EPT[M][N]Holy Guardians Chapter 1 - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
milo109
466 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 12:19 Chocolate wrote: my thoughts went from "him siding with kickstarter" to "he apparently read about half of what we've posted today and yet only came up with a very "safe" (in the sense that it makes sense to call the most active player town) read" to "What good is it to say "X player seems town"? There's no risk at all in that situation. " to "General inactivity His only contribution of note was to call a very active player town which seems way too conservative" it wasn't policy per se, IDK where you're getting that from. it was inactivity combined with conservative play yes but your post said: reason #1: general inactivity. which means policy. i can't read your mind. | ||
|
Tictock
United States6051 Posts
Just getting tired of getting scummed this game for little to no reason. I get it, I'm a new person here you all want to push people you don't know and get reads on them. I accepted that early on when there wasn't much to go on, but at this point in the game I've done plenty to give you guys material to work with. If you still have a hard time reading me, check the 2 most recent NSM games which I played in. @ritoky Maybe that's what you are reacting to? My play has changed a lot since the first game I played with you. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 12:19 Tictock wrote: Those were your reads? Those all look pretty null to me. You have a lot of "worries" about people, and are unsure of me because of something you dont even get yourself... Here, maybe you can understand my point if I try to speak your language... ![[image loading]](https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5133/13953783092_54352f67f8_o.jpg) i am going to stop responding to you now. i will start saying very rude things rather than do anything worth while. needless to say i have a very low value of your opinion at this point. you could very well be mafia, and at best a donkey town. my reads are good. you should start listening to them at some point. | ||
|
NydusHerMain
Canada492 Posts
Vote: GGTeMpLaR | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 12:54 Tictock wrote: Fair enough. I prob should just take a break from the game for a bit here... Just getting tired of getting scummed this game for little to no reason. I get it, I'm a new person here you all want to push people you don't know and get reads on them. I accepted that early on when there wasn't much to go on, but at this point in the game I've done plenty to give you guys material to work with. If you still have a hard time reading me, check the 2 most recent NSM games which I played in. @ritoky Maybe that's what you are reacting to? My play has changed a lot since the first game I played with you. here's the concise reason without any fluff of why i think you could be scum: 1) i don't agree with your reads and they are the opposite of mine in a lot of cases which means 1 of us is probably pretty wrong. and i don't think it is me. 2) i think your SL read is completely manufactured and making something out of nothing because you feel compelled to read him for some reason. 3) you are self centered and OMGUSing a lot. mafia tend to notice with a lot more frequency posts and accusations that target them and tend to talk about them more. i find you doing this a shit ton. 4) you made a post that gave me absolutely terrible feels. 5) you think templar is mafia for bogus reasons that have very little to do with content and a bit of hypocrisy. 6) your entry into the thread was very notice me senpai 7) "Just getting tired of getting scummed this game for little to no reason." implies there is a good reason to scum read you implying your scum (this last one is nitpicky and me being a ponce) | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 12:38 milo109 wrote: As for you and ritoky... I feel like you're asking me to referee this knife fight for you. I'll wait for the blood to finish dripping before I come to a conclusion. what does this even mean? | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
milo109
466 Posts
Dunno. It just came to me and sounded cool. | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
milo109
466 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
|
milo109
466 Posts
| ||
|
milo109
466 Posts
| ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 13:28 milo109 wrote: I agree on Templar. How you got scum from that is beyond me, unless you think being sloppy is scummy. I said who "people think is scum" not specifically you. i.e. look at the vote thread | ||
|
Tictock
United States6051 Posts
On June 04 2015 13:02 ritoky wrote: here's the concise reason without any fluff of why i think you could be scum: 1) i don't agree with your reads and they are the opposite of mine in a lot of cases which means 1 of us is probably pretty wrong. and i don't think it is me. 2) i think your SL read is completely manufactured and making something out of nothing because you feel compelled to read him for some reason. 3) you are self centered and OMGUSing a lot. mafia tend to notice with a lot more frequency posts and accusations that target them and tend to talk about them more. i find you doing this a shit ton. 4) you made a post that gave me absolutely terrible feels. 5) you think templar is mafia for bogus reasons that have very little to do with content and a bit of hypocrisy. 6) your entry into the thread was very notice me senpai 7) "Just getting tired of getting scummed this game for little to no reason." implies there is a good reason to scum read you implying your scum (this last one is nitpicky and me being a ponce) Ok last response to you today, kus I don't think we are getting anywhere with this back and forth anymore. 1) Whatever, we disagree that happens. I could easily flip this argument around as well. I don't like your reads, but mine seem good to me... I think your missing the possibility where we are both wrong here... 2) I pointed out stuff that makes me wary about SL because I haven't seen him use tactics like them before. How is this different from your saying I made a post that gave you "terrible feels"? 3) A lot of people on these forums are self centered, get over it. Also doesn't town have an obligation to try and keep themselves from gettin lynched, just as much as scum wants to avoid getting lynched? Not wanting to be voted on is pretty NAI in my opinion. 4) Don't use this as a reason if you can't accept others using it too. 5) I'm responding more to the way that he is going about his play. Like I feel it's really shitty that he's said I'm scum but isn't bothering to read what I'm posting. Like if I was totally going off of OMGUS I should be scumming you right? I'm not because you are clearly responding to my posts and we have established a dialog, I'm pretty sure you are town from that just not 100%. 6 & 7 both seem nitpicky to me Since I feel like your own reads are pretty weak I also find you being hypocritical calling mine weak. At this point I think we should just agree to disagree and hate each other for the rest of the game... ok? + Show Spoiler + Not serious about that, I just really feel like this is a total "kettle calling the pot black" situation | ||
|
milo109
466 Posts
On June 04 2015 13:33 ritoky wrote: I said who "people think is scum" not specifically you. i.e. look at the vote thread You misunderstand me. That was me openly agreeing with you, not attempting to refute a point. Also.. This Tictock kid. Stealing my phrase. Everyones hopping on wagon of calling you nitpicky. :/ | ||
|
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On June 04 2015 13:27 milo109 wrote: The two people you've chosen to pressure are both people who read Scott mafia. You laughed at both of their accusations. I don't see how you couldn't agree that lynching Scott would remove a low contributor from the game, and potentially also kill a mafia scum. Do you have anything more compelling than that? i try to make reads independently unless it involves vote logic or a LYLO situation. also when i play mafia i bus like a motherfucker (as do many others on this site), so making associative reads is largely meh. so even if a lot of the people i think could be scum think scott is mafia, it doesn't mean they can't be together. as for me scoffing at other people's reads, yeah i think they are weak. i think they are better than reads on templar. is my read better? probably. i think from a meta-pov when he was town he was more inquisitive, engaged, and tried to fit in less/was less self preservationist in posting. could be the irl thing he said. he is a low contributing question mark with differences in meta. which for day 1 means: lynchable. that's not a strong read, in fact it is weak at best; at least i am honest and not treating my read like it is the goods. | ||
| ||
