|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Vote Count
Snarfs (5): Node, Yamato77, WaveofShadow, Artanis[Xp], KelsierSC WaveofShadow (3): Eden1892, Probulous, Damdred Artanis[Xp] (2): snarfs, _Tormented_ KelsierSC (1): sicklucker
Not Voting (2): The Shining, Tronak
Currently, Snarfs is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends in at 00:00 GMT (+00:00).
Remember, voting is Mandatory. You may NOT abstain.
|
On February 26 2015 08:31 KelsierSC wrote: SL can you do something now that would be great thanks
|
On February 26 2015 08:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Holy shit Wave's filter since the Damdred push is terrible. FUCKING HELL I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOREVER
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Tormented don't waste your vote.
please.
|
On February 26 2015 08:32 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2015 08:28 yamato77 wrote:On February 26 2015 08:27 Probulous wrote:On February 26 2015 08:21 yamato77 wrote:On February 26 2015 08:16 Probulous wrote: ##Vote WaveofShadow
Answer the question. he's not going to be here wtf are you doing? I don't like a Snarfs lynch, he is active trying and willing to be wrong. Artanis is spammy as hell but so are others and he has been pushing his tormented case all game. He is at least active and trying to find scum. Wave has done absolutely nothing all game despite being asked for it. Many times. He wasn't a lynch target so he just AFKs. Classic scum. He didn't just AFK, he has a fucking job and a family dude wtf Right, sorry man. I'm not trying to be personal. I don't know what his personal circumstances are. Fact remains though, even without answering my question he has provided nothing to this thread despite saying multiple times he would go away and think about things.
Your logic is sound and my vote on artanis is pretty much a waste anyway.
##Unvote ##Vote Wave
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
I will vote Wave if it means saving myself, to be clear to everyone.
|
On February 26 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote: Tormented don't waste your vote.
please.
lol, get out of my head!!
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
oh god does this mean we give the hammer to shing who has read like 20 minutes of the game and SL who has like chronic idiocy
|
On February 26 2015 08:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Holy shit Wave's filter since the Damdred push is terrible.
You're just now noticing after I showed up, towned Snarfs and said I could vote Wave? Bus set up?
Not reading until now has really crippled me but a Wave scum flip does not help you in my eyes, Artanis.
Snarfs led and pushed conversation D1. Left for a while and re entered with an invite, been gone too long. Caution can come from both alignments but it just feels unnecessary to do as scum, whereas town really wants a good D1 lynch, not a mislynch, and doesn't want to waste their vote.
And that WoT Snarfs posted scumming me for lurker lynch. Damdred called it a legacy post and i agree. Personally I see myself as one of the least content players right now. And my only scum game here here was the exact same. It doesn't help that I'm not a fan of D1 and have stated so before. Do with that what you will.
|
On February 26 2015 08:29 Damdred wrote: ##unvote ##Vote wave Let's do this rd end masculine words have swayed my heart of stone I'm still waiting on these
On February 24 2015 12:58 Damdred wrote: And any amount of research into any recent game will find I totally destroyed the scum team in a few of them and have a case for case of the year yay... I read filters and make cases I don't drop cases this early in the game just give gut or feel reads..
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Vote Count
Snarfs (5): Node, Yamato77, WaveofShadow, Artanis[Xp], KelsierSC WaveofShadow (4): Eden1892, Probulous, Damdred, _Tormented_ Artanis[Xp] (1): snarfs KelsierSC (1): sicklucker
Not Voting (2): The Shining, Tronak
Currently, Snarfs is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends in at 00:00 GMT (+00:00).
Remember, voting is Mandatory. You may NOT abstain.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
|
I think I still prefer a Snarfs lynch over a Wave lynch. I just find it hard to imagine he wouldn't know who his main suspect is voting for and suspects if he actually put any effort into reading the filter whatsoever. I feel like Wave's play can be explained more easily by playing bad than Snarfs can.
|
##Vote WaveofShadow
Reasons: 1) I believe in Eden's case 2) You ignored me when I questioned your supposedly busy first hours 3) You haven't made own reads so far. 4) Last but not least, I don't want to lynch Snarfs despite I am not convinced of his innocence.
|
##Unvote ##Vote: WaveofShadow
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 26 2015 08:04 Tronak wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2015 07:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On February 26 2015 07:37 Snarfs wrote:On February 26 2015 07:30 _Tormented_ wrote: Sigh...that post does seem rather towny. I do agree with your opinion of artanis, but I believe someone posted that he usually does tunnel someone they think is scum. So the fact that he provided very little else to the entire D1 could possibly be explained with that. I just really dislike that I need to go back and read to figure out who he thinks is scum. If he was tunneling I'm pretty sure I'd know off the top of my head. I think it was yamato? Okay, I've made up my mind. You're scum. There's no way you're reading the thread if you don't know who I've been going after all game long. /agree I like Snarfs, as said before, he results interesting to exist in my learning curve. However, is impossible anyone reading half Artanis's post would miss his tunneling on Tormented. How can you explain that Snarfs?
|
I've constantly been suspected by him, he's asked multiple people about me and his read on me is amazingly inconsistent and poorly articulated. He suspects me because I didn't have a read on him when I had two other main suspects, yet he didn't even know where my vote was at whilst he was suspecting me the entire game. I don't believe it.
|
On February 26 2015 08:39 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I think I still prefer a Snarfs lynch over a Wave lynch. I just find it hard to imagine he wouldn't know who his main suspect is voting for and suspects if he actually put any effort into reading the filter whatsoever. I feel like Wave's play can be explained more easily by playing bad than Snarfs can. lol
so one mistake made by a newer player in a moment of forgetfulness is hard to explain away (see look I already did it)
but an entire half-turn of filter of utterly nothing good is just "playing bad"?
artanis pls
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Vote Count
WaveofShadow (6): Eden1892, Probulous, Damdred, _Tormented_, Tronak, snarfs Snarfs (5): Node, Yamato77, WaveofShadow, Artanis[Xp], KelsierSC KelsierSC (1): sicklucker
Not Voting (1): The Shining
Currently, WaveofShadow is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends in at 00:00 GMT (+00:00).
Remember, voting is Mandatory. You may NOT abstain.
|
|
|
|