|
Japan10647 Posts
On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible
what do you think of this?
On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post.
On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously"
|
On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next?
I started the conversation with bugs you know...
|
Look at WBG, yet again trying to twist the facts to give him room to attack me.
i'll be on later. I'm gonna go practice French
|
Japan10647 Posts
On January 08 2014 10:25 Corazon wrote:
WBG I'm done interacting with you. Stop trying to hide the facts and lie about me. When you asked for contribution from me, I had already said some things about Yamato and had a few other posts. You either lied about me not contributing or you didn't read the thread. Which one is it?
Your posts weren't contributions.
Making one liners that are wrong or simple summaries are not contributions.
When I asked you to elucidate any of your thoughts you refused to do so. Based on things you have said you have repeatedly proven that you are incapable of reading or comprehending the things you read, which means that even if you were town I'd have no use for your opinions. That's why I refused to give you anything. If iamp were in the thread at that point I might have disclosed some of what I was thinking, given that he actually seems to have valid opinions of his own (and if he's scum, then we are fucked)
|
On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him.
I'd lynch him atm actually.
##Vote: yamato
I'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch.
|
Japan10647 Posts
On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know...
I was wondering when someone would point this out :p
|
On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive.
Ahem... I don't really understand how you come to the conclusion that 180ing on Kush and antagonizing people is indicative of him just trying to survive.
|
On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously"
LOL I DID notice that.
Cora what turned the lightbulb on?
On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know...
Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet.
|
On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously"
This post was in response to this post:
On January 08 2014 10:22 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. lol lolwut ALL of my play is townplay
Get with the program, please.
Out for realsies.
|
On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet.
Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided?
|
On January 08 2014 10:33 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided?
I didn't; I was giving my read of you. I find your posting up until the reads you gave that WBG wrenched out of you forcefully neutral and unopinionated in a meaningful way. If you don't see the difference between yours and WBG's posting during that conversation than I don't believe there is more I can say on the matter.
|
than = then*
I'm dumb.
There you didn't have to do it bugs
|
On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch.
why did you wait so long to do this considering you said the same thing yesterday but didn't bother to vote?
|
Japan10647 Posts
On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:
Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet.
While this is true, there are other, more important things that I think you might be missing.
Do you actually think JAT is scum or would you say that his lack of reads is disconcerting?
And if you had to name an alternative to yamato who would it be?
It's in your best interest to be forthcoming with your reads, since your last few posts haven't looked so good if you are town.
|
On January 08 2014 10:36 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:33 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided? I didn't; I was giving my read of you. I find your posting up until the reads you gave that WBG wrenched out of you forcefully neutral and unopinionated in a meaningful way. If you don't see the difference between yours and WBG's posting during that conversation than I don't believe there is more I can say on the matter.
How convenient. The problem is you are trying to throw suspicion on me by saying bugs had to forcefully wrench reads out of me when it was exactly the same the other way round. He did not give any reads before that. How does that make any sense?
|
On January 08 2014 10:37 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:28 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:20 Corazon wrote:On January 08 2014 10:14 iamperfection wrote:
and corzan can you explain how bugs is scum when he decided to go on a huge rant with everyone look at me attitude. Sure seems like to me a non scum thing to do. It's easy for scum to fake that. His logic was not even good. He started calling me dumb because I asked him to actually contribute when he said he wouldn't until I did. He blatantly admitted to not have read the thread and he decided to attack kush, who at the time had 0 posts, and called him stupid until he did some random 180 and called kush town (while keeping his vote on him). He then OMGUSs me when I call him out for it. To me, it looks faked and it looks like he just wants to survive. I'm sorry, what? Most of this shit is just blatantly wrong or misleading. On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? Yamato, please. I want to hear your thoughts on him. I'd lynch him atm actually. ##Vote: yamatoI'm used to WAY more effort from him on any given D1 at this point. Too much one-liner, too much shutting down of discussion and negativity---and while he's capable of this as town, he's also capable of better play and I don't mind punishing him. Seriously threatening him is also often a good way to get something good out of him one way or another; see LXIII or LXI for examples. Yamato LOVES being tha D1 lynch. why did you wait so long to do this considering you said the same thing yesterday but didn't bother to vote?
'Cause he still hasn't done dicks since, and like I said yesterday, if you were reading, one vote two hours into D1 does not a threat make. I fully support anyone who would like to join me on this wagon, btw.
On January 08 2014 10:38 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:
Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. While this is true, there are other, more important things that I think you might be missing. Do you actually think JAT is scum or would you say that his lack of reads is disconcerting? And if you had to name an alternative to yamato who would it be? It's in your best interest to be forthcoming with your reads, since your last few posts haven't looked so good if you are town.
Uh....don't threaten me. I don't respond to threats. When exactly in this game have I been anything BUT forthcoming? Did I try to hold back my reads at any point? Because I sure as hell can't think of ANYONE who would do that, right?
I've already said I'm not sure about JAT. I don't like his neutrality, I'd maybe lean slightly scum right now but I haven't had the chance to do a dive of a whole bunch of other people. Yall are too busy jumping down my throat right as I return to the thread so I haven't had time for much else.
|
On January 08 2014 10:41 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:36 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:33 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided? I didn't; I was giving my read of you. I find your posting up until the reads you gave that WBG wrenched out of you forcefully neutral and unopinionated in a meaningful way. If you don't see the difference between yours and WBG's posting during that conversation than I don't believe there is more I can say on the matter. How convenient. The problem is you are trying to throw suspicion on me by saying bugs had to forcefully wrench reads out of me when it was exactly the same the other way round. He did not give any reads before that. How does that make any sense?
Nope.
Wrong.
The way I see it, WBG reveals a great deal about himself in the way he defends his policy lynch and most importantly puts himself out there. Everything you had posted up until that point was simply an attack or criticism of somebody else. You know, I'll give you that you're right I suppose in that it is not a read in the proper sense but at least it allows the entire thread to attempt a read of him. His posts are not guarded, careful. Yours reek of it.
|
ill be back in an hour or so.
|
On January 08 2014 10:44 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:41 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:36 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:33 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided? I didn't; I was giving my read of you. I find your posting up until the reads you gave that WBG wrenched out of you forcefully neutral and unopinionated in a meaningful way. If you don't see the difference between yours and WBG's posting during that conversation than I don't believe there is more I can say on the matter. How convenient. The problem is you are trying to throw suspicion on me by saying bugs had to forcefully wrench reads out of me when it was exactly the same the other way round. He did not give any reads before that. How does that make any sense? Nope. Wrong. The way I see it, WBG reveals a great deal about himself in the way he defends his policy lynch and most importantly puts himself out there. Everything you had posted up until that point was simply an attack or criticism of somebody else. You know, I'll give you that you're right I suppose in that it is not a read in the proper sense but at least it allows the entire thread to attempt a read of him. His posts are not guarded, careful. Yours reek of it.
Holy mother of shitlogic.
WBG reveals a great deal of himself by talking about POLICY the whole time? Surely you can enlighten me why scum would not be able to comfortably talk about policy how much they want?
Also he is clearly putting himself out there with this while I certainly don't do so by getting in a fight with him. Your posts reek of Sherlock...
|
On January 08 2014 10:44 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On January 08 2014 10:41 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:36 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:33 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:30 WaveofShadow wrote:On January 08 2014 10:25 wherebugsgo wrote:On January 08 2014 10:23 iamperfection wrote:
why are you asking my permission to do things wos? you seem to want to be as wishy washy as possible what do you think of this? On January 08 2014 10:21 Corazon wrote:
Wait can someone explain to me why that post was scummy? I'm not too familiar on WoS' town play so I'm not sure what you two see in his post. On January 08 2014 10:23 Corazon wrote:
Wow WoS. That post looks really bad.
"I'm so townie Cora, obviously" LOL I DID notice that. Cora what turned the lightbulb on? On January 08 2014 10:26 justanothertownie wrote:On January 08 2014 10:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
Bring it, suckas.
JAT:
Until prodded endlessly by WBG, he contributed nothing to the thread besides the nitpicking of other people's posts and reads and providing none of his own. Not a huge fan of his posting thus far---a little too 'fence-sitty' for my liking but whateva.
Iamp can I have a looky at you next? I started the conversation with bugs you know... Conversation yes, good contribution imo no. You offered exactly zero reads or opinion of your own aside from those that served to pick on others' posts and logic. Very VERY easy to do as scum. I dunno 'bout you yet. Well, if I am not mistaken I was prodding bugs for reads at least as hard as the other way round. How come you paint the whole thing this one sided? I didn't; I was giving my read of you. I find your posting up until the reads you gave that WBG wrenched out of you forcefully neutral and unopinionated in a meaningful way. If you don't see the difference between yours and WBG's posting during that conversation than I don't believe there is more I can say on the matter. How convenient. The problem is you are trying to throw suspicion on me by saying bugs had to forcefully wrench reads out of me when it was exactly the same the other way round. He did not give any reads before that. How does that make any sense? Nope. Wrong. The way I see it, WBG reveals a great deal about himself in the way he defends his policy lynch and most importantly puts himself out there. Everything you had posted up until that point was simply an attack or criticism of somebody else. You know, I'll give you that you're right I suppose in that it is not a read in the proper sense but at least it allows the entire thread to attempt a read of him. His posts are not guarded, careful. Yours reek of it.
And here's the thing about WBG. I'd call him town simply based on his lurker rage (because it is something I strongly can identify with throughout multiple games) but my issue there is I don't know bugs well. It is entirely possible that he's a clever duck and is jumping on the leftover rage bandwagon from the recent drama threads and is harnessing that in this game or some shit. I don't know how he TRULY feels, or what he is capable of as scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
