|
On October 09 2014 03:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:21 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:15 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:05 Damdred wrote:
snip Grack posted bad analysis and I changed my read. He went from "approaching a situation with reasonable doubt" to "this guy is scum because he didn't read my filter" which is bad analysis. There's no "non-reason" that I can see, so if you could elaborate on that point, that would be cool because I'm apparently not in the know. The rest of my lynch targets I have either talked over with Kelsier as of the past hour or so, or I've outright told you. My reason wasn't actually that you didn't read the thread but that you were complaining about nobody posting trying to progress the thread while not having read the thread - which I found fake and scummy Palmar didn't read the thread but I didn't care because he wasn't complaining about low content in the game. *Kind of like how mafia might show up after a lynch and complain that it was a bad lynch while having done nothing to try to change the lynch earlier,  id nothing to get the lynch off of what you perceive to be his partner. Yes. Very scum. 10/10
Wat
|
On October 09 2014 03:27 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 03:25 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:22 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:21 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:15 Grackaroni wrote:On October 09 2014 03:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On October 09 2014 03:05 Damdred wrote:
snip Grack posted bad analysis and I changed my read. He went from "approaching a situation with reasonable doubt" to "this guy is scum because he didn't read my filter" which is bad analysis. There's no "non-reason" that I can see, so if you could elaborate on that point, that would be cool because I'm apparently not in the know. The rest of my lynch targets I have either talked over with Kelsier as of the past hour or so, or I've outright told you. My reason wasn't actually that you didn't read the thread but that you were complaining about nobody posting trying to progress the thread while not having read the thread - which I found fake and scummy Palmar didn't read the thread but I didn't care because he wasn't complaining about low content in the game. *Kind of like how mafia might show up after a lynch and complain that it was a bad lynch while having done nothing to try to change the lynch earlier, id nothing to get the lynch off of what you perceive to be his partner. Yes. Very scum. 10/10 Wat You're accusing me of complaining about the lynch while doing nothing to change it. I did nothing to divert the lynch off of scum. Thus I am scum. Qed.
No I was making an analogy for my earlier statement
|
I'm actually not accusing you of anything right now
|
On October 09 2014 04:20 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 04:15 batsnacks wrote:
Actually it is possible to game BH's system without a time machine. It's the same as using bots to post "combos" on high traffic websites like 4chan. This would be in violation of TL Forum rules, but yes, if you're willing to go that far, it could be done.
hmmm I think I've already learned that there are no limits to the lengths BH will go to win at mafia.
|
Oats what do you think of Hopeless?
|
|
|
On October 09 2014 10:46 Holyflare wrote:
going to bed, i shot obi, gg
lol
|
Hope why did you end up voting OO? You originally liked his tone and you were complaining about it being a policy lynch for a while.
|
Yeah I think I'm just going to wait for the night post rather than attempt to read into whatever the fuck you're doing HF
|
there are no scum vigilantes BH
|
HF seeing as you're probably going to get shot, you want to leave some final reads?
|
You and your shenanigans HF
|
|
|
lol ok what the hell I'm just going to claim. I was the one who shot Oats. I was deciding between Oats/Hopeless at the end of the day and I decided that I'd have an easier time reading Hopeless. I'm really salty because I was wrong twice in a row now on Oats.
Not sure what happened to the scum shot it probably hit HF
|
On October 09 2014 13:12 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2014 13:12 Grackaroni wrote:
lol ok what the hell I'm just going to claim. I was the one who shot Oats. I was deciding between Oats/Hopeless at the end of the day and I decided that I'd have an easier time reading Hopeless. I'm really salty because I was wrong twice in a row now on Oats.
Not sure what happened to the scum shot it probably hit HF oh dude... that was a bad shot T_T
His reaction at the start of the game was really weird though and he kept pushing newer players so I thought it was his scum play
|
|
|
Are you claiming medic slam?
|
Do you think that points to Palmar being red?
|
I need to read through a bunch of stuff but It's mostly just obi/ksc arguing with each other from what I've seen. obviously not deciding anything until after today's flip but I will probably base it more on HFs reads next time lol.
|
Slam said I dunno chupazi on obi/hope
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
