|
On July 07 2015 21:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:07 Palmar wrote:On July 07 2015 21:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 21:02 boxerfred wrote:
Oats' filter is full of useless garbage, too. Plus he's asking me strange questions that show that he didn't read too well. Chimes in every now and then which really looks like drive-by posting. Followed my clarity vote early on but switched to rsoul because of a pure bullshit "xP" theory.
I'll add Oats to my scum lean list. Lol nice oppurtunstic scumread . Why do you think boxerfred is mafia Oats? OMGUS mainly. And this nonsensical scumread. Which comes cause I asked him some relevant questions but he bursts and just now mentions things he shouldve mentioned a lot earlier if he really thinks im mafia.
Wait wait wait. You say "I'll be mad for you because fluff" and you say the questions are relevant? How are the questions relevant? Explain.
|
It's easy. I read you scum right now. If you want that to change, better explain why you ask useless questions or why those questions are not useless. Your choice. Gonna have a game of foosball now, brb 15 mins.
|
On July 07 2015 21:08 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +Also by technical possibility you mean its possible the host gave a mafia role to both hf and trfel right? Yes. Can be both, I don't know it for sure nor do I have an assumption. You better deliver now an explanation for those totally useless and time stealing questions. It's really scummy.
WELL I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.
WHY DONT YOU HAVE AN OPINION >.>
actually its pretty scummy that you dont want to commit one way or another.
If you make a scumlist, I am gonna assume that you think they are all on the same team.
If so, I would like to know the connecting pieces.
Especially for the 2 pairs you chose.
Well if you think that hf and trfel are mafia together I would like to know why.
same goes for clarity and wave considering they have significant interactions with each other.
|
On July 07 2015 21:11 Palmar wrote:
So we should lynch boxerfred then Oats?
nah, we lynch geript.
I still want to lynch him.
Palmar, what exactly made you like my early day 1 posts?
|
~~
I'm doing a face and wondering if I should call oats mafia.
I'm not sure
But this feels awful.
|
On July 07 2015 21:11 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:05 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 21:05 boxerfred wrote:well no, if you think that trfel and HF cannot both be mafia, then your list has 3 mafia and 1 town. what a correct and useless statement. If you are mad i post fluff, then I guess you are mad at pretty much the whole game. Wait, you're actually admitting that your questions towards me are useless?
That wasnt actually a question.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 07 2015 20:31 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 20:22 Palmar wrote:
Tbh, if clarity is mafia it's because in literally the second post in the game he said holyflare claiming VT in the first post of the game is somehow "interesting".
It's not interesting, people do this shit every fucking game and no one should give a fuck. The fact he tried to appear interested in something so completely and obviously worthless (nevermind that HF is the worst "dick around with claims" offender on TL) is actually kinda scummy and the reason I threw my vote on him yesterday.
Like I think it's sort of mafia like but I don't know if I can convince people that calling something interesting that isn't interesting is a solid case for someone being mafia. I disagree on "noone should give a fuck". Every claim at every point in the game deserves attention. However I agree, pointing out how interesting it is does indicate that clarity wants to put emphasis on the claim - which he did not do. Although he said that due to him, people were talking "5 pages" about the claim which was simply a lie. I pointed that out alread (roughly page 40something I think) and I will point to that again. That's one of the reasons why clarity still is among my top scum reads! So I'm fine with lynching HF and clarity. I can see that HF is not going to be lynched today although I'm not liking marv yet. He's engaging and discussing, but he's not really making points. However it's day1, he just caught up, so I keep it at a null read and won't lean towards any alignment. I'll re-go for clarity and I'm fine with anyone who joins me on that. ##unvote ##vote clarity_nl
hold on
|
On July 07 2015 21:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Palmar, what exactly made you like my early day 1 posts?
Can't even remember. But can probably find it if I go back and look.
|
On July 07 2015 21:14 Palmar wrote:
~~
I'm doing a face and wondering if I should call oats mafia.
I'm not sure
But this feels awful.
not you too.
the madness is infectious.
But lets discuss.
Do you think my questions are "thread derailing" and "irrelevant"?
What thread was there to derail even?
|
that single post by milo looks scummy, yes.
Thread back on track?
WHO KNOWS.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 07 2015 20:46 Half the Sky wrote:
Alright, that clarity vote/unvote is a good catch. I'll check that area of the thread, and his filter as well and see if anything else pops up...
hold on
|
I don't know how BH rules on edited posts, I'm pretty sure it's a direct modkill, I can't really argue, so I'll just carry on until whenever.
Anyways back to milo - you said you found HF's case unconvincing on Trfel and you accuse him of severl things in your wall of text - does that case tell you anything about Holyflare one way or another?
|
On July 07 2015 21:15 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:14 Palmar wrote:
~~
I'm doing a face and wondering if I should call oats mafia.
I'm not sure
But this feels awful. not you too. the madness is infectious. But lets discuss. Do you think my questions are "thread derailing" and "irrelevant"? What thread was there to derail even?
I don't even care about that part. I have no idea what you asked him.
|
On July 07 2015 21:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
that single post by milo looks scummy, yes.
Thread back on track?
WHO KNOWS.
Which one are you referring to? I pointed out what I didn't like about his read on KSC.
|
On July 07 2015 21:18 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 07 2015 21:14 Palmar wrote:
~~
I'm doing a face and wondering if I should call oats mafia.
I'm not sure
But this feels awful. not you too. the madness is infectious. But lets discuss. Do you think my questions are "thread derailing" and "irrelevant"? What thread was there to derail even? I don't even care about that part. I have no idea what you asked him.
wait so what "feels awful"?
|
On July 07 2015 21:13 Oatsmaster wrote:
If you make a scumlist, I am gonna assume that you think they are all on the same team.
If so, I would like to know the connecting pieces.
Especially for the 2 pairs you chose.
Well if you think that hf and trfel are mafia together I would like to know why.
same goes for clarity and wave considering they have significant interactions with each other.
Actually this is complete bullshit but I'm not sure you're good enough to know that even if you happen to be town. Asking for connecting pieces between two people he has individually identified as mafia or scummy is flat out ridiculous. The connecting pieces may, depending on the quality of play by mafia, not even exist. Or he may also simply be wrong on one person from a pair or something.
Unless there's backstory to this, this is awful.
Like I think clarity and you may be mafia. I actually think WoS may be too, and maybe this scott guy. Do you need me to write an essay on how these are interconnected?
|
On July 07 2015 21:19 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
that single post by milo looks scummy, yes.
Thread back on track?
WHO KNOWS. Which one are you referring to? I pointed out what I didn't like about his read on KSC.
the one marv posted like 2 pages ago.
Why are you asking me this?
|
On July 07 2015 21:11 Palmar wrote:
So we should lynch boxerfred then Oats?
Why is boxerfred scum?
|
On July 07 2015 21:21 Half the Sky wrote:Why is boxerfred scum?
He isn't, I'm interrogating Oats.
Pay attention please if you're gonna butt in.
|
On July 07 2015 21:20 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 21:13 Oatsmaster wrote:
If you make a scumlist, I am gonna assume that you think they are all on the same team.
If so, I would like to know the connecting pieces.
Especially for the 2 pairs you chose.
Well if you think that hf and trfel are mafia together I would like to know why.
same goes for clarity and wave considering they have significant interactions with each other.
Actually this is complete bullshit but I'm not sure you're good enough to know that even if you happen to be town. Asking for connecting pieces between two people he has individually identified as mafia or scummy is flat out ridiculous. The connecting pieces may, depending on the quality of play by mafia, not even exist. Or he may also simply be wrong on one person from a pair or something. Unless there's backstory to this, this is awful. Like I think clarity and you may be mafia. I actually think WoS may be too, and maybe this scott guy. Do you need me to write an essay on how these are interconnected?
No, however the 4 people he picked can easily be split into 2 pairs because of their interactions and I was wondering if boxer had any thoughts on the connections between them, because the reasons he is calling them mafia involve them interacting with the other pair on the list.
Does this make sense too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
