|
On November 01 2018 06:19 happykrogan wrote:
Conversion did a very good in totally confusing me...
I don't get what he wanted to say, but I guess it doesn't matter as his theory was under a wrong understanding of the game mechanics...?
He still lied though
you could have read nothing but my last post and gotten that conclusion
congrats!
|
also you fixating on a point on me "lying" is really inane and forced trying to generate content when no one's paying attention to you
also I hope we draw F/F/F and descend in to chaos
|
Rayn/Krogan can't talk during this cycle
|
kitaman27
United States8592 Posts
We should elect rayn as much as possible then. :D :D :D
|
On November 01 2018 08:14 kitaman27 wrote:
We should elect rayn as much as possible then. :D :D :D
lol.
I don't know what Conversion's deal is right now but I think he's probably town.
|
On November 01 2018 08:14 kitaman27 wrote:
We should elect rayn as much as possible then. :D :D :D
brutal
|
So the next three people up are me, then conversion, then Kitaman.
If I'm not getting sent I'm ok with Conversion, but I think he's pretty unlikely to be approved because of his attitude this game.
|
On November 01 2018 08:23 Grackaroni wrote:
So the next three people up are me, then conversion, then Kitaman.
If I'm not getting sent I'm ok with Conversion, but I think he's pretty unlikely to be approved because of his attitude this game.
don't you sort of wanna hear who he's planning to chancelorize first?
|
ideally we'd send off as many governments as possible, no? I think statistically we are unlikely to enact all 6 liberal policies without a reshuffle
|
when cards are reshuffled, are we reshuffling all the non-enacted cards, or are we shuffling the entire deck + the unused policies?
|
On November 01 2018 09:06 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 08:23 Grackaroni wrote:
So the next three people up are me, then conversion, then Kitaman.
If I'm not getting sent I'm ok with Conversion, but I think he's pretty unlikely to be approved because of his attitude this game. don't you sort of wanna hear who he's planning to chancelorize first?
No I'm mostly concerned with the president atm. I think it's worthwhile for town if chancellor enacts a fascist policy if the president send L/F. I dont think chancellor is too important until 3 fascist when we have to avoid Hitler.
|
On November 01 2018 09:09 Conversion wrote:
when cards are reshuffled, are we reshuffling all the non-enacted cards, or are we shuffling the entire deck + the unused policies?
Both players have already submitted their decisions while I was out for the last 3 hours. Should we attempt to swallow another day and have the remaining 21 hours (+24 if needed) be for the next presidential candidate - Grackaroni - to pick a chancellor? This will also allow happy/rayn to return to the thread.
To answer your question enacted cards get left on the "table" but at the end everything gets reshuffled. Imagine we had 8 cards in this order:
liberal
liberal
fascist
liberal
fascist
fascist
fascist
fascist
On the first successful government for this deck, a liberal policy was enacted and on the second successful government a fascist policy was enacted. So now there is 1 liberal and 1 fascist policy on the table. There aren't enough cards left (just 2) for a third government, so I reshuffle the deck, minus the 1 liberal and 1 fascist policy that got enacted. So now the deck has 6 cards, 2 liberal and 4 fascist, in some new order.
|
I'm fine with submitting in the next 21 hours.
|
On October 31 2018 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2018 06:27 Rels wrote:On October 31 2018 06:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 31 2018 05:32 Rels wrote:
I like hk and grack thought process about finding Hitler. Would prefer one of them as chancellor if we had to choose right now What do you mean? Can you elaborate more? Grack one is he one where he says prp could be scum and kita Hitler. If I rzmember correctly. Not at home so if you don't find it I'll find it later Of course i know what you are talking about, i want you to elaborate onto the thought process of how Grack's thought process is townie, because: 1) it doesn't really make much sense if you put yourself into purplehaze's shoes 2) grack basically retracts form it almost immediately
I just thought that while I was reading his post. It's not deeper than that
|
kitaman27
United States8592 Posts
|
|
|
ELECTION 2
![[image loading]](https://www.thelocal.de/userdata/images/article/51b1329ad10bd7a283fab61f0be42dea236d2636a364e18a82cc44f65cc30222.jpg)
A liberal policy has been enacted!
It is Grackaroni's turn to be the presidential candidate and select a candidate for chancellor. This selection must be made in , after which everyone will get to vote.
Due to term limits, happykrogan and raynpelikoneet are ineligible to be chosen as chancellor.
|
I had two fascist and a liberal policy to choose from.
|
Cool.
I'm probably going to pick either Conversion on Rels.
|
On November 01 2018 07:20 Conversion wrote:
also you fixating on a point on me "lying" is really inane and forced trying to generate content when no one's paying attention to you
also I hope we draw F/F/F and descend in to chaos
you might not believe me, but I actually think lying is a scummy thing to do.
And you did lie, as you stated two contradicting things.
Also I think this response is scummy.
It doesn't fit into the careless attitude you showed, because you are clearly bothered by it.
Also instead of explaining why you said what you said as town (what town should be capable of), you decided to attack me and my credibility, calling it an desperate attempt of generating content.
Also you made this post, which I interpret as an attempt of making me look stupid
On November 01 2018 07:19 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2018 06:19 happykrogan wrote:
Conversion did a very good in totally confusing me...
I don't get what he wanted to say, but I guess it doesn't matter as his theory was under a wrong understanding of the game mechanics...?
He still lied though you could have read nothing but my last post and gotten that conclusion congrats!
Where I stated that trying to figure out your argument was confusing me (before I read your last post of course), which I admit was unnecessary to state as I already realized it doesn't matter anyways.
But the way you attacked me on it, together with the second post, seems like scum trying to defend themself by making the person with the argument look bad opposed to trying to convince him that argument was flawed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WCS
