EPThttp://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Xel'Naga_Tower
Simple Questions Simple Answers - Page 120
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
rsvp
United States2266 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Xel'Naga_Tower | ||
|
Kambing
United States1176 Posts
And 1 unit is roughly 1 zealot. So xel'nagas give you 22 zealot-lengths of vision! (For reference, most buildings and units have 9 zealot-lengths of vision). | ||
|
Synystyr
United States1446 Posts
On April 27 2011 23:53 Kambing wrote: And 1 unit is roughly 1 zealot. So xel'nagas give you 22 zealot-lengths of vision! (For reference, most buildings and units have 9 zealot-lengths of vision). Also if you turn Map Gridding on, you'll actually see the individual squares that are equal to 1 SI in Starcraft. | ||
|
zJayy962
1363 Posts
| ||
|
rsvp
United States2266 Posts
On April 28 2011 01:09 zJayy962 wrote: I see people edit and cross out words in their posts, how is this achieved? Do they copy and paste it into Microsoft W and cross out from there or is there an easier way to strike through your text? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/smilies.php | ||
|
moreCode
China2 Posts
| ||
|
entropius
United States1046 Posts
It seems like the investment is quite small and the benefit potentially large (since having the motions of your 5000 mineral army monitored can hurt you a lot more than the cost of a detector). Overseers are cheap, and ravens have other uses. Why don't the pros do this? Is it because of the APM cost, or is it not cost effective after all? | ||
|
Needo
Germany18 Posts
What would you recommend to be the "solid" opening on TvZ ( no map dependance ) | ||
svefnleysi
Iceland623 Posts
On April 28 2011 02:35 entropius wrote: Watching streams and vods, I notice that terran/zergs often don't make overseers/ravens against protoss to deny observers hovering over their bases/armies. It seems like the investment is quite small and the benefit potentially large (since having the motions of your 5000 mineral army monitored can hurt you a lot more than the cost of a detector). Overseers are cheap, and ravens have other uses. Why don't the pros do this? Is it because of the APM cost, or is it not cost effective after all? I'm definitely no pro and I don't know about overseers, but I'm hesitant about making ravens in TvP for a couple of reasons. Generally I want a reactor on my starport and not a tech lab, and because my raven gets focused quite a lot, switching back and forth to make ravens becomes expensive, both time and gas wise. I could make a new starport with a tech lab specifically for raven production, but that would be quite expensive and with multiple orbital commands (scans), marginally beneficial. However, I'm expecting ravens to become a larger part of TvP due to the fact that their point defense drone can be amazing if used correctly. | ||
|
Quochobao
United States350 Posts
On April 28 2011 02:57 svefnleysi wrote: I'm definitely no pro and I don't know about overseers, but I'm hesitant about making ravens in TvP for a couple of reasons. Generally I want a reactor on my starport and not a tech lab, and because my raven gets focused quite a lot, switching back and forth to make ravens becomes expensive, both time and gas wise. I could make a new starport with a tech lab specifically for raven production, but that would be quite expensive and with multiple orbital commands (scans), marginally beneficial. However, I'm expecting ravens to become a larger part of TvP due to the fact that their point defense drone can be amazing if used correctly. This is not a direct answer to the original question, but I do recommend terran and zerg to always bring detection. The risk of getting raven sniped is even less since TvP engages in less battles than ZvP. Nothing annoys me as a P more than not having vision. Perhaps the pros don't do it because they can detect the disturbance caused by observer and scan and kill. Still, you can see that they miss it a lots of time, and thus have dire consequences (esp when tanks unsiege and the toss knows it.) | ||
|
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
HAHAHHHAHAA Watch Set 2 Answer is: Yes. Although Brown was super clever about how he went about it. | ||
|
Defendor1
2 Posts
| ||
|
Tallbus
39 Posts
| ||
|
Vuistgevecht
Netherlands77 Posts
| ||
|
Softboing
United States68 Posts
| ||
|
Humbuuzio
Finland78 Posts
I matched up with someone by that name and I would like to know, if anyone can confirm one way or the other. His manner was quite convincing, however his playstyle was not. I can edit in a replay if needed. | ||
|
ZeroTalent
United States297 Posts
On April 28 2011 05:20 Softboing wrote: In TvT, what are some ways to catch up in the viking count race? (obvious: kill his vikings/ports/reactors, build more ports)
| ||
|
michaelhasanalias
Korea (South)1231 Posts
| ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
| ||
|
Comogury
United States412 Posts
| ||
| ||
