Newbie Student Mafia XVII: Fullmetal Edition - Page 87

On November 20 2015 08:55 Trfel wrote:
Fecalfeast

Here the posts that Fecalfeast has made this game that show his read progression.
+ Show Spoiler +
So, there are a few trends shown by the above posts.

1. Whoever posts is town

• Disformation from mafia to null (?) for this post
  
• VisceraEyes from mafia to null due to interacting with him
  
• MoosyDoosy town for being completely obnoxious
  
• Backs off on Trfel because he is angry

Furthermore, all of these are really, really weak. One by one:

The disinformation post that caused Fecalfeast to change his read isn't that great. It's the first actual reads post that disinformation has made all game, and it was only made on request. But this caused a dramatic change in Fecalfeast's read? Enough to make him never seriously discuss disformation again?

The way he downplayed his scumread on VisceraEyes is terrible. "I side with trfel on VE for sure", leading to a townread on Trfel and a scumread on VisceraEyes. Then, "ve seems ok now that i'm interacting with him" and "He's explained his reasoning for voting me further and my earlier scumread was entirely sheeped from trfel". First, VisceraEyes' Fecalfeast read wasn't a part of my case on VisceraEyes. The fact that this is what Fecalfeast mentioned, while also saying that his scumread came purely from my case, does not make sense at all.

For MoosyDoosy, his reasons are debatable, but the important thing is that he voted for MoosyDoosy again later. More on this later.

At the same time as Fecalfeast backed off of me (Trfel), he pushed onto Breshke. And he hadn't mentioned Breshke before. This push came out of nowhere. He said he'd rather lynch Breshke because I was "angry".

Every single time, there's a person who makes some posts, and Fecalfeast removes his scumread on that person. This is every single time that Fecalfeast has removed a scumread on someone. This reeks of "don't hurt me, I'm not scumreading you!"

2. "Decision" about Day 1 lynch target

Fecalfeast first includes MoosyDoosy as mafia in his list (no reason given), then votes MoosyDoosy for martyring. Then he unvotes MoosyDoosy because he thinks MoosyDoosy is just that obnoxious when he rolls town.

At this point, Fecalfeast had zero scum reads. So, he went back and voted for MoosyDoosy again, reasoning being that "giving him a free pass for throwing a tantrum is lame". It's noteworthy that at this time, there was a lot of push for lynching MoosyDoosy. This vote on MoosyDoosy is extremely opportunistic and seems to be a patch for Fecalfeast having zero reads.

Ritoky, one of the game's highest-influence players, then says that MoosyDoosy is exempt from being lynched. Fecalfeast immediately says he will look into scott31337. And then says he could kill scott31337. He doesn't care one bit about who is lynched, which is shown by his post saying that town ignoring MoosyDoosy causes them to automatically lose LYLO if MoosyDoosy is town, but ultimately vote for scott31337 instead of MoosyDoosy with no new reasons presented.

The progression is basically:

• MoosyDoosy is scum
  
• MoosyDoosy could do this as town
  
• I'm going to vote MoosyDoosy just because
  
• Scott31337 could be mafia, I could lynch him
  
• MoosyDoosy should be dealt with sooner rather than later
  
• Votes for scott31337 at deadline

Which makes no sense. Fecalfeast doesn't are at all about his vote. And why should he, when it's between two town players?

3. Other factors

I don't really have time to explain this as in detail, but namely his play on Day 3. He said that he didn't like disformation, but he never followed up on this or explained this at all. He said that I (Trfel) was suspicious primarily because of night kill analysis, but never actually addressed any of my posts or arguments like I asked him to, and like he said he would. Then he moved to Breshke, who he only mentioned once before in his filter, with a TOWN LEAN. Okay.

Conclusion

Fecalfeast is always taking the easy route, always making the easy reads. He's always keeping one scum read and when that stops being easy, he's just moving to the new easy scum read. His apathy towards the Day 1 lynch between two townies and forced read switches are extremely suspicious.

On November 20 2015 10:45 Fecalfeast wrote:
Hey breshke if you're around at all, you said to VE


And I decided to go back and check what you were basing this on.

Timestamp (on my screen): November 16 2015 14:48 PST

So I click my filter, literally ONLY the first page of my filter comes before this time.

Timestamp of the first post on page 2 of my filter: November 16 2015 14:55 PST

So from my entrance post to the end of page 1 of my filter is 11 posts.

I know it's in the distant past at this point but could you maybe try and remember what it is you liked about those posts?

I know a few posts later you say you're ok with lynching me but it's only because I'm "still being lazy"


and you say the bolded about scott.

Then your next post is asking me what I think of scott.


So you're more inclined to lynch moose or me over scott, citing that you're waiting for a big thought dump from scott. You ask me what I think of scott, I come to the conclusion that I think scott is mafia.


So scott makes a post about moose being a trash monster and you decide you want to kill him more than both moose and myself, citing that he made a cop-out post to talk about moose.


So that post puts him above both myself and moose? To the point where breshke scolds moose for possibly being town?



nope?

Then he misses deadline.


This is first post after the lynch of scott.

Asking the person he voted about his opinion.

This filter feels so random to me. I'd really like breshke to explain some of his thought process on day 1.