DapperDan, you're the mod and obviously if you say people can edit, then they can. I say editing is scummy, and editing your post is reason enough to be suspicious of someone. Same with lying.

Seraphim, if you want to lynch me, explain why. Give your opponents a chance to explain themselves. Without an actual argument, there is no reason to follow what you say.

dancefayedance!~

396 Posts

February 12 2008 02:06 GMT

#404

tracil after reading your posts i am seriously considering revoking my vote.

Live2Win

United States6657 Posts

February 12 2008 02:09 GMT

#405

On February 12 2008 11:06 dancefayedance!~ wrote:
tracil after reading your posts i am seriously considering revoking my vote.

I find that intriguing. My suspicion of Tracil has actually gone way down.

Dr.Dragoon

United States1241 Posts

February 12 2008 02:11 GMT

#406

On February 12 2008 11:09 Live2Win wrote:

Show nested quote +

I find that intriguing. My suspicion of Tracil has actually gone way down.

Everyone should think the OPPOSITE of what L2W thinks. He's clearly mafia (unlike me).

CDRdude

United States5625 Posts

February 12 2008 02:12 GMT

#407

I don't think there should be anything illegal about editing your posts. However, anyone can see if you've edited it or not, and therefore, can see that you have something to hide. Also, if you edit a post, you open yourself up to false claims of quoting the "original" content of a post, (as in "so what if the timestamp is different, it was in my browser cache when I quoted it, it's true!"). Basically, if people spot you editing posts, they know (or think) you have something to hide. If you have something to hide, others will assume that you are mafia. Editing a post seems like a dangerous risk, not to be undertaken by the faint of heart.

CDRdude

United States5625 Posts

February 12 2008 02:13 GMT

#408

On February 12 2008 11:06 dancefayedance!~ wrote:
tracil after reading your posts i am seriously considering revoking my vote.

Out of curiosity, what in his posts makes you want to revoke your vote?

Dapperdan

United States38 Posts

February 12 2008 02:14 GMT

#409

Yeah sure. In any case, that is all the more reason why we have no reason to outlaw the act.

Dr.Dragoon

United States1241 Posts

February 12 2008 02:15 GMT

#410

I'm not suspicious

mahnini

United States6862 Posts

February 12 2008 02:15 GMT

#411

dancefayedance!~

396 Posts

February 12 2008 02:15 GMT

#412

On February 12 2008 11:09 Live2Win wrote:

Show nested quote +

I find that intriguing. My suspicion of Tracil has actually gone way down.

and why is that? every post of his is him just turning it around on everyone else. its the beginning of the game. why cant people suspect him of being the mafia? he obviously has the experience so he knows what to do and what to say, which would make people weary, but it seems like he responds back to every single post that says he is the mafia. the only suspicion i have is that he is too consistent in responding back to every posts that says "lynch tracil he is the mafia!!". I admit it's not much and that's why I am still voting for him but dont let your guard down this early in the game, especially for someone like tracil that knows how to play the game.

Amber[LighT]

United States5078 Posts

February 12 2008 02:19 GMT

#413

I wouldn't trust L2W. He seems pretty shady.

Falcynn

United States3597 Posts

February 12 2008 02:19 GMT

#414

When it comes to the lynch vote I'll probably be voting for Dragoon. Either he's mafia or he's just making some really really stupid moves, in either case I think it'd be beneficial to get rid of him quickly. If the Village Idiot role were included in this game like I noticed in some SEN games then I'd be positive that Dragoon had that role, but since we don't all of his posts make him seem like a really clumsy townie, or mafia.

I know I probably didn't really add anything new, but I just felt like posting....

dancefayedance!~

396 Posts

February 12 2008 02:20 GMT

#415

On February 12 2008 11:12 CDRdude wrote:
I don't think there should be anything illegal about editing your posts. However, anyone can see if you've edited it or not, and therefore, can see that you have something to hide. Also, if you edit a post, you open yourself up to false claims of quoting the "original" content of a post, (as in "so what if the timestamp is different, it was in my browser cache when I quoted it, it's true!"). Basically, if people spot you editing posts, they know (or think) you have something to hide. If you have something to hide, others will assume that you are mafia. Editing a post seems like a dangerous risk, not to be undertaken by the faint of heart.

what's wrong with editing posts? besides it potentially being used as a tool of the mafia to create confusion. mafia members can gang up on people who edited their post. i dont think a simple edit should really justify people's suspicion. but be careful of people who say "omg X edited his post, he must be a mafia member!!".

Night[Mare

Mexico4793 Posts

February 12 2008 02:20 GMT

#416

LOOOL DR.DRAGON IS MAFIOSO.
dude give up and lay low, by posting you increase your suspicion, you might live
+ Show Spoiler +

not, lmao

CDRdude

United States5625 Posts

February 12 2008 02:21 GMT

#417

On February 12 2008 11:15 Dr.Dragoon wrote:
I'm not suspicious

Last edit: 2008-02-12 11:15:49

If we lynch him, it proves the theory of natural selection.

Caller

Poland8075 Posts

February 12 2008 02:21 GMT

#418

On February 12 2008 11:20 RtS)Night[Mare wrote:
LOOOL DR.DRAGON IS MAFIOSO.
dude give up and lay low, by posting you increase your suspicion, you might live
+ Show Spoiler +

not, lmao

that post seems really suspicious somehow, but i cant put my finger on it

EmeraldSparks

United States1451 Posts

February 12 2008 02:22 GMT

#419

If you are attacked, you defend.

There is nothing suspicious about a player who responds to every accusation. It merely demonstrates that they pay attentio.