• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:51
CET 01:51
KST 09:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion What happened to TvZ on Retro? Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2053 users

Better than Blizzard Map Challenge - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 20 2013 23:53 GMT
#101
Apart from the tileset I really don't think that map's close enough. Everything's pretty much different.

I also just realized it only had four bases per player, wow.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
June 21 2013 05:17 GMT
#102
I really think blistering sands remakes should have a backdoor. Otherwise what's the point, the rest of the layout on that map is just bad too and you have to do so much just to make it playable.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
lorestarcraft
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1049 Posts
June 21 2013 06:16 GMT
#103
On June 21 2013 14:17 EatThePath wrote:
I really think blistering sands remakes should have a backdoor. Otherwise what's the point, the rest of the layout on that map is just bad too and you have to do so much just to make it playable.

I tend to agree with this statement.
SC2 Mapmaker
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 21 2013 06:46 GMT
#104
I think the major problem is that even despite the rocks, the layout just looks nothing alike beyond the main/nat setup.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Samro225am
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany982 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-21 12:38:18
June 21 2013 07:38 GMT
#105
i think one should consider how a map plays like. not what the layout looks like.

i did not provide the concept explanation in my post yesterday, but here it is.

Features
- there is a backdoor to the nat which is not that far away for comitted attacks
- there is a very harassable third that is easily accessed from all four directions, the other third added in the position of the main backdoor is even more open for straight forward attacks.
- the tower does not provide vision for units without air support
- with all rocks taken down five or even four bases are not so easily kept
- LoSBs in the long end of the main for drops
- big main cliffs beiing walkable almost everywhere, big main invites drops, sneaky pylon, nydus, etc

Concept
What was especially strong in Blistering Sand's concept is the main backdoor. Consequently build-up was slow and you would never transfer easily into a macro game, because you just had to provide defense. Hence games developed slower and played out more aggressively than on other maps.
I did not want to keep the main backdoor (which was pretty much the shortest path) to direct these attacks along this one axis, but i wanted to keep the idea of strong aggressive openings and timing attacks. In midgame we can expect constant denial of fourths or even thirds.


Answer to all the people who think that map is not valid in this contest: you do not have to vote for it, but i think the map plays out closely enough in the style of blistering without being a remake. The contest asks for better than blizzard, not remake and balance their maps. Hence i took the strong early to mid game as a guideline and transformed the map as i thought it is needed.
I don't care too much in case the map is disqualified ^^ but it would be a pitty because i am quite sure it provides similar games within hots gameplay and an overall more grown up game.


edit: Semmo brought this up: take main hugging third and never move + win. This is pretty much why you will have aaggression. You cannot let the other player have the third so easily and the distance is short enough to be able to attack/disturb that base long enough. Maybe i should add a blizzard style rock (;
chuky500
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
France473 Posts
June 21 2013 12:22 GMT
#106
That's why I think it's better to just judge the maps and not have a poll with redundant choices. A map can be both great and a bit different but people can only pick one choice. If you think some maps aren't following the guideline then just vote it's bad, adding redundant choice is pointless and will only reward bland maps with almost no changes. The point of this contest is to take bad maps and turn them into good maps, not about picking good maps and tweaking them just a bit.

If the poll makes you choose between good and too different why not add choices like "too similar" or "corresponds to a metagame from 2 years ago". The contest is about judging maps there's no need to add side questions within the same poll.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 01:29 GMT
#107
Immortal Depths
Timetwister22

[image loading]

Aesthetics
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Remake of Xel'naga Caverns: + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 124x124
Immortal Depths playable size: 124x140

All of the high ground pods in the middle by the golds and watchtowers are pathable. The high ground by the natural is not pathable.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 24 2013 01:58 GMT
#108
Hey hey, I did it first.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 02:52 GMT
#109
Just a reminder, submissions close in 12 hours from now. Those posted after will not be accepted. I will start the voting phase sometime early this week.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 20:55:05
June 24 2013 02:56 GMT
#110
In that case I throw this one in:



Mondscheinsonate SE
Size:128, 134

[image loading]


Remake of XNC.
Size: 140x124
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
June 24 2013 03:57 GMT
#111
I have two maps that I'd like to submit. I'm just posting this to keep track of the time
Inimic
Profile Joined March 2013
Canada153 Posts
June 24 2013 04:38 GMT
#112
There needs to be a requirement to actually play the maps before you can vote for them. How a map looks on 'paper,' and how it plays/feels can vary a lot.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-25 16:51:11
June 24 2013 05:11 GMT
#113

Kulas Glen by RFDaemoniac

[image loading]

Remake of Kulas Ravine. + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 140x136
Kulas Glen playable size: 148x148
Album of additional images+ Show Spoiler +

Main/nat/in-base third setup with natural wall-off.
[image loading]

Natural with overlooking high-ground and rocked path between horizontal spawns.
[image loading]

Other third and area between vertical spawns
[image loading]

Center and watchtowers
[image loading]


Aesthetics are kinda crap... but I think I'm in that period where I'm getting worse before I improve.

Edit to include playable bounds and original image. I hope it's not too late.
RFDaemoniac
Profile Joined September 2011
United States544 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-25 17:02:42
June 24 2013 05:23 GMT
#114

Grave King Hill by RFDaemoniac
[image loading]

Remake of Burial Grounds. + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Original playable size: 132 x 132
Grave King Hill playable size: 132 x 136
Album of additional images+ Show Spoiler +

Main with choke wall-off
[image loading]

Natural with Nexus wall-off
[image loading]

Corner third with overlooking highround
[image loading]

Backdoor third
[image loading]

Forward/open third
[image loading]

Gold base
[image loading]

Center
[image loading]



The back door to the main has two rocks stacked, but slightly offset so that you can see both of them.

Edit: Included necessary submission info.

Edit 2: Some more info on my thoughts behind the changes.

I wanted the uphill to be important when moving out, in order to allow a contain, but not important when defending. Defending on the low ground feels terrible, even without a real high ground mechanic. I therefore pushed the highground a little farther away from the natural.

This made the middle ground area quite small, so I found an area where I could make it bigger, by bringing it over the corner of the main.

I decided to keep the two entrance main instead of converting it to a standard ramp down/9 choke because I like seeing aggressive games. I put rocks at the natural to help you wall and the pit in the natural helps create some interesting army movement for the attacker.

I gave the back door two rocks instead of one in order to mitigate things like hydra pushes against air toss. While the main entrance is wall able with only 2 buildings, it might be slightly too big to stop early pushes in TvP from both sides, in which case I'd make it smaller and put flat rocks on it.

There are multiple choices for a third. The two on the high ground are harassable, but the one in the corner is a little more choked, making it easier to defend for protoss or a mech terran. However, as a trade off for being more choked it is farther from your main/natural, forcing you to split your army well.

The backdoor third isn't particularly interesting except for its proximity to the gold base. I wanted to encourage players to be able to expand in either direction. I also wanted it to be possible for each player to hold a gold base, perhaps at the sacrifice of easy map control. The watch towers help make the counter-clockwise gold base takable, as well as encouraging air units to move through the middle where they have to pay attention to what's underneath them.
FlyingBeer
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States262 Posts
June 24 2013 09:05 GMT
#115
On June 21 2013 16:38 Samro225am wrote:
i think one should consider how a map plays like. not what the layout looks like.

i did not provide the concept explanation in my post yesterday, but here it is.

Features
- there is a backdoor to the nat which is not that far away for comitted attacks
- there is a very harassable third that is easily accessed from all four directions, the other third added in the position of the main backdoor is even more open for straight forward attacks.
- the tower does not provide vision for units without air support
- with all rocks taken down five or even four bases are not so easily kept
- LoSBs in the long end of the main for drops
- big main cliffs beiing walkable almost everywhere, big main invites drops, sneaky pylon, nydus, etc

Concept
What was especially strong in Blistering Sand's concept is the main backdoor. Consequently build-up was slow and you would never transfer easily into a macro game, because you just had to provide defense. Hence games developed slower and played out more aggressively than on other maps.
I did not want to keep the main backdoor (which was pretty much the shortest path) to direct these attacks along this one axis, but i wanted to keep the idea of strong aggressive openings and timing attacks. In midgame we can expect constant denial of fourths or even thirds.


Answer to all the people who think that map is not valid in this contest: you do not have to vote for it, but i think the map plays out closely enough in the style of blistering without being a remake. The contest asks for better than blizzard, not remake and balance their maps. Hence i took the strong early to mid game as a guideline and transformed the map as i thought it is needed.
I don't care too much in case the map is disqualified ^^ but it would be a pitty because i am quite sure it provides similar games within hots gameplay and an overall more grown up game.


edit: Semmo brought this up: take main hugging third and never move + win. This is pretty much why you will have aaggression. You cannot let the other player have the third so easily and the distance is short enough to be able to attack/disturb that base long enough. Maybe i should add a blizzard style rock (;


Your map is one of my favorites partly because it's well done, but also because you took the time to write this up. I was hoping to read more of the different map designers' insights into how they thought it best to improve on a map's design, but most are just being thrown up with very little comment.
Timetwister22
Profile Joined March 2011
United States538 Posts
June 24 2013 10:15 GMT
#116
.Looking through some of these submission threads, many are missing important info that will be needed as per the rules. I will include things such as original map size and pic vs the new size and pic for voting. If you don't include all your info in your threads, I will not hunt you down to find such info. I'll just simply not include your map in the voting.
Former ESV Mapmaker | @Timetwister22
meatpudding
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia520 Posts
June 24 2013 13:44 GMT
#117
Here's my submission for a Blizzar map remake.

Based on Xel'Naga Caverns 140 x 124

[image loading]

Excavation Site by meatpudding

Playable area 156 x 124

[image loading]

Angled
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Close up base and natural
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Close up third, which is the natural from the original
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


4th base with ramp and pathing added around the side
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Another pic of the 3 base setup
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


And hi res overview

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Oh and I was going to submit a scrap station remake but haven't finished it

[image loading]
Be excellent to each other.
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 16:08:25
June 24 2013 14:55 GMT
#118
Alright here is my submission.

Debris Station:

Based on Debris fields:

Original (116x140)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Remake (172x172)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


So i always felt that island maps was missing in SC2 so since i noticed Blizzard had made one i figured i could improve it to the standards of todays meta game. I might have gone a tad overboard through, but this is my first complete SC2 map. I have done a ton of map analysis through and from that i determened a few conditions required for a balanced Island map.

1. Must be 4 player
2. Must be huge
3. Must have 2 bases in main
4. Ideally Mirrored symmentry.

The 3 first of those conditions is accomplished with this remake through changing it to mirrored Symmentry would probably alter too much for this competitions conditions.

As this is my first map through, it is very simple in terms of terrain and also very light on doodads.

Some extra Pics:

+ Show Spoiler +
The Main
[image loading]

Center Island
[image loading]



Sorry for being an hour late through had issues with the pictures.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
turtles
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Australia360 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-24 16:50:22
June 24 2013 16:49 GMT
#119
I submit Bel'Shir swamp. A modification of metalopolis.

Basically I...

  • Removed close spawns
  • Coppied the main and nat setup
  • stretched out the distance between bases
  • rotated the centre bases 90 degrees and put rocks on them
  • stuck a great big ol' swamp in the middle
  • The swamp area has a lot of vission blockers so visibility is low everywhere in the swamp unless you have air support
  • no buildings can be built in the swamp
  • there is a xel'naga tower in the centre providing vision advantage in the swamp for those who hold it.


imgur.com is messing up for me at the moment so I submit the previous screenshots I had.

whole map
+ Show Spoiler +


angled overview

[image loading]


pathing

[image loading]



close ups
+ Show Spoiler +


in the swamp

[image loading]


looking from South base to East base

[image loading]


Xel'naga tower in the centre

[image loading]




To get an idea of the size here is a comparisson with metalopolis. Remember, close spawns are disabled but I included it anyway to get an idea of size.

close spawn
-Bel'Shir swamp: 121.4
-metalopolis: 107.7
-difference: +12%

close air:
-Bel'Shir swamp: 148.3
-metalopolis: 135.5
-difference: +9%

cross spawn:
-Bel'Shir swamp:170.3
-metalopolis: 159.1
-difference: +7%

I hope you like it. It was the first map I ever made. I touched it up a bit for this competition though. Including making the outside prettier, changing the water colours to match better, flattening the terrain more and fixing the pathing problems in the mains.


EDIT: Uploaded as Bel'Shir swamp on the NA and EU region for those wanting to try it
SiskosGoatee
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Albania1482 Posts
June 24 2013 18:31 GMT
#120
On June 24 2013 19:15 Timetwister22 wrote:
.Looking through some of these submission threads, many are missing important info that will be needed as per the rules. I will include things such as original map size and pic vs the new size and pic for voting. If you don't include all your info in your threads, I will not hunt you down to find such info. I'll just simply not include your map in the voting.
Well, I don't know what the original size of some Blizzard maps is.
WCS Apartheid cometh, all hail the casual audience, death to merit and hard work.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 9m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft330
trigger 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 677
Sexy 28
NaDa 19
Bale 7
Counter-Strike
fl0m558
Other Games
summit1g6637
gofns6461
Grubby4953
shahzam337
C9.Mang0154
Maynarde111
ViBE83
PPMD25
Models2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick589
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 77
• RyuSc2 42
• davetesta23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21123
• Ler74
Other Games
• Scarra363
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
9h 9m
RSL Revival
9h 9m
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
11h 9m
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
16h 9m
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
18h 9m
BSL 21
19h 9m
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 9h
RSL Revival
1d 9h
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
1d 11h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 11h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 19h
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
1d 19h
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 22h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL: GosuLeague
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.