|
On November 01 2018 00:46 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2018 10:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:33 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:12 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:06 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:57 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 09:31 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:08 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 09:06 happykrogan wrote:
Why was my answer for this question more important to you, than the answers of other people? Because you're up for election. so what do you make of my answer? Verdict pending but I don't think I'll make much of it. So why ask in the first place if you don't come to conclusions? Because maybe you could have answered something else that would have been more immediately useful to me. I don't know in advance what your answer may be. What would you think if he said he agrees with Rels' idea? Super weird to encourage people to reject their own government. Is that more immediately useful? If not, what other possible answers are there? I had expected him to be more aggressive towards the people who reject his government.
So me not fullfilling your expectations doesn't help you to draw conclusions.
How would me fullfilling your expectations help you to draw conclusions, if me doing the opposite thing doesn't?
|
On October 31 2018 23:17 byj wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2018 12:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Do you consider you have shared many reads or useful thoughts after you said the above? No, but I don't have any concrete feelings yet, some people make more sense than others, but it's nothing concrete yet. The lack of lynching doesn't help considering we won't get alignments until at least 3 Fascist policies have passed. Though for what it's worth if I were to just blindly pick I'd have a 3:4 chance of getting Scum
well you should better start contributing before 3 fascist policies have passed if you're town, which you very well might be because there are more scummier guys out there than you.
But if you want to be president or chancellor, which you should want, you have to give us reasons to believe you're town.
|
On November 01 2018 02:02 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 00:46 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:33 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:12 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:06 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:57 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 09:31 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:08 prplhz wrote:
[quote]
Because you're up for election. so what do you make of my answer? Verdict pending but I don't think I'll make much of it. So why ask in the first place if you don't come to conclusions? Because maybe you could have answered something else that would have been more immediately useful to me. I don't know in advance what your answer may be. What would you think if he said he agrees with Rels' idea? Super weird to encourage people to reject their own government. Is that more immediately useful? If not, what other possible answers are there? I had expected him to be more aggressive towards the people who reject his government. So me not fullfilling your expectations doesn't help you to draw conclusions. How would me fullfilling your expectations help you to draw conclusions, if me doing the opposite thing doesn't?
You didn't do the opposite, you did like a middle of the road thing that didn't push me in either direction.
|
On November 01 2018 02:35 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 02:02 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2018 00:46 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:33 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:12 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:06 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:57 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 09:31 happykrogan wrote:
[quote]
so what do you make of my answer? Verdict pending but I don't think I'll make much of it. So why ask in the first place if you don't come to conclusions? Because maybe you could have answered something else that would have been more immediately useful to me. I don't know in advance what your answer may be. What would you think if he said he agrees with Rels' idea? Super weird to encourage people to reject their own government. Is that more immediately useful? If not, what other possible answers are there? I had expected him to be more aggressive towards the people who reject his government. So me not fullfilling your expectations doesn't help you to draw conclusions. How would me fullfilling your expectations help you to draw conclusions, if me doing the opposite thing doesn't? You didn't do the opposite, you did like a middle of the road thing that didn't push me in either direction.
I guess I believe you... But please do more stuff other than still talking about the kitaman thing, which most of your posts are about.
|
On November 01 2018 02:41 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 02:35 prplhz wrote:On November 01 2018 02:02 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2018 00:46 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:33 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 10:12 prplhz wrote:On October 31 2018 10:06 happykrogan wrote:On October 31 2018 09:57 prplhz wrote:
[quote]
Verdict pending but I don't think I'll make much of it. So why ask in the first place if you don't come to conclusions? Because maybe you could have answered something else that would have been more immediately useful to me. I don't know in advance what your answer may be. What would you think if he said he agrees with Rels' idea? Super weird to encourage people to reject their own government. Is that more immediately useful? If not, what other possible answers are there? I had expected him to be more aggressive towards the people who reject his government. So me not fullfilling your expectations doesn't help you to draw conclusions. How would me fullfilling your expectations help you to draw conclusions, if me doing the opposite thing doesn't? You didn't do the opposite, you did like a middle of the road thing that didn't push me in either direction. I guess I believe you... But please do more stuff other than still talking about the kitaman thing, which most of your posts are about.
It's that I don't have unlimited time and people were super mad.
I'm thinking about some other things too, but I'm not ready to post.
|
Well pretty much I don't really know if the 24% is such a useful number.
|
On November 01 2018 02:50 prplhz wrote:
Well pretty much I don't really know if the 24% is such a useful number.
Explain please. And I shouldn't have to ask you that.
|
On November 01 2018 01:52 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 00:38 Conversion wrote:
In all seriousness, I like to always pass the first go, in any similar game like mafia when possible, to reveal where votes went and talk about that to get more information and give me one more round to work with, since drawing a random card as a policy isn't the worst thing ever, neither is adding one to the election tracker early on.
Whether that's optimal or not, I'm not quite sure but I do like doing it. Considering we can get RNG'd and get a F/F/F draw (unless this is impossible, someone correct me please if it is), I don't see why we're in any rush to elect this particular government. How will votes on a government that didn't pass (on the first day at least) be more telling than a passed government? Like what can you get out of these votes that will help you to read people until you can vote for the next government?
Because we don't run the risk of a crapshoot government passing a fascist policy in the event that you are not town?
|
I don't really care if I'm ever not elected chancellor TBH, that makes me make less decisions. I will remain in this pocket of neutral/slighty facist all day long as long as it lets me be lazy.
|
was kitaman the one that said just keep electing one dude until facist policy happens?
why was that a bad idea again
|
I guess we can still lose mathematically if Facists play hard enough to sow disarray when there was a 1/1 split and a Facist policy was passed
|
On November 01 2018 02:56 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 01:52 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2018 00:38 Conversion wrote:
In all seriousness, I like to always pass the first go, in any similar game like mafia when possible, to reveal where votes went and talk about that to get more information and give me one more round to work with, since drawing a random card as a policy isn't the worst thing ever, neither is adding one to the election tracker early on.
Whether that's optimal or not, I'm not quite sure but I do like doing it. Considering we can get RNG'd and get a F/F/F draw (unless this is impossible, someone correct me please if it is), I don't see why we're in any rush to elect this particular government. How will votes on a government that didn't pass (on the first day at least) be more telling than a passed government? Like what can you get out of these votes that will help you to read people until you can vote for the next government? Because we don't run the risk of a crapshoot government passing a fascist policy in the event that you are not town?
Thank you for the explanation...
Could you please go ahead and give also an answer to my question you quoted there?
|
On November 01 2018 03:00 Conversion wrote:
was kitaman the one that said just keep electing one dude until facist policy happens?
why was that a bad idea again
Election tracker and we can't just elect the same dude in two consecutive elections, it's a rule.
|
ok, so what prevents us from creating a super town triangle and cycling through them? if facists want to play deception, we'll get minimum 2-3 liberal policies through and we can eat some facist policies to cycle the deck (assuming that in some variation of the government, liberal policies are thrown away), and then rinse and repeat
|
On November 01 2018 03:06 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 02:56 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2018 01:52 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2018 00:38 Conversion wrote:
In all seriousness, I like to always pass the first go, in any similar game like mafia when possible, to reveal where votes went and talk about that to get more information and give me one more round to work with, since drawing a random card as a policy isn't the worst thing ever, neither is adding one to the election tracker early on.
Whether that's optimal or not, I'm not quite sure but I do like doing it. Considering we can get RNG'd and get a F/F/F draw (unless this is impossible, someone correct me please if it is), I don't see why we're in any rush to elect this particular government. How will votes on a government that didn't pass (on the first day at least) be more telling than a passed government? Like what can you get out of these votes that will help you to read people until you can vote for the next government? Because we don't run the risk of a crapshoot government passing a fascist policy in the event that you are not town? Thank you for the explanation... Could you please go ahead and give also an answer to my question you quoted there?
I don't get anything out of votes, I get more time and eat an election tracker that matters very little to me
|
On November 01 2018 03:07 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 03:00 Conversion wrote:
was kitaman the one that said just keep electing one dude until facist policy happens?
why was that a bad idea again Election tracker and we can't just elect the same dude in two consecutive elections, it's a rule.
Also it is likely that we get at least once fff. And if the two fascists that are not hitler get into government and enact fascist policies, we have three, which would let mafia auto-win if hitler gets in the government. So hitler could enact liberal policies to get in the town circle.
|
On November 01 2018 00:38 Conversion wrote:
In all seriousness, I like to always pass the first go, in any similar game like mafia when possible, to reveal where votes went and talk about that to get more information and give me one more round to work with, since drawing a random card as a policy isn't the worst thing ever, neither is adding one to the election tracker early on.
Whether that's optimal or not, I'm not quite sure but I do like doing it. Considering we can get RNG'd and get a F/F/F draw (unless this is impossible, someone correct me please if it is), I don't see why we're in any rush to elect this particular government.
conversion lied. Here's the proof
|
On November 01 2018 03:12 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 00:38 Conversion wrote:
In all seriousness, I like to always pass the first go, in any similar game like mafia when possible, to reveal where votes went and talk about that to get more information and give me one more round to work with, since drawing a random card as a policy isn't the worst thing ever, neither is adding one to the election tracker early on.
Whether that's optimal or not, I'm not quite sure but I do like doing it. Considering we can get RNG'd and get a F/F/F draw (unless this is impossible, someone correct me please if it is), I don't see why we're in any rush to elect this particular government. conversion lied. Here's the proof
you got me dude I'm hitler
|
but "reveal where votes went" != "discuss votes"
If you're going to semantically nitpick at something, do it well
|
oh I didn't even read my own thing. woops
yup I must be hitler
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
