|
On September 16 2015 18:14 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:10 Dandel Ion wrote:On September 16 2015 17:11 Tictock wrote:On September 16 2015 08:45 Dandel Ion wrote: damdred is town What makes you so sure? dunno how good his meta shit is ( but geript disagreed so it's probably solid) but he knows about the shine, which is more than i can say about anybody else this game. Ok you made me smile D1. I wont join Rels in Policy lynching you. Sorry Rels, this is how i read the trolls. I don't care if he's trolling or not. And it made me laugh too (= But actively lurking and poping out every few hours is scum indicative, and that's why I'm voting him
|
On September 16 2015 18:19 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 18:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical On September 16 2015 18:03 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:02 Rels wrote:On September 16 2015 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: James is another candidate for mafia imo. I think he is not thinking the game properly. Like the post about LS and people's reads on him (mainly my and geript's) shows that he is not processing the information properly. I agree his analysis of the LS' push is bad. But think about his point of view: he wasn't here when people started suspecting LS' first posts. He saw LS' genuine posts and lots of people pushing LS. Outside of this and his TT's read, I agreed with all of this post. And even what I didn't agree with was super logical I mean, that's why you were scumreading HTS yesterday; you didn't agree with what she said, even though it was logical. I generally think people who do not think things through properly before posting are mafia. I understand regarding James and HtS what you say could be the case here, but on the other hand it's really easy to come in when you are mafia and just trash on people on their read when the dude they were scumreading starts to look town (regarding to James and LS here). At the time me and geript were scumreading LS the read was really logical and made the most sense in the game (yes it really did). Both of them didn't even go into the reasons - they just said something i find out to be nonsense, especially considering LS is likely to be town here. It's easy to defend a townie when you are scum, and in neither of these cases (James & HtS) there was no reason to post what they did. Regarding TT. The second post i quoted jsut a while ago; I have a really hard time believing that is what the dude actually believes could be true. He has played with me, he knows how i do present my reads. I don't lay out everything at the start because it pushes out reactions. I have NEVER made a read, not explain it, and then NOT have reasons behind the read. Every single person who has ever played with me knows that. Like the dude has seen me make posts like this: On July 24 2015 22:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Barakos i would like you to elaborate onto your read on Barakos. ...and then he somehow believes it could be true i didn't have reasoning behind my read on LS at the start of the game. It is just bullshit. YOU had good reasons to scumread LS. But you didn't tell them right away. geript's reason was a supposedly fake meta read on LS. I understand both HTS and fidei for finding LS' push weak when geript's reason was weird: Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. And I understand TT's post about you when you agreed with this weird meta: Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 10:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. okay then we have the same reason  Now about this whole situation: I'm waiting for LS to answer my question about how geript's meta read is fabricated to push it further. It won't happen until he wakes up I suppose.
|
On September 16 2015 20:22 Vivax wrote: I find it interesting he points out how he disagrees with me and not rayn who at the time agreed with me on Rels and TT, and BM called rayn town from the get go. What irks me here is that he prefers to compare his reads to mine rather than to rayn's. Will have to take a closer look at that I guess. mm that's interesting let me check the context
|
OK I think I have the explanation for that I will let him answer first though to see if it matches @BM can you explain what Vivax just said ?
|
On September 16 2015 20:43 marvellosity wrote: Deadline in 10.5 hours Pretty sure the days are 72 hours long, which would mean there are like 34 hours left.
|
OK since we're waiting for quite a few people to answer stuff, I want to discuss something
Should people about to get mislynched roleclaim ? I'm thinking they shouldn't. On the plus side: the town knows a little more about the game and mafia cannot fakeclaim that particular role if we decide to mass claim one day. On the minus side: the mafia will have infos if they try to role POE.
Not talking about roles that will get revealed anyway, like grandier or crusader.
|
On September 16 2015 20:48 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 16:44 Rels wrote:OK LS. I will try to explain what I think so we can understand each other this time. Everybody seems to have drop the scumread on you, and I understand. Your posts really show anger at being scumread, then free of mind where you're not anymore. Please, if you're town, read carefully what others are saying, 'cause it's super frustrating to not be understood. I'll ask you two questions that need elaboration to answer, so take the time to do this right. 1. You said to HTS "some of the posts" you did this game were posts you would never make as scum. Can you show me a few example and explain to me why you wouldn't post that as scum ? 2. Your geript scumread is interesting, 'cause of the following: my reason for townreading geript was that I thought you were scum, and I didn't think geript would bus this early in the game. Now obviously if you're town, this push on you isn't alignment indicative anymore. What you are saying is that geript lied to explain his vote on you. You're saying this is a lie: On September 15 2015 10:46 geript wrote:On September 15 2015 07:20 LightningStrike wrote: So rayn since you want the martyr to claim do you see any benefit of them not claiming at all? When he's town he'll still follow the leader, but he'll generally over talk about a random reason he's thought against it. A less than LS question. Can you prove this is a lie ? For example, you talked about a game where you didn't do this. Was geript in this game or obsing this game ? 1. I was mainly asking HTS if she thinks I can any of the posts as scum instead of town since me and her actually been playing together since November of last year so she got lots of experience with playing with me. 2. Geript wasn't in that game nor obsing that game(Carol of the Bells Mafia) but in that game I actually went away from following the town leader at the time GlowingBear and pushed for my own lynch of Tubesock because I tohught Tubesock scum slipped about the amount of scum in the setup lol. OK. Why do you think geript is scum faking a meta read on you, instead of town using false meta by mistake ? I think he may be scum BTW so I'm not attacking you, I just want to know.
|
yo fidei I had a question for you in this post, can you answer it ?
On September 16 2015 17:19 Rels wrote:Yeees fidei I love your big post (= I really hoped you were town too! Let's reformate the team we had last game with TT. No JJ allowed this time! Looking forward to play with you. (= I agree with most of your post except: Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 08:28 Fidei86 wrote: - I think Lightning Strike is town, and I think the early push on him was suspect. I don't know how any of you can be surprised that LS says stuff that doesn't add up early on. He's done that in every game I've seen him in, and he's also basically like that in voice. The way that he responded to Rels at his post #362 (basically "I'm not talking to you any more") felt very genuine, and exactly how I'd expect angsty town LS to respond. Yes the way he answered was genuine. But did you really think the early push was suspect ? Maybe you don't realize 'cause you weren't here at the beginning, but LS's first posts were super scum indicative. Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 08:28 Fidei86 wrote: - I think the person who comes out from the LS push looking the worst is TT. At his post #218 he basically says that LS is a "fine lynch", but his reasons are just re-hashes of what other people have posted earlier. He then takes it back at (#473) after others already had. I also think his town reads of Rayn, Rels and Vivax feel a little ... safe. I think thread sentiment is all pretty set on those three already, for pretty obvious reasons. When TT was mafia in HG he felt like he was always on the right side of every argument, and so far he reminds me of this. Disclaimer: you may be right and I'm a fool. But TT was the first person in the game to try hard. I think it makes him 99% town. For me, he is confirmed town atm, and nothing has changed my view on him thus far. Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 08:28 Fidei86 wrote: - Rels looks towny insofar as his activity level goes, but he was also early on the LS 'wagon', although he didn't vote for it. I also don't like his TT read, and quite a lot of his activity seems responsive rather than pro-active, which is different from our last game together. Then again, that game (Personalities) was pretty weird and so IDK whether it's a reliable guide to someone's meta. The two things you are suspecting me for ... are the two things I disagreed in your post (= so it is super logical you find me weird. Reading what I wrote earlier, did that change your read of me ? Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 08:28 Fidei86 wrote: I don't have a good handle on geript, TS (whose thread entry got a lot of talk, but which seemed pretty NAI to me) and FF. Not sure I agree with TS anymore, but yeah for the other two. Especially geript.
|
On September 16 2015 21:00 geript wrote: Lynching non-factor Dandelion is a good idea. yo geript LS is affirming your meta read on him is false can you expand on that ?
|
fidei, before BM comes back to answer Vivax, what do you think of him ?
|
On September 16 2015 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: For the record i just booked a cruise to Stockholm for tomorrow - saturday. So don't expect tens of pages of filter from me during that time. that seems pretty cool (= for the record too: are you OK with people not claiming at the last moment if they are mislynched ?
|
On September 16 2015 22:42 Rels wrote: fidei, before BM comes back to answer Vivax, what do you think of him ? It wasn't clear though; not asking you to repeat what you said earlier, but what do you think about what Vivax found about BM comparing reads to Vivax and not rayn ?
|
On September 16 2015 21:01 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 21:00 geript wrote: Lynching non-factor Dandelion is a good idea. yo geript LS is affirming your meta read on him is false can you expand on that ? WTF geript why do you post something and not answer a question asked to you 1 minute later Dandel Ion, who you are saying is a non factor, did exactly the same thing with his "I don't understand people's posts even though Slam /out the game" post
|
On September 15 2015 23:56 geript wrote: I'm kinda torn on HtS fwiw. No clue why. It's definitely not related to her scumlean on me though.
On September 16 2015 23:31 geript wrote: In ACLS drving. Drug screen. I'm busy deal w/ it. Also I'm kinda down to lynch fido. Idk why. Beginning to be tired of these reads without explanation. Next time, please don't hit post until what you wrote is a defense against LS saying you're using fabricated meta.
|
On September 16 2015 23:42 Half the Sky wrote: Heads up. I am actually really sick today and left work early.
Going to rest up most of today and will catch up on everything (including the questions aimed at me) tonight. take care
|
Leaving work very soon so as always I won't be super active until tomorrow. I still have a ton of question without answers, so I will compile them to not forget.
@Everyone except Shining (about Damdred meta read of Shining) + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 17:11 Rels wrote:Damdred I think it is super weird you're not trying to find town like you did in every other game I played with you. I liked your boldness asking for the grail at the very beginning though. Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 08:37 Damdred wrote:On September 16 2015 08:27 Half the Sky wrote:On September 16 2015 08:21 Damdred wrote: Anyway I'm like 95% sure that my bro shining is scrum he was the first filter I looked at. He is just so... emotionless to a point and he barely reacts to the thread to a point with pretty posts that seem to be structured. He explained he's not a fan of playing much D1. Did that factor into your scumread or are you just not buying that explanation period? I've played with shining in a total of probably 60-90 games total. We have played a lot together multiple places. I know he hates playing early, but he can't hide emotional things as town he explodes at points or he gets super excited but it's missing here.a Another meta read. I hate them because I can't judge them. Can someone who knows Shining confirm or deny this ? If this is a lie, Damdred's read is super fake.
@BM + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 16:48 Rels wrote: About BM: he did the same thing as HTS; catching up with the thread and making his reads evolved. His thought process is clearly stated in the thread and understandable. And I loved how he simply said "well I don't have any scumread". =D I'm pretty sure BM is town. @BM a question though: why did you think rayn was 100% town based on his first posts ? On September 16 2015 16:57 Rels wrote:~circa ? On September 16 2015 20:30 Rels wrote: OK I think I have the explanation for that I will let him answer first though to see if it matches @BM can you explain what Vivax just said ?
@Shining + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 17:03 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 04:40 The Shining wrote:I'm here. Post will probably be sloppy because I'm writing as I'm catching up. On September 15 2015 18:34 Rels wrote: Going to grab some lunch so I'll be AFK until later. Here is my brain right now:
Town rayn Vivax TT
Maybe town Damdred geript
Null FF HTS fidei BM
Maybe scum Dandel Ion
Scum The Shining LS
See you all later (= This post is so easy to make. I said I don't get on much Monday/Tuesday and the game started slow while I was on, with almost no one posting. I'm almost always scummed D1 because I don't like to play it but w.e, I'm used to it. I started the holy grail convo because no one was talking about anything else and I figured the sooner we settle on it, the more info we'd get from people trying to push for it for strange reasons. Better to discuss it now than leave it until the last 12-24h of day phase. WTF My reason to scumread you was NOT you being AFK or wanting to discuss something different. I had three reasons to scumread you and they are explained here: Show nested quote +On September 15 2015 16:34 Rels wrote:On September 15 2015 07:38 The Shining wrote: Hi hi. Are people just scared to post or what? I'm not the martyr so Idk what else to do except start the conversation on the Holy Grail vote.
Who is it going to? I dislike this post very much for a few reasons. The main one is that this is the first post of The Shining, and there is two different subjects in it: "The game is slow" "Let's talk about the holy grail" First post with different subjects in them means the person didn't just post what he thought, but took the time to make a post. It is scum indicative. Plus, two questions: the easy way to participate for scum. Plus, he tries to start a conversation and leaves. Now your big post is alright, and I like the reasonning on Damdred. But your reasonning (Damdred applied for grail and gtfo) is one of the reasons I scumread you in the first place! So. You cannot explain the first two reasons I scumread you initially (different subjects in the first post + asking questions in the first post), they're scum indicative for me. It's small though. Can you explain the third ? How is you starting a conversation on grail then leaving is different from Damdred applying for Grail then leaving ?
@HTS + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 17:28 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 07:56 Half the Sky wrote: I see Fidei was catching up as of an hour ago, and he posted in the other thread. He's never played as mafia, and I know he told me sometime back he would likely struggle with it if he rolled it. The longer he goes without posting makes me wonder if he's actually gone red this go. OK HTS. You're the reason I townread fidei last game when I was scumreading him initially. So what is your read on fidei's catch up post ? Cause I find it super townie; logical, but with different conclusions on certain part of the game than the thread sentiment.
@geript + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 21:01 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 21:00 geript wrote: Lynching non-factor Dandelion is a good idea. yo geript LS is affirming your meta read on him is false can you expand on that ?
@fidei + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 22:47 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 22:42 Rels wrote: fidei, before BM comes back to answer Vivax, what do you think of him ? It wasn't clear though; not asking you to repeat what you said earlier, but what do you think about what Vivax found about BM comparing reads to Vivax and not rayn ?
@rayn + Show Spoiler +On September 16 2015 22:45 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 21:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: For the record i just booked a cruise to Stockholm for tomorrow - saturday. So don't expect tens of pages of filter from me during that time. that seems pretty cool (= for the record too: are you OK with people not claiming at the last moment if they are mislynched ?
My vote is on Dandel for actively lurking, not answering stuff and being the last member of the ULOUP (<3 FF). I also think geript is scum for not doing anything other than a push on LS, on a meta read that is apparently fabricated; and Damdred may be scum if his Shining's meta read is fabricated.
See you all tomorrow. (=
|
On September 17 2015 00:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +Can someone who knows Shining confirm or deny this ? If this is a lie, Damdred's read is super fake. Shining already explained this and he is town anyways. Shining cannot be trusted to explain if a meta read on him is true or not. Of course he will deny it if the meta read is an attack. Now he can prove it's false by quoting stuff that goes against to read, like LS did with geript. I kinda think Shining is town too, but what is important here is to know if Damdred's push on Shining is logical or fake.
|
On September 17 2015 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: Damdred's meta on him is that Shining will get "angry at some point if he is town and here he does not". Shining says he is taking anger management classes or whatever. Do you think he is lying? No. This has nothing to do with shining lying or alignment. It's simple: if shining has an history of getting emotional as town, then I can understand damdred s scumread of him, even if it doesn't apply this game. I agree that outside of that, damdred may be scum for not being active if that is his scum meta.
|
On September 17 2015 01:11 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On September 16 2015 23:40 Rels wrote:On September 15 2015 23:56 geript wrote: I'm kinda torn on HtS fwiw. No clue why. It's definitely not related to her scumlean on me though. On September 16 2015 23:31 geript wrote: In ACLS drving. Drug screen. I'm busy deal w/ it. Also I'm kinda down to lynch fido. Idk why. Beginning to be tired of these reads without explanation. Next time, please don't hit post until what you wrote is a defense against LS saying you're using fabricated meta. I'm not using fabricated meta. Wtf? What kind of response do you even expect there? Like that's a really scummy question bc there's literally nothing worthwhile coming out of it. As for being tired of random reads. Deal w/ it. I'm playing as much as I can while focusing on being able to pay bills, eat, keep my license, etc. you know shit that's actually important. So politely file your complaints in the trash can where they belong. Oh and I'm in a mother game and coaching so deal Wtf You said LS had an history of sheeping town leaders LS proves with quotes from two other game, one that you were part of, that that is not true Stop dodging the fucking subject and explain why you stated an incorrect meta
|
On September 17 2015 01:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2015 01:37 Rels wrote:On September 17 2015 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: Damdred's meta on him is that Shining will get "angry at some point if he is town and here he does not". Shining says he is taking anger management classes or whatever. Do you think he is lying? No. This has nothing to do with shining lying or alignment. It's simple: if shining has an history of getting emotional as town, then I can understand damdred s scumread of him, even if it doesn't apply this game. I agree that outside of that, damdred may be scum for not being active if that is his scum meta. Show nested quote +On September 17 2015 01:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 17 2015 00:46 Rels wrote: I kinda think Shining is town too, but what is important here is to know if Damdred's push on Shining is logical or fake. no it isn't. there is a difference in shining's play. Damdred would attack that as either alignment. It doesn't make him anything. That is the only real read Damdred has. OK let me clarify this You think damdred is scum for being not very active and having only 1 read, which is your meta read of scum damdred It makes me suspicious of damdred, but I find dandel active lurking and geript incorrect ls meta scummier Now if damdred used a fake meta on his read ofnshining, he would become my number 1 lynch Since it is not the case, he currently is my number 3 lynch So I'm OK with you pushing him, but I would prefer a dandel or geript lynch right now
|
|
|
|