|
On August 06 2014 00:38 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:37 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:34 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis? Im retracting halfly on gobble due to how I still have beef with his eagerness to switch, like what vivax pointed out. Scumtanis still have weird meta reads that he isn't explaining. Mostly telling me why he thought that way, not telling me what was the purpose. Except at first he wasn't happy with Artanis' posts: Show nested quote +On August 04 2014 21:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Ten one-line useless posts from Artanis later...
nope, not convinced
only later was he happier Show nested quote +On August 05 2014 13:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Artanis finally showed up and did something useful. Poofter hasn't. All he really has done is scumread on the timing of marv's vote and then say he can't read him anyway. It's such a useless, trivial point that occupies lots of space.
##vote: tehpoofter
I can almost hear gobble whispering 'please post something useful artanis please post please please'
'YES YOU DID IT YOURE TOWN'
|
On August 05 2014 23:05 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Gobble I think your case is bad in that it doesn't explain why Haru is scum, at least the first part doesn't really matter to me. Scum is more likely to invent a bs reason to vote someone rather than just sheeping. I still think the strongest points are: - Deflecting something Marv said, bringing up an awkward example where he asks how strong Marv's townreads are compared to me super townreading Wave (which I explained was a joke in the string of posts where he initially read it)
- List posts after saying he wouldn't bring up weak list posts on D1 as town because he doesn't view it as necessary.
- Hypocritical in how he accuses other people of unsubstantiated reads when he does the same himself.
- In the start, talking mostly about things outside of the game (HF has touched on this plenty)
It's funny though he explains the reason for why he should be scumreading Gobble there by himself.
I think your case is bullshit for a big part. Scum is more likely to invent bullshit instead of sheeping.
But you are not scum, let me correct you:
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:39 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:37 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:34 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis? Im retracting halfly on gobble due to how I still have beef with his eagerness to switch, like what vivax pointed out. Scumtanis still have weird meta reads that he isn't explaining. Mostly telling me why he thought that way, not telling me what was the purpose. Except at first he wasn't happy with Artanis' posts: On August 04 2014 21:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Ten one-line useless posts from Artanis later...
nope, not convinced
only later was he happier On August 05 2014 13:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Artanis finally showed up and did something useful. Poofter hasn't. All he really has done is scumread on the timing of marv's vote and then say he can't read him anyway. It's such a useless, trivial point that occupies lots of space.
##vote: tehpoofter I can almost hear gobble whispering 'please post something useful artanis please post please please' 'YES YOU DID IT YOURE TOWN'
no you can't
you're literally just making that up to fit a narrative.
|
On August 06 2014 00:40 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2014 00:39 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:38 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:37 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:34 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:33 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:30 marvellosity wrote:On August 06 2014 00:27 HaruRH wrote:On August 06 2014 00:26 justanothertownie wrote:On August 05 2014 22:33 HaruRH wrote:
He is also voting on lurkers. From artanis the non-contributer to pooft the lurking read thrower. Sooner or later when pooft comes on, he will give some lame reads to vote on obi. Then onto the next lurker. No legit proper scumread. This is what I dislike the most. You are calling him scum for scumreading your scumreads. Scumreadception. I dont like how he hopped from artanis to pooft the moment he saw stuff from artanis. Doesn't feel like a pressure vote either. More like moving away from the responsibility of actually having to converse with his own scumread. But it's precisely what you're advocating - if someone produces content then that's good, if they don;t produce concent then you are going to scumread them so it makes perfect sense when artanis produces content that gobbledy would think to unvote him, given his case on him to begin with was that he had a 3 page filter with no content........ ............ ................................................ nothing you say makes any sense at all, ever. ............... I'm blind. I did not see that until you pointed it out. .......................... Buuuuuut my point on artanis still stands. He have weird reads. 'Reason no.100 why haru dont do list posts early on because he usually make these lame ass mistakes that he only find out later or until someone shows it to him explicitly' So are you retracting on gobbledy? Would you rather kill Scumtanis? Im retracting halfly on gobble due to how I still have beef with his eagerness to switch, like what vivax pointed out. Scumtanis still have weird meta reads that he isn't explaining. Mostly telling me why he thought that way, not telling me what was the purpose. Except at first he wasn't happy with Artanis' posts: On August 04 2014 21:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Ten one-line useless posts from Artanis later...
nope, not convinced
only later was he happier On August 05 2014 13:12 gobbledydook wrote:
Artanis finally showed up and did something useful. Poofter hasn't. All he really has done is scumread on the timing of marv's vote and then say he can't read him anyway. It's such a useless, trivial point that occupies lots of space.
##vote: tehpoofter I can almost hear gobble whispering 'please post something useful artanis please post please please' 'YES YOU DID IT YOURE TOWN' no you can't you're literally just making that up to fit a narrative.
... AND NOW I CAN SCUMREAD POOFT!!!!'
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
like i said, you're literally making shit up to fit your invented narrative.
it's just complete trash.
|
##Vote: Haru
I am out for a while. Will be back in a few hours.
|
On August 06 2014 00:42 marvellosity wrote:
like i said, you're literally making shit up to fit your invented narrative.
it's just complete trash.
Waiting for artanis to post useful posts -> artanis does -> jumps to poofter, waiting for poofter to post useful posts
And the jump was due to 2 medium sized stuff that didn't make me feel that artanis was doing anything extra useful or townie either.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I could kill Haru or Vivax. I think I want to give Artanis an extra day.
|
That surge in activity by Artanis does look kinda forced. It's like he came into the thread trying to poke in all directions to look like he's doing something, and even then he did it wrong somewhere and said he's terrible at the game.
I think I'm with Haru on this one. Marv strangely stubborn on him.
|
|
|
Yeah why do you want to give Artanis an extra day, tell us more.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
In Haru's world, gobbledy is mafia because gobbledy came up with a mafiaread on Artanis, that he then stuck to for a while, but he only made this scumread because he was desperate to retract it again, because that makes perfect sense. Obviously gobbledy would confidently declare Artanis is mafia, just because later on he wants to take it back, because that makes perfect sense for a mafia to do.
Then when gobbledy gets his scumread to post some content, which is what he wanted all along when he first called his scumread mafia, he can retract his scumread as part of his masterplan and then move on to someone else.
|
I admit that I dont want to be mislynched today, but I have posted pretty badly and have misunderstood some posts. Hopefully this 2nd mislynch (order was my first and was soul crushing) would serve as a reminder in future games why haru shouldn't post reads d1. Too late for any regret, I am already at l1 and would probably be mislynched in my sleep. As a note, please never force me to make reads d1. I am literally incapable of doing so. Goodnight all.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:47 Vivax wrote:
That surge in activity by Artanis does look kinda forced. It's like he came into the thread trying to poke in all directions to look like he's doing something, and even then he did it wrong somewhere and said he's terrible at the game.
I think I'm with Haru on this one. Marv strangely stubborn on him.
it's like you haven't read the thread at all
|
On August 04 2014 10:48 gobbledydook wrote:
Read haru's filter. It is certainly badly worded. But palmar's advice on mafia: the most boring person is mafia, is legit. Often ppl who say the worst things are town because they aren't actively trying to sound innocuous.
On August 05 2014 22:53 gobbledydook wrote:
A case on HaruRH:
Near the beginning, I had HaruRH as scum because of his terrible logic about mafia acting more towny as usual. Then HF said that I shouldn't be so quick to scumread someone just because I disagree with them and I accepted it. The logic was terrible but it looked like he was trying to make a legit point at least.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
actually we already know you haven't read the thread, given you accused me of piggybacking the Vivax stuff when I was the first to explain it.
Forgot about that.
|
The last post sounds simply like an intro to a fucking story, especially when you compare it with the earlier opinion.
|
And it's the intro to his scumcase
|
Marv please lynch me so all my shit gains the credibility required to fuck up you and your scum friends.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On August 06 2014 00:59 Vivax wrote:
Marv please lynch me so all my shit gains the credibility required to fuck up you and your scum friends.
lol
are you really calling me mafia?
you've seen me play mafia twice in quick succession.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
