I'm only seeing a lazy Marv who is occasionally making good points when he's not being lazy. Where is the actual scum motivation in his posts? I don't see it.

I hear that said laziness is not AI for him.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

October 07 2016 19:46 GMT

#2109

nu: 'marv you so unconvincing with trying to get people lynched'
me: uh, i started the train on bats, lots of people followed, argued my lynch near deadline, got my lynch (for good or bad), attacked/made the case on Palmar, questioned him after he had a bit of activity, Palmar failed or refused to answer any of the questions.
nu: oh marv you so unconvincing, you don't try to get people to believe in your case. you scum!

really is brilliant

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

October 07 2016 19:48 GMT

#2110

calix, is nu terrible?

if not i'm gonna have to downgrade him

Calix

3379 Posts

October 07 2016 19:49 GMT

#2111

This is kind of why I don't think Palmar is scum either. Both of them are harping on about their ~speshul connection~ and how well they know each other, etc etc, so what I'm wondering is why either of them would (as scum) keep drawing attention to this while they are pushing each other.

It's poor play from scum because if one of them gets (mis) lynched then the other one looks absolutely terrible. All for the grand total of...one mislynch!

You'll notice this is a similar - if not identical - argument to what was being used with me at the start of the game when I was attacking NU. That's because it's a similar situation.

NeverUnlucky

Canada1622 Posts

October 07 2016 19:49 GMT

#2112

On October 08 2016 04:46 marvellosity wrote:
nu: 'marv you so unconvincing with trying to get people lynched'
me: uh, i started the train on bats, lots of people followed, argued my lynch near deadline, got my lynch (for good or bad), attacked/made the case on Palmar, questioned him after he had a bit of activity, Palmar failed or refused to answer any of the questions.
nu: oh marv you so unconvincing, you don't try to get people to believe in your case. you scum!

really is brilliant

Yours Truly NU

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

October 07 2016 19:50 GMT

#2113

On October 08 2016 04:49 Calix wrote:
This is kind of why I don't think Palmar is scum either. Both of them are harping on about their ~speshul connection~ and how well they know each other, etc etc, so what I'm wondering is why either of them would (as scum) keep drawing attention to this while they are pushing each other.

It's poor play from scum because if one of them gets (mis) lynched then the other one looks absolutely terrible. All for the grand total of...one mislynch!

You'll notice this is a similar - if not identical - argument to what was being used with me at the start of the game when I was attacking NU. That's because it's a similar situation.

palmar has attacked me many times when he was mafia and i was town.

palmar will/should readily admit he fails to do logical things as mafia.

Calix

3379 Posts

October 07 2016 19:50 GMT

#2114

He can have good instincts and he's improving but to call him a 'good' player is a stretch. (he has only been playing for a few months so this is naturally the case) This is largely due to his lack of persuasion abilities and tendency to troll.

justanothertownie

16343 Posts

October 07 2016 19:52 GMT

#2115

You are overestimating the influence the mafia player has in this situation. If he denies the connection he will just get lynched.

Calix

3379 Posts

October 07 2016 19:53 GMT

#2116

I stand by my case that neither of you are scum and I don't care to lynch among you two. The case against you is so weak that I can hardly remember what it even is and I don't feel like Palmar is scum.

We should discuss other players who have been out of the spotlight. I think Superbia has been lurking under the radar for one.

This is unproductive and taking up too much thread space compared to its significance imo.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

October 07 2016 19:53 GMT

#2117

i just can't possibly understand how he has managed to reach the conclusion he has given the relative posting of me and Palmar.

Palmar has done NOT ONE SINGLE THING to try to lynch a scumread. but i'm scum because i'm not trying to be convincing? it's so fucking illogical.

NOT ONE SINGLE THING. bears repeating.

Palmar

Iceland22634 Posts

October 07 2016 19:53 GMT

#2118

On October 08 2016 04:30 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

and tbh this is an excellent addition to the case

The Marv is scum case?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

October 07 2016 19:54 GMT

#2119

On October 08 2016 04:53 Calix wrote:
I stand by my case that neither of you are scum and I don't care to lynch among you two. The case against you is so weak that I can hardly remember what it even is and I don't feel like Palmar is scum.

We should discuss other players who have been out of the spotlight. I think Superbia has been lurking under the radar for one.

This is unproductive and taking up too much thread space compared to its significance imo.

the problem is you're likely wrong and it's incredibly significant.

Calix

3379 Posts

October 07 2016 19:56 GMT

#2120

On October 08 2016 04:54 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

the problem is you're likely wrong and it's incredibly significant.

I might be going out soon, so if I do then I'll make a note to look over your Palmar argument and read his filter with it in mind since nobody will fucking talk about anything else.