• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:41
CEST 14:41
KST 21:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War445.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202621Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ TL Sidebar missing streams Mineral Boosting (2 workers/patch) Rollback Netcode in Brood War [ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8064 users

Better than Blizzard Map Challenge - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 20 2013 23:53 GMT
#101
Apart from the tileset I really don't think that map's close enough. Everything's pretty much different.

I also just realized it only had four bases per player, wow.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
June 21 2013 05:17 GMT
#102
I really think blistering sands remakes should have a backdoor. Otherwise what's the point, the rest of the layout on that map is just bad too and you have to do so much just to make it playable.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
lorestarcraft
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1049 Posts
June 21 2013 06:16 GMT
#103
On June 21 2013 14:17 EatThePath wrote:
I really think blistering sands remakes should have a backdoor. Otherwise what's the point, the rest of the layout on that map is just bad too and you have to do so much just to make it playable.

I tend to agree with this statement.
SC2 Mapmaker
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 21 2013 06:46 GMT
#104
I think the major problem is that even despite the rocks, the layout just looks nothing alike beyond the main/nat setup.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Samro225am
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany982 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 12:38:18
June 21 2013 07:38 GMT
#105
i think one should consider how a map plays like. not what the layout looks like.

i did not provide the concept explanation in my post yesterday, but here it is.

Features
- there is a backdoor to the nat which is not that far away for comitted attacks
- there is a very harassable third that is easily accessed from all four directions, the other third added in the position of the main backdoor is even more open for straight forward attacks.
- the tower does not provide vision for units without air support
- with all rocks taken down five or even four bases are not so easily kept
- LoSBs in the long end of the main for drops
- big main cliffs beiing walkable almost everywhere, big main invites drops, sneaky pylon, nydus, etc

Concept
What was especially strong in Blistering Sand's concept is the main backdoor. Consequently build-up was slow and you would never transfer easily into a macro game, because you just had to provide defense. Hence games developed slower and played out more aggressively than on other maps.
I did not want to keep the main backdoor (which was pretty much the shortest path) to direct these attacks along this one axis, but i wanted to keep the idea of strong aggressive openings and timing attacks. In midgame we can expect constant denial of fourths or even thirds.


Answer to all the people who think that map is not valid in this contest: you do not have to vote for it, but i think the map plays out closely enough in the style of blistering without being a remake. The contest asks for better than blizzard, not remake and balance their maps. Hence i took the strong early to mid game as a guideline and transformed the map as i thought it is needed.
I don't care too much in case the map is disqualified ^^ but it would be a pitty because i am quite sure it provides similar games within hots gameplay and an overall more grown up game.


edit: Semmo brought this up: take main hugging third and never move + win. This is pretty much why you will have aaggression. You cannot let the other player have the third so easily and the distance is short enough to be able to attack/disturb that base long enough. Maybe i should add a blizzard style rock (;
chuky500
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
France473 Posts
June 21 2013 12:22 GMT
#106
That's why I think it's better to just judge the maps and not have a poll with redundant choices. A map can be both great and a bit different but people can only pick one choice. If you think some maps aren't following the guideline then just vote it's bad, adding redundant choice is pointless and will only reward bland maps with almost no changes. The point of this contest is to take bad maps and turn them into good maps, not about picking good maps and tweaking them just a bit.

If the poll makes you choose between good and too different why not add choices like "too similar" or "corresponds to a metagame from 2 years ago". The contest is about judging maps there's no need to add side questions within the same poll.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 01:29 GMT
#107
Immortal Depths
Timetwister22

[image loading]

Aesthetics
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Remake of Xel'naga Caverns: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 124x124
Immortal Depths playable size: 124x140

All of the high ground pods in the middle by the golds and watchtowers are pathable. The high ground by the natural is not pathable.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 24 2013 01:58 GMT
#108
Hey hey, I did it first.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 02:52 GMT
#109
Just a reminder, submissions close in 12 hours from now. Those posted after will not be accepted. I will start the voting phase sometime early this week.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 20:55:05
June 24 2013 02:56 GMT
#110
In that case I throw this one in:



Mondscheinsonate SE
Size:128, 134

[image loading]


Remake of XNC.
Size: 140x124
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
June 24 2013 03:57 GMT
#111
I have two maps that I'd like to submit. I'm just posting this to keep track of the time
Inimic
Profile Joined March 2013
Canada153 Posts
June 24 2013 04:38 GMT
#112
There needs to be a requirement to actually play the maps before you can vote for them. How a map looks on 'paper,' and how it plays/feels can vary a lot.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-25 16:51:11
June 24 2013 05:11 GMT
#113

Kulas Glen by RFDaemoniac

[image loading]

Remake of Kulas Ravine. + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 140x136
Kulas Glen playable size: 148x148
Album of additional images+ Show Spoiler +

Main/nat/in-base third setup with natural wall-off.
[image loading]

Natural with overlooking high-ground and rocked path between horizontal spawns.
[image loading]

Other third and area between vertical spawns
[image loading]

Center and watchtowers
[image loading]


Aesthetics are kinda crap... but I think I'm in that period where I'm getting worse before I improve.

Edit to include playable bounds and original image. I hope it's not too late.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-25 17:02:42
June 24 2013 05:23 GMT
#114

Grave King Hill by RFDaemoniac
[image loading]

Remake of Burial Grounds. + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 132 x 132
Grave King Hill playable size: 132 x 136
Album of additional images+ Show Spoiler +

Main with choke wall-off
[image loading]

Natural with Nexus wall-off
[image loading]

Corner third with overlooking highround
[image loading]

Backdoor third
[image loading]

Forward/open third
[image loading]

Gold base
[image loading]

Center
[image loading]



The back door to the main has two rocks stacked, but slightly offset so that you can see both of them.

Edit: Included necessary submission info.

Edit 2: Some more info on my thoughts behind the changes.

I wanted the uphill to be important when moving out, in order to allow a contain, but not important when defending. Defending on the low ground feels terrible, even without a real high ground mechanic. I therefore pushed the highground a little farther away from the natural.

This made the middle ground area quite small, so I found an area where I could make it bigger, by bringing it over the corner of the main.

I decided to keep the two entrance main instead of converting it to a standard ramp down/9 choke because I like seeing aggressive games. I put rocks at the natural to help you wall and the pit in the natural helps create some interesting army movement for the attacker.

I gave the back door two rocks instead of one in order to mitigate things like hydra pushes against air toss. While the main entrance is wall able with only 2 buildings, it might be slightly too big to stop early pushes in TvP from both sides, in which case I'd make it smaller and put flat rocks on it.

There are multiple choices for a third. The two on the high ground are harassable, but the one in the corner is a little more choked, making it easier to defend for protoss or a mech terran. However, as a trade off for being more choked it is farther from your main/natural, forcing you to split your army well.

The backdoor third isn't particularly interesting except for its proximity to the gold base. I wanted to encourage players to be able to expand in either direction. I also wanted it to be possible for each player to hold a gold base, perhaps at the sacrifice of easy map control. The watch towers help make the counter-clockwise gold base takable, as well as encouraging air units to move through the middle where they have to pay attention to what's underneath them.
FlyingBeer
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States262 Posts
June 24 2013 09:05 GMT
#115
On June 21 2013 16:38 Samro225am wrote:
i think one should consider how a map plays like. not what the layout looks like.

i did not provide the concept explanation in my post yesterday, but here it is.

Features
- there is a backdoor to the nat which is not that far away for comitted attacks
- there is a very harassable third that is easily accessed from all four directions, the other third added in the position of the main backdoor is even more open for straight forward attacks.
- the tower does not provide vision for units without air support
- with all rocks taken down five or even four bases are not so easily kept
- LoSBs in the long end of the main for drops
- big main cliffs beiing walkable almost everywhere, big main invites drops, sneaky pylon, nydus, etc

Concept
What was especially strong in Blistering Sand's concept is the main backdoor. Consequently build-up was slow and you would never transfer easily into a macro game, because you just had to provide defense. Hence games developed slower and played out more aggressively than on other maps.
I did not want to keep the main backdoor (which was pretty much the shortest path) to direct these attacks along this one axis, but i wanted to keep the idea of strong aggressive openings and timing attacks. In midgame we can expect constant denial of fourths or even thirds.


Answer to all the people who think that map is not valid in this contest: you do not have to vote for it, but i think the map plays out closely enough in the style of blistering without being a remake. The contest asks for better than blizzard, not remake and balance their maps. Hence i took the strong early to mid game as a guideline and transformed the map as i thought it is needed.
I don't care too much in case the map is disqualified ^^ but it would be a pitty because i am quite sure it provides similar games within hots gameplay and an overall more grown up game.


edit: Semmo brought this up: take main hugging third and never move + win. This is pretty much why you will have aaggression. You cannot let the other player have the third so easily and the distance is short enough to be able to attack/disturb that base long enough. Maybe i should add a blizzard style rock (;


Your map is one of my favorites partly because it's well done, but also because you took the time to write this up. I was hoping to read more of the different map designers' insights into how they thought it best to improve on a map's design, but most are just being thrown up with very little comment.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 10:15 GMT
#116
.Looking through some of these submission threads, many are missing important info that will be needed as per the rules. I will include things such as original map size and pic vs the new size and pic for voting. If you don't include all your info in your threads, I will not hunt you down to find such info. I'll just simply not include your map in the voting.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
meatpudding
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia520 Posts
June 24 2013 13:44 GMT
#117
Here's my submission for a Blizzar map remake.

Based on Xel'Naga Caverns 140 x 124

[image loading]

Excavation Site by meatpudding

Playable area 156 x 124

[image loading]

Angled
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Close up base and natural
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Close up third, which is the natural from the original
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


4th base with ramp and pathing added around the side
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Another pic of the 3 base setup
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


And hi res overview

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Oh and I was going to submit a scrap station remake but haven't finished it

[image loading]
Be excellent to each other.
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 16:08:25
June 24 2013 14:55 GMT
#118
Alright here is my submission.

Debris Station:

Based on Debris fields:

Original (116x140)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Remake (172x172)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


So i always felt that island maps was missing in SC2 so since i noticed Blizzard had made one i figured i could improve it to the standards of todays meta game. I might have gone a tad overboard through, but this is my first complete SC2 map. I have done a ton of map analysis through and from that i determened a few conditions required for a balanced Island map.

1. Must be 4 player
2. Must be huge
3. Must have 2 bases in main
4. Ideally Mirrored symmentry.

The 3 first of those conditions is accomplished with this remake through changing it to mirrored Symmentry would probably alter too much for this competitions conditions.

As this is my first map through, it is very simple in terms of terrain and also very light on doodads.

Some extra Pics:

+ Show Spoiler +
The Main
[image loading]

Center Island
[image loading]



Sorry for being an hour late through had issues with the pictures.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
turtles
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia360 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 16:50:22
June 24 2013 16:49 GMT
#119
I submit Bel'Shir swamp. A modification of metalopolis.

Basically I...

  • Removed close spawns
  • Coppied the main and nat setup
  • stretched out the distance between bases
  • rotated the centre bases 90 degrees and put rocks on them
  • stuck a great big ol' swamp in the middle
  • The swamp area has a lot of vission blockers so visibility is low everywhere in the swamp unless you have air support
  • no buildings can be built in the swamp
  • there is a xel'naga tower in the centre providing vision advantage in the swamp for those who hold it.


imgur.com is messing up for me at the moment so I submit the previous screenshots I had.

whole map
+ Show Spoiler +


angled overview

[image loading]


pathing

[image loading]



close ups
+ Show Spoiler +


in the swamp

[image loading]


looking from South base to East base

[image loading]


Xel'naga tower in the centre

[image loading]




To get an idea of the size here is a comparisson with metalopolis. Remember, close spawns are disabled but I included it anyway to get an idea of size.

close spawn
-Bel'Shir swamp: 121.4
-metalopolis: 107.7
-difference: +12%

close air:
-Bel'Shir swamp: 148.3
-metalopolis: 135.5
-difference: +9%

cross spawn:
-Bel'Shir swamp:170.3
-metalopolis: 159.1
-difference: +7%

I hope you like it. It was the first map I ever made. I touched it up a bit for this competition though. Including making the outside prettier, changing the water colours to match better, flattening the terrain more and fixing the pathing problems in the mains.


EDIT: Uploaded as Bel'Shir swamp on the NA and EU region for those wanting to try it
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 24 2013 18:31 GMT
#120
On June 24 2013 19:15 Timetwister22 wrote:
.Looking through some of these submission threads, many are missing important info that will be needed as per the rules. I will include things such as original map size and pic vs the new size and pic for voting. If you don't include all your info in your threads, I will not hunt you down to find such info. I'll just simply not include your map in the voting.
Well, I don't know what the original size of some Blizzard maps is.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
21:00
ONSYDE Invitational
TaKeTV 241
TKL 174
CranKy Ducklings71
Big Brain Bouts
19:00
#129
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinELIVE!
Reynor vs herO
RotterdaM960
IndyStarCraft 166
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 960
Lowko445
TKL 174
IndyStarCraft 166
Rex 87
MindelVK 15
ProTech3
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 61582
Free 3094
Jaedong 2172
BeSt 713
Soulkey 415
Horang2 347
Soma 302
Zeus 204
firebathero 186
Last 161
[ Show more ]
Hyun 142
sorry 127
Mind 114
Pusan 71
ToSsGirL 27
soO 26
Aegong 21
scan(afreeca) 21
Sacsri 11
zelot 10
Noble 7
Dota 2
Gorgc7139
Dendi774
XaKoH 397
canceldota51
Other Games
gofns34286
singsing2509
B2W.Neo494
byalli381
Pyrionflax306
ToD202
DeMusliM71
QueenE41
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV204
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 25
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP22
• Gemini_19 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1370
• WagamamaTV470
League of Legends
• Jankos3064
Upcoming Events
AI Arena Tournament
4h 19m
BSL: Ladder Tournament
6h 19m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 19m
Patches Events
1d 2h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 6h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 6h
OSC
1d 23h
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.