• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:22
CEST 11:22
KST 18:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week1[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 685 users

Putting an end to the Zerg Opening Economy debate. - Page 10

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 21 Next All
tehV
Profile Joined September 2010
28 Posts
November 30 2010 07:42 GMT
#181
On November 30 2010 16:35 Hurkyl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 16:30 tehV wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:16 30to1 wrote:

The real answer is this:

Instead of having a single finish line at 6 minutes, what you should do is have 3 finish lines at 5, 6, and 7. The build that performs best across multiple time periods should be the winner (as in real game, it would allow for the most flexibility while still maxing out economy).
I would just compare raw minerals mined at each time point, absolutely nothing else




I find your finish lines completely arbitrary that, why not finish lines at 1, 2, 3, and/or 4 also? The OP wants the best economic opener, not the best economic opener that is also the best at 5,6,and7 minutes.

And stopping around 7 minutes is obviously to short as Lomilar's drone advantage wont show up till closer to 8 minutes.

His 6 minute mark is obviously just a simplification to help test the best economic opener. If you wanted to remove this time limit nonsense, all you need to do is redefine the problem as the best economic opener is the one that fully mines out a specific map the fastest. Have fun doing that manually.

Going to 6 minutes, noting the drone differences, etc.. and extrapolating from there is probably 'good' enough.

If you limit yourself to mining out two bases, you don't have to do anything with "drone differences". At 7:00 or 7:30 or so, all builds considered will have 48 Drones, which (I believe) gives the maximum mining rate. So you just have note how many minerals are mined at that point in time.

Well, I guess this approach ignores the effects of when the mineral patches vanish. (but so does what you suggest). It could be accounted for, though, if anyone really cared.


Well now this is a debate over how to define the best economic opener. I'd argue that it should be the fastest to mine out your 'half' of the map. Yours seems to be, first to mine out your main and natural.

I think I'd grant that Lomilar's build reaches the 2-base saturation point later, thus wont mine out those bases as fast. But would probably win the more than 2 base 'race'.
Hurkyl
Profile Joined October 2010
304 Posts
November 30 2010 07:43 GMT
#182
On November 30 2010 16:33 tehV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 16:24 Hurkyl wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:10 tehV wrote:So its 155 minerals vs 2.58 drones.

As long as Lomilar stays 2.58 drones ahead, he should catch up on the mineral metric, in ~1.5 minutes.

You are assuming infinitely many mineral patches. At 6:00 both builds are nearly totally saturated, the next few Drones will barely increase the mining rate. After 48 drones, remaining 2.58 drones ahead is a total waste of 129 minerals. (Also, the "Drones" line in the opening post is not a good estimate of how many Drones ahead each build will be, on average)



We don't need to assume infinitely many mineral patches, but zergs like to get a 3rd base right? Do zergs stop naturally in game at 48 drones?

Lomilar's drones will be an economic advantage, I don't see how you get around that.

AFAIK, Zergs with two fully saturated bases wait until they actually have a third base before building the Drones for it.
tehV
Profile Joined September 2010
28 Posts
November 30 2010 07:45 GMT
#183
On November 30 2010 16:43 Hurkyl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 16:33 tehV wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:24 Hurkyl wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:10 tehV wrote:So its 155 minerals vs 2.58 drones.

As long as Lomilar stays 2.58 drones ahead, he should catch up on the mineral metric, in ~1.5 minutes.

You are assuming infinitely many mineral patches. At 6:00 both builds are nearly totally saturated, the next few Drones will barely increase the mining rate. After 48 drones, remaining 2.58 drones ahead is a total waste of 129 minerals. (Also, the "Drones" line in the opening post is not a good estimate of how many Drones ahead each build will be, on average)



We don't need to assume infinitely many mineral patches, but zergs like to get a 3rd base right? Do zergs stop naturally in game at 48 drones?

Lomilar's drones will be an economic advantage, I don't see how you get around that.

AFAIK, Zergs with two fully saturated bases wait until they actually have a third base before building the Drones for it.



That could be true, but that wouldn't be economic play. I only meant to imply there is more than 2 bases, thus you can't ignore his drone advantage. At least when limited to the economic question.
Scrimpton
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom465 Posts
November 30 2010 07:47 GMT
#184
Afaik the Flexibility and safeness of having an 11pool as default whilst still being incredibly economic is being so horribly overlooked here.

For an 11pool build being even close to a 14/15/16 pool build in terms of economy is amazing. Getting that pool over a minute faster is also of very high value
Protoss is the only race with "pro" in it
Hurkyl
Profile Joined October 2010
304 Posts
November 30 2010 07:47 GMT
#185
On a slight tangent, I admit it would be nice to have an optimized triple hatch build prepared for dealing with 15 Nexus openings on Shakuras Plateau.
Melancholia
Profile Joined March 2010
United States717 Posts
November 30 2010 07:47 GMT
#186
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.
Melancholia
Profile Joined March 2010
United States717 Posts
November 30 2010 07:50 GMT
#187
On November 30 2010 16:47 Scrimpton wrote:
Afaik the Flexibility and safeness of having an 11pool as default whilst still being incredibly economic is being so horribly overlooked here.

For an 11pool build being even close to a 14/15/16 pool build in terms of economy is amazing. Getting that pool over a minute faster is also of very high value

It's being overlooked because that isn't the point of the thread. We are looking solely at the economy, not at the other aspects of the game. While I agree that it is rather amazing, it doesn't matter when looking only at the resources.
tehV
Profile Joined September 2010
28 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 07:52:54
November 30 2010 07:52 GMT
#188
On November 30 2010 16:47 Hurkyl wrote:
On a slight tangent, I admit it would be nice to have an optimized triple hatch build prepared for dealing with 15 Nexus openings on Shakuras Plateau.



This actually might be the way to go.

Define the economic openers based on # of bases, instead of by time.

For example, I hear zergs complain about Jungle Basin and getting a 3rd on that map. So knowing which opener is the best for economic 2-base play. And for your suggestion on SP, would give us the build that gets the best economic opener assuming 3-base play.

I don't play zerg, but I imagine breaking it down this way is useful, even the best 1 base play for a map like steppes might be useful.
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
November 30 2010 07:53 GMT
#189
On November 30 2010 16:47 Melancholia wrote:
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.


I believe 14 hatch/14 pool beats 14h/15p, 15h/14p, 15h/15p, and 16h/15p by a *slight* margin, likely due to faster queens. They all seem to be pretty damn close. I only tested the various builds a couple times though, and might not have them perfectly down anyway, so take that with a grain of salt, and test it yourself if you really care. The only result that matters is yours anyway.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
jdseemoreglass
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3773 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 08:18:50
November 30 2010 07:57 GMT
#190
Everyone is bringing up some pretty interesting points... I think my next step is to extend the sampling time to various points to see if perhaps I underestimated the length of time required to overcome the initial investment of the second hatchery. However, my suspicion is that this will merely delay the same problem of more drones vs more minerals. No way of knowing of course until it is tested. I will begin with this tomorrow afternoon.

I have also been thinking a lot about the notion of "opportunity cost" in relation to drones. A drone could easily also be a roach, or a roach warren. The flexibility of choice that a larva gives the user could perhaps be worth something that I can't quantify. Of course, the same argument could be made for minerals... but the idea is that a single larva has the option of using differing AMOUNTS of minerals in very different ways.

I am hoping people really start stretching the limits of what is possible with these submissions. I have been interested in seeing very early hatches or very late pools tested. What about comparing the effects of a 13/13 build to a 17/17 build? Also, I think we can still squeeze some efficiency out of the 11overpool. Let's keep up the good content.
"If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006
jdseemoreglass
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3773 Posts
November 30 2010 08:05 GMT
#191
On November 30 2010 16:47 Melancholia wrote:
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.


We can't define overall economy by such a simple metric. For example, I saw one build using an optimizer that led all the others in resources mined... but it left us supply blocked with only 4 overlords. I think the additional 2 drones more than makes up for the 55 fewer minerals in either case.
"If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006
Melancholia
Profile Joined March 2010
United States717 Posts
November 30 2010 08:08 GMT
#192
On November 30 2010 17:05 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 16:47 Melancholia wrote:
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.


We can't define overall economy by such a simple metric. For example, I saw one build using an optimizer that led all the others in resources mined... but it left us supply blocked with only 4 overlords. I think the additional 2 drones more than makes up for the 55 fewer minerals in either case.

I'd agree that we shouldn't use such a simple metric, but at the moment we don't appear to have any metric, and until that point it's premature to put ANY builds in the "Current Leader" category.
jdseemoreglass
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States3773 Posts
November 30 2010 08:14 GMT
#193
On November 30 2010 17:08 Melancholia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 17:05 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:47 Melancholia wrote:
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.


We can't define overall economy by such a simple metric. For example, I saw one build using an optimizer that led all the others in resources mined... but it left us supply blocked with only 4 overlords. I think the additional 2 drones more than makes up for the 55 fewer minerals in either case.

I'd agree that we shouldn't use such a simple metric, but at the moment we don't appear to have any metric, and until that point it's premature to put ANY builds in the "Current Leader" category.


The two most weighted metrics as stated in the OP are drones and resources mined. The trouble is equating the value of the two in a relative way. That is why I am trying to compute the value of an additional drone in minerals, because without this mathematical comparison it is merely a subjective assessment.
"If you want this forum to be full of half-baked philosophy discussions between pompous faggots like yourself forever, stay the course captain vanilla" - FakeSteve[TPR], 2006
Hurkyl
Profile Joined October 2010
304 Posts
November 30 2010 08:25 GMT
#194
On November 30 2010 17:14 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 30 2010 17:08 Melancholia wrote:
On November 30 2010 17:05 jdseemoreglass wrote:
On November 30 2010 16:47 Melancholia wrote:
Why is 14 Hatch/15 Pool being disregarded as a potential leader? Until we've clarified what exactly constitutes winning I would think that the total resource leader should be kept in contention.


We can't define overall economy by such a simple metric. For example, I saw one build using an optimizer that led all the others in resources mined... but it left us supply blocked with only 4 overlords. I think the additional 2 drones more than makes up for the 55 fewer minerals in either case.

I'd agree that we shouldn't use such a simple metric, but at the moment we don't appear to have any metric, and until that point it's premature to put ANY builds in the "Current Leader" category.


The two most weighted metrics as stated in the OP are drones and resources mined. The trouble is equating the value of the two in a relative way. That is why I am trying to compute the value of an additional drone in minerals, because without this mathematical comparison it is merely a subjective assessment.

Rather than what you can measure, what, precisely, is it you want to measure? Maybe if you can answer that, the way to proceed would be more clear.
Lomilar
Profile Joined July 2010
United States130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 08:46:00
November 30 2010 08:26 GMT
#195
Okay. I have taken this build to the next level of silliness:

Double extractor trick @ 10 & 110 minerals
12 Overpool
16 OL (no really)
18 Queen
Send drone to hatch at 190 minerals
18 Hatch
21 Queen (should start right as previous queen finishes and you have minerals)
23 Overlord (should finish right as eggs pop)
29 Overlord
Maynard 8 drones at 30 (this should be when hatch pops)
Overlord at 37

This build ends up feeling a lot different.

Here is what I ended up with at 6 minutes:

38 drones
2 drones at 17/17 seconds (essentially 40 drones)
1 drone 9/17 seconds
1 drone 5/17 seconds
4 drones 3/17 seconds (that is for a total of 8 drones in production)
Queens at 5 & 24 energy, spawn larvas at 5/40 and 19/40
6 overlords
293 minerals
50/52 supply

<edit>
Total larva: 38+8+6+2=54

I noticed that the number of larva this build makes is offset from the single extractor trick, which gets 43+2+6+2=53 larva and both vomits at 20/40 seconds. So... that's not significant.
</edit>

Thing (just one) to work out: You almost start the queen immediately after the previous one. Which one should go to the expo?

The Keanu Reeves things about this build.
This build completely avoids ever having 3 larva on your hatchery, except when eggs pop.
This build never gets supply blocked, except for the extractor trick.
Moar minerals.

[image loading]
Scrimpton
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom465 Posts
November 30 2010 08:47 GMT
#196
Lominar. I just dont know how to think any more.

What is an earth
Protoss is the only race with "pro" in it
johngalt90
Profile Joined May 2010
United States357 Posts
November 30 2010 08:47 GMT
#197
think the most accurate would be to show a resource graph; total larvae produced; and hatches and queen count. all this is really telling me is what builds get you a certain econ at time X. i dont know which is most economical. the graph seems to be suggesting that 11 pool is the highest but that certainly wouldnt get you a very good econ for the next couple minutes and then you have to consider how much larvae u need at what times.
fuck the haters
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
November 30 2010 09:05 GMT
#198
jdseemoreglass:

I'm not sure how you get consistent results between builds, but what I did was save a game where I droned until 9, then re-loaded that same game for each different build I wanted to test so that any differences in initial split-time/response-time did not exist. I also put the game on normal speed so I could macro/micro perfectly.
Lomilar
Profile Joined July 2010
United States130 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-30 09:07:37
November 30 2010 09:07 GMT
#199
I think the trickoverpool fast expand... Hey, its all the builds in one!

Anyway, I think it is generally stronger economy wise and military wise early on (earlier pool, earlier lings, earlier queen), but it doesn't get as many drones up at the second base as quickly, and that is where it is losing minerals compared to the 15 hatch build.

I've named it. The TOP-FE build. It even sounds pretentious! Yeah!
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
November 30 2010 09:07 GMT
#200
On November 30 2010 17:26 Lomilar wrote:
Okay. I have taken this build to the next level of silliness:

Here is what I ended up with at 6 minutes:

38 drones
2 drones at 17/17 seconds (essentially 40 drones)
1 drone 9/17 seconds
1 drone 5/17 seconds
4 drones 3/17 seconds (that is for a total of 8 drones in production)
Queens at 5 & 24 energy, spawn larvas at 5/40 and 19/40
6 overlords
293 minerals
50/52 supply


That's pretty significantly behind everything I tried, by at least a couple hundred minerals, and slightly behind on larvae as well. 14h/14p has been my best so far, with 40 drones, 30/17 total on 6 drones in production, and just over 600 minerals.

Looks like you probably just were slow on a spawn somewhere for the larva count, though, with one queen having 24 energy but it's spawn only being half-done.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 9077
Sea 4527
Hyuk 470
Jaedong 453
Backho 294
actioN 241
Soulkey 94
Soma 92
Zeus 76
ToSsGirL 71
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 66
hero 60
Sharp 38
Noble 35
sSak 32
Hyun 29
JulyZerg 29
NaDa 25
yabsab 19
sorry 18
Sacsri 16
Free 15
Bale 14
Shinee 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
Hm[arnc] 7
Sexy 4
Dota 2
Gorgc2369
XaKoH 460
XcaliburYe374
League of Legends
JimRising 528
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss929
chrisJcsgo76
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor151
Other Games
tarik_tv17491
shahzam701
ceh9592
Stewie2K531
crisheroes404
monkeys_forever225
Lowko139
Liquid`RaSZi134
SortOf81
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick24146
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 401
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH358
• LUISG 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2162
League of Legends
• Lourlo1287
• Stunt494
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
38m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
3h 38m
Replay Cast
14h 38m
RSL Revival
1d
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 6h
OSC
1d 10h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.