|
On August 06 2014 04:30 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also I can't get behind Gobble as scum. I know I'm town and I see no reason why he'd abandon my wagon when there's still plenty of steam for it. The change in attitude when it was unnecessary makes no sense for him from a scum perspective.
There wasn't a reason for marv to push any townie over Xata in titanic and yet he did exactly that. Faulty faulty reasoning.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 06 2014 04:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote: HF do you not want to lynch haru anymore or is it just Vivax being even scummier?
The latter
|
On August 06 2014 04:32 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:30 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also I can't get behind Gobble as scum. I know I'm town and I see no reason why he'd abandon my wagon when there's still plenty of steam for it. The change in attitude when it was unnecessary makes no sense for him from a scum perspective. There wasn't a reason for marv to push any townie over Xata in titanic and yet he did exactly that. Faulty faulty reasoning. Because Marv and Gobble are extremely comparable players. Take into context that Gobble is not a high volume poster.
|
Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere.
|
On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster.
|
On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster.
So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched?
It completely skips over any post analysis.
|
On August 06 2014 04:42 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster. So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched? It completely skips over any post analysis. There are some more logical problems with it. 1) If the wagon still has steam maybe he didn't want to be on a mislynch wagon? 2) I don't think anything was settled at that point in time. Artanis is giving the unvote way to much weight.
|
On August 06 2014 04:42 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster. So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched? It completely skips over any post analysis. I'm saying that given the amount of content he's provided and the amount of time he's spent in the thread I don't consider him a good lynch candidate even solely based off that, yes. On top of that, I think his initial read on me was warranted. He's one of the people I'm least interested in lynching today.
|
On August 06 2014 04:45 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:42 Vivax wrote:On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster. So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched? It completely skips over any post analysis. There are some more logical problems with it. 1) If the wagon still has steam maybe he didn't want to be on a mislynch wagon? 2) I don't think anything was settled at that point in time. Artanis is giving the unvote way to much weight. 1) He started the wagon and wasn't the one pushing it through. It doesn't seem likely that it'd come back to haunt him. 2) Of course not, but you'd want to keep the train in motion as scum.
|
who the fuck are we lynching today?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Vivax why is gobble scum for updating his reasoning on haru?
|
On August 06 2014 04:47 Eden1892 wrote: who the fuck are we lynching today? I'd still like to see Haru hang from a tree. His questions towards me when he had the chance really didn't go anywhere and I was unsatisfied with his replies regarding my points on him.
|
On August 06 2014 04:47 Eden1892 wrote: who the fuck are we lynching today? I thought you wanted to decide that?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Has jaru disappeared now ppl are defending him AGAIN???
|
On August 06 2014 04:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:42 Vivax wrote:On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster. So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched? It completely skips over any post analysis. I'm saying that given the amount of content he's provided and the amount of time he's spent in the thread I don't consider him a good lynch candidate even solely based off that, yes. On top of that, I think his initial read on me was warranted. He's one of the people I'm least interested in lynching today.
I would argue he's one of the guys who posted the least, if not THE guy who posted the least, so I don't see why now you use a post volume argument.
|
On August 06 2014 04:49 Holyflare wrote: Has jaru disappeared now ppl are defending him AGAIN??? He went to bed, and with his timezone I believe it.
|
On August 06 2014 04:50 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:45 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:42 Vivax wrote:On August 06 2014 04:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On August 06 2014 04:35 Vivax wrote: Your reasoning isn't acceptable if you look at the facts posted. It's that typical egocentric reasoning any scum can use by saying "I know I'm town", and even if it was true it would be so WIFOM-y that it would exactly lead to nowhere. I'm telling you why I'm not voting for him. I have information that you don't; my alignment. It also doesn't matter if scum can abuse it. I know it can be abused, it IS abused, but I don't think Gobble would simply due to his seeming nature as a low volume poster. So you're saying that no matter how scummy a guy looks, you're going to vote for him cause he unvoted you when your wagon had the chance to get you lynched? It completely skips over any post analysis. I'm saying that given the amount of content he's provided and the amount of time he's spent in the thread I don't consider him a good lynch candidate even solely based off that, yes. On top of that, I think his initial read on me was warranted. He's one of the people I'm least interested in lynching today. I would argue he's one of the guys who posted the least, if not THE guy who posted the least, so I don't see why now you use a post volume argument. The post volume to content, and intelligent decision making ratio seems too high for him to likely be scum to me.
|
On August 06 2014 04:50 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 04:49 Holyflare wrote: Has jaru disappeared now ppl are defending him AGAIN??? He went to bed, and with his timezone I believe it. The point is that people are defending him. Like Vivax is.
|
On August 06 2014 03:52 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 03:49 Eden1892 wrote:On August 06 2014 03:29 kushm4sta wrote:On August 05 2014 22:40 gobbledydook wrote: To those who are saying im suspicious:
Every game I have played so far I was mafia.
Guess how much I know about playing town. I'm trying, but just that I'm not up to your standards doesn't mean I'm scum. You can also compare this game to my 2 scumgames to see the difference.
GD, what is the difference, would you say? also this is really your first towngame? because judging by your first two games here on tl, it seems like you have experience playing forum mafia somewhere else. oh wow lol no he's played town before on webdip i subbed into a game where he was town and got n1'd to be fair he prolly means "every game on tl" but at the same time he's not new to being town... everyone see this shit??? LAL it up ##unvote ##vote Gobbledy
yo hf and everyone who reads gobble town, read this exchange. he's lying. he's mafia.
|
jat why would you assume I read haru as scum because i ask someone why they are townreading him
|
|
|
|