EPTOn September 16 2014 11:10 Chairman Ray wrote:
So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him?
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2014 11:06 batsnacks wrote:
He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia."
On September 16 2014 11:01 Chairman Ray wrote:
I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
On September 16 2014 10:30 batsnacks wrote:
Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo.
On September 16 2014 10:22 Chairman Ray wrote:
What do you mean by this?
On September 16 2014 10:13 batsnacks wrote:
I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two:
Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row.
On September 15 2014 18:19 Palmar wrote:
Lynching a smurf is always good though.
Lynching a smurf is always good though.
On September 15 2014 19:06 Palmar wrote:
Because policy lynches are dumb.
Because policy lynches are dumb.
I didn't really think that much about those two posts, the sarcasm was consistent with a few other of his early posts. But then he posted these two:
On September 16 2014 05:21 Palmar wrote:
i am always serious.
Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously.
On September 16 2014 05:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious.
On September 16 2014 05:20 Palmar wrote:
The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master.
On September 16 2014 05:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
Why is everyone ignoring this guy?
Why is everyone ignoring this guy?
The light of your wisdom shines so bright other posts fade into the background. But I will vote however you want me master.
I'll tell you before end of day. It probably won't be you if you're serious.
i am always serious.
Everything I've said this game should be taken seriously.
On September 16 2014 05:23 Palmar wrote:
We must make your post retroactively true.
I am mafia.
On September 16 2014 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me.
#vote Palmar
Basically just claimed mafia in thread, good enough for me.
We must make your post retroactively true.
I am mafia.
Claiming mafia sarcastically is still claiming mafia. Also that was two consecutive posts. That's pretty much like claiming mafia two posts in a row.
What do you mean by this?
Those bottom two quotes were one right after the other. In one post he says we should take everything he says seriously, in the next post he claims mafia. That's like claiming mafia twice imo.
On September 16 2014 10:27 StorrZerg wrote:
Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts.
Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then?
On September 16 2014 09:19 Chairman Ray wrote:
I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways.
I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here.
On September 16 2014 08:14 StorrZerg wrote:
care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason.
You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning?
Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea...
I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy"
he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy.
regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response)
On September 16 2014 07:30 Chairman Ray wrote:
I'm getting some mafiafeels from: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/466211-tl-mafia-lxviii-fanfic-crossover-edition?user=StorrZerg
I'm getting some mafiafeels from: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/466211-tl-mafia-lxviii-fanfic-crossover-edition?user=StorrZerg
care to explain? Its hard to omgus you if you don't give a reason.
On September 16 2014 07:38 Chairman Ray wrote:
His reasoning not bother you at all?
On September 16 2014 07:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3.
Storr calls Palmar and kush scum which makes him town until D3.
His reasoning not bother you at all?
You seem to be fishing for an answer. why are you so hesitant to present your reasoning?
On September 16 2014 07:39 Chairman Ray wrote:
Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well.
Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's.
On September 16 2014 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter.
yea not interested in storr right now.
even if we ignore palmar, dunno why i'd ever lynch storr over batsnacks.
or someone like poofter.
Yeah, I could go for a batsnacks lynch as well.
Idk about poofter though, I'd rather go for Lord Tolkien, who's 2 posts are vastly more scummy than poofter's.
Seems like a light defense on my prime suspect, Yet why does he seem "town" to you? Sure you might call his actions atm not alignment indicative because he hasn't done anything. Yet, he hasn't done anything so why is pressuring him a bad idea...
I disagree that Lord Tolkien is "vastly more scummy"
he calls me out, which I ignore. part of this has to do when we have played together in RL. (something something him being very easy to lynch day 1 cause of easy read, and lack of defending himself) This was an attempt to generate discussion early on in the day. I don't find that post scummy.
regardless, they both have been pretty inactive, yet i find it hard to believe you have such a strong feeling over one of them with out any bases, or willingness to explain. (i eagerly await your response)
I'll rescind my read on you since it's not that strong and people don't seem to want to lynch you anyways.
I find Lord Tolkien scummy because his entry into the game is joking about lynching himself and that's all he's done so far. I've seen mafia do this so often where they just joke about being mafia, and then tune out the rest of the day. Wouldn't be surprised if that's the case here.
Ok fair enough. now that seems to be a dead end till he posts.
Now palmer joked that he was mafia, would you read him the same way then?
I don't read it as Palmer claiming he's mafia. I read it as Palmer saying he never claimed mafia in a condescending way.
He literally said "I am mafia." He could have been condescending without saying "I am mafia."
So if Palmer worded it in another way, you would feel differently about him?
You mean like, if he said "Mafia, I am" instead of "I am mafia"?
No I'd feel exactly the same even if he changed the words.
