|
On March 21 2008 08:11 Naib wrote:
The "selfish" part wasn't actually directed at you in person, just in general.
Oh and Shallow: ur mum ;(
See: the above one-liner is the quality of most of your posts made here. And it's not only me noticing / saying (Hell, it's not even only about Mafia but TL in general, just look around). Maybe everyone on the road is going on the wrong side...but maybe it's you?
/derailment off
Can't wait to see who dies when they day arises...That'll be how much hours approximately from here on?
Ha ha, good joke I guess, I didn't fully understand how my posts don't have quality. (If your speaking about my previous one liner then I didn't really have much to respond to.)
If I can come up with counters to what the mafia might be able to do, then I'll post what I'm thinking of right now. However if the mafia does what I'm thinking of, I'm not sure if there's a decent way to catch them. So until I can think of a way to close this hole, I'd rather not discuss it (since I'm hoping that the mafia won't think of it).
I'll be looking forward to it.
@french toast, heros pink
(long so I shortened it)
For the spreadsheet thing, to bad you didn't go through with it, I guess it's a thing for people with a lot of time. As for the information gathering point, I actually see a big difference. You could, of course keep track of all these people, get info, and guess who's who, that's what I'm saying you should do. Doing your own investigative work and then comparing answers with someone else is what I think the most exciting part of this game is. However, telling everyone to PM their roles to you, if you can combine that with your list effectively, you own all. Not only will you have all of the special roles in due time, you will also have an abridged list of suspects, and all the detectives at your disposal. Using detectives to check your suspects and Vigilantes to kill them is like the ultimate counter-mafia fighting force!
|
On March 21 2008 08:19 Falcynn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2008 08:15 French_Toast wrote:On March 21 2008 07:54 LucasWoJ wrote:
Jeez, it sounds like you're against the town winning. If it's by the rules, why complain about what you feel is inevitable victory? Sure sounds like your against the interest of the town. It sounds like you're a mafioso who's having trouble deciding on what to do. I think I already addressed this, whatever I'll say it again. In the previous posts I made, one of my arguments was that it would make the game less fun. Mafia is supposed to be about digging up clues and dirt on people, convincing your theory is right to other people, and having fun in general. These kind of games can become epic and fun to read, but if you use a cheap win you will lose all of that. TBH mafia is originally supposed to be played without any clues and you usually win using strategies like what we're using (ok...not really like them, but close enough). Clues are only used for large internet games where it's hard to personally get to know people and understand their character.
True, but that is why I am attracted to this game so. You have lots of time to keep track of everything and to determine clues. However the down side to this is that there are so many people that it is a guessing game most of the time, if people actually take the challenge to do all of this investigating then they will have fun and dominate.
ShadowDrgn
Yes, at first. But this plan is not instantly put into place, after around 2 days people have to login to vote or else they are breaking the rule that you have to vote and will be kicked, then the role will be assigned to another and they will confirm. After a while you will the info.
|
On March 21 2008 08:35 Naib wrote:French_Toast you misunderstood me again, I meant "general" as in: people who don't read / don't get it / don't PM. I didn't mean general as "French_Toast's posts in general". You take everything personal  edit: the followup part of my post that you quoted can be misunderstood, too, and I think you took it on yourself: it's directed at Shallow[bay] to try to get him get his act together. Well that's too much posting from me again: I'm off to sleep.
Ha ha, alright I was wondering you picked shallow bay to talk about his mom, I thought it was funny because of that.
|
On March 24 2008 07:33 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2008 07:29 Showtime! wrote:
Chuiu, I have another question for you!
Scenario 1: What happens when a Vigilante and a member of the mafia target each other on the same night? Do they both die a painful death or is it a coinflip?
They both die a painful death, trust me It's not a member of the mafia targeting them though, it's the entire mafia agreeing to put them on the list.
Speaking of which, why do we have to lynch people. Instead of voting only for the person we should also vote for that way we kill them. We could maybe shoot them in the head, inject them with some crap, chop their head off with a guillotine... etc. Night posts would be so much more interesting if we had a creative way of killing people.
|
Oh my, I'm famous!
On a side note- Just because you are irritated at my posts doesn't mean I am necessarily mafia. As for Ace's post on lynching people because their annoying, for someone who cares so much about the town to push the self destruct button... (I hope that was sarcasm)
|
I don't really understand what you mean by confusing the town. If speaking out against your plan was confusing the town then I'm not sure we have the same definition. As for being against you on every step, not really. I agree with you lynching Mandalore, that counts.
|
I'm not going to go into the details of why I think it's cheap again. Talking about the strategy being cheap was just my opinion being expressed. It was not my intention to cause confusion and panic (which I hope I didn't do), it was just to point out that it resembled something of abusing a glitch in a game. I have not yet however seen an outcome or jump in the numbers of mafia getting killed per night, so so far I have been proven wrong.
|
Showtime!, if you would like further discuss whether it's cheap or not, do not do it in the thread.
|
On March 24 2008 09:28 Scorch wrote:
what i'm saying is that he is considered guilty by many people already anyway. for my part, i don't need any more material to want him dead.
good night now, 1:30am here.
And then we lynch him and he turns out to be a towny.
Would you rather be 90% sure or 100% sure? Last game a lot of people were lynched that were so obvious and turned out to be towny. An example would be Dr.Dragoon, with the syringe clue, people were 99% sure it's him, and he turned up innocent.
|
I don't think it should take them that long to make tactical decisions. Assuming the mafia are organized, the constantly active mafias are most likely the ones who make most of the decisions and just use the constantly inactive mafia's killing power for their schemes. That's how it worked last game, wouldn't be surprised if that's how it worked now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
