Follow his thought process like he's scummy on Bunny, asked MZ what he thought of the Jamp-bunny interaction, bounces onto MZ. Like it's a clear natural progression IMO. Doesn't look or feel forced.

Right. I don't have any problem with jamp finding bunny scummy and then deciding that MZ is scummy based on not finding bunny scummy there.

You have no problem with:

(1) Jamp finding MZ scummy for that, but then having him as not a possible lynch in the very next post? Despite still having bunnies as scum?

(2) Jamp finding bunnies scum, being pretty clearly scummy on bunnies, but never voting her and not pushing her lynch, choosing to look elsewhere every time he plops a vote down?

I can perfectly understand why he might find bunnies and MZ scummy. But his RESPONSE to that finding is not to vote, and to pull a 180 on MZ for no reason (while not doing so on bunnies).

(NEED TO CHECK AND SEE WHAT/IF MZ POSTED IN THAT TIME)

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

May 25 2014 00:36 GMT

#3744

austin you are talking way too much.

geript

10024 Posts

May 25 2014 00:37 GMT

#3745

I just don't see a reason to exclude that type of progression what reading the player.

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

May 25 2014 00:37 GMT

#3746

EBWOP

not "deciding that MZ is scummy based on not finding bunny scummy there"

but instead

"deciding that MZ is scummy based on FINDING bunny scummy there but for different reasons"

MZ just didn't share jampi's reasoning, and jampi thought MZ was scummy because he missed what jampi thought was important

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

May 25 2014 00:40 GMT

#3747

On May 25 2014 09:36 kushm4sta wrote:
austin you are talking way too much.

What's your favorite kind of cheese?

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

May 25 2014 00:40 GMT

#3748

i just realized we might as well plynch because scum are like impossible to find anyway.
##vote mysterymeat

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

May 25 2014 00:41 GMT

#3749

On May 25 2014 09:40 austinmcc wrote:

Show nested quote +

What's your favorite kind of cheese?

extra sharp cheddar

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

May 25 2014 00:41 GMT

#3750

so did that help you determine my alignment?

austinmcc

United States6737 Posts

May 25 2014 00:43 GMT

#3751

It's a boring favorite, but not alignment-determinative.

RIGHT NOW.

layabout

United Kingdom2600 Posts

May 25 2014 00:44 GMT

#3752

Those two posts frm ritoky look CAREFUL.

He is a great bet for mafia, i had a lot of people agreeing with me but no votes. What gives?

+ Show Spoiler +

people were over, i alcoholed sue me

Thing is, (and this is part of why i gave up on jamp,) his list was actually a pretty good assessment of the game at that point

we have 14or so/28 votes cast is it too much to ask for people to be more forthcoming with votes and opinions? Thread feels flat.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 25 2014 00:47 GMT

#3753

layabout, you have any opinions on anyone else?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 25 2014 00:47 GMT

#3754

like any of the other wagons, anyone who's not really been talked about that you think should have done...

your focus is extremely singleminded

geript

10024 Posts

May 25 2014 00:50 GMT

#3755

I think Thrawn is mafia. Can't explain it well. The Kush read is really odd. He's also not withdrawn at all; like he's just angry. Like Kush is usually pretty detached from the thread and what I've seen of Thrawn (and how to read him) is that he's like 30% of Kush apart from the threat. Here it looks more like he has no interest in playing whatsoever which is more what I understand of his mafia play.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

May 25 2014 00:55 GMT

#3756

On May 25 2014 09:50 geript wrote:
I think Thrawn is mafia. Can't explain it well. The Kush read is really odd. He's also not withdrawn at all; like he's just angry. Like Kush is usually pretty detached from the thread and what I've seen of Thrawn (and how to read him) is that he's like 30% of Kush apart from the threat. Here it looks more like he has no interest in playing whatsoever which is more what I understand of his mafia play.

I get this read but the problem is I think thrawn would at least make a token effort as mafia to make/explain reads or do some cases. He was mafia in LXIII that I hosted and he *did* things. Actually in many cases bad things, but he did things. I kinda feel like in this game he'd at least have pretended to give even a bit of a shit? It's actually *really easy* in this sort of game to bullshit up a couple of reads on any of the many lurkers/weirdplaying players.

If I were mafia in this game (soft townclaim ftw) I'd just go "here's one or two players, let's lynch them for some random reasons in their filter" and just go from there. Dunno. It's actually quite hard to imagine mafia playing like thrawn is doing where he's been around to do a few inconsequential things, without taking what is a really easy path and making some bogus reads.

Then again I'm not certain this makes him not-mafia, but it makes me go eeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Understand me?

layabout

United Kingdom2600 Posts

May 25 2014 01:02 GMT

#3757

my notes say that i think mtamburini and kush and probably mafias

i have a reasonable pool of players that i am confident are town

ive been waiting for sqrootnegwhatever to do something today since i don't feel like i could push him at the moment.

erandorr and thrawn need to die.

tbh most of the people i thought or now think might be mafia have stopped playing and the lynch is between people i am fine with