EPTtrekvslamer1
| Forum Index > Replays |
|
hasuwar
7365 Posts
| ||
|
SwedishHero
Sweden869 Posts
| ||
|
SwedishHero
Sweden869 Posts
 | ||
|
karelen
Sweden2407 Posts
| ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
great game anyway, altho lamer completely outplayed trek but still lost cuz of dumbness. | ||
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
|
Holorin
France227 Posts
-full upgrades -funny waste of siege mode -expand denied victory sux | ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
| ||
|
Shiv
France447 Posts
And his macro is solid. I'm impressed. | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
Lamer would have had a MUCH better chance had he abused siege mode a bit more. His mass tanks would very often lose to mass goons  | ||
|
ubergamer15
United States645 Posts
-Trek brings about 6 zealots to one of Lamer's (undefended) mineral only's and starts to move them toward the SCV's, but before they get there, Lamer selects as many SCV's as he can and just hits "stop". The SCV's scatter, tangling the zealots up in a flurry of movement, and a couple moments later, 12 vultures show up and pick off the trapped zealots. I think Trek got 2-3 SCV kills there. | ||
|
TreK
Sweden2089 Posts
 | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
btw i like a girl named kristen^^ | ||
|
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
On April 20 2005 18:38 ubergamer15 wrote: Indeed, macro was the name of this game, but there's one nice micro moment that's worth watching the game again just to see: -Trek brings about 6 zealots to one of Lamer's (undefended) mineral only's and starts to move them toward the SCV's, but before they get there, Lamer selects as many SCV's as he can and just hits "stop". The SCV's scatter, tangling the zealots up in a flurry of movement, and a couple moments later, 12 vultures show up and pick off the trapped zealots. I think Trek got 2-3 SCV kills there. It looked impressive but it wasn't anything special =] He used attack, not stop too im pretty sure | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
| ||
|
MPXMX
Canada4309 Posts
| ||
|
ubergamer15
United States645 Posts
On April 21 2005 06:58 MPXMX wrote: He said it's a moment for which it's worth watching the game again, but I think that was more of a mistake on trek's part and raelly not that impressive though it DID look good. You're right, its not really worth watching the game again for. | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
| ||
|
DaZe
Sweden2111 Posts
| ||
|
EchoOfRain
United States516 Posts
| ||
|
Breeze
Bulgaria989 Posts
On April 24 2005 02:25 EchoOfRain wrote: i played and beat lamer pvt and he said that T wasnt his main race...how lame. oh well gg but now i know the truth. hahahah | ||
|
Sky101
United States1758 Posts
On April 24 2005 02:25 EchoOfRain wrote: i played and beat lamer pvt and he said that T wasnt his main race...how lame. oh well gg but now i know the truth. rep?? | ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
On April 19 2005 19:14 pfff wrote: umm, lamer shouldnt have exchanged his brain for extra apm. great game anyway, altho lamer completely outplayed trek but still lost cuz of dumbness. Not true | ||
|
RedMeat
United Kingdom490 Posts
| ||
|
LetMeBeWithYou
Canada4254 Posts
Man blue just rams it right into the zealots and siege argh it hurts to see all those tanks die so quickly =[ I thought it was a great fast paced macro game with terran just dont give a shit about the units =DD!! | ||
| ||
