| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Yonnua
United Kingdom2331 Posts
On July 26 2012 23:00 CruxEWPrime wrote: Why this map's version LE is. Because I post on PlayXP. And First version had too much Frame Drop. And I made Low Edition version, i post on TL. Do you have any pretty pictures from the original version or are the aesthetics still pretty much the same? | ||
|
TibblesEvilCat
United Kingdom766 Posts
| ||
|
Aunvilgod
2653 Posts
On July 27 2012 00:34 Dexington wrote: A map with a different layout than normal! Excited to see how it works. I don´t see where this map is different? I can´t see any unique features. | ||
|
Syphon8
Canada298 Posts
On July 27 2012 03:25 Aunvilgod wrote: I don´t see where this map is different? I can´t see any unique features. Ya, it's almost the exact same layout as Daybreak with different proportions. That said, it's an amazing improvement. I really hope this goes to ladder. | ||
|
Aunvilgod
2653 Posts
On July 27 2012 03:35 Syphon8 wrote: Ya, it's almost the exact same layout as Daybreak with different proportions. That said, it's an amazing improvement. I really hope this goes to ladder. Yes, that is the probably best comparison. It might also have heavy circle syndrome. | ||
|
dezi
Germany1536 Posts
| ||
|
RFDaemoniac
United States544 Posts
 | ||
|
Aunvilgod
2653 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:08 RFDaemoniac wrote: Except that you can realistically expand down either side from either spawn, depending on race/preferences. This could create some interesting tensions over the 4th base I am close to a 100% sure pros will just expand linear. But we might see. | ||
|
Superouman
France2195 Posts
| ||
|
ShowTheLights
Korea (South)1715 Posts
| ||
|
Semmo
Korea (South)627 Posts
On July 27 2012 01:10 FlaShFTW wrote: With three chokes to defend to take your third, it seems a bit of a struggle. However, relooking at the map, since rush distances are so long, there shouldn't be too big of a problem with it, since one of them is easily walled off as well. Very pretty map, love it a lot. Usually when a map has the middle mains, the corner expos behind the mains become very underused. Not the case here. I can see them coming into great use. I played it on the Kr server, the rush distance is quite short. | ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
On July 27 2012 04:08 RFDaemoniac wrote: Except that you can realistically expand down either side from either spawn, depending on race/preferences. This could create some interesting tensions over the 4th base This is how people will expand: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ZPCrk.jpg) Corner expansions are kinda neutral, yet so close to either expansion pattern that they are quite awkward for both sides to take. | ||
|
Semmo
Korea (South)627 Posts
On July 27 2012 09:03 Ragoo wrote: This is how people will expand: + Show Spoiler + Corner expansions are kinda neutral, yet so close to either expansion pattern that they are quite awkward for both sides to take. Since I played and obbed on this map, let me say that people especially terrans in TvZ expand to the central expo as their third while being agressive. The conventional third is actually more difficult to secure than people think, that's the reason why people take the central expansion, I think. | ||
|
AssyrianKing
Australia2117 Posts
| ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
On July 27 2012 09:44 kim9067 wrote: Since I played and obbed on this map, let me say that people especially terrans in TvZ expand to the central expo as their third while being agressive. The conventional third is actually more difficult to secure than people think, that's the reason why people take the central expansion, I think. Oh yeah, that's obviously another expansion pattern you could use. I was just trying to point out that the sixth are neutral-ish. | ||
|
LemonyTang
United Kingdom436 Posts
| ||
FlaShFTW
United States10528 Posts
On July 27 2012 08:50 kim9067 wrote: I played it on the Kr server, the rush distance is quite short. really? with the main/nat setup, id expect them to be quite long... nvm, relooked at the map, didnt see the smaller ramp that leads to the middle. | ||
|
SeinGalton
South Africa387 Posts
The proportions seem particularly good to me, and I enjoy small features like the "backdoor" path into the third. The distances between bases and possible expansion patterns reminds me of Cloud Kingdom, and this map reveals the same solidity in its initial base layout. The middle is much different, and even though it's reminiscent of Daybreak, it should play out rather differently, not in the least due to the watchtower placement. It encourages far more aggression throughout all stages of the game. Honestly, I feel the middle map is just about flawless. I can't think of a more promising map in recent memory - I'm excited to play on this map and to see it really stress tested. I reckon and hope this map has a bright future. EDIT: Actually, the one thing I can fault is the name: "Abyssal City" is a little underwhelming and doesn't quite roll of the tongue. I don't know if that's still subject to change though. | ||
|
xeqwist
55 Posts
Too bad it's not on EU T–T, but from what I can see on the overview it looks really solid. | ||
|
ChaosRefined
United States52 Posts
| ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
