|
I don't believe I said anything that implies my understanding of your post as being anything other than what you just said it was. Most of my writing was a commentary on the forum simply sparked from what you wrote. Your comment didn't hurt my feelings, as I said in my response to Orome, since I'm not judging TL.net at all. Posting here isn't an emotional experience for me so there's no need to apologize.
As far as why the moderators would desire the posts, I tried to address that in my response to Orome. If there were absolutely no shallow posts, as Orome said, we'd be left with 50 people. That won't sustain this forum. The SC community isn't big enough to be picky so that if people insist on making only 1 out of every 10 posts worthwhile, then we have to take the good with the bad and make the best of it. I suppose the word 'desire' is a bit of a crux but I tried to amend it by saying that moderators would never encourage such behavior. Such behavior is always expected and moderators consciously allow it, everywhere, so it just came off as a bit funny to me that you brought the issue up here. I thought this thread was rather decent for discussion as far as the standards of the site go.
PS: I don't understand the 'Sigmund and Freud' comment. Aren't they magicians?
|
On December 06 2006 10:25 stickman wrote:
I don't believe I said anything that implies my understanding of your post as being anything other than what you just said it was. Most of my writing was a commentary on the forum simply sparked from what you wrote. Your comment didn't hurt my feelings, as I said in my response to Orome, since I'm not judging TL.net at all. Posting here isn't an emotional experience for me so there's no need to apologize.
As far as why the moderators would desire the posts, I tried to address that in my response to Orome. If there were absolutely no shallow posts, as Orome said, we'd be left with 50 people. That won't sustain this forum. The SC community isn't big enough to be picky so that if people insist on making only 1 out of every 10 posts worthwhile, then we have to take the good with the bad and make the best of it. I suppose the word 'desire' is a bit of a crux but I tried to amend it by saying that moderators would never encourage such behavior. Such behavior is always expected and moderators consciously allow it, everywhere, so it just came off as a bit funny to me that you brought the issue up here. I thought this thread was rather decent for discussion as far as the standards of the site go.
PS: I don't understand the 'Sigmund and Freud' comment. Aren't they magicians?
Sigmund and Freud magicians jajajaja...this kids nowadays...
|
United States5262 Posts
On December 06 2006 10:25 stickman wrote:
I don't believe I said anything that implies my understanding of your post as being anything other than what you just said it was. Most of my writing was a commentary on the forum simply sparked from what you wrote. Your comment didn't hurt my feelings, as I said in my response to Orome, since I'm not judging TL.net at all. Posting here isn't an emotional experience for me so there's no need to apologize.
As far as why the moderators would desire the posts, I tried to address that in my response to Orome. If there were absolutely no shallow posts, as Orome said, we'd be left with 50 people. That won't sustain this forum. The SC community isn't big enough to be picky so that if people insist on making only 1 out of every 10 posts worthwhile, then we have to take the good with the bad and make the best of it. I suppose the word 'desire' is a bit of a crux but I tried to amend it by saying that moderators would never encourage such behavior. Such behavior is always expected and moderators consciously allow it, everywhere, so it just came off as a bit funny to me that you brought the issue up here. I thought this thread was rather decent for discussion as far as the standards of the site go.
PS: I don't understand the 'Sigmund and Freud' comment. Aren't they magicians?
Zzzzz. You've given this a lot of thought. I just wanted to see some constructive criticism, rather than 1. iloveoov, 2. YellOw, 3. BoxeR over and over again.
|
United States5262 Posts
Oooh one more week and the new power rankings should be up.
|
On December 11 2006 20:37 jkillashark wrote:
Oooh one more week and the new power rankings should be up.
You are a keen observer. I might wait a couple days if some big games are coming up or something (I really don't want to post them before I've seen an OSL game or two), but they should be up a little before Christmas one way or another.
|
There havent been enough matches played yet for the ranking to change much, mostly dual, first week of MSL, and some progleague matches. Worth to note Sea playing in neither MSL nor OSL. Even though his skill level is good enough to belong on the list, his hot streak has cooled considerably. Jaedong should definitely be added and perhaps Much too as he has been doing good lately. Still remains to see what impact he'll have in the leagues. Qualifying is one thing, performing there is another thing, just look at Light&Canata for example who should be doing better than 0-3 in groups, but dont.
Right after New Year would be a good time to make a new ranking.
|
United States5262 Posts
Jin Yeongsu dude. He crushed sAviOr on Longina.
|
Shut up, that was a fluke. That was the Maestro having a wrist twitch and the flute solo went bad. Pure fluke. Nice timing on Hwasin's part but it's Savior. He's lost to MnM rushes before.
Sea has to be gone, and BOUT TIME!! I always say that kid is hype. Bisu -_--;; Drop out of MSL so you can drop out of pokerrank~
|
On December 13 2006 18:01 SuperJongMan wrote:
Shut up, that was a fluke. That was the Maestro having a wrist twitch and the flute solo went bad. Pure fluke. Nice timing on Hwasin's part but it's Savior. He's lost to MnM rushes before.
Sea has to be gone, and BOUT TIME!! I always say that kid is hype. Bisu -_--;; Drop out of MSL so you can drop out of pokerrank~
Excuses...
Dont try to opacate Hwasin's effort...
I saw the game and I can tell by my years of experience...in seeing Korean Progamer Matches...
That Hwasin vs Savior was a...GG...
|
... Did I really type Pokerrank and not Power Rank?
OMG I gotta stop playing. Was this some sick mod joke? OMG
|
Guys I really want to see Sea fall down, he has to play off line Starleague qualifiers...
|
People who should apear :
Much, Hwasin and Jaedong ?
People who should disapear :
GGplay, Sea and Nada ?
Savior, Midas, Anytime, Ra should stay close to their current rank.
The rest is hard
|
I think Much and Hwasin deserve spots in the power rank.
Edit: If Anytime is lower then rank 3 this upcoming power rank me and Etter are going to have a throwdown.
|
United States5262 Posts
I think maybe its best if Etter does his Power Rankings for December 2006 AFTER the Wednesday and Friday OSL games. That way for sure he knows if Hwasin, Jaedong, and etc are hot for reals.
|
Jaedong isn't in OSL, and he just lost to Pusan in MSL. 
I agree with Guybrush, there isn't enough information to make a ranking that doesn't seem a little arbitrary right now, I'd wait 2-3 weeks and see how the players do in OSL/MSL and the proleague playoffs.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
next powerrank should be after the PL playoff on the 23rd
+ Show Spoiler +this is just my opinion, so if u dont want it dont read any further Player's that should be droppingGGplay- really starting to slump  sadly Bisu - starting to lose games... but i suspect fanboyism will prevent any dramatic fall Nada - dispite making his MSL group.. he did lose to pokju =/... maybe staying at three will be appropriate JJu- there are simply better gamers to put in there Gorush - can you say flop? Player's that should move upNal_ra - atleast to ahead of bisu Jaedong - check out that PL record, enough for tenth i think Pusan - not top ten, but is showing signs of form after beating jaedong and GGplay Odin - probably not top ten but showing some real promise here, potentially the next big thing Free - beating juylzerg twice pvz is some mean feat, and is showing real form as well as qualifying for the next msl Much - hes like the more glamorised version of free imo Daezang - cornerstone of hanbit's success in PL as well as proiding good games and doing amazingly well in the 16man bloodbath for that last spot in the MSL dispite not actually making it Hwasin - beating savior in itself is an awesome feat as well as having killer tvz, he deserves a low spot imo Light[AlivE] - MBC's ace, awesome record, insane multitasking ability- this guy is machine and his games are awesome.. imo better than sea
|
|
|
On December 16 2006 02:20 Orome wrote:
Odin sucks. :p
Well I dont think so...if you are talking about the Odin from Brazil...who lose against Legend 2-1...in Round Of 16 of WCG 2006...I mean thats a really big accomplishment...and in my opinion to say he sucks its just wrong...
But if you are talking about a Korean Progamer...its just even worse...because obviously the Odin Korean Progamer owns the Odin from Brazil...
|
Regardless even after waiting 2 or 3 more weeks it could just complicate things even more. But as of right now I think it is impossible to rank top 10. There are so many people that deserve spots such as Jaedong,Hwasin,Pusan,Much,Free,and Daezang.. Really I have no idea how I would list my top 10. Maybe the list could possibly be bumped to top 15 because of how tense and heated progaming is of right now its incredibly difficult to just name "10" of the best progamers.
|
pusans been in a horrible lose streak overall i doubt he can get in
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
