|
On January 08 2014 11:39 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 11:35 iamperfection wrote:
wave didnt run away and is at least posting thoughts so lets kill yamato
## Unvote
##vote yamato Cora, on the other hand, did (and really didn't post much of anything while he was here anyway). I'm interested to see what happens if I switch as well. WoS will probably switch too, so yamato will have some pretty serious momentum before anyone else arrives back in the thread. ##unvote
##vote yamato
No one to switch to, he is my first and only vote.
On January 08 2014 11:37 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 11:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bugs what do you make of Cheese v Artanis that everybody seemed to want to comment on a while ago? seemed to me like Artanis had a natural focus on Cheesecake (sort of how i have a natural focus on Corazon) simply because they were interacting. I could sort of follow the conversation from both perspectives; i.e. if you were to pretend to be town Artanis or town Cheesecake, do you think their actions make sense? For the most part they seem to make sense. I haven't read into Cheesecake too heavily, but as far as Artanis goes the major thing that concerns me is his lack of presence today. It probably doesn't mean anything, but if he's still not present tomorrow I'd be worried. His posting tone so far seems fine to me. Another thing is that he sort of deflected giving an opinion on Yamato (IIRC he said something about not having played with scum yamato in a long time) and a bit more minor is that I don't really agree with his opinions, but I think they can reasonably be justified from his perspective. Sadly it's a "let's wait and see" on him, Cheese, yamato...basically everyone in the filter list that is not a townread to me for now. I would rank yamato at the top of the scum list, though.
I dunno...I really didn't find anything worth commenting on throughout that conversation---at least not nearly as much as others did. Don't have much of a read on either so I'll take a closer look soon.
Can I ask you bugs, what changed between this post:
Why should I let scum have a head start into knowing whom I suspect so early, if it doesn't particularly benefit me? It only changes their behaviour when they know who is specifically under scrutiny.
and now?
|
|
|
@wos what do you mean people think your opening posts are scummy? in what game did that happen?
|
On January 08 2014 11:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
I would kill artanis/corazon/rayn/yamato
I take back artanis because I am undecided. Probably Corazon too.
Anyone wanna kill rayn?
|
What's up thrawn:
On January 07 2014 18:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 18:33 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 07 2014 18:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 07 2014 17:59 thrawn2112 wrote:
i was hoping that you would tell me why you're scum because i'm too lazy to make the case myself What was your read on me before my answer and why did it change? You're pushing the limit of how much thought you can assume I put into my earlier posts. I mean you said "and there goes my only read" after i gave you an answer to your question. I assume you had some sort of a read on me and i would like to know what that was.
Seeing your last post you're gonna get lynched if you do not explain this.
|
On January 08 2014 12:18 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 11:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
I would kill artanis/corazon/rayn/yamato I take back artanis because I am undecided. Probably Corazon too. Anyone wanna kill rayn?
why don't you want to kill yamato now?
|
I doubt it. There is nothing to explain.
You're probably town though so nvm.
|
On January 08 2014 12:20 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 12:18 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 08 2014 11:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
I would kill artanis/corazon/rayn/yamato I take back artanis because I am undecided. Probably Corazon too. Anyone wanna kill rayn? why don't you want to kill yamato now?
That's where my vote is. None of the people I want to talk to are here, so I'm just lurking.
|
Okay so this is exactly what scum!thrawn does.
##Vote: thrawn
|
On January 08 2014 12:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay so this is exactly what scum!thrawn does.
##Vote: thrawn
does what?
|
lol i know what he's gonna say and it's true for this game but has nothing to do with my alignment
|
BTW Rayn at the beginning of the game when I voted you and said I'd keep my vote on you until you do something that convinces me otherwise, how you're posting now is what I was waiting for. Obviously it was good I didn't tell you this when you complained about it, which is why sometimes you need to have faith that some people only tell you what you need to know.
I'm pretty sure this relates to what you're thinking about me right now?
|
On January 08 2014 12:26 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 12:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay so this is exactly what scum!thrawn does.
##Vote: thrawn does what?
He does something that is not usually considered as alignemnt indicative. When someone looke beyond what he said and thinks why he did that and asks for reasoning behind his actions he refuses to contribute to them.
|
|
|
On January 08 2014 11:44 WaveofShadow wrote:Can I ask you bugs, what changed between this post: Show nested quote +Why should I let scum have a head start into knowing whom I suspect so early, if it doesn't particularly benefit me? It only changes their behaviour when they know who is specifically under scrutiny. and now?
Oh, now I am just going to hold things back without saying anything about that fact.
If my reads need to change publicly they will, but as long as someone who is getting lynched who I am okay with getting lynched, I'm not really going to hold back from talking about them. I'll also freely discuss other alternatives.
Mostly though when there's more people around who seem to be interested in scumhunting there's less incentive to hold everything back, but that doesn't mean I am putting forth everything either.
|
Rayn you are trying to grill me over a "thought process" I can't even remember having nor was I probably aware of it at the time. I'm completely willing to talk to you about anything I've posted since I started being srs but I can't even remember what my reads were in those first few hours
On January 08 2014 12:42 iamperfection wrote:
... i don't get it
basically I avoid answering the tough questions by refusing to converse for one reason or another.
|
Here is the original interaction.
On January 07 2014 17:03 thrawn2112 wrote:
rayn if i told you i have a valid reason to believe you're scum, what do you think it is?
On January 07 2014 17:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I have no idea.
On January 07 2014 17:11 thrawn2112 wrote:
annnnnd now have 0 reads
On January 07 2014 17:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Could you elaborate more on what was that all about?
On January 07 2014 17:59 thrawn2112 wrote:
i was hoping that you would tell me why you're scum because i'm too lazy to make the case myself
What does this mean?
thrawn must have had a some kind of a read on me. The bolded quote is proof of that. If he claims otherwise he is lying and there is no reason to lie about that as town.
After that i ask thrawn what was his read on me and why i became null after his answer.
He refused to answer, he still refuses to answer. There is no reason to refuse to answer unless he has no answers. He does have an answer (of his own thought process) if he is town.
Therefore he is scum, it's the only possibility.
|
On January 08 2014 12:46 thrawn2112 wrote:
Rayn you are trying to grill me over a "thought process" I can't even remember having nor was I probably aware of it at the time.
This can't possibly be true because i asked you about it right after. You did not answer me, instead you went on discussing Artanis.
|
On January 08 2014 12:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:What's up thrawn: Show nested quote +On January 07 2014 18:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 07 2014 18:33 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 07 2014 18:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:On January 07 2014 17:59 thrawn2112 wrote:
i was hoping that you would tell me why you're scum because i'm too lazy to make the case myself What was your read on me before my answer and why did it change? You're pushing the limit of how much thought you can assume I put into my earlier posts. I mean you said "and there goes my only read" after i gave you an answer to your question. I assume you had some sort of a read on me and i would like to know what that was. Seeing your last post you're gonna get lynched if you do not explain this.
Read this, i asked you about your thought process right after the conversation.
|
If you lose your train of thousght in ~15 minutes you should not play mafia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
