|
On January 22 2014 03:15 Balla24 wrote:
Also in relation to that quote that VE and JL just posted: says VE is defensive in his big case, yet when VE is not defensive he calls him out for it.
So what exactly do you want him to do zarepath?
My case was that he was being overly-defensive, not the fact that he was defending himself at all. And there is a big difference between simply not being over-defensive and saying "lynch me, town." It is not inconsistent to criticize both behaviors.
|
On January 22 2014 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No i am not. What in your case made VE scum?
You ahve still not proven it.
Cases don't MAKE people scum; I listed why I suspected him to be scum, and some of my suspicions were tunneled and so I've stepped back.
He is STILL suspicious for bieng so quick to vote Wile, then quick to drop and vote for someone else (without a reason to vote for that person, ONLY giving reasons for no longer voting for Wile). So no, I'm not pushing it anymore because it was a bad case, but that doesn't mean I didn't suspect him and can no longer suspect him.
|
On January 22 2014 03:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also i have already pointed out where you defended VE and later on they were points in your case "why VE is mafia".
So cut the crap, start reading the thread and answer your contradictions.
If by "defend" you mean saying it was ok for VE to suspect WileE, and then later in my case saying it was evidence for scumminess, okay, I can see that contradiction. But at the time he did that, he hadn't already completely dropped that vote for someone else without explaining why he was voting for that someone else, establishing a pattern. The pattern is what made me suspicious and see that first immediate vote as evidence, when before it seemed like a normalish reaction (albeit hasty).
|
rayne keeps bringing up things I've already explained and I'm going to stop addressing them
|
When I voted for bum I didn't ONLY explain why I no longer was voting for VE, I explained why bum was scummy and then voted for him. So obviously different. It's like you're willfully misreading
|
Because he said he'd never unvote, and his literal only explanation for the unvote was motivated by how town perceived him.
Sure, he MIGHT think he'll just get him later, but that's inconsistent with what he said earlier, and he didn't say it or suggest it; meanwhile what he DID say in this universe is scummy
|
I have to stick my head back into work again, Barristan, but off-hand I think Aristotle is inexplicably getting away with a lot, kush seems very confident and townie, and you seem like an opportunist to me but that may just be because your case was on me.
|
On January 22 2014 04:25 Balla24 wrote:
lol Aristotle? You mean artanis?
No, I meant Aristotle. That guy got away with so much and everybody's all "oooh, what a great philosopher, ooh." Well, he's been absent for thousands of years.
|
On January 22 2014 04:26 kushm4sta wrote:
Balla why are you voting zare? There is nothing scummy therre. Yes rayn is town and probably jl too but that doesn't make them righT
preach it brother
|
It's fine to suspect two people who are both voting for each other as long as you're more suspicious of one than the other. You can't guess the entire scum team at once
|
At this point I would be happy for a lynch of Wiley, Crossfire, or bum. I don't know why scum would fake blue-claim like that, except that it apparently gave Wiley a free ride to not do anything else at all day 1. And I don't know why any of those three have failed to do anything at all today leading up to the lynch.
|
On January 22 2014 05:41 kushm4sta wrote:
fuck no are we lynching wiley. blues are immune remember we agreed to that?
no no, he has to claim blue after we put him up for lynch, then we can't
|
Okay holy crap guys
You are Coagulation and are famous for shitting up the banlist thread. Because of your exploits you are really well known. You win when all the mafia are eliminated.
(Named VT)
##Unvote
##Vote Crossfire
|
So that's still breaking the rules if I'm not fake claiming? Crap. Sorry all.
|
|
|
I unvoted VE and voted for Crossfire. Also, there is a lot of confusion about rules 11 and 12 and my roleclaim
|
that was crazy and awesome
|
On January 22 2014 12:53 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
Sweet!
Well I was wrong it appears, but my named vt is not blue. I might not be a boxer. Mine is green but I'm Chezinu.
Anyway, bum I think if I was scum I would be a lot townier, but I do play lurker games at times. If I was scum with Kush we would win. His scum game synergizes with mine incredibly well.
Next scum I would say is Kush, unless you willing to have long chat with Rayn and answer every question he comes up with?
Rayn, are you here? If you are try to paint me scum or something. I wants to defenses
what in the actual
Can someone explain this Alakaslam person to me please
|
No, I mean meta. When people understood he was Alakaslam, it was like everybody gave him a pass because of meta or something. How does he usually play?
|
On January 22 2014 23:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:
In the last game JonnyLaw was [u]literally sure BigDad was mafia on D1 yet at the end of the day he had two other candidates for lynch which he debated between. Goddamn suki, why are you not thinking?
Do you seriously think JonnyLaw did nothing on D1 than bussed his whole team? Before voting zarepath he has done nothing but talked about kush and Balla. Do you really think that's what JonnyLaw did as mafia? [/b]
The way you worded this sounds like you're assuming kush is scum
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
