EPTOn June 27 2016 04:59 Jealous wrote:
Tumblewood: + Show Spoiler +
GlowingBear: + Show Spoiler +
Jealous: + Show Spoiler +
emperorchampion: + Show Spoiler +
Damdred: + Show Spoiler +
MoosyDoosy: + Show Spoiler +
Chezinu: + Show Spoiler +
Artanis[Xp]: + Show Spoiler +
More to come.
Tumblewood: + Show Spoiler +
Pretty weak play so far. Has only posted one or two substantiated reads. This quote from him sums it up: "like, there's playing the game, and then there's trying to solve the game. most of us are just playing the game right now..." Don't like him so far, but not enough to say he's scum.
GlowingBear: + Show Spoiler +
Some decent posts questioning people. A lot of fluff otherwise. Asking to be mayor over and over without giving any reasoning as to why he should be one. Somehow has garnered a lot of support despite not being wholly convincing to me. Only one real good post explaining his reads. If he wasn't pushing so hard to be mayor without any real foundation, I would townlean on him.
Jealous: + Show Spoiler +
I'm VT.
emperorchampion: + Show Spoiler +
Very weak start to the game but made a goost post @Jean, which I liked. Overall I'm not very impressed with his play so far, but he hasn't said anything that seemed outright scummy, so I have him as null for now.
Damdred: + Show Spoiler +
Weak reads, hasn't contributed much of anything at all.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/510385-presidential-election-mini-mafia?page=23#459
This post is suspect because he gets on the defensive while saying that there is "no real reason" for him being scumpushed, but has done nothing in the game up to that point, which to me is reason enough.
Later on he gets pressured more, and again says there is no reason to scumread him even though yet again he hasn't contribute much of anything. Gives detailed reads under pressure and they do not impress. Does reads based on "tone" and stuff like that. Tries to jump on me for a policy lynch, then posts this:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/510385-presidential-election-mini-mafia?page=41#807
Trying to be objective about it, I think is a horrible post. I answered a question directly to the best of my ability and he disqualifies it because I have no experience playing with Artanis? Also uses this as an opportunity to further support his QT town read that he has been pushing from the start.
A few posts later, he is convinced that I am scum and not just inactive as I said I would be, all based off of one post. Although, apparently moves me to "lower null" just a few minutes ago.
Makes a late push for pardoner? On what basis? -_-
Definite scum lean.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/510385-presidential-election-mini-mafia?page=23#459
This post is suspect because he gets on the defensive while saying that there is "no real reason" for him being scumpushed, but has done nothing in the game up to that point, which to me is reason enough.
Later on he gets pressured more, and again says there is no reason to scumread him even though yet again he hasn't contribute much of anything. Gives detailed reads under pressure and they do not impress. Does reads based on "tone" and stuff like that. Tries to jump on me for a policy lynch, then posts this:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/510385-presidential-election-mini-mafia?page=41#807
Trying to be objective about it, I think is a horrible post. I answered a question directly to the best of my ability and he disqualifies it because I have no experience playing with Artanis? Also uses this as an opportunity to further support his QT town read that he has been pushing from the start.
A few posts later, he is convinced that I am scum and not just inactive as I said I would be, all based off of one post. Although, apparently moves me to "lower null" just a few minutes ago.
Makes a late push for pardoner? On what basis? -_-
Definite scum lean.
MoosyDoosy: + Show Spoiler +
Super trolly as always, which I hate that he can get away with every game (according to what some veterans have said so far). Impossible to read and thus not a benefit to town so far.
Chezinu: + Show Spoiler +
Has contributed the least of all besides MoosyDoosy. Hard to read off of that, but necessitates a mild scum lean from me.
Artanis[Xp]: + Show Spoiler +
A few jokey posts at the start of the game, with some weak/fake reads. I don't personally like that style of play but I wouldn't send him to the gallows for it (if I were to do so, Moosy would go first). I can actually understand his push on QT, as QT himself said he plays "oddly" and that seems to get him into trouble D1. I wish QT would play less "odd." It wouldn't cause situations like this one. QT's case was pretty weak in my opinion but because he isn't the type to let it go, Artanis was forced into a defensive position (seems like he doesn't like giving up either, even though he eventually did). Overall I'd have to say Artanis reacted pretty normally to the situation.
After that, I feel that he has been active and trying to push the game forward, albeit using too much meta, history, and "tone" for my liking. His play vs. Jean and @TT, I can't entirely agree with, but he's trying. He's town to me.
After that, I feel that he has been active and trying to push the game forward, albeit using too much meta, history, and "tone" for my liking. His play vs. Jean and @TT, I can't entirely agree with, but he's trying. He's town to me.
More to come.
I can see Damdred's response there coming from town pretty easily. I honestly was like "what, I'm dumb town here?" at first. I can see why he'd come to the conclusion he did.
