EPT[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 105
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 08 2016 03:57 marvellosity wrote: Palmar isn't being supertown despite his own proclamations, so i can basically conclude he's unable to give any reasonable explanation for his actions Ok, but why are you voting him? "Not supertown" != Mafia | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 07 2016 19:40 Koshi wrote: I like how people are only mafia after you flip. It's your only argument. Fearmongering at its best. although maybe this comment alone makes up for it | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:14 NeverUnlucky wrote: Ok, but why are you voting him? "Not supertown" != Mafia i explained so i won't again. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
if he's town, the best chance town has of winning the game is engaging with me properly and moving things forward. instead he chose to antagonise me and not answer any of my questions which actually do need answering because they're questions about his play that don't make sense. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
Quote it at least. No reason to act anti-town. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:20 NeverUnlucky wrote: Quote it at least. No reason to act anti-town. Read at least, no reason to act anti-town. page 7 of my filter a few posts after my vote, and the subsequent questions i posed | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 06:31 marvellosity wrote: might as well elaborate on palmar a little, pros and cons: flicking through his filter just now, there are quite a few posts that look decently like flippant town palmar but he criticised the lynch while doing absolutely nothing about it. it's an awfully long time ago now but it reminds me very much of rockband where he shat all over the prplhz lynch d1 while doing absolutely nothing about it. he voted for hf instead (on nothing) having previously kinda townread him, and then subsequently townread him (????). like he says hf looks fine, votes him for a total non-reason at deadline while doing nothing to dissuade the bats wagon, and then calls him town after. it's all just nonsense and palmar doesn't generally do nonsense of that variety as town. plus there were one or two other things i picked out on day 1 that i don't remember now but hey if he's town he can so easily turn things around, because i'll always listen to him (which he knows) The bolded is a decent argument. But it's really all there is to your case. "plus there were one or two other things i picked out on day 1 that i don't remember now" isn't really helpful. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
especially as he's more prone to it as mafia (hence providing it as an example). but it's simply scummy on its own to bitch about a lynch while doing nothing about it. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:20 marvellosity wrote: like Palmar said his activity is going to be reduced because he's going somewhere? (i think) if he's town, the best chance town has of winning the game is engaging with me properly and moving things forward. instead he chose to antagonise me and not answer any of my questions which actually do need answering because they're questions about his play that don't make sense. and tbh this is an excellent addition to the case | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:29 marvellosity wrote: don't understand how you don't get the paragraph above the bolded one isn't correct/relevant either especially as he's more prone to it as mafia (hence providing it as an example). but it's simply scummy on its own to bitch about a lynch while doing nothing about it. That argument is inside the bolded paragraph, kindda. You like used the same argument twice, lol. Why are you so lackadaisical about not having a convincing case enough for others to vote for your scum-read? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:31 NeverUnlucky wrote: That argument is inside the bolded paragraph, kindda. You like used the same argument twice, lol. Why are you so lackadaisical about not having a convincing case enough for others to vote for your scum-read? why shouldn't i be it's basically the only case made today :p | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's kinda surreal tbh. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
Your carelessness over the case makes me think you made a case for the sake of making a case so that the annoying townie does not call you out for not doing shit. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 08 2016 04:34 marvellosity wrote: funny question given my push on bats was the one convincing enough for town to lynch him and then today i'm the only one actually sustaining any pressure on a scumread it's kinda surreal tbh. You made a case on bats? New information to me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
unbelievable. | ||
| ||
