[M][T] Haunted Mansion 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
![]() | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I'm feeling a lot of indignation from calix, which I usually consider to be more of a town tell. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 08:17 Vivax wrote: The calix issue for me is that she was so intent on proceeding to splitting atoms with me when I pointed it out. I'd have felt better about the post if I just had gotten back as answer "alright it's fluffy but I wanted to talk about setup so it's obvious that it's going to be fluffy" instead of her defending the points she made so rabidly (for example in fear of looking bad if not able to defend them). It's early enough for me to still chill and force silent people to post without having to jump into tunnels, so I'll just judge calix based on other stuff as well, but this will definitely be an argument should I decide for myself that she's mafia. Actually a good point, may have to reexamine your argument when I get out of class. And I've used my 2 15 minute break to at least say something about the game (regardless of how minimal it is). Not sure I fit with anyone who's trolled or called everyone boring and skipped off. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 09:26 Tumblewood wrote: fuba also seems pretty cool While I appreciate it, it always makes me uncomfortable when people town read me, especially D1 XD | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 09:29 Grackaroni wrote: I was expecting to find some good stuff here, but Vivax's points are actually really meh. We're talking about the set up here. There's no reason whatsoever why scum would have worse thoughts on the setup than town. Also fair warning: If I get lynched day 1 I'm totally shooting. Second paragraph also a great point. Occurred to me as well, but I forgot :/ | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 11:40 NeverUnlucky wrote: A) "seems pretty cool" =/= Town-read. Can hardly even call it a read. B) I agree that you've done nothing worthy of being town-read so far. 4 "I'm alive" posts shouldn't warrant a t-r. C) Why did you specify "especially D1"? A) what else would it mean in the context of a mafia game? B) Cool story bro. C) I have no idea what to do D1. It tends to get me in hot water early. Really, I'm not all that great until a few days have passed. Great at hyper-analyzing everything everyone's said at a later date, though. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
*sheeps* | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Only the "I like this post" part. Not a big deal. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 20:41 Superbia wrote: Is he prone to be abrasive and yet form no actual opinion on someone? He calls TW 'lynchbait', which suggests he is TRing him, but nothing suggests he is reaching any actual conclusion. Seems weird to put seemingly that much energy/emotion into something but reach no real conclusion. This was the one thing that really stood out to me from last night. He seems to be, at best, town reading TW and at worst, accidentally admitting he knows TW is town. I'm willing to trust calix's meta knowledge atm though. Would revisit him if something crazy happens or TW does end up flipping town. In any case, ticktock not returning after dinner last night makes me feel even better about my vote. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 09 2016 21:33 Holyflare wrote: Wow. You mean my vote, you belong to me now. My apologies. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Actually, mentioning that he's lynchbait is counterproductive to getting TW lynched, so why even mention it? Gonna need to think about this more after work - need my computer in front of me XD | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:23 NeverUnlucky wrote: Odd that you change your stance on this point after Vivax and I called you out for it. Calling him bad =/= town-reading him. What does my knowledge of TW's meta have to do with any of this? "That's why I wouldn't really revisit it unless TW flips town (if/when that happens). I.E. if TW flips town, this could have been a slip." So you know he is going to flip town with the addition of the 'when'. I do not see why else you found the need to add this word after 'if' which is a conditional, meaning you know he's town. Scumslip. You're also trying to tie up TW's flip to me which is scummy as fuck. IE - X flipped town and was pushed by Y, therefore Y is scum. You are already setting up a mislynch on me knowing that TW will flip town. What makes you say that I wanted him lynched? Scum-read =/= desire to lynch Fuba is scum. This is the single most nonsensical response to any post I have ever written. Excited to get home and absolutely tear it to tiny bits of terrible case. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 06:08 Vivax wrote: I don't see anything wrong about this? Isn't she allowed to have a few reads that are the same as yours? Or to change her mind? Doesn't really seem like a reason to be suspicious of anything to me. I'm glad somebody else sees that fuba is playing very timidly to say the least. On top of it he attacked you with superbia for calling TW lynch bait, but not HF. Seems especially strange cause you were more vocal about the opinion on TW. HF has the right to call TW lynchbait based off of meta. NU has to call him lynchbait based on his knowledge from this game. Which means he thinks or knows that TW is town. If that is not the case, then he should just think he is scum. Calling him lynchbait is at the least inconsistent with his scumread of TW. At worst it is a slip. And his intentional misinterpretation of the post he quoted is making me think slip. How is this not obvious? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 06:33 Vivax wrote: FYI Tumble is not lynch bait. When he started playing around here he was perfectly capable of concise , informative posts with lists and reasoning and stuff, and he was jailkeeper a while back and got NKd N1. Not lynched. Not sure why he's started to go into wobbly land with his posting, but when he posts differently than in those games it's never a bad call to lynch him. And what does this have to do with you bitching about NU for using that term but not finding it suspicious in the slightest in HF? Is there any particular wording I missed that NU used that makes it more worth noticing? I could at least see HF having a different view of TW than you. I read the first few pages of the last game and thought TW was scum. HF was there, and said he had felt the same. In any case, it doesn't matter, because he at least has a right to an opinion of whether TW is lynchbait or not. He's seen him play as town before. NU has not. He has no reference point from which to call TW lynchbait. Except for this game. You are lynchbait if, as town, you behave in a scummy manner. UN only has this game from which to draw a conclusion. As I say this, I realize that I'm assuming it's his first game here rather than one of his first games here. However, assuming he's never played with TW before, my point stands strong. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 06:44 fuba wrote: I could at least see HF having a different view of TW than you. I read the first few pages of the last game and thought TW was scum. HF was there, and said he had felt the same. In any case, it doesn't matter, because he at least has a right to an opinion of whether TW is lynchbait or not. He's seen him play as town before. NU has not. He has no reference point from which to call TW lynchbait. Except for this game. You are lynchbait if, as town, you behave in a scummy manner. UN only has this game from which to draw a conclusion. As I say this, I realize that I'm assuming it's his first game here rather than one of his first games here. However, assuming he's never played with TW before, my point stands strong. No response vivax? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 07:03 Vivax wrote: It's a response that seemed reasonable, but that's it. In the context of him actually scumreading TW, I don't see how you reach the conclusion that he's mafia for calling him lynch bait in whatever way. I assume you think he spewed him town there having TMI? Important question. I'm gonna come up with an analogy that will explain my current thought process about this eventually. To answer your question, I didn't originally think so, but since I was brought up, and I started to think about it more closely, yes. From my perspective, the only way UN could see TW as lynchbait is if he knows he's town. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 07:08 NeverUnlucky wrote: ^ Yes, it is what he thinks I did. I think he did the same thing in another post (to which he hasn't replied). Chill. That will be handled on a point-by-point basis when I'm home. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 07:17 Damdred wrote: This looks like a town post, 5 points to anyone who can say why. Because I wrote it. I will accept my points if and when I flip. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Nvm -_- | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:23 NeverUnlucky wrote: Odd that you change your stance on this point after Vivax and I called you out for it. What did I change my mind about? Nothing really changed about what I said earlier, aside from my second from last sentence bringing up a point I hadn't considered before. Calling him bad =/= town-reading him. I may have rushed my explanation, but I didn't think you were townreading him. That is why it's strange you would call him lynchbait in your first game with him. It implied believing TW was town despite your push against him. What does my knowledge of TW's meta have to do with any of this? Covered this. "That's why I wouldn't really revisit it unless TW flips town (if/when that happens). I.E. if TW flips town, this could have been a slip." So you know he is going to flip town with the addition of the 'when'. I do not see why else you found the need to add this word after 'if' which is a conditional, meaning you know he's town. Scumslip. Flimsiest "scumslip" I've ever heard of. Like, it's so insignificant that it's ridiculously hard to come up with any response. People say "if and when" all the time. They say it when they mean "if". It's not indicative of anything whatsoever. You're also trying to tie up TW's flip to me which is scummy as fuck. IE - X flipped town and was pushed by Y, therefore Y is scum. You are already setting up a mislynch on me knowing that TW will flip town. I'm thinking about the game. That is what you are accusing me of. People decide that if something happens, it would likely indicate something else literally all the time. It's like a core aspect of the game. You're making it seem as though what I said requires that I know TW is town, which it does not. Whole point is null and void. (see how I could have just said null, but I said both together because it is a thing that people say?) You're also saying this despite the fact that you strongly feel TW is scum. Do you see the problem here? You're saying both of us are scum, while at the same time saying that my supposition that a town TW could mean a scum UN is setting you up for a lynch. It's impossible in your scenario for both of us to be scum, but that is what you would have us believe. While I said that if TW flips town, you might be scum, you are calling me scum NOW for something that goes against your own belief in what's going on in the thread. Man this feels good. What makes you say that I wanted him lynched? Scum-read =/= desire to lynch That is, in fact, the definition of a scum read for me. Not sure how you could not want to lynch scum reads. I suppose that from your PoV as someone who plays with more scumreads than there are scum, you don't want to lynch them all maybe? However, this is a silly nonsensical thing to point out. It's obvious what I meant. Fuba is scum. Uh, false. Going through this actually made me more confident in you being scum. Especially that second (technically third) response from the end. You're looking at the game as someone who has to make himself see people as scum because he knows they're not. The whole "lynchbait" thing doesn't even need to come into play, even though I still think it holds weight. Time to eat. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 07:28 Vivax wrote: This is what I wanted to hear. Cause you pointed him spewing TW town at a time when you were scumreading TW, which makes it in my opinion a very unlikely thought to come to your mind when reading NUs post. Or explained differently. If you're holding the belief that TW is scum, you wouldn't hold the belief that somebody just scumslipped that he's town. Which is one more reason you're a good lynch ! I don't actually remember saying anything about TW all game. I've only mentioned him in relation to NU's comments about him. Are you thinking about ticktock? Because I am scumreading ticktock. He was really my only scumread until all of this happened. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I work tomorrow from 8am-4pm, which is the deadline. I may be able to pop in about 3-4 hours before that for a few minutes, but will be otherwise unavailable. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I really don't feel like responding to this. Wanted to take a step back from this game. This bugs the shit out of me, because you bitched so much about me not responding even though I told you exactly when I would respond. Then I respond, and you "don't feel like responding to this". You wanted it a short while ago, when you used it to make me look scummy. Now you don't? Ugh. I have. This doesn't clarify anything, only makes it harder for me to respond to you. See, you're contradicting yourself again. You state that you didn't think that I was town-reading him, yet believe that I thought he was town. Town-reading someone IS thinking someone is town. I have not once contradicted myself. If I'm pointing out a contradiction I've found in what YOU said, it doesn't mean I'm the one making a contradiction. The contradiction is that you are both supposedly scumreading TW, while at the same time declaring him town as lynchbait. That is the contradiction. Very cool, very interesting, very dank. However, the question was: why did you feel the need to add 'when' in there? What does this word tell us that 'if' doesn't? Nothing, but implying that you knew that TW was town. Completely ignored me. I've already responded to this. It's a ridiculous reason to scumread someone, and is not in any way a scumslip. It's actually impossible for it to be. You are only thinking about me and TW. All of your posts are about either of us. You're not thinking about the game. AGAIN, you talk theoretically without making connections to the game which is a scumtell! So you're not players in the game? I've made clear connections to the game. You're the one talking theoretically. As I mentioned before, you're the one making calls now based on some perceived future theoretical town-flip of TW. You. Are. The. One. Talking. Theoretically. (at least in this dialogue between us that no one seems to want to comment on ![]() I don't strongly feel that TW is scum, that's not true. The only read I am confident in is my Vivax TR. If I strongly felt that TW was scum, I'd be voting him. Lmao, you talk about pre-flip associations Day 1. I scum-read you both individually, not as a team. No one should read players off of others, especially not D1. I called you scum a while back, sir. What is the "something that goes against my own belief in what's going on in the thread"? You gave reasons for me to be at least slightly townie 10 hours ago. You decided I was scum 7 hours ago. Wouldn't really call that "calling me scum a while back". In any case, you clearly thought TW was scum. The level of that read is irrelevant. And YOU ARE THE ONE TALKING ABOUT PRE FLIP ASSOCIATIONS DAY ONE AND VOTING ON THAT ASSOCIATION. I mentioned a single thing: that in the future if TW flips town then I would reinvestigate what you had said. This is not at all alignment indicative. Half of the game has already done that. You, however, are deciding that I'm setting you up for a lynch by doing so and voting me for that. Nearly exclusively. The rest being "I didn't like his posts earlier and he said 'when'". I realize that's minimizing what your actual arguments are from your point of view, but that's really all they are to me. And I'm just going to repeat that my read on you has nothing to do with anyone else's alignment. I don't really know how to make it any clearer, but I guess I'll try. My first point was that you, while supposedly scumreading TW, called him lynchbait, which in my mind indicates you on some level see him as town. The thought was that the only reason you would say that is as an accident (because "town NU" thinks TW is scummy), and it would be because you ultimately know him to be town. It doesn't have anything to do with me knowing his alignment. He could be whatever. It's that the only reason you would call him lynchbait when you think he's scum, without knowing from previous games that he might be perceived as lynchbait by some people (i.e. you have no personal meta read of him) is that you know he is town in this game, and accidentally reveal that fact. However, if we simply have different definitions of lynchbait, most of this can't be guaranteed true. The second point was that while scumreading TW, you decide that I am scum, trying to push a mislynch on you when TW flips town. You think he's scum, but you think he's town, so you think I'm scum. Or you think he's scum, and you want to be able to say you think I'm scum, so you decide he's going to flip town. I kept running through the scenarios and it comes down to you claiming in thread that you think he's scum, but you're mentally making him town for the purpose of getting me lynched. Essentially, you're having trouble keeping your reads straight because you know the people you're accusing are town. I'm standing at 6 scum-reads, there are 3 scums. Of course I do not want to lynch all of my scum-reads even more so because I am not confident enough in most of them. Yes, it's a common thing for players not to systematically want to lynch their scum-reads. i.e. I wouldn't ever lynch Calix day 1 even if I scum-read her because she at least posts and tries to contribute, and I respect that. I think this little debate isn't really going anywhere. We play in different ways, so while I don't have scumreads unless I want to lynch them, you have plenty of scumreads and therefore don't want to lynch them all. Just gonna have to agree to disagree, and it doesn't really help the discussion. Kinda sorry I brought it up. If you look at my posts on people, it's clear that I do not know anyone's alignment. My reads have always been nuanced and always had reasoning (like it or not, I have reasoning to sr you). Perhaps the second to last sentence is true. You're right that I've mostly focused on this one scenario to the exclusion of much else. It's kind of what I do - see something and latch onto it. I still don't think I'm wrong, but I'll look at your filter tomorrow. Thing is, I feel like you can often distill entire games down into individual moments. Defining moments. Like someone accidentally revealing his scumread is town, or subconsciously allowing privileged information to color their reads and explanations of their reads on other players. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Regarding NU: there are things I really want to clarify from his last post about me, but no one seems to agree with my case, so I'm setting it aside for now. No one agreeing tends to mean I'm on the wrong track, anyway. Thinking back, I do remember thinking he was town before I went all paranoid (I guess) about the lynchbait thing. I can't reaffirm that without going back and rereading his filter, which I don't have e time for atm, so I'm just going to entertain the idea that he's town for now. I can read a single filter on the way to work. Likely a short one. Got any more info on your damdred scum read NU, or is it already in your filter. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
And he has been defended, in a way. Pushing another lynch defends the current lynch leader. I'm not at all saying that everyone iffy about a TT lynch is scum. I'm saying that if we're voting for someone else, then we're not voting for tt. Scum could push a counter lynch, or simply hop onto one, and not have to worry all that much about being associated with him because he's "just a lurker lynch". I have to get back to work soon. Might be able to sneak a peak at the game before lynch time. Staying on TT because despite HF's overconfidence in the case, I remember finding it compelling at the time and nothing TT has done has convinced me otherwise. Also, the fact that he disappeared right after the votes popped up, and the fact that HF appeared to be (and still is) dead set on lynching him may have sapped his will to fight back. I know it's projecting, but I would be disheartened if HF declared me so strongly scum so early. Anyone know if this would apply to TT too? Like, is he more likely to disappear when he's town being wrongly accused, or scum being correctly accused? Or maybe is neither more likely? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 11 2016 02:35 Damdred wrote: You forgot a option tbh, the third option is tt didn't want to play as scum and at least one team mate is light budding with the intent to jump on when the train looks like it,had no breaks,for cred. COukd it be town tt just going down with the ship, yes it could. But there is no logical reasoning town should defend tt is there? For such a easy target the amount of push back,that has been received from the tt while no one town reads him is staggering tbh. But really there is so much time left and so few people voting it coups,mean any number of things. Liking damdred for this post. Basically in line with my thoughts. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Gonna go subscribe to the replacement thread now :S | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Got a few minutes before work. To answer NU's questions (paraphrasing, on my phone): What are my thoughts on the calix discussion? I think she probably could have defended tt as either alignment. I disagree that starting the defense because of VCA is accurate, though. I don't see how 3v2v2v1v1v6-no-votes (generalizing, can't look at the vote list right now) indicates a lack of defense. There were other wagons trying throughout the day to get onto someone other than tt. Once the votes were skewed to what they became at EoD, I might have gotten concerned, but she was on it much earlier than that. Might lean slight scum for that, but I also recall thinking that many of her posts just felt like frustrated town. Might be able to find some and quote them later. At the moment I'm considering her town. Why did I vote for tt? The narrative HF originally laid out made sense to me, and then tt disappearing after it just reinforced it. At the end of the day, I could still see scum behaving as he had, so my vote didn't change. I didn't see any reason that HF exaggerating his sureness was indicative of the case being bad. Though iirc he later mentions that he no longer had a scum read (or maybe it was just a weaker scum read? Would have to look it up) on tt and was lynching for information at that point. That bugs me. Mostly because I'm not sure how much reasonably confident information we got from the lynch. Maybe that'll come to me when I reread EoD. Who are my scum reads? I'll have to get back to you on that one. My two yesterday were you and tt, which is more that I usually have d1 XD. One was proven wrong, the other I'm currently believing is town. Have to dive some filters and probably reread EoD to develop some more. I also have some thoughts on TW that are almost completely unrelated to this game, and actually take place in an obs QT for another game that he wasn't in as far as I remember, but there are similarities to this game and I was wondering what other people's thoughts were on it. In one of my previous town games I made a case on a suspected scum being town. In the obs QT, it was declared that I was town for doing so by most people present, even if they were unsure of me before. Does anyone feel that this could apply to TW in this game? I could try to find the game, but would have to wait until a few hours after start of day. On one hand, I understand that scum have an easy time town reading people (if they're town) because they know they're town. They know it's from a town perspective because everything has to be. On the other, why defend a high content poster once the thread starts swinging slightly against them if your goal is to get them killed? The ability to defend town is greater, but the reason for doing it seems far less so. I know that these scenarios assume tw scum and calix town, but I'm leaving out the possibility that they're both scum because that would be a hard defense of a scum buddy. Which I guess could happen, but it doesn't feel likely? The scenario feels like either both town or one scum. I needed to ask because it'll be on my mind until it's resolved (think NU's lynchbait comment). | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I'm glad I stopped tunneling you NU, I really liked your last few posts. The stuff about a TW lynch feeling a lot like the TT lynch was exactly what I was thinking at the moment. At least as it pertains to HF. Not saying it makes him scummy, it just has the exact same feeling to it. And if you want my response to the calix NK, it's generally that very few conclusions can be drawn. That's not to say I have no ideas about why it was done, but there's no way to narrow it down from 50 possibilities to even a reasonable fraction of them, so I'm not gonna throw my speculation out there XD Was gonna call vivax out for trying to get HF to fight his battles for him, but I reread his filter really quick and it actually seems like his read on me has been fluctuating pretty reasonably all game. Incorrect whenever he thinks I'm scum, but I can see the thought behind it, and I think I can remember the approximate timing of most of the posts and I can understand them. He doesn't really push too hard, but at least I think I can see a townie thought process. Also, without having reread any cases on anyone, so many of TW's posts feel like posts that I make or have made as town that I have trouble really seeing him as scum. He seems better able to let himself post freely, regardless of the consequences, than I do, but I feel some kind of "bad townie" (for lack of a better term) kinship. Oh, and I really, really wouldn't rely too much on the ghosts or speculation about it. Like, anyone who knows scott shadowed HF or whatever could have set up that little code. Scum can control the LW and scum can control the votes. I don't want to lose because we trust in something we know that scum will try to use against us. Yay townreads! Scum will come once I have the time to reread more filters XD (should be around the second half of D2 :S) | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 13 2016 00:09 Vivax wrote: Picking up where I left yesterday, I'm snipping out one part here (when he talks about the Calix discussion, doesn't yield anything interesting). My comments are in [] brackets. This post is mostly just here to see if he actually did any of the things he promised in the previous post which doesn't seem like he did. His NU scumread turned to town for his latest posts. Ok. What about the famous game he talked about? What about EoD and HF changing reads on TT? No delivery. Fuba mostly just talks a lot to say very little. Which doesn't surprise me cause he just pops in occasionally with probably great pressure to look super contributive, but since he's actually doing very little, he fluffs up the posts like a pro. I think we should lynch him before we lynch TW cause TW at least shows some degree of consistent presence whereas fuba is under the radar 90 % and when he shows up he throws up a post that only really talks about irrelevant stuff in an overly worded way. Scott's message is old news, and nobody is really interested in figuring out NUs alignment at this point. But I guess he felt he had to put it in there for consistency otherwise somebody could call him out for forgetting about his scumread on him. I'll be voting accordingly. So am I posting for consistency or being inconsistent? I can't be both. You say I'm posting under intense pressure to look contributive, but there has been almost none on me the entire game (a fact that I've already mentioned I find strange). One fact you have right: I haven't acted on things I've said I'd do. Some of those are because they feel irrelevant once I finish catching up with the thread. The others are because I legitimately have no time to do it. I keep making promises, not realizing that I can hold to them. That should change in the next few days, as I don't have to work before/after class. It's funny that in the same post, you point out how no one wants to know my thoughts on something that happened in the thread in the past while at the same time pointing out how I'm not telling everyone all my thoughts from things in the past. You know that if no one reacts to something I've posted, I'm incredibly likely to assume no one agrees/cares and assume that's because it's useless. So why would I go find the case I mentioned? Also gonna point out how I'm scummy for suggesting that the case might give more insight into what im saying, as well as not providing the case after no one has reacted to my post in any way for hours. I'm scum for literally anything I post. How would town fuba act here vivax? Keeping in mind that I'm reasonably sure that you've scum read me in 100% of our games together. Since the entire case boils down to "he isn't here a lot", I'm just gonna start being more active in the game now that I (kinda) have time to, and hopefully you'll take off your scum-tinted shades. As for the hf EoD stuff, someone (tw?) raised a good point that scum hf gains nothing from admitting he wasn't sure about tt being scum anymore but voting for him anyway. Makes it NAI. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
In any case, I'm awake now. Only have 15 pages to read for my class today, which starts in ~9 hours. Should give me a good amount of time to at least read most of the filters in the game and give some input. Will probably start with people who have yet to vote, which coincidentally seems to include most of the people others are scumreading. My class starts at about an hour before EoD, so I can't be here for that (probably. Might be able to be sneaky while in class. I'd rather not get the professor angry at me on the second day of class, though XD) | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 13 2016 19:48 Superbia wrote: orly. If scum are in the people not voting, why haven't they placed a vote on you then? I uh, didn't say that. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
[QUOTE]On September 13 2016 20:14 fuba wrote: [QUOTE]On September 13 2016 19:48 Superbia wrote: [QUOTE]On September 13 2016 19:42 fuba wrote: It is way too easy to snooze all of my alarms. I should really get one of those alarms that start running around the room when it goes off so I can't ignore it. In any case, I'm awake now. Only have 15 pages to read for my class today, which starts in ~9 hours. Should give me a good amount of time to at least read most of the filters in the game and give some input. Will probably start with people who have yet to vote, which coincidentally seems to include most of the people others are scumreading. My class starts at about an hour before EoD, so I can't be here for that (probably. Might be able to be sneaky while in class. I'd rather not get the professor angry at me on the second day of class, though XD)[/QUOTE] orly. If scum are in the people not voting, why haven't they placed a vote on you then?[/QUOTE] I uh, didn't say that.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On September 13 2016 19:42 fuba wrote: It is way too easy to snooze all of my alarms. I should really get one of those alarms that start running around the room when it goes off so I can't ignore it. Right. "Most others". My mistake. Who is scum then?[/QUOTE] Literally what I said I'd be doing over the next 9 hours. Why are you making such a big deal about a pretty nothing post? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 13 2016 20:38 Superbia wrote: You know what has happened this game right? People voted for town d1. People voted for others d1. Go over some reads you already had, then go over votes. Then post who you think are mafia. Then read filters and adjust accordingly. You're riding me for literally no reason right now, lol. Chill out. Town reads can be fast, scum requires analysis. Situation's simple: I've said I'll have my reads in the thread. If I don't end up supplying any, just vote me and it'll be done. Honestly, not sure why you haven't voted me already lol | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 13 2016 21:00 Superbia wrote: You think I'm scum then or? Certainly a possibility, reading your filter now. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Superbia Setup talk - Is completely wrong about everything. Doesn't mention the scumteam's abilities until he points out that he thought they had no spectral abilities until dead. I can see that explaining his spam and the absence of scum power discussion. Upon further consideration, it really seems unlikely that as scum he would enter the game in this way. "I'm going to try to get free townreads for entering the game by trying to break the setup, pretend to misinterpret every aspect of the power roles, completely ignore discussion of the scum powers, and then wrap it up by providing the completely reasonable excuse that I misinterpreted what "spectral" meant." Like, I can 100% see the town reasoning running through his train of thought. Scum would have to be really, really schemey to pull this off. At this point, since it popped into my head, what I said earlier about scott's LW being unreliable is probably untrue. From what I understand, even if someone saw the replacement post they wouldn't know who was replacing. The LW itself is likely 100% reliable, the vote will not be. In addition to what I said earlier, after reading the rest of D1 (I believe), I've found that the way he's pushing me to post is consistent with the way he, himself, plays and says he plays earlier in the thread. I don't think it's forced, and I don't think he's trying to push a wagon without being on the wagon. I also felt a strong similarity between his response to vivax's case against him and my own, which, while probably terrible reasoning, makes me lean slightly more town. (not calling vivax scum here, think he's still town too XD) Was gonna keep reading, but there's a lot for me to get through, and townreads aren't what anyone is looking for. I think super's entry was actually enough for me to consider him town. Might be underestimating his mafia cleverness, but I can't really see anyone entering like that as scum. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Shapelog First thing I felt was of consequence was when he returned for the second half of D2. Gave an unasked for self-meta of his scum play, then implies he's scumreading TW for TW's reasons for townreading him. I'm not 100% sure what bugs me about the post. It feels slimy. The self-meta disclosure doesn't seem to fit with the generally more free-flowing thoughts from his other posts. I think what I don't like about the TW stuff is that it all seems pointless. It depends on whether TW feels the same way about shape's meta as shape does, and generally ignores whether or not a post like that is more likely to come from town or scum TW. Like, it seems to imply "this post is wrong and it makes him scummy" but only says why it's wrong. Feels scummy. Addendum after reading the rest of the filter: he eventually gets around to calling TW scum. The meta aspect I can't argue with, not really great with meta. But why would TW just make up BS about shape to call him town if he knows he's town. He wouldn't have to make anything up. I just don't see how shape sees it as alignment indicative. I must have missed the sheeping skynx thing, but regardless, does TW just become a moron when he rolls scum? The argument feels more like "this isn't TW" than "this is scum TW". Looking at his reason for voting TT - His comments about the vote count are correct. He then says that TT's filter is crap, after having mildly defended him against HF the day before. I can see someone who hasn't been able to catch up having no idea who else to really vote for, so I'm gonna go with NAI for his vote at EoD. As for his walls of text that I missed in my first readthrough cuz of spoilers, There's probably a lot that can be discussed, but I don't have the time to really go into them. From what shape himself says, the WoTs help him understand the thread, so I think he'd probably need them as either alignment to either contain his thoughts as town or to keep his story straight as scum. So NAI. Leaning scum on shape. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Shoot. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 14 2016 00:21 Superbia wrote: What was your goal going into this game? Like what was your plan as mafia and what was your plan as town. My usual plan is to not be mafia in the first place. It really doesn't turn out well. I tend to have trouble outright lying. The only person I remember pushing as scum was my scummate, because I knew I was right XD When I play town my plan every game is to post more stream-of-consciousness, but that never works out. I hate being wrong too much to let myself be unsure of something I say. And this game I haven't had the time to read the thread actively until now, so I had 0 chance of pulling it off this game either, lol. I tend to not have discussions, I observe and report what I see. I kinda play a side game rather than participating. My goal is usually to get to end game and find the last scum. I did it once in a dr who game and it was a thrill XD | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 14 2016 02:18 Holyflare wrote: I always get town feels from whatever fuba posts until i actually focus on the content ![]() Could take a look at... basterds mafia, I think? I can't pull off town feels as scum :S (though iirc, I got vivax lynched because I'm an idiot lol) Just finished reading what NU and calix wrote about damdred, gonna dive into his filter now :D | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 10 2016 07:17 Damdred wrote: This looks like a town post, 5 points to anyone who can say why. Damdred, did you ever say why this was the case? I think you responded once, but in response to a different post or something. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 14 2016 04:10 Tumblewood wrote: I'm gonna change and see if anybody follows I'm tempted to, because I'm completely unsure of damdred. Dunno if I've tried to go through too much too fast, but I can't even seem to think enough to make a decision on him. Calix's case had me going into his filter seeing him as scum already, and then I tried to pick it out myself on a readthrough and I couldn't do it. Maybe I was trying too hard to discount bias, maybe I'm letting myself be buddied, maybe I'm just too tired to focus after about 8 hours of (attempted) critical reading. It's down to either sheeping calix, NU, and scott, or going with my own scumread despite the fact that I have 4-5 other people to read still. Ugh, sticking with Damdred. The three I mentioned were able to read him in real time in the context of what was going on in the thread and come to an agreement. Class has already basically started, I can't think about it anymore today. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 15 2016 08:08 NeverUnlucky wrote: I have stated my opinion -- Earlier the VCA led me to think fuba/Super. Now I'm thinking Grack/Vivax. DDD is town cleared in my book. Is the town clear based on the opposing lynches, or something additional? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Wanted to point out that it's really strange that vivax hasn't jumped on me at all, considering that I (at least in my mind and according to my own self-meta posted in this thread) basically claimed scum last night, and was his top scumread. While I'm not complaining about it, since I actually am town, it's weird that no one (but particularly vivax, possibly superbia) caught it. Maybe I'm not as big a concern for people as I feel I should be given my activity and contributions this game. But for someone who had me as his top scum read, it feels weird that I was dropped (or at least shifted to secondary concern) after an admittedly lackluster performance at EoD. While I could certainly see HF being a lynch priority if he is scum, I would consider myself a lock scum for vivax after last night. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 16 2016 09:40 Holyflare wrote: Uh what did you do last night? Pointed out to superbia that the only people I really scumread if I'm mafia are my scum mates because I have trouble lying. Then I only really gave any kind of analysis for two reads - a town read on superbia and a scum read on shape (which even at the time I admit is weird because everyone's talking about damdred). I then vote damdred despite having an actual scumread. My scumread ends up being lynched while I sat idly on the other wagon, and he was scum. Guess I was the only one to see it because I was experiencing it firsthand? But it was so absurdly coincidental at the time that I literally started laughing. Was waiting for a vig shot that I didn't even realize at the time couldn't be coming. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I also have this paranoid theory that I'm being "saved" for later. I mean, I appreciate that I've been allowed to get my homework (and paid work) taken care of, but I've been really phoning it in this game :/ On that note, apparently liberal science courses at my university require 200 pages of reading a week, and I've signed up for two of them. It's super great. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
I also don't want to lynch TW, NU, or super. I have literally no opinion of palmar. Leaves grack, vivax, holyflare. Can't get over the feeling that I'm being saved as a mislynch for later. All three of these could do this, as could palmar. Makes me wary of voting into them, but I generally townread everyone else. Vivax seems more suspicious based on this because he dropped me for the day in favor of HF. And arguing with HF is basically all he's done today. Though the same could be said about HF regarding vivax (yes HF, I'm sure you've mentioned other people, but I can't remember it because of the vivax stuff). I think at least one of them is scum, but I'm not sure which one -_- Not sure why Palmar/HF/vivax are still alive. Skynx NK suggests he was either onto something with his night posts (suggests HF). Damdred's point that skynx might have been killed because he was hard defending DDD is a viable option (though the fact that ddd himself raised the point kinda lessens its strength). As is the possibility that NU is scum, since skynx was literally the only person in the thread willing to consider NU as scum (really wish he wrote his cases before EoN, but ![]() Game is hard :/ Voting vivax, I guess. I hope the 4 on damdred are right, since it'll simplify the wifom I have to work through, but I'm not feeling it. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
His thoughts have often related to my own, I believe his post at EoD where he says he's getting a shot. There might be other things, but I can't remember. I read his posts and have a bad feeling about lynching him. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
If I understand the votes right, skynx+calix voted on damdred, scott voted HF. That's... hmmm... Skynx seemed positive of HF scum. Seems tampered with. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 05:10 fuba wrote: I'm really tempted to switch to HF for no reason that I can accurately convey. Might be grack's undying love. If I understand the votes right, skynx+calix voted on damdred, scott voted HF. That's... hmmm... Skynx seemed positive of HF scum. Seems tampered with. But like, in the most obvious way ever. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 05:17 Holyflare wrote: Skynx's whole reason to vote me nicely destroyed. The vote on me is also likely manipulated because it aids vivax's lynch. The question is whether skynx was convinced the case was destroyed, which he certainly didn't appear to be at the end of the day. And he also seemed certain that damdred was town. This means for that vote to not be tampered with, skynx has to have deferred 100% to calix, which it didn't seem he was likely to do. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 05:22 Holyflare wrote: Furthermore skynx who mafia reads me during the night doesn't even vote me as a ghost. So no fuba if I'm mafia and killed him why is he voting damdred in this situation? Either I've manipulated the votes to fuck me over for no reason for an illogical scott vote or mafia has to fuck me over. Bolded is literally my point. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 06:07 Palmar wrote: also how retarded is that HF the townie died because he wouldn't change his vote. Actually tried to at the last minute. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Basically, while I was waffling about HF and vivax, I didn't want to lynch damdred. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 07:30 Palmar wrote: why not damdred? he's been an absolute shitter all game. Because I think he's town. And I'd be remiss if I didn't admit that paranoia had, and is still having, its way with me. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 17 2016 08:13 Damdred wrote: Anyway I really don't care to an extent just because haven't been able to connect. People trying to steer the lynch only towards hf lynch and towards me should be looked at. Also fuba why did you tr ame It boils down to "you seem genuine." | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Might the nks have been not because they were townies who were right, but actually townies who were wrong? We now know hf was town, so naturally scum would want a vig shot in the hands of someone who had hf as 100% scum. What if the nks are an attempt to guide vig shots while eliminating vocal townies in their own right? | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Yeah, remembered that like, 15 minutes into my job :/. Thought I was onto something ![]() But yay medic save ^^ | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 18 2016 06:35 Grackaroni wrote: lol I thought I was going to be #6 I thought it was me XD | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
He definitely shot you. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Though honestly, I'm probably afk until about an hour before the lynch either way. This course load is going to kill me. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
But is that worth it considering they can only use their protect once? Probably not imo. But yeah, if HF said he shot you in his message from last night, why would he then vote to say he didn't shoot you? And none of the BGs seemed inclined to save you. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Everyone else has been on my town list since around d2. | ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
On September 21 2016 06:27 Holyflare wrote: I didn't vig shot anybody ![]() LOL GG everyone. Glad my schedule didn't end up entirely ruining the game. Thanks hosts :D | ||
| ||