|
On January 09 2014 04:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 04:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 09 2014 04:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:@Rayn
On January 09 2014 04:35 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 09 2014 04:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:31 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 09 2014 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:25 thrawn2112 wrote:
rayn you're replacing stupidity with stupidity Explain. How am i being stupid? You're policy lynching for destructive behavior that you're provoking in the first place. I don't have any problems with cora's attitude (none that affect who I want to lynch) and I don't mind kush at all. I also don't think either of them are scum. In fact singling them out for a policy lynch is realistically only going to antagonize them further. All you have to do is decide if you think kush is mafia/town. Lynch if scum. Cooperate with him if he's town. What you are doing is not even worrying about his alignment and refusing to cooperate because you think he will also refuse. This post is totally wrong. I have stated multiple times in thread why those people are no use for town even if they are town. Thay have proved it in this game. Are you saying you know cora is town? How have "Thay proved it in this game" I have literally just made a fucking page of a filter of posts that say that. What the fuck are you doing? By THIS game did you mean extractor? Because that line is fucking confusing when i think you mean this game right here right now and you know the alignment of someone you're lynching WHERE THE FUCK DO I SAY I KNOW CORAZON'S ALIGNMENT?
You said the people in question proved is this game which means you know their alignment this game.
|
|
|
On January 09 2014 04:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 04:48 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 09 2014 04:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:@Rayn
On January 09 2014 04:35 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 09 2014 04:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:31 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 09 2014 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:25 thrawn2112 wrote:
rayn you're replacing stupidity with stupidity Explain. How am i being stupid? You're policy lynching for destructive behavior that you're provoking in the first place. I don't have any problems with cora's attitude (none that affect who I want to lynch) and I don't mind kush at all. I also don't think either of them are scum. In fact singling them out for a policy lynch is realistically only going to antagonize them further. All you have to do is decide if you think kush is mafia/town. Lynch if scum. Cooperate with him if he's town. What you are doing is not even worrying about his alignment and refusing to cooperate because you think he will also refuse. This post is totally wrong. I have stated multiple times in thread why those people are no use for town even if they are town. Thay have proved it in this game. Are you saying you know cora is town? How have "Thay proved it in this game" I have literally just made a fucking page of a filter of posts that say that. What the fuck are you doing? By THIS game did you mean extractor? Because that line is fucking confusing when i think you mean this game right here right now and you know the alignment of someone you're lynching WHERE THE FUCK DO I SAY I KNOW CORAZON'S ALIGNMENT?
BY SAYING "THEY PROVED IT THIS GAME" WOULD MEAN YOU KNOW THAT TOWN ACT THIS WAY (I.E. CORA) AND YOU ARE LYNCHING HIM DESPITE KNOWING HE'S TOWN.
But apparently you were talking about extractor, saying "this" game is confusing as hell rayn
|
So I was going to go see if I could find anything else on Yamato in order to convince you guys to lynch him, but I did not find anything besides the plethora of things that were discussed already. I guess the one small new thing I found was that he switched his vote onto me (when everyone was hammering on me, as well) without talking about why he didn't find Iamp scummy anymore. He had to be asked about it before he explained why he thought Iamp was town. His explanation was a meta read, after saying "meta is ass".
He's barely playing the game and when he does, he is playing like his scum meta. The case isn't completely about his meta, but the meta part is the icing on the cake.
Yamato is the best lynch today, guys.
|
I literally said "They have proven they are no use to town, even if they are town".
The key word here is "EVEN". Holy fucking shit, can't people read any more?
|
On January 09 2014 05:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I literally said "They have proven they are no use to town, even if they are town".
The key word here is "EVEN". Holy fucking shit, can't people read any more?
that still indicates that you think cora is town... w.e. semantics. dropped.
|
On January 09 2014 05:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I literally said "They have proven they are no use to town, even if they are town".
The key word here is "EVEN". Holy fucking shit, can't people read any more?
Well they can't prove this without being town, right?
|
On January 09 2014 00:16 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 00:12 wherebugsgo wrote:
Anyway I think this convo between you guys is pretty fruitless. I also think there's almost no chance we lynch thrown today (or anyone other than Yamato, really)
We need to get people onto Yamato. I'll be around sporadically, but I'm going to lunch and a movie so I don't know how much time I can commit for the next few hours. I should hopefully be done a few hours before lynch.
I highly encourage everyone to read my two posts on Yamato following his "vote" on iamperfection. I'm on my phone, otherwise I'd link them. We need to consolidate on Yamato now, before it becomes too hectic close to the lynch to have anything reasonably thought-out or predictable. We need to be prepared for Yamato to be kicking and screaming regardless of alignment. How he does it will determine his alignment. it will get done more importantly what movie are you seeing.
I saw Frozen :p
When I came back my door was frozen -_-
On January 09 2014 01:11 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 01:08 kushm4sta wrote:
sorry but I am not interesting in playing a conversational style of mafia this game. I will not read through your epically long conversations.
anyway yamato is lynch bait these days dont fucking sign up dude. You basically said well I'm not going to read the thread. Fuck you
On January 09 2014 01:13 WaveofShadow wrote:
It's shit like this.
Nobody would ever support a switch to him to punish this kind of play but FUCK
I think at this point it's best to just pretend he doesn't exist. I think he'll understand when people start listing him under players they'd rather not play with for wisdom of the crowds or whatever that is.
He's more or less just trolling. Since we have a better chance at killing mafia by not killing him, we have no choice but to ignore him.
On January 09 2014 04:36 thrawn2112 wrote:
wbg are you here? I'm about to leave for this phase and would like your thoughts on yamato
Nothing he has done so far has changed my read.
He basically made a reentrance version 2.0 and then has stuck around to throw around useless one liners ever since. He's not bothered pushing his stance all that hard.
Corazon looks pretty scummy too but in my eyes their alignments are divorced. I think we can kill either Cora or Yamato today but I do not think that the other should be left alone after that. (i.e. they are scummy regardless of what the other's alignment is, which is why I don't think we should read into the fact that they are voting each other) Neither has truly bothered to give a whole-hearted push of the other, too, which is disconcerting on both ends.
Do you find it odd that yamato has found the time to be around but consistently does not do what one would expect town yamato to do? Do you think, even if it is a time-issue, that town yamato would act the way he's currently acting? I see a lot of whining from both Corazon and Yamato. Neither of them seem to be trying very hard to get their reads lynched, nor do they seem to be willing to discuss things rather than just throw up their hands and accuse others in very vague terms.
Yamato's attack on iamp would have made sense from a town perspective if and only if it was strongly motivated. It was so weak, however, that I could really only make sense of it from a scum perspective. Do you think a town yamato would expend so little effort on pushing iamp if he truly thought that his "secret read" was so important? I got the impression that he wanted to gauge the reaction of other players to his "idea" and to see what would happen if he pushed iamp. I don't get the impression that he actually strongly believed iamp was ever scum. If he had, as he himself noted that his vote didn't count, I think he would have both revoted and encouraged the rest of town to flip the vote. Do you agree?
|
On January 09 2014 04:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 04:31 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 09 2014 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:25 thrawn2112 wrote:
rayn you're replacing stupidity with stupidity Explain. How am i being stupid? You're policy lynching for destructive behavior that you're provoking in the first place. I don't have any problems with cora's attitude (none that affect who I want to lynch) and I don't mind kush at all. I also don't think either of them are scum. In fact singling them out for a policy lynch is realistically only going to antagonize them further. All you have to do is decide if you think kush is mafia/town. Lynch if scum. Cooperate with him if he's town. What you are doing is not even worrying about his alignment and refusing to cooperate because you think he will also refuse. This post is totally wrong. I have stated multiple times in thread why those people are no use for town even if they are town. Thay have proved it in this game.
They will not help the town win even if they are town.
This is proven by their posts in this game. They have proven they can't help the town, nowhere i fucking say they are town.
|
On January 09 2014 05:02 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 05:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I literally said "They have proven they are no use to town, even if they are town".
The key word here is "EVEN". Holy fucking shit, can't people read any more? that still indicates that you think cora is town... w.e. semantics. dropped.
semantically it's actually ambiguous.
From the context though it's pretty apparent that he meant that they've proved that they're a detriment to town (period), not that they're a detriment despite being town.
Which makes sense, they both are a huge detriment to town no matter what their alignments are.
|
On January 09 2014 05:02 wherebugsgo wrote:
Yamato's attack on iamp would have made sense from a town perspective if and only if it was strongly motivated. It was so weak, however, that I could really only make sense of it from a scum perspective. Do you think a town yamato would expend so little effort on pushing iamp if he truly thought that his "secret read" was so important? I got the impression that he wanted to gauge the reaction of other players to his "idea" and to see what would happen if he pushed iamp. I don't get the impression that he actually strongly believed iamp was ever scum. If he had, as he himself noted that his vote didn't count, I think he would have both revoted and encouraged the rest of town to flip the vote. Do you agree?
felt the same way. especially considering it being yamato
|
11589 Posts
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative.
|
On January 09 2014 05:05 yamato77 wrote:
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative.
I've seen you as town afk from the thread and come back with reads that you are confident about and very proud of to the point that you call everyone bad and tell them all to sheep you. Here you provided a weak case embedded in layers of spoilers that you clearly didn't care to push.
|
On January 09 2014 05:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 04:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:31 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 09 2014 04:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 09 2014 04:25 thrawn2112 wrote:
rayn you're replacing stupidity with stupidity Explain. How am i being stupid? You're policy lynching for destructive behavior that you're provoking in the first place. I don't have any problems with cora's attitude (none that affect who I want to lynch) and I don't mind kush at all. I also don't think either of them are scum. In fact singling them out for a policy lynch is realistically only going to antagonize them further. All you have to do is decide if you think kush is mafia/town. Lynch if scum. Cooperate with him if he's town. What you are doing is not even worrying about his alignment and refusing to cooperate because you think he will also refuse. This post is totally wrong. I have stated multiple times in thread why those people are no use for town even if they are town. Thay have proved it in this game. They will not help the town win even if they are town. This is proven by their posts in this game. They have proven they can't help the town, nowhere i fucking say they are town.
For your statement to make sense it is necessary for them to be town. But yeah I don't think you would scumslip this way so you are probably just not understanding the problem. Let's stop this.
|
also if you were town i think you'd be a lot meaner to everyone accusing you
|
On January 09 2014 05:05 yamato77 wrote:
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative.
Then why did you make a giant post and vote Iamp straight away? No one had really talked about him before you made that post, and then you just voted for Iamp without doing your "town thing" of gauging reactions from the thread. That doesn't make sense.
|
11589 Posts
On January 09 2014 05:07 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 05:05 yamato77 wrote:
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative. I've seen you as town afk from the thread and come back with reads that you are confident about and very proud of to the point that you call everyone bad and tell them all to sheep you. Here you provided a weak case embedded in layers of spoilers that you clearly didn't care to push.
I'm demoralized atm, I really don't even care what happens this game that much.
|
11589 Posts
On January 09 2014 05:08 thrawn2112 wrote:
also if you were town i think you'd be a lot meaner to everyone accusing you
I would use stronger words, but I'm trying not to be belligerent and make this thread any worse than it is.
|
11589 Posts
On January 09 2014 05:08 Corazon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 05:05 yamato77 wrote:
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative. Then why did you make a giant post and vote Iamp straight away? No one had really talked about him before you made that post, and then you just voted for Iamp without doing your "town thing" of gauging reactions from the thread. That doesn't make sense.
I don't always do it. Jesus you're thick.
|
On January 09 2014 05:13 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 09 2014 05:08 Corazon wrote:On January 09 2014 05:05 yamato77 wrote:
WBG, I gauge reactions of the thread as town before voting. Your point is not alignment indicative. Then why did you make a giant post and vote Iamp straight away? No one had really talked about him before you made that post, and then you just voted for Iamp without doing your "town thing" of gauging reactions from the thread. That doesn't make sense. I don't always do it. Jesus you're thick.
You're not helping my theory that you did not really believe in your Iamp lynch and just wrote it because people were asking for activity from you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
