[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia: The Reboot - Page 96
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
Holy / Side Anyhow, thanks for hosting. Was a really cool setup, altho I hate you a bit for giving me scum twice! | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Super massive big thanks to BlazingHand for being awesome coach. Sorry for being somewhat afk at times, I've been working 7 days a week, 10 hours a day but I really wanted to participate since who knows when the next opportunity like this appears - think I learned something here. At least my filter was bigger than ever before! | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 18 2014 07:06 Promethelax wrote: Agreed with this. And if all the lynches are terrible lynches that should be shooting off red flags everywhere... i fucked up pretty hard with my n2 play though as wellNo, there were a few bad lynches and one terrible lynch. The most active town player is a terrible lynch. | ||
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
Huge thanks to all the coaches aswell ! ![]() | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
Holyflare and I living on opposite sides of the world made our QT a little sparse. Also towards the end I didn't ask questions in there so much as just rant about the game. Even so, what he did say was quite helpful ![]() | ||
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
I gotta say this is the least enthused I have ever been to have been checked as innocent by a cop | ||
sidesprang
Norway1033 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
Scary. Anyway gg town. Felt like there were 3 misslynches but only one. Oo. I totes agree with how the game went then. wp. So was there a gf or not? I take it there wasn't? Crazy. You could have been a Hero jayb. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
I thought there were at least 2. jeez. Perfect game then. | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
![]() | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
Post-death game analysis by me: So I think my d1 was really really good. I felt confident throughout the entire thing, pressured a mafia right off the bat and actually forced him to crumble (me along with koshi and aquanim). The opening was really good and fun, and it's possible it actually caught 2/3 mafia so who knows how credible that kind of thing actually is, I was expecting 0/3. But most importantly I had a lot of fun on d1. I don't think I would do anything differently, except maybe explain why I was hoping on the "wagon of justice" on suki a bit earlier and not trusting oats to follow through with the pressure. My n1 felt ok, I still don't know what I could have done better in regards to jay's blue claim, I kind of just ignored it after we discussed it a bit. I didn't really pressure anyone hard here and I think my play started dropping off on that end. My reads were still good, but my questioning and pressuring dropped off pretty hard. I think had I been killed here instead of Koshi, I would have left town in a good position with what I wrote on n1 and I think that's probably the most important part. Maybe I should have let the night kill discussion go on a bit more and let things develop as they would. Starting with d2 I got demotivated, dealing with oats tilted me and i'm not sure it should have. I was able to come back with a clear head and lynch mafia which is good, but I was pretty absent on d2. No pressure, no questioning, just a case in the end based on what the rest of the town did. I was able to secure the lynch on mafia. However I'm not sure we got the best information out of this day and that'll lead into my n2 play. N2 I think I was too quick to clear people based on the d2 votes. My n1 vote analysis was much better than what I did on n2. I was too quick to assume that mafia wouldn't buss and I was too quick to assume that there's no way we were on 2 mafia in that situation. In the future I should go into the analysis with the mindset that anything is possible and end up writing things about each scenario and where each lynch candidate could be either alignment: I should have done the analysis like: - Scenario 1: Coag is town, Sidesprang is flipped mafia relevant analysis -Scenario 2: Coag is mafia, Sidesprang is flipped mafia relevant analysis That would have helped to show that while scenario 2 is unlikely, it is still very much possible. I did this in my d1 vote analysis so I don't know why I didn't do it on d2, I guess its cause I townread coag so hard. Beyond that, I already felt kind of burnt out of the game, so I don't think I gave my best analysis and best pre-death send off that I could have, and I think I botched the vote analysis so I don't think I left town in a good position. Especially in regards to jay's blue claim, again, I should have just left that alone I think. All in all though I think I played a great game, 2/2 mafia lynches is already something to be happy about. Just sad I didn't get to get the 3rd one myself ^_^ | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On February 18 2014 07:34 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Scum was just 3 goons. I rolled between one blue and no scum roles, 2 blue and one scum role, and 3 blues and 2 scum roles, weighted towards the middle option and against the last option. Huh, I looked at the first game and couldn't find a second blue role, just Who was the other power role in the first game, anyway? | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On February 08 2014 14:37 Balla24 wrote: Okeydokeyroleypoleyoley, this game is moving along much better than last game IMO. There are more townie people, less questionable people. Obviously this is good. So let's get to it. The probable mafia for me today are Jonnylaw and Alakaslam. Unfortunately they are both relatively lurky, thus hard to read. However this is in direct contrast to the previous game where they were both spammy and somewhat active for a period during every section of day 1. Alakaslam has so little content. I get the impression that he doesn't really know what to talk about in this game. I've expected to see a lot of posts on the verge of being spammy when he is here, related to what he is reading at the current moment. He started to do that earlier but didn't really follow through. The things he HAS chosen to talk about are just not helpful to town: This is his first post. The first thing he decides to talk about is the change in suki and I's play. Mind you, I buckled down pretty quickly and got to business within the first 2 pages of the thread and this post is coming today LONG after everything has settled and there is plenty of real content to talk about. I don't understand the reasoning behind this post. What conclusion is he trying to draw? I don't see any attempt to draw a conclusion about our alignment. He leaves it open-ended for us to guess at what he's trying to get at. As if he wanted us to look back at it and say "Wow! These two really were trolly! That must mean they are scum. There had already been discussion on suki about it too. Same thing here, I don't understand the intent: + Show Spoiler + On February 08 2014 10:03 Alakaslam wrote: I have work folks. Yes I would be unhappy if I was lynched. That being said @suki: you appear to have "gotten better" as has Balla24 but it just doesn't strike me as the best entrance. I may be biased through being tired and a time crunch. I am kind of fighting a pregame bias that Jaybrundage is scum because last game I was CONVINCED he was scum and !what! He was almost made innocent child. Going to try some filters now. On his second return to the thread, he becomes more Alakaslam like. Starts posting inquiries on what he is currently reading. This is good. However it abruptly ends before he even gets to anywhere good within the thread, with him posting some self-meta analysis that he posted last game. I would have expected some conclusions from his read through. Does my vote that he commented on make me scummy? Is suki trolling more scummy? There are no conclusions. Slam makes conclusions regardless of how far-fetched they are. Is JB scummy for suggesting that he will policy lurkers and not having his vote on you? These are the questions I would expect him to be asking himself and posting the conclusions to. Instead he just makes broad statements and questions about the posts he finds interesting. The posts I am referencing are in the spoilers below, but it's basically just the rest of his posts. + Show Spoiler [The rest of slams posts] + On February 08 2014 10:17 Alakaslam wrote: Am I? Jay had better be leading that with any who agree on lynchig lurkers. Back to his. On February 08 2014 10:21 Alakaslam wrote: Open the nested quotes. What is with Balla's vote here? Yes I don't like the post much but if jay follows through then it is a policy we don't do often enough according to everyone, so why not? Indeed I anyone lurks harder than me tell me who and I will vote them until I find a filter as strikes me more scummy. On February 08 2014 12:19 Alakaslam wrote: After more irl and deciding I have to skim stuff I see a ploy of sorts. Jaybrundage did little but call out Suki and Balla early for trolling and stuff. They have said that is all in the interest of fun which I can understand. I too am someone who enjoys trolling... ... And rolling scum. Look, if you read TL mafia LXIII you will see the context for a quote I am about to copy in here. The point of this game is getting better, not more comfortable with trolling or believe me, there would be YouTube in my filter by now. On February 08 2014 12:19 Alakaslam wrote: After more irl and deciding I have to skim stuff I see a ploy of sorts. Jaybrundage did little but call out Suki and Balla early for trolling and stuff. They have said that is all in the interest of fun which I can understand. I too am someone who enjoys trolling... ... And rolling scum. Look, if you read TL mafia LXIII you will see the context for a quote I am about to copy in here. The point of this game is getting better, not more comfortable with trolling or believe me, there would be YouTube in my filter by now. One more thing: First off, I don't recall Jaybrundage calling out me and suki for trolling and stuff. Maybe he's talking about Jonnylaw? Regardless of who it is, this is a strange statement because that's literally all he's done himself, and if he's calling JB scummy for that then that's pretty sketchy... Moving on, Jonnylaw. I feel bad here because of his drunk posting last night and how I said I wanted to ignore it while waiting for Jonny to come back and tell me if they were serious or not. But it's been a while now... his activity level is making me very wary(did I use the right word?) on top of all the other stuff I've already posted about. So actually, mid-writing this I decide I don't really have anything more to say about Jonny. I'd appreciate if he would try again to refute the points I brought up against him last night, because all drunk jonny did was mis-interpret what I was saying and ignore other stuff then call me scum for my filter which has still not been followed up on. Actually he also did this while he was sober too: It's actually giving me flashbacks to Normal Mini Mafia 1 vibes where I was scum and I was called scum early by multiple people because of my activity, and unfortunately I wasn't able to re-establish myself in the thread like I would have liked. I'm not sure if that's what's happening here obviously until Jonny gives me some sense that this is not what's happening. Another thing that makes me feel worse about him is that when we are both town, we tend to work very well together, regardless of how clashy our personalities are. We're not working well together. I don't know who he thinks is scum, all I know is he read my filter and thought it smelled bad. Maybe that will change. The townies Suki, Aquanim, Hopeless1der all seem to be pushing pro-town things. Hopeless1der's game is much much different than last and i'm not getting any super bad vibes from him. The things he is doing he seems to have reason for it and anything that is unexplained he seems to have a followup and explanation for it. The things that stuck out to me last game are not apparent here. He is not content to sit around and talk about early game shennanigans, he is not super afk lurky like last time. Here's where I get the impression he doesn't want to be talking about policy, whereas like I made the case on last game, he is content to do so as scum: Then there are multiple points where I feel he is asking the right questions, these are things that I want to ask too and there seems to be reasoning behind them. + Show Spoiler + On February 07 2014 10:36 Hopeless1der wrote: How is Balla's first post indicative of alignment? On February 07 2014 11:21 Hopeless1der wrote: was koshi scum before or after his super serious vote on you jay? Here is an example of where he follows up on something. This was in reference to me asking him about his read on oats, sure it took a little for me to get it out of him but he got it out quickly in response to me. There's logical thinking here, and the desire to learn oats' alignment (and mine, in a previous post). The trolliness you guys can see on your own in his filter, I think that is more of a town trait for hopeless. Aquanim is more of the same. He has a natural inquisitive nature that I think is clear in his posting. He's trying to learn people's alignments. A lot of the questions he's asking are questions I would have asked myself, though there are also a lot of easy questions that have obvious answers as well. He's also trying to bring new information to the thread. + Show Spoiler + On February 07 2014 09:35 Aquanim wrote: @suki: What is your read on jayB and koshi, in the light of their little contretemps? On February 07 2014 13:16 Aquanim wrote: @jayb: Do you think it's impossible or unlikely that a town Koshi would have a gut read on you which he is unwilling or unable to state more precisely than that he thinks you feel "off"? I know in previous games I've had gut reads on people's posts where I had difficulty saying exactly what I didn't like about them, but was certain there was something weird. On February 08 2014 11:30 Aquanim wrote: Why don't you want to lynch alak "right now" if you don't think he's town? In the first quote is an example of something he does a lot: where he clearly thinks suki is scummy with his followup case on her, so he wants to force her to take a stance on the other possible other people he may or may not think are scummy for obvious reasons. He does this multiple times towards multiple people. The other two are examples of good questions that are attempting to learn more about the person and understand their alignment. Even though the last one is an easy question, it's something that Oats really has to address because it's just a weird thing to say. Everything seems to indicate that Aquanim is very curious, attempting to learn everybody's alignment. I said earlier that his attempts at starting conversation seemed awkward and he wasn't really getting that done. That's changed drastically and I think he's really getting what he wants from the thread now. The main thing for Suki is that, while I didn't like her initial cases on people. She defends them as if she really thought what she was saying was true. The koshi case was pretty bad, but she never really backed down from it. The jaybrundage meta case was unexplained, but she followed up with a great case on what she saw. The sidesprang case is one of the few where she does somewhat backdown: But the way she does it is humble, she doesn't try to stick up for it at all when she realizes how off it is, and actually gives reasoning why it was bad. In contrast, if you remember Koshi's case from last game, when he realized it was bad it was more like "shit yeah this was bad sorry guys peace!" trying to sweep it under the rug. I'm probably one of the few, but I think that suki's trolling and roleplaying and all that is actually more indicative of a town player. They are more likely to be happy and care-free and attempt to have fun. Now i'm not saying this couldn't come from a scum player who is good at the game (like suki is), but I believe a scum player would be much more serious in attempting to fit in right away with the town, trying to scum hunt, trying to be pro-town etc. Beyond that I see real attempts at trying to figure out other's alignments, and a curiosity, almost more fierce then anybody else in this game. She has 7 pages of filter already for crying out loud. It's reminiscent of a town koshi, town rayn type player. Questionables Everybody else is rather questionable. I'm getting tired of sidesprang's dissapearing acts. He does this way too much. From the little he has posted he leans town-null. He wants to dispell attacks on him. Hes sharing his opinions on people more freely then last game. It's good. Lonemeow is playing similar to last game, where I thought he was scum, but he was town... sooooo...... we'll see about him. He posted a lot today, which is good in comparison to last game and the games i've read of him. That means he is somewhat motivated to play this game. We've seen him shut down in a scum game, and he's expressed his hatred for playing scum, so that bodes well for him. Jaybrundage started off bad pretty bad and since then he hasn't been amazing, but when he explained what was going through his head at the time of the shitstorm in the beginning, it kind of makes sense from a town perspective like others were saying. Lots of OMGUS which is annoying, but maybe it's because all the scum are picking on him so he can't even get anything else out before he is attacked again. And in all seriousness, he isn't actually thinking like me at all. So we'll see what that means at the end I guess lol. Finally.... ##vote Jonnylaw | ||
| ||