EPT+2
User was warned for this post
[L/G]Using Pyschoanalysis in your games. - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
+2 User was warned for this post | ||
|
MrASAP
United Kingdom63 Posts
Nice read, thanks for fending off bordem whilst i was at work!  | ||
|
MrASAP
United Kingdom63 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
leBIGcrab
France313 Posts
| ||
|
N3rV[Green]
United States1935 Posts
Here's my tip. Stop thinking so god damn much about the game, and keep your money low. Low money=winning. Spending even 5 seconds thinking about your opponents "personality"=/=winning. | ||
|
mtwlinux
France29 Posts
| ||
|
Sheikhspeare
United Kingdom5 Posts
| ||
|
redwingxviii
United States101 Posts
--I am a smoker, so I always have a lighter on me. As such to try and keep my fingers sharp as well as my mind, I will either spam grind the flint without hitting the gas on the lighter, or twirl it between my fingers as fast as I can. ---------I find that this helps me when I am playing StarCraft II, in situations where I need to push my macro that extra mile because my fingers will already be used to moving around quite a bit. Makes moving my fingers and hands from say Hotkey+1, to Hotkey+7 alot easier and smoother in my opinion TL has officially jumped the shark | ||
|
redwingxviii
United States101 Posts
On July 01 2011 02:18 N3rV[Green] wrote: Honestly people in lowers leagues think about this game more than I do agreed, i wonder where these threads come from. i anxiously await the return of the "ideal worker" split threads, should be any minute now. | ||
|
Myolden
Finland83 Posts
On June 30 2011 14:59 o29 wrote: No offense, but your use of the term psychoanalysis is completely wrong. As for the rest of the post, it's completely ridiculous. Your illusory correlations are based only on anecdotal evidence. This. If you don't know what psychoanalysis is, don't use the word. And everything is just wrong with those things. | ||
|
Captain Soban
United States119 Posts
+3 This tread needs to be closed. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
mavsfan0041
United States306 Posts
| ||
|
MaxField
United States2386 Posts
| ||
|
Deja Thoris
South Africa646 Posts
I don't put much stock in the OP at all. If you were in silver and got the analysis coreect 89% of the time you'd just kill him or deflect the cheese you know is coming. | ||
|
MageWarden
United States95 Posts
On June 30 2011 23:46 iChau wrote: Funny how your minimum values add up to 125%.. I bet you made up these statistics. I love how you spell "retarded" wrong. get off my dick, i wrote that at 2 AM. and this is the internet | ||
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
It wasn't invented by Freud, he just took most of the credit for it. edit: What made Freud so popular was his theory of personality, not his version of psychotherapy, because quite frankly, it wasn't psychotherapy at all. It was all a series of case studies. He gave cocaine to one of his clients and was delighted to see he cheered up (the cheering up reached the level of mania, of course). | ||
|
GigaFlop
United States1146 Posts
| ||
|
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On July 01 2011 02:35 Sheikhspeare wrote: This is not psychoanalysis and I'm not sure it is very helpful either. it's more akin to those personality types...forget who made the big 5 | ||
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
On July 01 2011 03:12 Roe wrote: it's more akin to those personality types...forget who made the big 5 Big 5 is just a watered down version of Eysenck's trait theory.There isn't even any theory behind it, it's just the result of factor analysis. | ||
|
Latedi
Sweden1027 Posts
| ||
| ||
