. What really matters is gas, and Z can never have more gas than you if you opt for an economy-heavy build. I have taken wins from GM zergs with this build. 3OC/tank is working at code S levels of play. It's fairly standard stuff.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-04 17:15:31
September 04 2012 17:14 GMT
#160
On September 05 2012 01:29 SHODAN wrote:
I'll try to explain the strategy behind triple OC tanks, and economy-heavy builds in general. Early tanks allow you to play as economy-heavy as possible. It lets you take a faster 3rd OC, faster 3rd and 4th gas, and faster upgrades (double engi bay at 6:50). Your early tank count then allows you to land your third much faster (9:30 mark), take the 5th and 6th gas faster, start 2-2 much faster. By 11:00 you will have 1 viking and 2 medivacs. After the viking has finished clearing nearby overlords, you use it as a spotter to track the location of his army. 2 medivacs and 16 supply of bio can freely clear up creep, then lift-off when you're in danger. This also opens up the threat of drops, whether you choose to commit to them or not. At the 13:30 mark, you will be at 180 supply, 6-7 tanks, 4 medivacs, 2-2 finished, 10 naked raxx, 1 with a techlab (only add reactors after you start 3-3). You attack at 2-2, shut down Z's fourth if it exists, trade well with his army and keep trading... I don't rely on gimmicky shit to get an early advantage over zerg. I try to outplay Z in the midgame with core units, drops, and tank lines. Z can safely make 75 drones no matter what opening you do. What really matters is gas, and Z can never have more gas than you with an economy-heavy build.

I know perfectly well both the reasoning and the benchmarks since, as stated some pages ago, I used to play this kind of build. Of course Zerg will reach 75 drones, that's not the point—the question is how much time until he gets that, and how much he has to dedicate to his defence. With triple OC tanks answers are “as fast as possible” and “zero,” which is not good since both creep and Zerg economy are exponential. You might not like Hellions/Banshees openings but at least they don't allow Zergs to reach 3-bases saturation uncontested. Zergs have to be careful against Hellion openings, they have to get Spores against Banshees follows-ups, they can't just sit at the edge of the creep with their extra Queens and allocate all their energy to new Creep Tumors. There's no doubt you hit a powerful 200 2/2 max army by the 14' mark, but it doesn't matter since creep prevents you from using it to its full potency, thus allowing the Zerg to welcome you with unchallenged BLs or 5/3 Ultralisks. Not saying this build will auto-lose but Zergs should definitely have the advantage against it should they go standard macro.
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 22 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 205
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 17662
Sea 4000
Larva 476
Mind 381
firebathero 355
ToSsGirL 251
Free 108
Dewaltoss 105
Zeus 70
Movie 21
[ Show more ]
ivOry 5
Dota 2
XcaliburYe500
League of Legends
JimRising 597
Counter-Strike
edward59
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor162
Other Games
summit1g5499
singsing635
Fuzer 350
Happy182
crisheroes101
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick929
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH254
• LUISG 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2199
League of Legends
• Jankos797
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
1h 17m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5h 17m
CSO Cup
7h 17m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
9h 17m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 5h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.