|
On December 15 2013 23:10 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 23:03 Plutarch wrote:
I would like people to read grack's filter and tell me what they think in light of the flip today. Grackaroni is definitely one of the most suspicious votes (if not the most suspicious). He was very unwilling to lynch purple. Incidentally, his D1 vote was also one of the most scummy: Show nested quote +On December 12 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:
Geez Vayne actually slipped lol. Un-lynchable scum record goodbye I will take pleasure in this.
##Unvote: Alakaslam
##Vote: VayneAuthority
I don't think it prevents Slam from being scum. I don't think VA and Grackaroni are scum together, though. And Grackaroni is very scummy on his own rights.
Why don't you think they can be scum together?
|
Grack busses as hell.
I don't have much time now, i'll look at everything talked about before the deadline though and give my opinions.
|
On December 15 2013 23:14 Plutarch wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 23:10 Xatalos wrote:On December 15 2013 23:03 Plutarch wrote:
I would like people to read grack's filter and tell me what they think in light of the flip today. Grackaroni is definitely one of the most suspicious votes (if not the most suspicious). He was very unwilling to lynch purple. Incidentally, his D1 vote was also one of the most scummy: On December 12 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:
Geez Vayne actually slipped lol. Un-lynchable scum record goodbye I will take pleasure in this.
##Unvote: Alakaslam
##Vote: VayneAuthority
I don't think it prevents Slam from being scum. I don't think VA and Grackaroni are scum together, though. And Grackaroni is very scummy on his own rights. Why don't you think they can be scum together?
Because he was very eager to jump on the VA bandwagon at the end of D1. Well, they *can*, but it's not very likely that they are IMO.
|
I mean I don't think that quote rules it out at all. Is there anything more?
|
On December 15 2013 23:18 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 23:14 Plutarch wrote:On December 15 2013 23:10 Xatalos wrote:On December 15 2013 23:03 Plutarch wrote:
I would like people to read grack's filter and tell me what they think in light of the flip today. Grackaroni is definitely one of the most suspicious votes (if not the most suspicious). He was very unwilling to lynch purple. Incidentally, his D1 vote was also one of the most scummy: On December 12 2013 03:24 Grackaroni wrote:
Geez Vayne actually slipped lol. Un-lynchable scum record goodbye I will take pleasure in this.
##Unvote: Alakaslam
##Vote: VayneAuthority
I don't think it prevents Slam from being scum. I don't think VA and Grackaroni are scum together, though. And Grackaroni is very scummy on his own rights. Why don't you think they can be scum together? Because he was very eager to jump on the VA bandwagon at the end of D1. Well, they *can*, but it's not very likely that they are IMO.
I suggest you look at LXIII and what Grackaroni did as mafia. He basically bussed his whole team and vice versa.
|
In Golden Sun he also bussed Blazinghand all D1 until the very last moment and got away with that bullshit.
|
Lol, I didn't know that loves to bus so much. Then it wouldn't be weird, I guess. Also.....
On December 10 2013 21:21 Grackaroni wrote:
Purple case is weak. You pretty much just made a case to show that he's clueless and all I had to do was look at his original accusation to find that out.
This doesn't look very good after purple's flip.
|
I need to look at that too in more detail but i found that very weird since afaik everyone else who elaborated on that matter found purple suspicious of what i said.
|
So Basically where I'm at after doing a lot of filter analysis is that
Vayne
Alakaslam
Grack
All look terrible with the purp flip and should be seriously considered as lynch candidates
LSB and Xigxag look better.
Xatalos is likely 3rd party.
still need to read artanis
As for others, Kush is town, Coag is ....
|
Where do you get that I'd be SK...?
|
Sidesprang looks better also
|
On December 15 2013 23:33 Xatalos wrote:
Where do you get that I'd be SK...?
Basically you have sheeped me a lot.
You talk a lot but are more likely to discuss things when lead/promtped. You have basically sheeped the strong townies all game.
You have made good points etc. but not really seemed ultra invested in the outcome of lynches hence the sheeping of one or two townies most of the game.
You aren't scummy but you are active and not townie.
Basically it is really obvious.
|
On December 15 2013 23:38 Plutarch wrote:Basically you have sheeped me a lot. You talk a lot but are more likely to discuss things when lead/promtped. You have basically sheeped the strong townies all game. You have made good points etc. but not really seemed ultra invested in the outcome of lynches hence the sheeping of one or two townies most of the game. You aren't scummy but you are active and not townie. Basically it is really obvious.
Well, obviously I disagree... Do you think that my heavy pressure during D1 or individual pushes on several players (Artanis, Corazon...) are indicative of sheeping / not being that invested in who gets lynched?
|
On December 15 2013 23:46 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 23:38 Plutarch wrote:On December 15 2013 23:33 Xatalos wrote:
Where do you get that I'd be SK...? Basically you have sheeped me a lot. You talk a lot but are more likely to discuss things when lead/promtped. You have basically sheeped the strong townies all game. You have made good points etc. but not really seemed ultra invested in the outcome of lynches hence the sheeping of one or two townies most of the game. You aren't scummy but you are active and not townie. Basically it is really obvious. Well, obviously I disagree... Do you think that my heavy pressure during D1 or individual pushes on several players (Artanis, Corazon...) are indicative of sheeping / not being that invested in who gets lynched?
Well that is like my whole point. You went through the motions and stuff with pressure and cases but at the end of the day you sheeped like crazy.
Like it is so obvious to me that I'm not even calling you mafia. I am calling you SK and I am very very sure.
|
Personally I think LSB might be SK. He's been like... the player least invested in who gets lynched at all......
|
On December 15 2013 23:51 Xatalos wrote:
Personally I think LSB might be SK. He's been like... the player least invested in who gets lynched at all......
He doesn't seem invested in the game. Period.
You are Very invested in the game. But not in who dies. All you have done is sheep when push comes to shove. And that is why you are SK.
|
yeah :LSB for sk. Xatalos is scum. Hapa your list sucks imo. I am liek a prophet heed my words as you wrongly convince people to lynch down your list.
|
On December 15 2013 23:55 kushm4sta wrote:
yeah :LSB for sk. Xatalos is scum. Hapa your list sucks imo. I am liek a prophet heed my words as you wrongly convince people to lynch down your list.
No offense Kush but I trust my reads and the sheer amount of work I put into them over yours.
|
therea re only 3 scum left right?
(JarJarDrinks)
Xatalos
Alakaslam
(xigxag)
then lsb for sk
|
On December 15 2013 23:51 Plutarch wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2013 23:46 Xatalos wrote:On December 15 2013 23:38 Plutarch wrote:On December 15 2013 23:33 Xatalos wrote:
Where do you get that I'd be SK...? Basically you have sheeped me a lot. You talk a lot but are more likely to discuss things when lead/promtped. You have basically sheeped the strong townies all game. You have made good points etc. but not really seemed ultra invested in the outcome of lynches hence the sheeping of one or two townies most of the game. You aren't scummy but you are active and not townie. Basically it is really obvious. Well, obviously I disagree... Do you think that my heavy pressure during D1 or individual pushes on several players (Artanis, Corazon...) are indicative of sheeping / not being that invested in who gets lynched? Well that is like my whole point. You went through the motions and stuff with pressure and cases but at the end of the day you sheeped like crazy. Like it is so obvious to me that I'm not even calling you mafia. I am calling you SK and I am very very sure.
I'm not sure which game you played in with me, but usually I like to lynch together with my strong town reads if that's an option. Like in GoT Mafia, I sheeped Clarity a lot since I was 99% certain he was town. And iamperfection. If you're one of them then (LOL) you should at least know that I'm not the often super confident in my reads and I like to collaborate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
