EPTTSL4? - Page 14
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
monx
Canada1400 Posts
| ||
|
lurked
Canada918 Posts
I'd vote to do it right now, but I want to do something of my summer week ends!  please, wait a few more weeks before to start? haha | ||
|
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
I like 1ce 6 months | ||
|
godemperor
Belgium2043 Posts
| ||
|
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
On May 19 2011 06:34 godemperor wrote: 2 per year, 1 in summer and another in winter. I approve cuz it's during breaks!!!! | ||
|
sl
Canada239 Posts
| ||
|
Elbonbunny
Ireland60 Posts
| ||
|
Mooga
United States575 Posts
| ||
|
Taj
Denmark1 Post
| ||
|
Jayrod
1820 Posts
On May 18 2011 01:47 kerpal wrote: SOMEONE VOTED FOR NO MORE TSLs!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Liquid`Tyler voted 268 times | ||
|
oDieN[Siege]
United States2905 Posts
| ||
|
VGhost
United States3620 Posts
The elimination bracket is a Ro32 and will likely stay that way, no? Assuming TL keeps the weekend schedule (which is brilliant) that gives us: 2 weeks for Ro32 (Sat/Sun x4 matches each) 2 weeks for Ro16 (Sat/Sun x2 matches each) 1 week for Ro8 (Sat/Sun x2 matches each) 1 week for Ro4 (Sat/Sun x1 match each) 1 week for Grand Final/3rd place (Sat/Sun x1 match each) This is 7 weeks minimum to run the actual tournament. Assuming that we keep the same format, we have: 16 seeds/invites* 8 qualifier winners 8 qualifiers on points This adds 8 more weeks of qualifiers, assuming they run one a week. (It would be possible to run more than one at a time of course but that's going to screw things up I think.) So the point is, we're talking a minimum of four months to run a TSL. That limits the TSL to a max of three seasons a year (similar to the MSL/OSL). Practically, it limits it to two seasons a year given staffing, sorting invites, scheduling, etc. TSL has been running a little less than once a year so far. I think the optimal idea is to continue the TSL as a "yearly" tournament and in fact make that the official position. I'm not inherently opposed to two seasons a year, though more is just a really bad idea - but I'm in favor of limiting the occurences. * And here's the note. I think that it would make more sense to seed 4, and then invites should be top performers from other tourneys (GSL, MLG IPL, NASL, Dreamhack, etc. depending on which events develop as most prestigious). I mean, 12 invites (or the 13 we now have) seems like a lot, but if you have top 3 GSL invited, top 3 MLG or IPL, top 3 Dreamhack, or whatever, that's completely a legit field. | ||
|
socommaster123
United States578 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
Stamper
Germany148 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
Just more game spamming is going to water down the significance. Wait as long as you possibly can. I would recommend a couple patches into HoTS. | ||
|
MrthePig
United States84 Posts
| ||
|
ShinySleepy
Philippines80 Posts
| ||
|
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
| ||
| ||
