Sea.s2 SiR@SoNi~
Forum Index > Replays |
-Centaurus-
Russian Federation28 Posts
| ||
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17727 Posts
| ||
![]()
RaGe
Belgium9947 Posts
amazing game btw ^^ | ||
iNsaNe-
Finland5201 Posts
| ||
Pafnucy
Poland1124 Posts
| ||
-Centaurus-
Russian Federation28 Posts
![]() | ||
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
<3 | ||
SchOOl_VicTIm
Greece2394 Posts
![]() | ||
Pafnucy
Poland1124 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ending (zerg lacking gas, long game - irradiate) might disgust zerg users here. omg, that decision to lift all and just go vs main and 2 exps, so sexy, huge balls, sir | ||
Gandalf
Pakistan1905 Posts
| ||
iNsaNe-
Finland5201 Posts
| ||
ygor
Slovakia246 Posts
| ||
![]()
IntoTheWow
is awesome32274 Posts
Thats why it is effective going 3 fact tanks vs hydra swarm zergs. Watch in the rep-> he has 2 lurkers under swarm burrowed (they cant take damage burrowed), but he unburrows 1, and it dies from the splash from the fire on the first lurkers (the one still burrowed). there was a thread discussing this some time ago. | ||
Myxomatosis
United States2392 Posts
On September 06 2006 16:15 ygor wrote: Why did he keep firing at his SCV's with a tank to kill lurker, when that lurker was under swarm? I thought lurker is immune to tank fire under swarm. except to splash damage. Nada was dealing like 30 damage to the lurks from firing at his scv. wow close game. must see! was this the new peaks btw? | ||
RiSE
United States3182 Posts
| ||
![]()
IntoTheWow
is awesome32274 Posts
http://teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=38851 | ||
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
![]()
Excalibur_Z
United States12235 Posts
| ||
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
| ||
SCNewb
Canada2210 Posts
| ||
skindzer
Chile5114 Posts
| ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
| ||
Pafnucy
Poland1124 Posts
copyright | ||
Wonders
Australia753 Posts
| ||
abandonallhope
Sweden563 Posts
| ||
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
I keep trying to tell people that original peaks wasn't that bad for ZvT. You just have to know and understand 1 base Zerg, which most Zerg users are bad at. I'd say New Peaks is maybe even less balanced TvZ, but New Peaks is a bette map because of the much improved PvZ balance. | ||
iNsaNe-
Finland5201 Posts
On September 06 2006 19:02 Drowsy wrote: It was alright. Sir@Soni~ is married and like 27 isn't he or am I thinking of someone who probably doesn't exist? Don't know his age but he was the first progamer to get married. | ||
Red_Dragon
Croatia2862 Posts
| ||
pooper-scooper
United States3108 Posts
| ||
GroT
Belgium3003 Posts
| ||
![]()
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
nitram
Canada5412 Posts
| ||
In)Spire
United States1323 Posts
| ||
sundance
Slovakia3201 Posts
On September 07 2006 18:12 GroT wrote: these are the coolest kinds of games :p | ||
Koldblooded
United States661 Posts
| ||
decafchicken
United States20021 Posts
/crying I keep trying to tell people that original peaks wasn't that bad for ZvT. You just have to know and understand 1 base Zerg, which most Zerg users are bad at. 1 base t > 1 base z | ||
gulii
Sweden2791 Posts
![]() | ||
Alborz
Canada1551 Posts
| ||
nitram
Canada5412 Posts
| ||
| ||