On March 11 2015 09:27 rsoultin wrote: only if you use the silken rope
i like to die in style!
But is it stylish when it has a body dangling from it?
I'm kind of disappointed in the lack of response to my proposed scum team. If you see something I'm missing, I'd really like to know. Otherwise, I just want to lynch MysteryMeat1 and Oatsmaster and win the game, right?
On March 11 2015 10:07 rsoultin wrote: lol that's my biggest reason to townread him xP we're at a crossroads
maybe i'm right because you're just pretending?
Gimme a sec, lemme go ask my friends how to cover up a scumslip.....
LOOK BEHIND YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See, the answer is that Half the Sky is actually hosting this game because she was bribed to do so by the American Communist party. It's all a conspiracy!
We live in a troubled world. I don't think there is any debate over this. Things are just too unequal, with the rich winning, and the ordinary people left to suffer.
For an example of this, look no further than this very game.
On March 04 2015 07:59 Half the Sky wrote: Day 1 Vote Count
As it currently stands, Snickers is slated to be deported. The voting thread is located here. Countdown:
Day 1. Prplhz and Alakaslam took six and five votes, respectively. And the only other player rewarded with a vote was ritoky, with Alakaslam's lone vote. Out of thirteen players, only three were given any votes, and one of those only had one vote.
Day 2. Superbia received six votes, and IAmRobik received three. MysteryMeat1 received one vote. This distribution is a little more even, but two players still had significantly more votes than the rest.
Day 3. Snickers received four votes, and MysteryMeat1 received two. Six players in the game, but only two received votes. This again shows the inequalities among the players.
All of the players started out equal. A number, a name, and a filter. But now, I notice a strange thing. All but five of the names have a strikethrough. And I also noticed that with one exception, every single one of the players who was fortunate enough to receive multiple votes has a strikethrough! After more research, I found something truly incredible.
On March 01 2015 15:29 Half the Sky wrote: Activity: You must post in this thread TWICE per day/night cycle and vote every day while you are alive. Failure to do so will result in a warning; a second offence will result in a modkill.
What is this?!?! We are forced to post in this game, against our will? And those with the extreme honor of receiving votes are no longer forced to follow this requirement! Clearly, this system favors the privileged, and those of us who were unfortunate enough not to be given votes are left to suffer and are forced to post and vote. And we are not even allowed to vote for ourselves.
Clearly, this entire game is a capitalist conspiracy to overthrow everything we hold dear. As loyal communists, we cannot stand for this! Take up the good fight, and share the votes! Everyone deserves votes in equal portions, as this will ensure that everyone receives the equal standing that we had when we signed up for this game as equals.
What?!?! An outrage! If everyone receives the same number of votes, still only one is given the honor of the strikethrough! Inequality and injustice is fundamentally built into this game!
Comrades, only one answer remains. We must overthrow our cruel oppressors and take control of our own lives!
On March 11 2015 12:06 rsoultin wrote: So your answer for rampant inequality and favoritism is to give all the votes to the oppressors?!
Precisely. Clearly you must be a new recruit to the cause.
If Half the Sky and OnceKing are dead, the game cannot proceed. All people (players, hosts, observers, etc) will be given entirely equal rights, with no obligations and no requirements. This is the only true way for a fair world.
Part of me really wants to switch votes to Oatsmaster. That way if ritoky is scum, the game keeps going. At this point, it's more likely that Oatsmaster is scum than MysteryMeat1, just because of the votes.
However, I'd rather just end it. I don't think that anything will happen to change my mind, so I have no real desire to switch targets at this time.
Pretty sure the scum team is rsoultin/ritoky, because that is what would make me be 100% wrong. And I'm very good at being wrong.
I just can't see myself lynching the only player in the game who is playing it properly.
Even when the end results of his actions fit what mafia would do at the time.
Well done by ritoky. Should have been a little faster, and maybe could have gotten him when he posted that "swag" image.
I agree, posting restrictions had absolutely no effect on this game at all. Town just was unable to do anything whatsoever. I personally found reading the thread too painful, so I couldn't play the game properly at any point.
I really do apologize for my play this game. It was very poor, and I am well aware of it.
The only time I properly played the game was when I actually read the entire thread for several hours before taking my vig shot. Before that, and after that, I was never playing the game properly. And for that, I apologize. I didn't give town my best.
On March 13 2015 13:17 ritoky wrote: yeah i had a bad enough day 1 to where i should never have been a clear town read imo, but that random vote switch and me calling for the vigi shot on my teammate seemed to make every1 forget how bad i was day 1
You played the best of all of the players in the game. I'm willing to overlook a very suspicious Day 1 when you still showed an apparent willingness to scumhunt, which you did continuously all game long. No one else showed that level of effort this game.
Seriously, you played extremely well. Definitely deserved the win.
From here on out, you don't get any slack, though.