|
|
|
I really don't like what calix is trying to push here. Sure what nu is doing is super bad play and from first glance it looks scummy but it's not actually scummy. Why would scum post that he can be modconfirmed town? That makes 0 sense.
And now she's trying to push some stupid Lynch based on content but no one has done shit anyway. Fake activity
|
All of you need to stay up man. Useless pieces of American timezone shits
|
She wants to Lynch you and repeatedly calls your play scummy, I don't see how I can read that as anything else
|
NU, is calix mafia?
##vote superbia
Calix the fake activity is refering to you being mafia and just pushing shit for the sake of creating posts.
Nu, can you explain why stutters is mafia?
|
Lol wtf you guys played like less than 10 games together and profess to be able to read each other one post into the game, come on man.
Calix that's really soft. Why can't I vote for superbia? Am I gonna lose my vote? No. Am I free to vote again? Yes.
So why is my vote even alignment indicative when there are still more than 24 hours to Lynch?
I would like to hear this.
|
Lol what the fuck.
Can you tell me what reads you got from the nu push and the people that responded calix?
|
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
|
On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1.
Dude what the fuck. So you think that finding mafia isn't your first priority but instead, staying alive is your first priority? Full of shit
|
On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read?
Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum?
|
On October 04 2016 22:18 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:16 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1. Dude what the fuck. So you think that finding mafia isn't your first priority but instead, staying alive is your first priority? Full of shit Wow you caught me. That is 100% the exact reason I want to stay on the sidelines.
I'm still not sure how staying on the sidelines is conductive to you finding scum, pls explain.
|
On October 04 2016 22:21 Calix wrote:
You're not even voting for Superbia. I just checked the vote thread.
So what the fuck are you doing?
Why the fuck do I need to vote in the vote thread???
|
On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read.
Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind.
|
On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis.
In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist
|
On October 04 2016 22:28 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:24 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? I'm looking forward to ignoring the forced read. Go and reread your first 2 posts and tell me they are made with the town wincon in mind. I have studied them thoroughly and have conclusively concluded that they are not only incredibly townie, they are the key to town winning this game.
Explain
|
On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope.
Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched.
|
On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts.
Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment?
|
On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off.
I said my point already.
Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him.
|
I really don't understand why you expect me to pour all my thoughts out into the game.
Is it not obvious that when I vote for someone it's because I think they are scummy?
So I have to say "xx is scummy vote xx" before voting? That's ludicrous.
And it says absolutely nothing about my alignment. So far in this game you have proceed with 2 ridiculous pushes.
|
On October 04 2016 22:57 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off. I said my point already. Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him. If you're saying that you don't give a fuck about other people voting for Superbia and if you haven't given any compelling arguments for mafia!Superbia then where is the pressure? You just randomly 'voted' for Superbia out of nowhere and didn't explain your reasoning for multiple posts. You're really confusing me tbh.
What I'm saying is that when I want to actually get people to vote for and Lynch superbia, I will vote in the voting thread and try to convince people.
I think the vote was enough pressure, superbia came in after that. I'm not too much of a fan of his posts so far but since he promised actual activity, I'm gonna wait in anticipation.
|
On October 04 2016 22:59 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off. I said my point already. Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him. Calling a vote a pressure vote kills its intent. Do you have actual reads?
Intent over already.
I think koshi has been skating by on pithy little comments.
I seem to remember other people promising shit but not delivering. I think it's stutters so he's leaning scum. Pretty sure Marv and Palmar are town. They don't give enough of a shit.
|
On October 04 2016 23:30 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Sorry, but how does one loon making a vote-that-isn't-even-a-vote pressure Superbia into doing anything? for realsies?
He did do things though so shush
|
On October 05 2016 02:40 Superbia wrote:
As I've said before, the Calix/NU thing is the most interesting thing so far. You've danced around alignments like a ballerina. Your push on Palmar was decent and founded. Palmar has shown up and done somewhat okay shit.
What now Marv?
Lol how was Marv's push anything more than "he hasn't done jack shit when I expect him to do shit if he was town". That's not particularly well founded. And it's hardly a push, it's like 3 posts.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say with this post.
|
On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me.
What are those reasons?
|
On October 05 2016 08:45 Palmar wrote:
I am not mafia please guys show mercy
Fuck off man.
|
Grack do you have any reads or you just decide to post when you feel like it uselessly?
|
I quite like what bats has been doing recently, especially since he returned pretty quickly after his peace out post.
Super still whining and not being proactive.
Koshi and stutters no-show.
Koshi if you really don't have the time, just find one read and push it. Don't do this fluffy shit.
Jat a lot of activity but not a lot of content, leaning scum on him.
|
On October 05 2016 10:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 09:35 Grackaroni wrote:
I'm filtering because I don't want to read through the Calix/NU posts because I'm pretty confident they're both town. You're missing out on certain interactions then.
I think the same way honestly, it was only useful in the sense that it gave town reads.
|
On October 05 2016 10:00 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 09:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me. What are those reasons? Complacency Acting too nice Making closed posts ie not open for discussion (Didn't happen this game yet, but his actions and reads were all self-centered) Reads not conclusive His stances are late (Not really here. Different context) Safe reads
So now what is your read on him?
|
On October 05 2016 10:41 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me. Interpret this the way you like.
No dude, I want you to give a town read or scum read.
|
On October 05 2016 10:52 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 10:41 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me. Interpret this the way you like. That is all you'll get. I assume you have reads on the most active players as well. Care to share them?
Marv town, calix town, you town, I'm town
|
On October 05 2016 11:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 10:45 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 10:41 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 06:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:
I don't like Damdred's posts and would scum-read him for it, but I not trust this read myself. It's basically based on the same arguments I scum-read him HM3 (in which he was town), so I guess his town meta could just appear scummy to me. Interpret this the way you like. No dude, I want you to give a town read or scum read. Funny considering you have not pronounced yourself on that matter. I did not see you commenting on the HF, DDD, nor Grack. Also, have you done your military service? And why would the government make it mandatory when the country has no threatening enemy?
I think damdred pretty null for me.
Grack scummy, hf is also scummy. hes weirdly defensive and his tone is a bit off.
Im in the middle of it right now lol. It's mandatory because any country could just invade, Singapore has quite a lot of value in terms of its location + it's a mainly Chinese country in the middle of Malay countries. So it's more for deterrence now.
|
On October 05 2016 06:45 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 06:39 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 05:34 Holyflare wrote:
There's simply no way anyone can think Superbia is town, he put out reads and is simply asked to explain them and can't and has done shit all but whine.
That post was outrageously tmi. I think Superbia is town. Yes and that is why I am voting batsnacks. *clap clap*
I really don't get this post from hf. He still thinks superbia might be scum but he shuts down NU. It's just really confusing man pls explain
|
On October 05 2016 06:49 Holyflare wrote:
There's nothing wrong with either of those "cases", both based on legit good points, both dropped when something more pressing and evident comes to light.
It's called playing mafia, you should try it bro.
Also hf doesn't have much emotional attachment to his pushes, that's weird.
|
On October 05 2016 11:19 NeverUnlucky wrote:Oh, boy, that was ugly. "EBWOP": Huzzah! See, you cannot decide whether he is town or scum either. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 10:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
No dude, I want you to give a town read or scum read.
Show nested quote +
Grack scummy, hf is also scummy. hes weirdly defensive and his tone is a bit off.
Exactly. Dunno about Grack. He's been pretty \0 so far. What makes you think he is scummy? Show nested quote +Im in the middle of it right now lol. It's mandatory because any country could just invade, Singapore has quite a lot of value in terms of its location + it's a mainly Chinese country in the middle of Malay countries. So it's more for deterrence now.
I guess that makes sense, especially historically. Although if any country wanted to invade Singapore, a 5 million people city/country, I guess they would have already done it by now. You almost have more chance of fending off assailants with Durian's smell than with manpower, lol.
Same reason as koshi. Enough time to come and fluff but not enough time or interest to affect the game.
Well the idea is that we will do an extreme amount of damage before they can invade. But diplomacy and all that shit is very impt
|
On October 05 2016 11:42 Grackaroni wrote:
I ended up watching the VP debate instead. So who's scum?
|
On October 05 2016 11:58 Grackaroni wrote:
What do you mean when you say that HF is not emotionally attached to his pushes? Do you mean not following up on Calix or something else that I'm missing?
No I mean he just drops them when apparently something new and pressing comes up. So he isn't actually invested in them but instead is just looking to Lynch anyone.
|
On October 05 2016 11:59 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 11:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 11:42 Grackaroni wrote:
I ended up watching the VP debate instead. So who's scum? I don't know yet Oats. I think I've said that earlier.
Go and fucking find out. You have 27 pages to obtain a single scum-read.
|
On October 05 2016 12:02 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 02:33 marvellosity wrote:
Still want to know why superbia phrased his question to me like there wasn't a shadow of doubt calix is town I don't like this push by the way.
Explain
|
On October 05 2016 12:06 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 12:04 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:02 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 02:33 marvellosity wrote:
Still want to know why superbia phrased his question to me like there wasn't a shadow of doubt calix is town I don't like this push by the way. Explain Because a town read on Calix isn't unusual. She's posted more than anyone, assuming that she is town doesn't mean that Superbia has too much information like Marv has suggested.
Can you quote the question? Thanks
|
On October 05 2016 12:10 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 12:04 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 11:59 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 11:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 11:42 Grackaroni wrote:
I ended up watching the VP debate instead. So who's scum? I don't know yet Oats. I think I've said that earlier. Go and fucking find out. You have 27 pages to obtain a single scum-read. Relax Oats. When I get ideas I will share them, and if I get lynched because I haven't solved the game so be it. If you end up wanting to lynch HF over me then you should help me follow the read because I don't think HF's post on Batsnacks was bad. Batsnacks was making some weird assumptions for Superbia's play.
It's not that hf's read on bats is inherently bad, but the way he switched onto him and was like "fuck my previous lynch" was not the best. It's just a weird attitude where I kinda got the impression that he didn't want to Lynch superbia anymore but the actual case was he wanted to Lynch bats more.
|
On October 05 2016 12:32 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 12:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:06 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 12:04 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:02 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 02:33 marvellosity wrote:
Still want to know why superbia phrased his question to me like there wasn't a shadow of doubt calix is town I don't like this push by the way. Explain Because a town read on Calix isn't unusual. She's posted more than anyone, assuming that she is town doesn't mean that Superbia has too much information like Marv has suggested. Can you quote the question? Thanks Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 00:56 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:53 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 23:46 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:43 Superbia wrote:
Marv what are your thoughts on the flare? Inconclusively town. Don't think his calix push was particularly shit flingy Mafia latching on then? With the massive assumption you're making that calix is town? I don't even understand the question. I just don't find the assumption scummy considering Calix's play so far.
Ah ok, I see where Marv is going here. Super proposed a throwaway question with no doubt in his mind that calix was town. I'm not sure if super is saying that mafia is latching onto to hf's push or that hf is latching on.
Scum slips don't exist though so i agree with you
|
On October 05 2016 12:27 Grackaroni wrote:I think this is actually a good post from Batsnacks.
I don't like that he doesn't actually come to a proper conclusion but kinda leaves it open to interpretation. Also I don't like that he sells himself short at meta reading damdred but that seems to be one reason why he thinks damdred is scummy.
|
On October 05 2016 12:40 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 12:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:27 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 08:30 batsnacks wrote:This was the damdred game I read sort of recently where his line of questioning at the beginning seems slower and different http://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/threads/3255-Season-3-Final-Game-The-Koopa-TroopI'm not super current on anyone's meta here but damdred's sudden entrance, sudden conclusions without the early questions, and his conclusions being a lot different than mine could suggest an agenda. I think this is actually a good post from Batsnacks. I don't like that he doesn't actually come to a proper conclusion but kinda leaves it open to interpretation. Also I don't like that he sells himself short at meta reading damdred but that seems to be one reason why he thinks damdred is scummy. His conclusion was that Damdred is scummy in his reads list earlier.
Ok thats true. But feels a bit easy if you know what I mean
|
Why is super town lol wtf.
|
On October 05 2016 15:15 Grackaroni wrote:
Who are you going to vote Oats?
Hf
|
On October 05 2016 14:50 Grackaroni wrote:Because I think that the cocky useless attitude and annoyance is harder to fake than it seems. Also the times that he has contributed I think he's made good points, i.e. Damdred's confidence on Marv and HF dropping his Calix push.
Lol wait wait you really need to expand on this. Cause it's really important
|
On October 05 2016 15:42 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 15:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 15:15 Grackaroni wrote:
Who are you going to vote Oats? Hf Wait no I kind of like HF right now because he's going to push my JAT lynch for me.
Lol you got bullied. Stand up for yourself man.
|
On October 05 2016 15:55 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 15:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 14:50 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 14:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why is super town lol wtf. Because I think that the cocky useless attitude and annoyance is harder to fake than it seems. Also the times that he has contributed I think he's made good points, i.e. Damdred's confidence on Marv and HF dropping his Calix push. Lol wait wait you really need to expand on this. Cause it's really important I don't think that scum becomes genuinely annoyed at somebody for not answering a question because they don't actually care about the answer. This is something that Superbia has to actively think of to fake. If you're going for the cocky useless scum play, then you are drawing a lot more attention to yourself. It can be harder to pull off than you would think, and it's always a riskier gambit than just contributing more than the shittiest players. Marv isn't going to roll over this game as scum because he hasn't played in months. HF point was something that I noticed as well.
It's a bit of a stretch to say that he's really been cocky useless because all he's done is whine about not being able to play his preferred way. Meh agree to disagree for now.
I'm interested in what hf is gonna do now though.
|
I could easily Lynch jat but he hadn't said anything that offended me so I'm gonna look at other people
|
His filter is just general meh useless fluff
|
On October 05 2016 16:41 Superbia wrote:
Skimmed a bit. Really like grack. Kinda liking bats as well.
Pls elaborate
|
|
|
|
|
On October 05 2016 17:56 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 12:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:32 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 12:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:06 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 12:04 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 12:02 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 02:33 marvellosity wrote:
Still want to know why superbia phrased his question to me like there wasn't a shadow of doubt calix is town I don't like this push by the way. Explain Because a town read on Calix isn't unusual. She's posted more than anyone, assuming that she is town doesn't mean that Superbia has too much information like Marv has suggested. Can you quote the question? Thanks On October 05 2016 00:56 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:53 Superbia wrote:On October 04 2016 23:46 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 23:43 Superbia wrote:
Marv what are your thoughts on the flare? Inconclusively town. Don't think his calix push was particularly shit flingy Mafia latching on then? With the massive assumption you're making that calix is town? I don't even understand the question. I just don't find the assumption scummy considering Calix's play so far. Ah ok, I see where Marv is going here. Super proposed a throwaway question with no doubt in his mind that calix was town. I'm not sure if super is saying that mafia is latching onto to hf's push or that hf is latching on. Scum slips don't exist though so i agree with you This is really bad. Super does something tmi'ish, oats sees it but then he suddenly agrees with gracks assessment that super is town because "scumslips don't exist"? So oats is basically saying mafia will never show tmi or what? Ridiculous.
No, it means you can't infer alignment based on a "scum slip" because repeated games have shown that it's obviously not true.
Also tmi is generally advance knowledge of night actions, not alignment.
|
I don't want to Lynch you today jat? When I mean "do not offend" , I mean you haven't said shit that is controversial or stupid yet.
|
I feel that at some point I thought bats was town. Hmm
##vote stutters
|
Ok now I'm gonna sheep Marv, so my vote is not useless Palmar....
Honestly though bats re-entry did not include a scum-read or Vote and it did include some stupid shit about "if I'm mafia and super is town, I have nothing to gain by hard defending super" except that 1, when super flips you get cred for being right, 2, your influence is so low that you aren't going to change anyone's minds. Vote threads suxk
|
Lol Palmar isn't making sense calix.
Don't get sidetracked by this shit
Talk to me about grack
|
You calix, tomato tomato, same thing
|
On October 05 2016 22:00 Calix wrote:
Basically Grack is someone who is in my lean-town category because of some shitty/ weak reasoning, other people being scummier, etc. Consider it 'town by statistical probability'.
I expect my reads to change drastically depending on the flip.
Can you bring me through a quick summary of his alignment assuming bats flips town/scum?
|
On October 05 2016 22:09 batsnacks wrote:
You fellas and ladies should start thinking about who other than me would be a good lynch today. Damdred is my preferred lynch right now I'll keep checking in though to see if i can find any chances to save myself
##vote: Damdred
Lol why would we do that when you don't even care about saving yourself?
|
On October 05 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 22:20 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 05 2016 22:00 Calix wrote:
Basically Grack is someone who is in my lean-town category because of some shitty/ weak reasoning, other people being scummier, etc. Consider it 'town by statistical probability'.
I expect my reads to change drastically depending on the flip. Can you bring me through a quick summary of his alignment assuming bats flips town/scum? If Bat is scum, then I'd look into Grack as he is a possible partner, wouldn't have pushed scum!bat much and focused more on pushing HF/ JAT and defending Superbia. (however I don't think Grack has said anything to/ about batsnacks that is scummy by itself) If Bat is town then I don't see my opinion of him changing much, so town. I'm not very comfortable with giving my thoughts on how I might view things in hypothetical scenarios so take with a grain of salt.
Ok sounds good.
|
|
|
What I gathered from the day end was a whole lotta waffling in the thread, but not q lot of waffling in the vote thread. And Palmar didn't vote to save himself what the fuck. Marv seems impressively unexcited about the flip which is interesting
|
Has Palmar done the " fuck you guys youbsuck as mafia before?
|
On October 06 2016 10:43 NeverUnlucky wrote:Yay, a new read! NU is excited. NU wants to know where it is coming from.
Don't do that....
He's been pretty apathetic in the period leading up to the lynch and he didn't really have many other reads than bats.
I need to reread later but that's it from the top of my head
|
On October 06 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote:Could be. ;p
Shoot this shit.
Hf might be the mafia vig that would be interesting. He's totally setting himself up for the worst shot in the world on calix cause everything he says to defend himself is also what calix has been doing.
Marv being super defensive is bad. He's just whining that people have a totally legitimate reason to scum-read him, come on man. No interest in finding and pushing another mafia.
|
On October 06 2016 22:33 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:27 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 06 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 21:56 Palmar wrote:
Superbia could still be scum Could be. ;p Shoot this shit. Hf might be the mafia vig that would be interesting. He's totally setting himself up for the worst shot in the world on calix cause everything he says to defend himself is also what calix has been doing. Marv being super defensive is bad. He's just whining that people have a totally legitimate reason to scum-read him, come on man. No interest in finding and pushing another mafia. Um, so I forgot all my scum reads, made up some bs about nu, made up teams and forgot the previous association i made with batsnacks and ignored the towny nuggets from bs and defended palmar? Don't think I did any of that oats. Are you saying you haven't read the thread at all?
No, you pushed cases and kept the thread alive when it was dying. same as calix. did you even read my question or did you just see, "someone called me scum,must answer with some irrelevant nonsense".
|
On October 06 2016 22:34 Superbia wrote:
Ehhh palmar*
Ok the thing is, I feel like both Marv and Palmar cant be scum together.
I feel like Marv is scummier and that Palmar literally doesn't give a shit. Both dying would be great though, deffo one scum in there.
|
On October 06 2016 06:17 Palmar wrote:
check marv, he was wrong on a townie sounding guy.
maybe shoot him, who cares.
Like no way these 2 are the same alignment vut one of them must be scum.
|
On October 06 2016 22:50 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 06 2016 22:33 Holyflare wrote:On October 06 2016 22:27 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 06 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote:On October 06 2016 21:56 Palmar wrote:
Superbia could still be scum Could be. ;p Shoot this shit. Hf might be the mafia vig that would be interesting. He's totally setting himself up for the worst shot in the world on calix cause everything he says to defend himself is also what calix has been doing. Marv being super defensive is bad. He's just whining that people have a totally legitimate reason to scum-read him, come on man. No interest in finding and pushing another mafia. Um, so I forgot all my scum reads, made up some bs about nu, made up teams and forgot the previous association i made with batsnacks and ignored the towny nuggets from bs and defended palmar? Don't think I did any of that oats. Are you saying you haven't read the thread at all? No, you pushed cases and kept the thread alive when it was dying. same as calix. did you even read my question or did you just see, "someone called me scum,must answer with some irrelevant nonsense". It's almost as if logical inconsistencies and lapses in thoughts and judgement mean nothing to you. I don't remember calix pushing the thread forward. I remember her having no explanation for her nu read and it was a bad push, I remember her saying some stuff about batsnacks and that ended up wrong and then she never really made her own push again. Which she fully admits.
Its almost as if I'm not even making that point.
Can you quote the wrong stuff about bats?
|
Did you even read her filter hf? You were on bats too, she has been pushing shit as well as you. You are blind to things in front of your face in order to throw shit at this.
|
On October 06 2016 22:51 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 22:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 06 2016 22:34 Superbia wrote:
Ehhh palmar* Ok the thing is, I feel like both Marv and Palmar cant be scum together. I feel like Marv is scummier and that Palmar literally doesn't give a shit. Both dying would be great though, deffo one scum in there. Okay I think this not incorrect at this point in time. What way are you leaning? And do you believe I'm more mafia than either of them?
Marv for sure.
Yeah you are more mafia than them.
|
Like what the fuck man hf. I just said that calix pushed shit and kept the thread going which is objectively correct and also what you said you did that makes you town. That's it.
|
On October 07 2016 09:17 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Drinking game: Every time I say "bad", take a shot.
I'm dead now thanks.
Anyway I think we should be lynching Marv today instead of Palmar.
|
|
|
Nu and calix shit is 100℅ tvt
|
|
|
How do people feel about koshi now?
|
On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all.
I mean, generally that happens when someone is accusatory but calix being passive in the conversation isnt a scumtell at all. it reads like calix really doesnt care about the point nu was making but had to keep replying cause addicted.
It doesnt seem like you think calix is mafia at all man.
|
On October 07 2016 16:59 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 13:31 Grackaroni wrote:
Writing a case for Damdred is harder than I thought.
There's the point that Bats made of Damdred primarily making a reads dump and very little questioning, which seems uncharacteristic.
I think a case could also be made that he's only willing to scum read weaker players that won't give him too much trouble. He mentioned HF in his initial reads post and backed off that very quickly.
Primarily I'm going to go with, "I have a lot of town reads and the feels are reals." Can you disprove my feels, Damdred? Bats getting so much heat and little support also points towards Damdred mafia. The guy who gets lynched D1 often sits on mafia. I like it.
What do you mean by the last sentence?
|
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
|
On October 05 2016 05:57 Damdred wrote:
Besides bats spewing super I did think of one reason for super to be town but I think it's more fun to watch super squirm
On October 05 2016 06:03 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 05:52 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 05:50 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 05:49 Superbia wrote:
Anyway I think:
NU/Calix/Marv are town.
JAT is pretty town.
Palmar is possibly town.
HF is possibly town.
Rest is all meh with bats taking the lowest slot.
Ho can you think bats is scum (at this point) but just have me meh with no real read given I actually think you are on the low part of meh because of your very meh push on me, but I didn't have any real strong opinion. I.e. I also think Koshi is weird. Need to evaluate more on that. So your working theory is that I am potential scum with bats, because you were/are acting shady with almost no explanations. And most of,the other people,who share opinions with me and mostly agree with my posts you town read?
On October 05 2016 06:08 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 06:05 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 06:03 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 05:52 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 05:50 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 05:49 Superbia wrote:
Anyway I think:
NU/Calix/Marv are town.
JAT is pretty town.
Palmar is possibly town.
HF is possibly town.
Rest is all meh with bats taking the lowest slot.
Ho can you think bats is scum (at this point) but just have me meh with no real read given I actually think you are on the low part of meh because of your very meh push on me, but I didn't have any real strong opinion. I.e. I also think Koshi is weird. Need to evaluate more on that. So your working theory is that I am potential scum with bats, because you were/are acting shady with almost no explanations. And most of,the other people,who share opinions with me and mostly agree with my posts you town read? No. My working theory is that I thought your push on me for the marv interaction was scummy (as it heavily assumed Marv was town out of nowhere) and that I need to evaluate more at some later point (pretty done for today). My working theory on snacks is that he's getting some light pressure put on him and posting a thesis on how I'm town. No connection (yet!). Marv is an obvious town read at that point for several reasons and most people should realize why and your pressure on him was shit tbh. The push on you by everyone was warranted and still is to some degree.
On October 05 2016 06:28 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 06:25 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 06:21 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 06:10 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 06:08 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 06:05 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 06:03 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 05:52 Superbia wrote:On October 05 2016 05:50 Damdred wrote:On October 05 2016 05:49 Superbia wrote:
Anyway I think:
NU/Calix/Marv are town.
JAT is pretty town.
Palmar is possibly town.
HF is possibly town.
Rest is all meh with bats taking the lowest slot.
Ho can you think bats is scum (at this point) but just have me meh with no real read given I actually think you are on the low part of meh because of your very meh push on me, but I didn't have any real strong opinion. I.e. I also think Koshi is weird. Need to evaluate more on that. So your working theory is that I am potential scum with bats, because you were/are acting shady with almost no explanations. And most of,the other people,who share opinions with me and mostly agree with my posts you town read? No. My working theory is that I thought your push on me for the marv interaction was scummy (as it heavily assumed Marv was town out of nowhere) and that I need to evaluate more at some later point (pretty done for today). My working theory on snacks is that he's getting some light pressure put on him and posting a thesis on how I'm town. No connection (yet!). Marv is an obvious town read at that point for several reasons and most people should realize why and your pressure on him was shit tbh. The push on you by everyone was warranted and still is to some degree. Please succinctly explain how Marv (who is a decent player) is an easy read and should never receive any pressure. That's dumb and you know it, Is marv playing? If yes probably town Is marv sassy? More than likely town Palmar went after marv yes or no? If yes refer to one Marv went after a hard to lynch person? Probably town Honestly I don't like how you're locking into this read. I agree with the read but I am wary of the lack of uncertainty. Yeah let's hope bats flips scum so I can ignore you for a cycle or two. Because you aren't making,g a lot of sense.
this sequence of posts is pretty weird by damdred, at first he seems to think that super is town but his attitude towards super in the following posts is pretty negative and suspicious and he doesnt end the conversation on a good note in terms of him thinking super is town. It definetely reads a lot more like he thinks super is scum rather than super is bad town which is contrary to his earlier posts.
|
jat has posted absolutely no content whatsoever, its disgusting how little shit is in his 10 page filter.
Jat, find a scumread and write some shit about him go
|
On October 07 2016 18:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 17:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
jat has posted absolutely no content whatsoever, its disgusting how little shit is in his 10 page filter.
Jat, find a scumread and write some shit about him go I already stated my reads numerous times and wrote shit about them. If you did not see that you haven't read my filter.
please help me and quote them.
From my perspective, you are just posting one liners and being real salty.
|
On October 07 2016 19:33 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 17:51 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 07 2016 16:59 Koshi wrote:On October 07 2016 13:31 Grackaroni wrote:
Writing a case for Damdred is harder than I thought.
There's the point that Bats made of Damdred primarily making a reads dump and very little questioning, which seems uncharacteristic.
I think a case could also be made that he's only willing to scum read weaker players that won't give him too much trouble. He mentioned HF in his initial reads post and backed off that very quickly.
Primarily I'm going to go with, "I have a lot of town reads and the feels are reals." Can you disprove my feels, Damdred? Bats getting so much heat and little support also points towards Damdred mafia. The guy who gets lynched D1 often sits on mafia. I like it. What do you mean by the last sentence? That it wouldn't be the first time that somebody who pushes a mafia read D1 gets lynched.
still not following.
|
Palmar is 100% town now by the way. I think he's completely incapable of this kind of play as mafia.
like 100% not true but contextually in this game hes town though.
if he somehow makes it to lylo with me, hes hanging.
man I keep flipping back and forth on marv.
Hes almost too chill.
Damn.
|
hey super can you do a palmar?
|
On October 07 2016 22:43 Superbia wrote:Why?
seems like its a good skill to have.
Apparently you dont have it.
|
On October 07 2016 22:56 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 22:50 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 07 2016 22:43 Superbia wrote:On October 07 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
hey super can you do a palmar?
Why? seems like its a good skill to have. Apparently you dont have it. I think it'd useful if Marv does it because his alignment should become clear today imo.
Dont really think so because today is pretty set.
|
On October 07 2016 23:04 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 21:59 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 07 2016 21:51 Superbia wrote:
I walk a certain road and I generally don't care if people are walking before or behind me. As long as people are walking in similar direction. There's a long road ahead. You do not want to be alone at night. You must choose a faction to live on. Besides, I have been supporting the Dutch football team since 2010 and am an EDM zealot. You will find yourself home in Gracktopia. NU promise. RIP Dutch football team after the next 2 games. 1/6.
hey dude are you ever gonna decide who you read as scum?
|
On October 07 2016 23:06 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 21:19 Koshi wrote:On October 07 2016 21:13 Grackaroni wrote:On October 07 2016 21:10 Koshi wrote:On October 07 2016 21:08 Grackaroni wrote:On October 07 2016 21:01 Koshi wrote:On October 07 2016 20:47 Grackaroni wrote:On October 07 2016 20:33 Koshi wrote:On October 07 2016 20:28 Grackaroni wrote:On October 07 2016 20:22 Koshi wrote:
[quote]
meh. Nothing in here makes me want to sheep him. Nothing stands out except maybe the Grack read. I like that one. You called me obvious town around this point yesterday for doing exactly this. Jesus Koshi. I was probably sleep deprived back then. I also don't recall that at all. I do recall I thought you were town though. Somewhere. Yeah I just checked you're in pretty deep here Koshi. First you were arguing that I was bussing JAT. Now you're citing JAT's reasoning as a reason to scum read me without a connection to JAT when it's basically a summary of all the reasons you town read me to begin with. On October 06 2016 03:15 Koshi wrote:
Ohyeah I remember why Palmar is in my scumlist.
He wanted to kill both Calix and Grack in consecutive posts when they are obv town.
Now that I reread his filter he is 100% mafia on Calix the entire game. The guy is not this bad.
##vote Palmar
On October 06 2016 04:19 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 03:59 Holyflare wrote:
Koshi, why is it you town read grack? I'm curious. I had a +1 after his name after I did the read up. I don't know what post it exactly was. I think it was for going against the stream and pushing the Calix town read? That being said. He and rels owned my ass superhard last time so I should be still very careful. On October 06 2016 02:35 justanothertownie wrote:
Grackaroni:
Made a case against me immediately when 1-2 people suddenly started suspecting me when I was gone yesterday. A really lazy and factual problematic case as I have explained lately. He also just harddefended Calix without even knowing what the problem was with her posting. Otherwise he is just existing in this game without doing much.
Those are 2 completely different instances. The reason I called you town in the first quote was because you went against some people pushing your reads. Now I am saying that JAT reason to scumread you is the most sheepable of all his reads. You put those together and call it deep shit? lol Yes when you read JAT's "sheepable reasons" the complete opposite way only the day before. You were one of the people who targeted JAT while he wasn't there. You town read me for defending Calix. Yes and? What? It seems pretty self explanatory to me. Now that Palmar is off the lynch block you're looking for a backup and you're using some reasoning you couldn't possibly agree with to try to support killing me. I am not doing that at all. Not at fucking all. marv/JAT/Palmar and if a back up is needed I am thinking Damdred/Scott. Never did I want to go to you.
you think both marv and palmar are mafia?
|
hey lets lynch scott guys
##vote scott
palmar+marv is feeling more like tvt the more it goes, they both are fucking egoistic and no one wants to give the other an inch.
|
On October 08 2016 16:02 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 12:54 Oatsmaster wrote:
hey lets lynch scott guys
##vote scott
palmar+marv is feeling more like tvt the more it goes, they both are fucking egoistic and no one wants to give the other an inch.
I'm not mafia. Try again.
so im just supposed to believe you?
|
that lurker vote is strong af.
|
Er ok I didn't expect that lynch or that outcome. I wouldn't have been surprised if he flipped scum tbh. I haven't had the time to read what happened recently but the votes seem quite obvious, Palmar and Marv not really interested in the game, grack not able to convince anyone, super pissed off calix and nu. Scott sheeping something.
|
On October 08 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 21:29 Calix wrote:
On Day 1, I town-read him.
I didn't have one for most of Day 2 since he didn't do anything.
Now I'm skeptical because of that horrendous vote. Would you kindly share your opinion on Oats? Personally, my town-read of him is fading out. He asks for others' opinions more than he gives his. He mischaracterizes stuff sometimes. Connects with 1 - no read progression/I don't know why he is voting X. Was pretty defensive over his vote D1 when no accusations against him were made. Much of an overreaction. (NAI) His fake-voting puzzles me. Really.
Meh, you just don't think I'm town cause I haven't posted much recently, don't lie.
|
On October 09 2016 05:15 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 03:39 Superbia wrote:
Well I'm town and I'm not going to defend myself so have fun.
See who joins my wagon then someone who's supposed to be 'good town' tomorrow. Not a problem.
What is this nonsense tag on sheep that's the only thing Scott said
|
On October 09 2016 05:47 Palmar wrote:
Superbia is gonna flip town.
Scum team is a combination of JAT koshi Marv Scott damdred
So half the fucking game? Or basically not me and calix. Useful post man.
|
Ok Palmar has been shockingly right about the town flips and me and shockingly putting everyone else in his scumbasket. Pretty shit if you ask me.
Scum-team is Palmar Scott jat.
Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
|
im excited, someone come and talk to me man.
|
On October 09 2016 19:20 Calix wrote:
Palmar and Scott FTW.
Do you have anything else about your JAT read? I'm not so convinced there.
not much more than anyone else has said so far but its a really sick read though
|
On October 09 2016 19:24 justanothertownie wrote:Oats is probably mafia. Can anyone tell me how the green and the red can go together in the mindset of a townie? Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 16:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
[green]Er ok I didn't expect that lynch or that outcome. I wouldn't have been surprised if he flipped scum tbh.[/green} I haven't had the time to read what happened recently but the votes seem quite obvious, Palmar and Marv not really interested in the game, grack not able to convince anyone, super pissed off calix and nu. Scott sheeping something. Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 16:37 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok Palmar has been shockingly right about the town flips and me and shockingly putting everyone else in his scumbasket. Pretty shit if you ask me.
Scum-team is Palmar Scott jat.
Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target. If you thought he could have easily flipped mafia then how on earth is it scummy for me to push his lynch? Or why would the lynch not happen without scum intervention? It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. If you don't even think damdred is mafia then why would scum need to intervene to get the lynch off of him and onto someone else? These 2 posts alone are full with contradictions. The Palmar point is alright though. He had no business being right on superbia there after calling himself an acceptable lynch just before. And he also never moved his vote away from me or tried to convince anyone to lynch who he wants to be lynched. You cannot complain afterwards if you didn't do anything about the lynch while you were clearly around at times.
I read the thread dude. the first post was flip only, second post was with context.
|
On October 09 2016 19:26 Calix wrote:
Either way, Palmar/ Scott should die tomorrow while the rest pans itself out. Sound like a plan?
deffo scott for now.
the jat thing is super cool but it rests on people flipping
|
On October 09 2016 20:37 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 20:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 19:20 Calix wrote:
Palmar and Scott FTW.
Do you have anything else about your JAT read? I'm not so convinced there. not much more than anyone else has said so far but its a really sick read though Can you repeat what "everyone else has said" then? If it's such a sick read that shouldn't be too hard.
not really interested tbh
|
On October 09 2016 20:38 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 20:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 19:20 Calix wrote:
Palmar and Scott FTW.
Do you have anything else about your JAT read? I'm not so convinced there. not much more than anyone else has said so far but its a really sick read though your alibi for being a no show yesterday? >: (
life is full of disappointments.
|
On October 09 2016 20:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 20:42 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 20:37 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 20:36 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 19:20 Calix wrote:
Palmar and Scott FTW.
Do you have anything else about your JAT read? I'm not so convinced there. not much more than anyone else has said so far but its a really sick read though Can you repeat what "everyone else has said" then? If it's such a sick read that shouldn't be too hard. not really interested tbh You mean you can't since noone really put into words why I should be mafia and you are just bullshitting right now.
not interested
|
Im not gonna seriously push this until at least after scott gets lynched, probably after scott+palmar gets lynched.
|
On October 09 2016 20:54 Calix wrote:
Do you have any reason for wanting to lynch Scott first? lol
hes idependantly scummy, also what a retarded vote on damdred then the super sheep onto super.
Ok really going nowhere jat. Like you really think that I cant find shit in other peoples filters?
Honestly.
|
On October 09 2016 21:01 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 21:00 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 20:54 Calix wrote:
Do you have any reason for wanting to lynch Scott first? lol hes idependantly scummy, also what a retarded vote on damdred then the super sheep onto super. Ok really going nowhere jat. Like you really think that I cant find shit in other peoples filters? Honestly. And Palmar isn't independently scummy? Well why DO you scum-read JAT? Can't be hard to summarise at least. In fact, I'll get JAT to demonstrate. JAT, why did you scum-read me/ null-scum read me to begin with? And what changed? lol
well both of them as posted earlier but I can only lynch one of them a day and scott is that one..
Im just gonna quote your filter k.
|
On October 09 2016 21:27 justanothertownie wrote:
Oats is just flailing right now.
This is hilarious
|
On October 09 2016 22:18 Calix wrote:
If Oats' next post does not do the following:
A) Explain why he's scum-reading JAT
B) Explain his read on Palmar
C) Actually push the game forward
then there had better be some god-tier explanation.
Girl plz.
Palmar is hardcore just popping in, posting some stuff about the game that makes some sense then peacing out. His behavior around the lynch was really weird with him here
On October 09 2016 04:16 Palmar wrote:
Regarding superbia. Lynching him isnt the worst idea
On October 09 2016 05:47 Palmar wrote:
Superbia is gonna flip town.
Scum team is a combination of JAT koshi Marv Scott damdred
I mean like what the fuck man.
there isnt much to say about scott cause its so obvious.
Jat shit is in here come on man, im just quoting your filter.
+ Show Spoiler +On October 05 2016 16:27 Calix wrote:Not quotes but JAT has a lot of posts where he says "XYZ is behaving normally for them" or asking a question and then not going anywhere with them. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Here JAT's response is to characterise batsnacks as 'sassy and self-confident' (implying that these are accurate words to describe his filter). He also notes that batsnacks had been 'improving his scum game' - an odd thing to note on someone that you claim to have 'no problems' with so far. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:19 justanothertownie wrote:
I still maintain that I do not have a particular problem with his filter but I retract my confidence. This doesn't make sense. He didn't have much confidence in his read to begin with (i.e., the comment about an improved mafia game) and how does one lose confidence without seeing a problem with the filter? Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:22 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:19 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 01:16 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:11 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Eh? I didn't get the impression that he was being that sassy or whatnot. In fact, his filter is one that I'd characterise as "trying to blend in" so I don't relate to your impression of him. I don't have a 'case' per se but my impression of him is that he's popping in to make comments which sound okay by themselves but add up to a poor filter. Namely he has a few pre-flip association theories which don't tell us much about where he actually stands on the players as individuals. #266 pinged me because he doesn't really SAY anything in it. He waffles around, seemingly contemplating the possibility of scum!Calix, and then concludes null on NU/ myself (although he says that NU 'gives him town vibes'?) and his argument is "if they're TvT then it would be more obvious since they seem to know each other well" #334 and #399 read like he's throwing shade on everyone in the NU/ Calix/ HF debacle. He throws up ideas where we could all be scum at certain points...but we have NO idea of where he actually stands. This is lazy but I think he's a good candidate for scum atm. On October 05 2016 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 05 2016 00:32 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 00:26 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:14 batsnacks wrote:
Calix said that there was no specific evidence she could produce for NU abusing PMs as Mafia, even though she implied NU did this as Mafia before
Holyflare said "produce evidence or die"
Those events happened in that order. Maybe Mafia Holyflare knowingly issued Calix an impossible task to make the narrative for Calix being Mafia stronger? Anyway that's what I was thinking hopefully it makes sense. Quote the posts please. I explicitly said that I had no specific evidence after HF's last post iirc. On another note, Palmar is underwhelming as fuck so far. Wouldn't mind policy-lynching him. No, this post was not against you. It was against HF. Read snacks's post again. It's about HF being aware that what he is asking you is impossible for you to deliver, thus making you appear mafia. offski Yeah this is also effective if holyflare is town though so I guess it depends whether or not town Holyflare thinks Calix is Mafia. Holyflare wasn't wrong about anything he said it just seemed like a pretty dramatic way to be right. Calix wrote it off st the time as Holyflare being a dramatic person, I would probably be more concerned about it in her position. HF is a dramatic person though? You're not actually faulting HF's arguments, you're just faulting his confidence which he can do as any alignment. (aka it's null) No idea why you're hung up on this. Also how is your point 'effective' if your original point had HF as scum? I don't understand. Actually there is less of that stuff in his filter than I remembered. But there are still quite a few posts I would label as typical town bats posts. Maybe I didn't use the correct words to describe the tone: On October 04 2016 07:24 batsnacks wrote:
Just a scummy pop in post nothing to see here. On October 04 2016 21:45 batsnacks wrote:
lol someone said "Power Wolf" that sounds like a sex thing On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right? First two look like typical shit-posts to me. Third one is one of the reasons why I'm suspecting him. So not terribly convinced here but I'll see. The quality of the content doesn't necessarily correlate with the overall usefullness of a post to get a read. Those ARE shitposts. But in my experience town batsnacks is more likely to make shitposts like that. If you want to judge him on content you will have a bad time if he is town. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:26 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:23 Calix wrote:
I'm not bothered about his shit-posts; they don't factor into the main issues I have with him.
I just don't think they warrant a town-read unless you're saying that he's one of those types who is more serious as scum. He is definitely one of thise types. And on the heels of losing his confidence, he makes these two posts: Soft-ball defense of batsnacks using his shit-posting, arguing that this shows batsnacks is less serious and thus is likely town. His last post says that batsnacks is "definitely" one of the types to be more serious as scum. This is an odd shift in confidence from "having retracted [his confidence]" to now being sure that batsnacks acts in a certain way as scum. On October 07 2016 19:01 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:56 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:54 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. It was 100% a TvT, go away Says the guy who did not list calix as town in his list. Can you explain how I have been "atrociously wrong" all game? You cannot seriously fault anyone for scumreading you, even if you are town. This is so bad. Doesn't read like JAT is scum-hunting at all. On October 08 2016 17:11 Calix wrote:
I still think JAT is the scummiest player in the thread. As flagged up earlier, I get the impression that he just pops in to make leading comments that serve the mafia agenda. It's a Saturday morning so no harm in me reading his filter now.
And I think the other two are among you, Damdred, Superbia because I think the majority of the scum are passive/ lack influence.
You could add Palmar/ Koshi but I think those two are town. jat has posted absolutely no content whatsoever, its disgusting how little shit is in his 10 page filter.
|
Oh I totally forgot about damdred.
yeah hes on the scumteam too
so 4 of the people.
|
On October 09 2016 22:24 Calix wrote:
Because Oats is skirting around doing anything productive in the most hilarious manner. Did you see his talk with JAT earlier?
I still think your Palmar town-read sucks. Can you find town motivation for the posts that Koshi has flagged up? Otherwise having a 'strong opening' is not a town tell.
Its night now dude, you honestly dont know why I think jat is scum?
|
On October 09 2016 22:27 justanothertownie wrote:
Really oats? That's the "sick read"?
no dude, the sick read was the totally correct breakdown of how the lynch happened.
|
On October 09 2016 22:30 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 22:25 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:18 Calix wrote:
If Oats' next post does not do the following:
A) Explain why he's scum-reading JAT
B) Explain his read on Palmar
C) Actually push the game forward
then there had better be some god-tier explanation. Girl plz. Palmar is hardcore just popping in, posting some stuff about the game that makes some sense then peacing out. His behavior around the lynch was really weird with him here On October 09 2016 04:16 Palmar wrote:
Regarding superbia. Lynching him isnt the worst idea On October 09 2016 05:47 Palmar wrote:
Superbia is gonna flip town.
Scum team is a combination of JAT koshi Marv Scott damdred I mean like what the fuck man. there isnt much to say about scott cause its so obvious. Jat shit is in here come on man, im just quoting your filter. + Show Spoiler +On October 05 2016 16:27 Calix wrote:Not quotes but JAT has a lot of posts where he says "XYZ is behaving normally for them" or asking a question and then not going anywhere with them. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Here JAT's response is to characterise batsnacks as 'sassy and self-confident' (implying that these are accurate words to describe his filter). He also notes that batsnacks had been 'improving his scum game' - an odd thing to note on someone that you claim to have 'no problems' with so far. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:19 justanothertownie wrote:
I still maintain that I do not have a particular problem with his filter but I retract my confidence. This doesn't make sense. He didn't have much confidence in his read to begin with (i.e., the comment about an improved mafia game) and how does one lose confidence without seeing a problem with the filter? Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:22 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:19 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 01:16 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:11 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:47 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 00:41 Calix wrote:
Also if anyone wants to comment on batsnacks' filter so far then knock yourself out. 0 problems with his filter so far. Generally town batsnacks doesn't give a fuck/is very sassy/self-confident while scum batsnacks tends to blend in immediately. Not really conclusive since I think he was improving his game the last time I saw him as mafia but I wouldn't lynch him right now. Eh? I didn't get the impression that he was being that sassy or whatnot. In fact, his filter is one that I'd characterise as "trying to blend in" so I don't relate to your impression of him. I don't have a 'case' per se but my impression of him is that he's popping in to make comments which sound okay by themselves but add up to a poor filter. Namely he has a few pre-flip association theories which don't tell us much about where he actually stands on the players as individuals. #266 pinged me because he doesn't really SAY anything in it. He waffles around, seemingly contemplating the possibility of scum!Calix, and then concludes null on NU/ myself (although he says that NU 'gives him town vibes'?) and his argument is "if they're TvT then it would be more obvious since they seem to know each other well" #334 and #399 read like he's throwing shade on everyone in the NU/ Calix/ HF debacle. He throws up ideas where we could all be scum at certain points...but we have NO idea of where he actually stands. This is lazy but I think he's a good candidate for scum atm. On October 05 2016 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 05 2016 00:32 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 05 2016 00:26 Calix wrote:On October 05 2016 00:14 batsnacks wrote:
Calix said that there was no specific evidence she could produce for NU abusing PMs as Mafia, even though she implied NU did this as Mafia before
Holyflare said "produce evidence or die"
Those events happened in that order. Maybe Mafia Holyflare knowingly issued Calix an impossible task to make the narrative for Calix being Mafia stronger? Anyway that's what I was thinking hopefully it makes sense. Quote the posts please. I explicitly said that I had no specific evidence after HF's last post iirc. On another note, Palmar is underwhelming as fuck so far. Wouldn't mind policy-lynching him. No, this post was not against you. It was against HF. Read snacks's post again. It's about HF being aware that what he is asking you is impossible for you to deliver, thus making you appear mafia. offski Yeah this is also effective if holyflare is town though so I guess it depends whether or not town Holyflare thinks Calix is Mafia. Holyflare wasn't wrong about anything he said it just seemed like a pretty dramatic way to be right. Calix wrote it off st the time as Holyflare being a dramatic person, I would probably be more concerned about it in her position. HF is a dramatic person though? You're not actually faulting HF's arguments, you're just faulting his confidence which he can do as any alignment. (aka it's null) No idea why you're hung up on this. Also how is your point 'effective' if your original point had HF as scum? I don't understand. Actually there is less of that stuff in his filter than I remembered. But there are still quite a few posts I would label as typical town bats posts. Maybe I didn't use the correct words to describe the tone: On October 04 2016 07:24 batsnacks wrote:
Just a scummy pop in post nothing to see here. On October 04 2016 21:45 batsnacks wrote:
lol someone said "Power Wolf" that sounds like a sex thing On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right? First two look like typical shit-posts to me. Third one is one of the reasons why I'm suspecting him. So not terribly convinced here but I'll see. The quality of the content doesn't necessarily correlate with the overall usefullness of a post to get a read. Those ARE shitposts. But in my experience town batsnacks is more likely to make shitposts like that. If you want to judge him on content you will have a bad time if he is town. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 01:26 justanothertownie wrote:On October 05 2016 01:23 Calix wrote:
I'm not bothered about his shit-posts; they don't factor into the main issues I have with him.
I just don't think they warrant a town-read unless you're saying that he's one of those types who is more serious as scum. He is definitely one of thise types. And on the heels of losing his confidence, he makes these two posts: Soft-ball defense of batsnacks using his shit-posting, arguing that this shows batsnacks is less serious and thus is likely town. His last post says that batsnacks is "definitely" one of the types to be more serious as scum. This is an odd shift in confidence from "having retracted [his confidence]" to now being sure that batsnacks acts in a certain way as scum. On October 07 2016 19:01 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:56 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:54 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. It was 100% a TvT, go away Says the guy who did not list calix as town in his list. Can you explain how I have been "atrociously wrong" all game? You cannot seriously fault anyone for scumreading you, even if you are town. This is so bad. Doesn't read like JAT is scum-hunting at all. On October 08 2016 17:11 Calix wrote:
I still think JAT is the scummiest player in the thread. As flagged up earlier, I get the impression that he just pops in to make leading comments that serve the mafia agenda. It's a Saturday morning so no harm in me reading his filter now.
And I think the other two are among you, Damdred, Superbia because I think the majority of the scum are passive/ lack influence.
You could add Palmar/ Koshi but I think those two are town. jat has posted absolutely no content whatsoever, its disgusting how little shit is in his 10 page filter.
I see some Palmar comments but no conclusion. I don't agree with most of the things that you quoted anymore. If you actually read Day 2, you would have seen why my read changed. lol
Palmars mafia?
lol.
I dont understand what you are trying to do.
|
On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right?
Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case.
|
I never said he was mafia for the stuff he said near to the lynch, Im not going there.
|
On October 09 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right? Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case. Then why on earth am I mafia for pushing his lynch?
can everyone please reread this post.
Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
And tell me how any of your questions are linked to what I said.
|
On October 09 2016 22:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right? Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case. Then why on earth am I mafia for pushing his lynch? can everyone please reread this post. Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
And tell me how any of your questions are linked to what I said. I already asked you why scum would even need to intervene when you don't even think damdred is mafia. And the assumption that only mafia would do that is even more stupid.
Rephrase this lol, i dont not understand.
|
On October 09 2016 22:48 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:43 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right? Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case. Then why on earth am I mafia for pushing his lynch? can everyone please reread this post. Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
And tell me how any of your questions are linked to what I said. I already asked you why scum would even need to intervene when you don't even think damdred is mafia. And the assumption that only mafia would do that is even more stupid. Rephrase this lol, i dont not understand. Seriously? Why would I as mafia go out of my way to not lynch damdred if he is town? Why would I need to INTERVENE like that? Why would I as town only lynch between the 2 hardcore lurkers?
I dont know if you realised, but you were very close to being lynched yesterday.
I think damdred is mafia.
Dunno what your last quiestion is.
|
On October 09 2016 22:55 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 22:53 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:48 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:43 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right? Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case. Then why on earth am I mafia for pushing his lynch? can everyone please reread this post. Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
And tell me how any of your questions are linked to what I said. I already asked you why scum would even need to intervene when you don't even think damdred is mafia. And the assumption that only mafia would do that is even more stupid. Rephrase this lol, i dont not understand. Seriously? Why would I as mafia go out of my way to not lynch damdred if he is town? Why would I need to INTERVENE like that? Why would I as town only lynch between the 2 hardcore lurkers? I dont know if you realised, but you were very close to being lynched yesterday. I think damdred is mafia. Dunno what your last quiestion is. I really wasn't close to being lynched at all. And I just assumed that you do not scumread damdred since in the post before that you declared the mafia team to be me, palmar and scott. My last question is very simple. Why would I only push out side of damdred and scott as mafia? Why would I not do that as town?
Because they are mafia and you dont want to push them if they arent getting any pressure?
You wont lynch them as town because you dont think they are scum?
I mean, its really fucking obvious isnt it.
|
On October 09 2016 23:02 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2016 23:00 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 09 2016 22:55 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:53 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:48 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:43 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 09 2016 22:39 justanothertownie wrote:On October 09 2016 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
Super was super anti town lol, there is nothing inherently wrong with JAT's case.
Then why on earth am I mafia for pushing his lynch? can everyone please reread this post. Listen to me about jat. It's highly unlikely that without significant scum intervention, we managed to avoid lynching damdred and Scott by now, and jat was the main mover of the last lynch. Scott came in with the ninja vote and Palmar really didnt give a shit about moving the vote onto his target.
And tell me how any of your questions are linked to what I said. I already asked you why scum would even need to intervene when you don't even think damdred is mafia. And the assumption that only mafia would do that is even more stupid. Rephrase this lol, i dont not understand. Seriously? Why would I as mafia go out of my way to not lynch damdred if he is town? Why would I need to INTERVENE like that? Why would I as town only lynch between the 2 hardcore lurkers? I dont know if you realised, but you were very close to being lynched yesterday. I think damdred is mafia. Dunno what your last quiestion is. I really wasn't close to being lynched at all. And I just assumed that you do not scumread damdred since in the post before that you declared the mafia team to be me, palmar and scott. My last question is very simple. Why would I only push out side of damdred and scott as mafia? Why would I not do that as town? Look, Calix. His questions are ones that need to be answered with "WIFOM". He has no will to defend himself out of WIFOM, because WIFOM and only WIFOM make his play make sense as town. This is less about me defending myself and more about oats being mafia for just making shit up on the fly.
Literally not interested in continuing this converstation.
I want to lynch scott tmr k guys.
|
On October 10 2016 07:33 Damdred wrote:
Saying that my activity level is indicative of anything is folly at best and idiocy at worst.
For example I,have several scum games that have 15-30 pages who or at the same time I have some scum games with 1-5 pages. And these happen in indiscriminate means as I see fit.
The same can be said of my town game the range in which I post is high sometimes and low others.
Trying to draw conclusions based off activity and any type of excuses (that I'm attempting to keep out of thread) is ludicrous.
As such if you are town you should be happy I am here and will catch up. If you are scum keep being dumb.
Lol ok damdred, this post took at least 5 min to write and it could've been so much better than a whiny defensive post. But apparently that's where you want to put effort in.
|
I really don't feel like I'm lynching Scott causr he hasn't played, I'm lynching Scott because he's been scummy as absolutely shit with his votes and posts.
|
I realised that Palmar is being lynhed for a lot of the same things Marv is doing but Marv isn't under any pressure lol.
|
On October 10 2016 09:53 Damdred wrote:
I can do with my time as I see fit oats and I can do multiple things at the same time. If I want to interact and talk with people w hug Ile I read I will do so, so really go fuck off with your attitude.
I would like to buy a scum-read pls
|
On October 10 2016 10:06 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 09:54 Oatsmaster wrote:
I realised that Palmar is being lynhed for a lot of the same things Marv is doing but Marv isn't under any pressure lol. And why are you defending Plam exactly?
Reread that and go the other way. Anyway my scum list in order of preference is
Scott
Damdred
Palmar
Jat
Marv
|
On October 10 2016 10:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Damn it, you have no sick reads.
Why is Damdred your 2nd and why is Plam your 3rd? Short answers please, watching the debate.
I really don't like the way damdred re entered the game with him being all salty he got scum-read.
Don't waste your time man, I couldn't take trump turning everything into what Hillary has done badly.
|
It's like damdred couldn't come up with any reads and instead is resorting to defending himself and hopefully produce some "town anger"
|
On October 10 2016 11:56 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On October 10 2016 11:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 10 2016 10:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:
Damn it, you have no sick reads.
Why is Damdred your 2nd and why is Plam your 3rd? Short answers please, watching the debate. I really don't like the way damdred re entered the game with him being all salty he got scum-read. Don't waste your time man, I couldn't take trump turning everything into what Hillary has done badly. It really was a waste of my time. I wish I could get a refund on that hour and a half I just wasted.
This is a total shitshow. Can we elect the vps instead
|
I would take palmar more seriously if he would actually carry this through a few hours and eventually produce something other than "lynch marv cause I say so".
Calix, why are you hesitant about lynching scott?
|
I don't want to Lynch him today, but neither do I want to Lynch marv. Therein lies the problem Palmar.
|
I've kinda gone off the scum-team association stuff because we haven't even got one scum flip and honestly it's not necessary to convince ppl.
|
On October 07 2016 12:23 scott31337 wrote:Koshi - Carefree Koshi, leaning town for now. Calix - He hates it when I put him in the tinfoil town pile, so I'll do it again.  marvellosity - town, pretty confident of - if he got mafia again he'd be all mopey and shit Palmar - Null/Leaning Scum - Trying to coast, doesn't give much for info. (Lynch Calix) justanothertownie - leaning scum, he's doing the not getting info/shitposting JAT - which is a mafia trait for him. Damdred-slight townlean/almost null - very little to go on. NeverUnlucky - town, probably #2 - lots of info, somewhat helpful. Oatsmaster - townlean - points out some inconstistencies in posts that I've seen Superbia - Uggg - kind of like last game - not very helpful - null Grackaroni - like last game too but nothing of help/doing/etc. That's where I'm at now - Lynch Palmar/JAT preferred, Poke Super and Grack some more.
After this post which is meh, scott then doesn't actually do shit about super and grack and asks Palmar some throwaway question that he never gets a reply to or cares about again.
|
On October 08 2016 16:09 scott31337 wrote:
Sorry Damdred, I've had car accidents happen and still was able to at least voice my opinion. My vote is for you.
This shit + the next 3 posts are also looking like he wants to kill damdred for an out of game reason.
|
On October 08 2016 17:05 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2016 16:30 Calix wrote:On October 08 2016 16:09 scott31337 wrote:
Sorry Damdred, I've had car accidents happen and still was able to at least voice my opinion. My vote is for you. That's a really bad reason to vote for someone. One last comment - Who are your two scum reads and a sentence on each.
I don't see why he's asking this question because it's clear he doesn't think calix is scum from earlier and I think calix made it pretty clear who she wants to Lynch.
Just all around play which isn't finding scum, very reactive and 2 bad votes, one ninja on super and one onto damdred for out of game reasons.
|
How the fuck did we not lynch scott???
|
I would also like to know this code thing. Its seems really cool.
##vote scott
|
Yay we are lynching scott.
Great boys.
Scum-team is obviously scott/damdred/jat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
