[M][T] Secret Hitler, Act I, Take II - Page 10

It's that things stay more simple if we can trust the first governments. It's actually I thought, let's just elect kita but he's super hard to read I think, so he can mess things up early and we can't trust anything that's going on later because we don't know if he lied about policies or not.

On October 31 2018 09:41 Conversion wrote:
are we generally agreeing to pass these two or what

On October 31 2018 09:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Meh i am going to try be more clear, sorry, explaining shit is not my strong suit.

So purplehaze, this is what bothers me:

- You have taken part to discussion of how governments should be elected and imo come to conclusion that we should elect townie people.
- After the above has happened, you ask "Is it a good idea to make the chancellor someone who is easy to read?"
- When krogan asks you "why do you ask that?", you answer:


The last quote doesn't make any sense unless you were, at the time of when you asked "Is it a good idea to make the chancellor someone who is easy to read?", thinking of electing kitaman, but both your answer (in the last quote), and how you took part to the discussion earlier disagrees with that.

On October 31 2018 09:31 happykrogan wrote:

so what do you make of my answer?

On October 31 2018 09:42 Conversion wrote:
not really considering ur in it tbh. should have paid attention

On October 31 2018 09:59 prplhz wrote:

Because you didn't know he was in it or because you had forgotten it?

On October 31 2018 10:00 Conversion wrote:


I didn't look and thought we could have a nice game but forgot who he was.

I voted no pass to this anyways, see you all in 21 hours

On October 31 2018 09:57 prplhz wrote:

No, I wasn't thinking about electing kita when I asked that question. Before I asked that question I was thinking about electing kita but then I changed my mind and made a post about what had changed my mind (how readability and townyness ). Then I thought that it was a good idea to elect townie people (and not necessarily super scum hunters), and I wrote it in the thread, in the form of a question because then maybe someone will answer and maybe we can talk about something.

I don't think anybody in the thread had clearly expressed the thought that townyness is important, and skill/dependability irrelevant up until that point. But maybe nobody had found that necessary to point out, because nobody had had the same thought process as me which was

1) elect kita/random! (nothing matters)
2) maybe do like mayor elections (or how i pretty much every game in that I sheep a lot)? (skill and townyness matter)
3) no, the only things that matter are readbility/townyness (townyness matters, skill is irrelevant)

On October 30 2018 09:06 prplhz wrote:
Is it a good idea to make the chancellor someone who is easy to read?

On October 30 2018 09:39 prplhz wrote:

It's that things stay more simple if we can trust the first governments. It's actually I thought, let's just elect kita but he's super hard to read I think, so he can mess things up early and we can't trust anything that's going on later because we don't know if he lied about policies or not.

On October 31 2018 10:06 happykrogan wrote:

So why ask in the first place if you don't come to conclusions?

On October 31 2018 10:12 prplhz wrote:

Because maybe you could have answered something else that would have been more immediately useful to me. I don't know in advance what your answer may be.

On October 31 2018 10:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:

What would you think if he said he agrees with Rels' idea?

On October 31 2018 10:33 prplhz wrote:

Super weird to encourage people to reject their own government.