|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 02 2014 17:24 3d12 wrote:
And currently exhibit A on my list is kushm4sta. Despite the awesomely understanding acceptance of my newbie ways, we haven't seen much from him aside from jumping on the batwagon and refuting Vivax -- who, in my opinion, is making the most sense out of anyone in this entire thread, myself included. Exhibit B is Micchan, who seems strangely quiet. I hope he hasn't gone AFK.
How do you feel about obi and poofter so far?
|
Actually, I hate Templar's post where he calls like 4 people scummy. I really don't like the fact that he's lying about what I'm doing either.
|
On September 02 2014 22:08 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
I prefer not to guess what batsnacks is doing. Safe to say, whatever it is, it isn't very useful.
##vote: obiwan
wat.
Policy lynching is scum favored
|
Lying means intentional mistakes.
Show how templar is intentionally misleading us about your posts.
|
Vote Count – Day 1
27ninjabunnies (0): Obiwanshinobi, Tehpoofter
Tehpoofter (0): 27ninjabunnies
The_Templar (1): batsnacks
batsnacks (2): kushm4sta, Obiwanshinobi
Micchan (1): Tehpoofter
Obiwanshinobi (1): Oatsmaster
Not voting (-): Everyone else
Currently, batsnacks is set to be lynched with 2 votes.
Please contact the mods if the vote count is incorrect. Thank you!
Day 1 will end in (19:30 GMT (+00:00)).
|
On September 02 2014 17:24 3d12 wrote:
And currently exhibit A on my list is kushm4sta. Despite the awesomely understanding acceptance of my newbie ways, we haven't seen much from him aside from jumping on the batwagon and refuting Vivax -- who, in my opinion, is making the most sense out of anyone in this entire thread, myself included. Exhibit B is Micchan, who seems strangely quiet. I hope he hasn't gone AFK.
So why am I scum?
"jumping on the bandwagon?" not really a bandwagon since there are only two people voting for batsnacks, and I didn't really jump on it cause I was the first vote.
"refuting vivax" Why are my refutations scummy? What has vivax said that makes sense?
|
On September 02 2014 22:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 22:08 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 02 2014 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
I prefer not to guess what batsnacks is doing. Safe to say, whatever it is, it isn't very useful.
##vote: obiwan
wat. Policy lynching is scum favored
Yeah, if you hit town. Batsnacks posting the way he's posting in a game that has known mechanics in which mafia might have to act out-of-the-ordinary is scummy. I don't understand how you think it's okay.
Furthermore, if you're going to lynch me for wanting to plynch someone for being weird, then that in and of itself is a policy lynch and is also scum favored. Also, why me instead of kush, specifically?
In regards to your second post, Templar is the one who has to prove that I'm intentionally stirring stuff up and then lurking immediately after. What am I stirring up? Why is it scummy that I've supposedly disappeared from the game? Is there a logical reason behind it or is he just saying that disappearing is scummy and refusing to follow it up at all? Lying might not be the correct word, but I still don't like what he's doing.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
mderg, you were around for the setup speculation but haven't said anything since. I found the generic "reads are the most important thing" statement suspicious since it was a bland statement that nobody is ever going to disagree with and it also makes you look worse now that your activity has dropped off and you're the one not giving reads.
|
I'm heading off to work.
Try not to flip out when I "stir stuff up" and then "lurk."
|
your Country52797 Posts
On September 02 2014 22:16 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Actually, I hate Templar's post where he calls like 4 people scummy. I really don't like the fact that he's lying about what I'm doing either.
What are you doing then?
|
your Country52797 Posts
I'm in class so I don't expect a conversation out of this yet.
Also because of this
On September 02 2014 22:51 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'm heading off to work.
Try not to flip out when I "stir stuff up" and then "lurk."
We'll talk about this later I guess.
|
On September 02 2014 22:10 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 14:03 27ninjabunnies wrote:On September 02 2014 12:12 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 02 2014 12:06 Vivax wrote:
Have you been physically mistreated by bunnies in the past for bold statements? repeatedly. Cough* Bullshit *Cough Also, Tehpoof couldn't handle this hotness. That being said, yes, you are looking too much into. Apparently troll reaction means you are scum. Don't know why. Could honestly care less if you voted for me. So I just skimmed the thread, but is there anything specific I should look at? Did someone say batsnacks made a terrible post? So why is tehpoofter "top town" if he is making this horrible case on you, equating trolliness to scuminess? Follow up question: Since you two have had a romantic history together, are you good at reading each other?
I feel like I'm on an episode of "Days of our Lives" or something. Lmao.
Anyway, my romantic history has nothing to do with how I read Tehpoof.
Ive played quite a few games with him, both as mafia and town, where we were opposite alignments, and same alignments (on both ends of the spectrum). So yes, I'd like to think I'm good at reading him. Him reading me, well that's a question to ask him.
Trolly Poof does not equal scummy poof (though it can in some cases, but again those depend).
Town poof is when he says whatever he wants without reprocussion.
Scum poof is more careful, calculated, and talks less.
So regardless of his "horrible case" on me as you put it, tehpoof is town.
Also, he did say his vote was a troll vote-therefore it isn't really a case.
This is town poof as far as Ive seen.
|
On September 02 2014 23:24 The_Templar wrote:I'm in class so I don't expect a conversation out of this yet. Also because of this Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 22:51 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'm heading off to work.
Try not to flip out when I "stir stuff up" and then "lurk." We'll talk about this later I guess.
I'm in class, too.
Addiction Disorders and Recovery. Quite interesting.
I'm about to comment on the 4 points you gave me that were interesting, so keep an eye out.
I'm curious as to why those 4 points though.
(The batsnacks horrible post is a given though)
|
your Country52797 Posts
On September 02 2014 23:32 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 23:24 The_Templar wrote:I'm in class so I don't expect a conversation out of this yet. Also because of this On September 02 2014 22:51 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I'm heading off to work.
Try not to flip out when I "stir stuff up" and then "lurk." We'll talk about this later I guess. I'm in class, too. Addiction Disorders and Recovery. Quite interesting. I'm about to comment on the 4 points you gave me that were interesting, so keep an eye out. I'm curious as to why those 4 points though. (The batsnacks horrible post is a given though)
Will do. Low on battery though.
|
On September 02 2014 22:30 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 22:17 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 02 2014 22:08 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 02 2014 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
I prefer not to guess what batsnacks is doing. Safe to say, whatever it is, it isn't very useful.
##vote: obiwan
wat. Policy lynching is scum favored Yeah, if you hit town. Batsnacks posting the way he's posting in a game that has known mechanics in which mafia might have to act out-of-the-ordinary is scummy. I don't understand how you think it's okay. Furthermore, if you're going to lynch me for wanting to plynch someone for being weird, then that in and of itself is a policy lynch and is also scum favored. Also, why me instead of kush, specifically? In regards to your second post, Templar is the one who has to prove that I'm intentionally stirring stuff up and then lurking immediately after. What am I stirring up? Why is it scummy that I've supposedly disappeared from the game? Is there a logical reason behind it or is he just saying that disappearing is scummy and refusing to follow it up at all? Lying might not be the correct word, but I still don't like what he's doing.
So you are saying lynching someone who does something scum favored is the same as a policy lynch. How about no.
Kush is actually saying stuff other than voting. You just vote and leave.
Voting for someone without a good explaination can be construed as stirring shit. Especially twice. And you leave immediately after. It's a reasonable conclusion to draw., why are you so offended he accused you of being scummy? Why don't you do something to change that rather than chainsawing him?
|
I don't like the batsnacks votes. They seem kinda lazy. Sure, his post didn't make any sense but that's it.
On September 02 2014 22:41 kitaman27 wrote:
mderg, you were around for the setup speculation but haven't said anything since. I found the generic "reads are the most important thing" statement suspicious since it was a bland statement that nobody is ever going to disagree with and it also makes you look worse now that your activity has dropped off and you're the one not giving reads.
How does it make me look worse now that "my activity has dropped off"? I said that making reads is more important than talking about missions. Of course I can't make reads when I'm not here, though. Me not being here can very well be explained (hint: I'm from Germany).
The question that arises for me is why you didn't mention how my generic and suspicious my statement was when I was still there. The statement stayed the same and my activity level doesn't make it any more or less suspicious.
|
@ Batsnacks terrible post
Inb4 there are third party roles, BS is fool, and therefore trying to get himself lynched.
@3d12's post
How is posting random useless things, random voting someone, town?
He posted a useless post, random voted Templar, and then disappeared.
Not townie at all, but see above post.
I say if we have a vigi, shoot him. JS
@Micchan's post
Lurkfest incoming
@Kita's post
So In a way, I think the idea of having all votes in an hour early isn't such a bad idea (unless that is mafia's mission).
My thing is, why focus on missions when we need to find mafia? I think it's going to cause a lot of tension and bad reads to focus on squashing missions rather than lynching off the mafia.
Idk
I also don't see how Templar's post was low quality?
@Templar, so why are these posts the most interesting to you?
|
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too.
|
On September 03 2014 00:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too.
Why are you so willing to shoot batsnacks? You even say that this is fool batsnacks in your post, it seems kinda weird you would want to shoot bats when you think hes possibly trying to get lynched..... And why would you be willing to get 3d12 out of the game? He seems awkward its true, and his read on bats is faulty (his initial reasons anyway) but does not getting him out of the game for those reasons seem a bit flimsy to you?
|
On September 03 2014 00:32 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 00:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too. Why are you so willing to shoot batsnacks? You even say that this is fool batsnacks in your post, it seems kinda weird you would want to shoot bats when you think hes possibly trying to get lynched..... And why would you be willing to get 3d12 out of the game? He seems awkward its true, and his read on bats is faulty (his initial reasons anyway) but does not getting him out of the game for those reasons seem a bit flimsy to you?
So a fool's win condition is to be lynched (hey, could be a mafia mission too).
Basically, I'm trying to keep all my options open. It's how I approach the game.
For all I know, we don't even have 3p or vigi. But it was just an idea. So, therefore, that's why I said shoot him rather than lynch.
As for 3d12, more of a gut read, but I don't like his posting. Sure the bs read is slightly based on that, but his posting is awkward in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
